Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2012, Vol. 28 Issue (2): 1-9     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.02.01
  数字图书馆 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
面向在线群体研讨的言语行为分类体系设计框架研究
李嘉1,2, 张朋柱2, 李欣苗3
1. 华东理工大学商学院 上海 200237;
2. 上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院 上海 200052;
3. 上海财经大学信息管理与工程学院 上海 200433
A Design Framework for Speech Act Taxonomy of Online Group Discussion
Li Jia1,2, Zhang Pengzhu2, Li Xinmiao3
1. School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. Antai College of Economics & Management, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200052, China;
3. School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China
全文: PDF (598 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 缺乏言语行为分类体系及其构造方法论,已经成为国内言语行为自动化分析研究的一个主要障碍。以信息系统设计理论为指导,提出言语行为分类体系的设计需求,并以流程为人造物的观点,研究设计出一个包含5个关键步骤的迭代流程来满足设计需求。进一步以该方法论为指导,以E-learning环境语料为案例,提出一个适合在线问答研讨的言语行为分类体系,并验证该体系的辨别能力和泛化能力。E-learning语料环境的应用结果表明,该言语行为分类体系构造方法论具有较好的效果。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
李嘉
张朋柱
李欣苗
关键词 言语行为分类体系在线研讨辨别能力泛化能力    
Abstract:The lacking of studies on speech act analysis in Chinese context can be attributed to the short of speech act taxonomies.This research follows the paradigm of design science by proposing the design requirement for speech act taxonomy, and develops an iterative process that contains five steps to satisfy the design requirement. Further, the authors develop speech act taxonomy for E-learning environment based on the proposed methodology, and evaluate its discernment and generalization ability. The successful application in E-learning environment validates the effectiveness of proposed design framework for speech act taxonomy.
Key wordsSpeech act    Taxonomy    Online discussion    Discernment ability    Generalization ability
收稿日期: 2012-01-11      出版日期: 2012-03-23
: 

TP391.1

 
基金资助:

本文系国家自然科学基金青年项目“面向在线群体研讨的自动化辅助方法研究”(项目编号:71001038)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“群体研讨文本的自动摘要与研讨态势可视化研究”(项目编号:WN1022003)和国家自然科学基金青年项目“面向任务的开放式团队创新协同理论与方法研究”(项目编号:71001059)的研究成果之一。

引用本文:   
李嘉, 张朋柱, 李欣苗. 面向在线群体研讨的言语行为分类体系设计框架研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, 28(2): 1-9.
Li Jia, Zhang Pengzhu, Li Xinmiao. A Design Framework for Speech Act Taxonomy of Online Group Discussion. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2012, 28(2): 1-9.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.02.01      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2012/V28/I2/1
[1] Austin J L. How to Do Things with Words [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.

[2] Prasad R, Walker M. Training a Dialogue Act Tagger for Human-Human and Human-Computer Travel Dialogues [C]. In:Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue,Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.2002.

[3] Fernandez R, Ginzburg J, Lappin S. Using Machine Learning for Non-sentential Utterance Classification [C]. In:Proceedings of the 6th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue,Lisbon, Portugal.2005.

[4] Lendvai P, van den Bosch A, Krahmer E. Machine Learning for Shallow Interpretation of User Utterances in Spoken Dialogue Systems [C].In:Proceedings of the EACL-03 Workshop on Dialogue Systems: Interaction, Adaptation and Styles of Management,Budapest, Hungary.2003.

[5] Allen J, Core M. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers [OL].[2012-01-12]. http://www.cis.udel.edu/~carberry/CIS-885/Papers/Allen-DAMSL-manual.pdf.

[6] Levin L, Ries K, Thyme-Gobbel A, et al. Tagging of Speech Acts and Dialogue Games in Spanish Call Home [C]. In:Proceedings of the ACL Workshop "Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging", Somerset, NJ,USA. 1998.

[7] Reithinger N, Maier E. Utilizing Statistical Dialogue Act Processing in Verbmobil [C]. In:Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1995.

[8] Jurafsky D, Shriberg E, Biasca D. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annotation Coders Manual [OL]. [2012-01-12].http://www.psych.colorado.edu/ics/techpubs/pdf/97-02-part1.pdf.

[9] Godfrey J J, Holliman E C, McDaniel J. SWITCHBOARD: Telephone Speech Corpus for Research and Development [C]. In:Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, San Francisco, CA, USA.1992.

[10] Gerassimenko O, Hennoste T, Koit M,et al. Annotated Dialogue Corpus as a Language Resource: An Experience of Building the Estonian Dialogue Corpus [C]. In:Proceedings of the 1st Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies,Riga, Latvia.2004.

[11] Fukada T, Koll D, Waibel A, et al. Probabilistic Dialogue Act Extraction for Concept Based Multilingual Translation Systems [C]. In:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-1998),Sydney, Australia.1998.

[12] Sung C L, Day M Y, Yen H C, et al. A Template Alignment Algorithm for Question Classification [C]. In:Proceeding of IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics.2008.

[13] 文勖, 张宇, 刘挺, 等. 基于句法结构分析的中文问题分类 [J]. 中文信息学报 , 2006, 20(2): 33-39.(Wen Xu, Zhang Yu, Liu Ting, et al. Syntactic Structure Parsing Based Chinese Question Classification [J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2006, 20(2): 33-39.)

[14] Hevner A R, March S T, Park J, et al. Design Science in Information Systems Research [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(1): 75-105.

[15] Walls J G, Widmeyer G R, El-Sawy O A. Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS [J]. Information Systems Research, 1992, 3(1): 36-59.

[16] Traum D R. Speech Acts for Dialogue Agents[A]//Wooldridge M J, Rao A.Foundations and Theories of Rational Agents[M].Kluwer Academic Publishers,1999:173-206.

[17] Uebersax J S. Diversity of Decision-making Models and the Measurement of Interrater Agreement [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1987, 101(1): 140.

[18] Cohen J. Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70(4): 213.

[19] Shrout P E, Fleiss J L. Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability [J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86(2): 420.

[20] Lin L I. A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility [J]. Biometrics, 1989, 45(1): 255.

[21] Everitt B S. Making Sense of Statistics in Psychology: A Second-level Course [M]. Oxford University Press, 1996.

[22] Kim J, Shaw E, Ravi S, et al. Scaffolding On-Line Discussions with Past Discussions: An Analysis and Pilot Study of PedaBot [C]. In:Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems(ITS 2008),Montreal, Canada.Springer, 2008.

[23] Kim S N, Wang L, Baldwin T. Tagging and Linking Web Forum Posts [C]. In:Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning,Uppsala, Sweden.Association for Computational Linguistics Press, 2010.

[24] Joty S, Carenini G, Lin C Y. Unsupervised Modeling of Dialog Acts in Asynchronous Conversations [C]. In:Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.2011.

[25] Samuel K, Carberry S, Vijay-Shanker K. Dialogue Act Tagging with Transformation-based Learning [C]. In:Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.1998.
[1] 胡正银, 方曙, 文奕, 张娴, 梁田. 面向TRIZ的专利自动分类研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(1): 66-74.
[2] 唐晓波, 房小可. 微博中文本特征质量对检索效果的影响[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(6): 79-86.
[3] 刘华 . 超大规模分类语料库的构建[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 22(1): 71-73.
[4] 汪华明. 我国情报文献工作标准化理论探讨及政策研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 1995, 11(4): 16-18.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn