Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2016, Vol. 32 Issue (10): 25-32     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2016.10.03
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
评价知识本体研究与规则实现*
周红照(),侯敏,滕永林
中国传媒大学国家语言资源监测与研究有声媒体中心 北京 100024
Evaluation Ontology Research and Rule Implementation
Zhou Hongzhao(),Hou Min,Teng Yonglin
Broadcast Media Language Branch, National Language Resources Monitoring and Research Center, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China
全文: PDF (535 KB)   HTML ( 55
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

目的】建立一套集评价句识别、倾向性判定、评价对象抽取于一体的评价分析智能系统。【方法】对中文评价知识本体进行研究, 基于本体研究成果建立评价分析规则库, 实现基于词典规则的评价分析智能系统CUCsas。【结果】以第7届中文倾向性分析评测(COAE2015)发布的50 000篇微博(共计133 201个句子)为实验数据, 系统评价句识别及倾向性判定的正确率、召回率和F值分别为0.83、0.70、0.76, 而评价对象抽取的结果较差。【局限】系统尚缺少评价新词发现和领域词典自动构建模块。【结论】初步建立起一套实用化的评价分析智能系统。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
周红照
侯敏
滕永林
关键词 评价知识本体评价句识别倾向性判定规则方法评价对象抽取    
Abstract

[Objective] This study aims to build an evaluation analysis intelligent system consisting of evaluation sentences recognition, polarity identification and evaluation objects extraction. [Methods] We first researched Chinese evaluation Ontology. Then, established an evaluation analysis rule base based on the results of Ontology research. Finally, programmed into evaluation analysis intelligent system CUCsas. [Results] Taking 50,000 weibo messages (a total of 133,201 sentences) released by the 7th Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation Conference (COAE2015) as the experimental data, the precision, recall and F rates of evaluation sentences recognition and polarity identification of CUCsas were 0.83, 0.70 and 0.76 respectively, but the experimental result of evaluation objects extraction was poor. [Limitations] The system was short of new evaluation factors discovery and domain lexicons automatic construction modules. [Conclusions] A practical evaluation analysis intelligent system was basically built.

Key wordsEvaluation ontology    Evaluation sentences recognition    Polarity identification    Rule method    Evaluation objects extraction
收稿日期: 2016-05-16      出版日期: 2016-11-23
基金资助:*本文系国家语言资源监测与研究中心项目“中文情感倾向本体研究与规则实现”(项目编号: YZYS15-05)的研究成果之一
引用本文:   
周红照,侯敏,滕永林. 评价知识本体研究与规则实现*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(10): 25-32.
Zhou Hongzhao,Hou Min,Teng Yonglin. Evaluation Ontology Research and Rule Implementation. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2016, 32(10): 25-32.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2016.10.03      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2016/V32/I10/25
[1] 张清亮, 徐健. 网络情感词自动识别方法研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2011(10): 24-28.
[1] (Zhang Qingliang, Xu Jian.Research on Automatic Extraction of Web Sentiment Words[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011(10): 24-28.)
[2] 丁晟春, 李红梅. 基于SVM的中文微博观点倾向性识别[C]. 见: 第7届中文倾向性分析评测会议(COAE2015)论文集.2015: 200-207.
[2] (Ding Shengchun, Li Hongmei.Chinese Micro-blogging Opinion Recognition Based on SVM Model [C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation Conference. 2015: 200-207.)
[3] 童毅轩, 张光磊. 基于集成学习的中文微博情感分类研究[C]. 见: 第7届中文倾向性分析评测会议(COAE2015)论文集.2015: 55-61.
[3] (Tong Yixuan, Zhang Guanglei.Study of Chinese Microblog Sentiment Classification Based on Ensemble Learning [C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation Conference. 2015: 55-61.)
[4] 姜姗姗, 张佳师. 中文评论细粒度情感分析[C]. 见: 第7届中文倾向性分析评测会议(COAE2015)论文集. 2015: 70-78.
[4] (Jiang Shanshan, Zhang Jiashi.Fine-Grained Sentiment Analysis on Chinese Reviews [C]. In: Proceedings of the 7th Chinese Opinion Analysis Evaluation Conference. 2015: 70-78.)
[5] 王昌厚, 王菲. 使用基于模式的Bootstrapping方法抽取情感词[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(1): 127-129.
[5] (Wang Changhou, Wang Fei.Extracting Sentiment Words Using Pattern Based Bootstrapping Method[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 50(1): 127-129.)
[6] 侯敏, 滕永林, 陈毓麒. 评价短语的倾向性分析研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2013, 27(6): 103-109.
[6] (Hou Min, Teng Yonglin, Chen Yuqi.Research on Orientation Analysis of Opinion Phrases[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2013, 27(6): 103-109.)
[7] 周红照, 侯明午, 侯敏, 等. 基于语义分类的比较句识别与比较要素抽取研究[J]. 中文信息学报, 2014, 28(3): 136-141.
[7] (Zhou Hongzhao, Hou Mingwu, Hou Min, et al.Chinese Comparative Sentences Identification and Comparative Elements Extraction Based on Semantic Classification[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2014, 28(3): 136-141.)
[8] 周红照, 侯明午, 颜彭莉, 等. 语义特征在评价对象抽取与极性判定中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 50(1): 93-99.
[8] (Zhou Hongzhao, Hou Mingwu, Yan Pengli, et al.Function of Semantic Features in Opinion Target Extraction and Its Polarity Identification[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2014, 50(1): 93-99.)
[9] 白硕. 关于基于规则方法的反思[J]. 心智与计算, 2012, 6(2): 66-74.
[9] (Bai Shuo.Ruminations on Rule-based Methods[J]. Mind and Computation, 2012, 6(2): 66-74.)
[10] 冯志伟. 从知识本体谈自然语言处理的人文性[J]. 语言文字应用, 2005(4): 100-107.
[10] (Feng Zhiwei.On Humanity Spirit of Natural Language Processing from the Viewpoint of Ontology[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2005(4): 100-107.)
[11] Lyons J.Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 293-342.
[12] Martin J R, White P R R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005: 1-91.
[13] Halliday M A K. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar[M]. Revised by Matthiessen C M I M. The 4th Edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2014: 82-258.
[14] 范晓, 胡裕树. 有关语法研究三个平面的几个问题[J]. 中国语文, 1992(4): 272-278.
[14] (Fan Xiao, Hu Yushu.Some Questions about the Three Planes of Grammar Study[J]. Studies of the Chinese Language, 1992(4): 272-278.)
[15] 周红照. 基于句法语义的评价对象抽取与极性判定研究[D]. 北京: 中国传媒大学, 2014.
[15] (Zhou Hongzhao.Opinion Target Extraction and Its Polarity Identification Based on Syntax and Semantics [D]. Beijing: Communication University of China, 2014.)
[1] 丁晟春,侯琳琳,王颖. 基于电商数据的产品知识图谱构建研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 45-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn