信息系统采用模型的比较研究

doi:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2005.12.04

现代图书情报技术

2005, Vol. 21

Issue (12): 17-21 https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2005.12.04

数字图书馆

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

信息系统采用模型的比较研究

王玮

（香港理工大学工商管理学院管理及市场学系香港）

User Acceptance of Information Systems: A Comparison of Three Theoretical Models

Wang Wei

(Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business, The HongKong Polytechnic University, HongKong, China)

摘要
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文:
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

信息系统采用是信息系统研究领域中一个极为重要的话题。其研究主要集中在认知行为模型的探讨方面，试图寻求一种理想的模型来解释人们为什么接受新的系统或技术。本文详细论述了三种常用的模型——理性行为理论、技术接受模型和计划行为理论，并对这三种模型进行了比较，在此基础上指出了未来研究的发展方向。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

关键词 ：信息系统采纳, 信息系统接受, 信息系统研究

Abstract：

User acceptance is an important issue in Information System (IS) research field. Previous research primarily focused on cognitive behavioral models and tried to explain and predict IS usage better. This study introduces and compares three popular models that predict an individual’s intention to use an IS: the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Based on the comparison, this study suggests the direction of the future research.

Key words： Information system adoption Information system acceptance Information system research

收稿日期: 2005-08-12 出版日期: 2005-12-25

F406.3

通讯作者: 王玮 E-mail: wang.wei@polyu.edu.hk

作者简介: 王玮

引用本文:

王玮. 信息系统采用模型的比较研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005, 21(12): 17-21.
Wang Wei. User Acceptance of Information Systems: A Comparison of Three Theoretical Models. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2005, 21(12): 17-21.

链接本文:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2005.12.04 或 https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2005/V21/I12/17

1Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction of Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975
2Davis F D, Bagozzi R P, and Warshaw P R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science; 1989, 35(8): 982-1003
3Limayem M, ，Hirt S G. Force of Habit and Information Systems Usage: Theory and Initial Validation. Journal of the Association of Information Systems， 2003, 4: 65-97
4Davis F D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986
5Vroom V H. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964
6Zmud R W. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past. Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, 2000
7Ajzen I, and Madden T J. Prediction of Goal Directed Behaviors: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology， 1986, 22: 453-474
8Kuhl J, and Beckmann J. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer Verlag, 1985
9Pratkanis A R, Breckler S J, and Greenwald A G. Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989
10Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes， 1991, 50: 179-211
11Mathieson K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research， 1991, 2(3): 173-191
12Davis F D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly， 1989, 13: 318-339
13Taylor S, and Todd P. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research， 1995, 6(2):144-176
14Taylor S, and Todd P. Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS Quarterly， 1995, 19(4):561-570
15Mathieson K, Peacock E., and Chin W W. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems， 2001, 32(3):86-112

No related articles found!

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed