DINI 机构仓储库认证*

doi:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2008.03.17

现代图书情报技术

2008, Vol. 24

Issue (3): 95-102 https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2008.03.17

海外动向

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

DINI 机构仓储库认证*

Susanne Dobratz¹Frank Scholze²吴霞(译)

¹（Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany）
²（Stuttgart University Library, Stuttgart, Germany）

DINI Institutional Repository Certification and Beyond

Susanne Dobratz¹Frank Scholze²Wu Xia(Compile)

¹（Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany）
²（Stuttgart University Library, Stuttgart, Germany）

摘要
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF (402 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

目的——旨在概述机构仓储库的认证技术以支持德国开放存取活动，同时还描述了德国网络信息初始化计划（DINI）开展的“DINI认证2006”活动。
设计方法——DINI对文献和出版物仓库的认证向潜在用户表明，该仓储的运行质量是有所保证的，同时使其区别于一般机构的网络服务。本认证也能够被用作支持开放获取的一个工具。
结果—— 仓储库认证技术虽然不会成为全球性学术信息实现开放获取的主要影响因素，但它能够促进机构仓储库的推广，并提高机构仓储库服务的知名度。
研究局限性/意义——DINI认证作为一种“软性”认证，关注的是数字仓储库的互操作性，这是一种正在流行的有指导意义的观点。但是它并不能为可信赖的数字资源长期保存系统提供详尽的审计工具。
实践意义——依据特定的组织及技术标准，“DINI针对文档及出版物仓储的认证”推进了德国机构仓储库的发展，同时也为世界范围内数字仓储库的互操作性做出了贡献。
原创性/价值——本文描述了德国采用的一个独特方法，同时也适用于其他国家及组织。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴霞(译)

关键词 ：数字存储, 档案管理, 德国

Abstract：

Purpose:Overview on certification of institutional repositories as a means to support Open Access in Germany and description of the DINI Certificate 2006 developed by DINI, the German Initiative for Networked Information.
Design/methodology/approach: The DINI Certificate for Document and Publication Repositories shows potential users and authores of digital documents that a certain level of quality in operating the repository is guaranteed and that this distinguishes it from commun insitutional Web servers.The Certificate can also be used as an instrument to support Open Access.
Findings: Repository certification will not be the main factor in achieving open access to academic information globally, but it can support the spread of institutional repositories and enhance visibility of the “Institutional Repository”-service.
Research limitations/implications: The DINI Certificate as a “soft” certificate aims towards interpoperability of digital repositories,the coaching idea prevails.It does not provide an exhaustive auditing tool for trusted digital long term preservation archives.
Practical implications: The DINI Certificate for Document and Publication Repositories pushed the development of institutional repositories in Germany according to certain organisational and technical standards and contributes to the interoperability amongst digital repositories worldwide.
Originality/value: This paper describes anique approach that has been implemented in Germany and could be transferred to other countries and communities.

Key words： Digital storage Archives management Germany

出版日期: 2008-03-25

G25

通讯作者: Susanne Dobratz E-mail: dobratz@cms.hu-berlin.de

作者简介: Susanne Dobratz,Frank Scholze

引用本文:

Susanne Dobratz,Frank Scholze, 吴霞(译). DINI 机构仓储库认证*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2008, 24(3): 95-102.
Susanne Dobratz,Frank Scholze,Wu Xia(Compile). DINI Institutional Repository Certification and Beyond. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2008, 24(3): 95-102.

链接本文:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2008.03.17 或 https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2008/V24/I3/95

［1］ Ball, P. (2006), “Prestige is factored into journal ratings: ‘Y-factor’ measures quality as well as quantity of citations”, Nature, Vol. 439 No. 7078, pp. 770-1.
［2］ Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H.S.J.A. and Luce, R. (2005), “Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 1419-40.
［3］ Brody, T. (2006), “Citation impact of open access articles vs. articles available only through subscription (‘toll-access’)”, ongoing study, available at: www.citebase.org/isi_study/(accessed 27 April 2006).
［4］ Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2002), “Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS)”, Blue Book, available at: http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf (accessed 24 April 2006).
［5］ Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) (2005), “COUNTER code of practice for journals and databases: release 2”, available at: www.projectcounter.org/code_practice.html (accessed 27 April 2006).
［6］ Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources (COUNTER) (2006), “COUNTER code of practice for books and reference works release 1”, available at: www.projectcounter.org/code_practice.html (accessed 27 April 2006).
［7］ Dale, R.L. (2005), “Making certification real: developing methodology for evaluating repository trustworthiness”, RLG DigiNews, Vol. 9 No. 5, available at: www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID 20793#article2 (accessed 26 April 2006).
［8］ Die Deutsche Bibliothek (2006), “LMER: long-term preservation metadata for electronic resources”, available at: www.ddb.de/standards/pdf/lmer12_e.pdf (accessed 26 April 2006).
［9］ DINI Electronic Publishing Working Group (2003), “DINI certificate for document and publication repositories”, available at: www.dini.de/documents/Zertifikat-en.pdf (accessed 27 April 2006).
［10］ DINI Electronic Publishing Working Group (2005), “Electronic publishing in higher education: how to design OAI interfaces – recommendations”, 2nd edition, available at: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/dini-schriften/ 2005-2-de2/PDF/2-de2.pdf (accessed 27 April 2006).
［11］ DINI Electronic Publishing Working Group (2006), “DINI certificate for document and publication repositories”, in press.
［12］ Dobratz, S. and Schoger, A. (2005), “Digital repository certification: a report from Germany”, RLGDigiNews, Vol. 9 No. 5, available at: www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID20793#article3(accessed 26 April 2006).
［13］ Dobratz, S., Neuroth, H., Schoger, A. and Strathmann, S. (2005), “nestor – Entwicklungsstand des Kompetenznetzwerks zur Langzeitarchivierung digitaler Ressourcen in Deutschland”, ZfBB – Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, Vol. 52 Nos 3/4, pp. 151-62.
［14］ Gue?deon, J.-C. (2004), “The ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching”, Serials Review, Vol. 30 No. 4.
［15］ Hardy, R., Oppenheim, C., Brody, T. and Hitchcock, S. (2005), “Open access citation information”, available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/11536/ (accessed 27 April 2006).
［16］ Harnad, S. (2001), “The self-archiving initiative”, Nature, Vol. 410 No. 6832, pp. 1024-5.Harnad, S. (2005),
［17］ “Fast-forward on the green road to open access: the case against mixing up green and gold”, Ariadne, No. 42, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue42/harnad/(accessed 26 April 2006).
［18］ Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Stamerjohanns, H. and Hilf, E. (2004), “The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access”, Serials Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 310-4.
［19］ International Standardisation Organisation (ISO) (2003), “Information and documentation – the Dublin Core metadata element set ANSI/NISO Z39.85-20012 or ISO 15836:2003”, available at: www.niso.org/international/SC4/n515.pdf (accessed 27 April 2006).
［20］ Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H. and Nelson, M.W.S. (2002), “The open archives protocol for metadata harvesting”, available at: www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html (accessed 27 April 2006).
［21］ Lawrence, S. (2001), “Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact”, Nature,Vol. 411 No. 6837, p. 521.
［22］ Lossau, N. (2006), “Digital repository infrastructure vision for European research”, paper presented at the International Workshop on Institutional Repositories and Enhanced and Alternative Metrics of Publication Impact, Humboldt University, Berlin, 20-21 February 2006, available at: www.dini.de/veranstaltung/workshop/oaimpact/presentations/lossau.ppt (accessed 27 April 2006).
［23］ METS Editorial Board (2005), “METS: metadata encoding and transmission standard: schema and documentation”, available at: www.loc.gov/standards/mets/ (accessed 27 April 2006).
［24］ Mittler, E. and Schulz, M. (2004), “ProPrint world-wide print-on-demand services for study and research”, Library Hi Tech, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 227-30.
［25］ PREMIS Working Group (2005), “Data dictionary for preservation metadata”, available at: www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/premis-final.pdf (accessed 27 April 2006).
［26］ RLG/NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification (2005), Audit Checklist for Certifying Digital Repositories, RLG/NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification, Mountain View, CA.RLG Working Group on Digital Archive Attributes (2002), Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities, RLG, OCLC, Mountain View, CA, available at: www.rlg.org/legacy/longterm/repositories.pdf (accessed 27 April 2006).
［27］ Ross, S. and McHugh, A. (2005), “Audit and certification of digital repositories: creating a mandate for the Digital Curation Centre (DCC)”, RLG DigiNews, Vol. 9 No. 5, available at: www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID20793 #article3 (accessed 26 April 2006).
［28］ Schirmbacher, P. (2005), “Die neue Kultur des elektronischen Publizierens”, in Nielsen, E.K., Saur, K.G. and Ceynowa, K. (Eds), Die innovative Bibliothek, K.G. Saur, Munich, pp. 107-20.
［29］ Scholze, F. and Stephan, W. (2002), “Electronic publishing”, in Leonhard, J.-F. (Ed.), Handbu¨ cher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Vol. 15, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 2634-48.
［30］ Schroeder, K. (2003), “Persistent Identifiers im Kontext von Metadaten”, ZfBB – Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliografie, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 205-9.

[1]	张梦霞,顾立平. 数据监管的政策研究综述^*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(1): 3-10.
[2]	郑菲, 陈朝晖, 文奕, 胡正银, 任波, 肖仙桃, 李珑. 中国科学院科技查新检索服务平台的设计与实践应用[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2010, 26(11): 79-83.
[3]	李利,李玮. EDM档案管理系统的设计与开发[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2002, 18(3): 35-37.
[4]	于丽娟. 电子文件及其对档案管理的冲击[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 1999, 15(4): 18-21.
[5]	刘伟晏,马淑桂. 多途径引导叠加式档案联机检索系统的设计与实现[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 1991, 7(3): 30-35.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed