The Correction of Anchoring Effect on Information Screening Based on Concept Lattice in Virtual Community
Tian Yilin1,2, Teng Guangqing1,3, Dong Lili4, Zhang Fan5
1. School of International Business Administration, Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou 310012, China;
2. School of Management, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
3. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China;
4. School of Music, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China;
5. Library of Zhejiang International Studies University, Hangzhou 310012, China
Abstract:Based on concept lattice theory, this article constructs concept lattice of information and its characteristics in virtual community by formal concept analysis. Conceptual clustering and association rule mining assists screening and recommending “analogical anchors” which is higher in accessibility, and the anchoring effect of former anchor information is intervened. From a combination of epistemological and Ontological perspective, try to explore the correction methods of anchoring effect on information screening in virtual community.
田依林, 滕广青, 董立丽, 张凡. 基于概念格的虚拟社区信息甄别中锚定效应的矫正[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2011, 27(4): 24-28.
Tian Yilin, Teng Guangqing, Dong Lili, Zhang Fan. The Correction of Anchoring Effect on Information Screening Based on Concept Lattice in Virtual Community. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011, 27(4): 24-28.
[1] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases[J]. Science, 1974, 185(4157):1124-1131.[2] Graf A, Stiglbauer K. First Impression in Electronic Negotiations Counts?!- An Empirical Study on Anchoring Effects and Trust Building[EB/OL]. [2011-02-03]. http://info.wlu.ca/~wwwmath/faculty/kilgour/gdn/main.pdf#page=89.[3] Strack F, Mussweiler T. Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(3):437-446.[4] Mussweiler T. Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequences[J]. Psychological Review, 2003, 110(3):472-489.[5] Englich B. When Knowledge Matters-differential Effects of Available Knowledge in Standard and Basic Anchoring Tasks[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008,38(5):896-904.[6] Kaustia M, Alho E, Puttonen V. How Much Does Expertise Reduce Behavioral Biases? The Case of Anchoring Effects in Stock Return Estimates[J]. Financial Management, 2008, 37(3):391-412.[7] Paritosh P K, Klenk M E. Cognitive Processes in Quantitative Estimation: Analogical Anchors and Causal Adjustment[EB/OL]. [2011-02-03]. http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2006/docs/p1926.pdf.[8] Wille R. Restructuring Lattice Theory: An Approach Based on Hierarchies of Concept[C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009:314-339.[9] Ganter B, Wille R. Applied Lattice Theory: Formal Concept Analysis[EB/OL]. [2010-11-07]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.42.9907&rep=rep1&type=pdf.[10] Stumme G. Formal Concept Analysis on Its Way from Mathematics to Computer Science[C]. In:Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces. London: Springer-Verlag, 2002:2-19.