Evaluating Academic Credits of Scientific Research Project Leaders
Huai Mengjiao1, Pan Yuntao2, Yuan Junpeng3()
1Library of Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China 2Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China 3National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
[Objective] This study proposes and examines a system to evaluate the academic credits of scientific project leaders. [Methods] First, we established the scientific credit evaluation system based on 7 experts’ suggestion. Then, we examined this system with 100 leaders of important scientific research projects using Fuzzy Comprehensive Appraised Method. [Results] The proposed method could assess the academic credit of scientific research project leaders effectively. [Limitations] Our new system was relatively simple, and the sample was not comprehensive. [Conclusions] The academic credit evaluation system is practical, and could help the administrators appraise the performance of scientific project leaders.
(The Press Briefing on the Investigation of the Retraction of Academic Journals will be Held in Beijing [EB/OL]. [2017-07-27]. .)
[2]
George S L.Research Misconduct and Data Fraud in Clinical Trials: Prevalence and Causal Factors[J]. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016, 21(1): 15-21.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3
pmid: 26289019
[3]
Fang F C, Steen R G, Casadevall A.Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(42): 17028-17033.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109
(Wang Yafen.On the Definition, Prevention and Administration of Dishonorable Behavior in Scientific Research[J]. R&D Management, 2007, 19(4): 133-137.)
(Fang Yudong, Fang Jikun, Zhang Lili, et al.A Review of the Causes of Academic Misconduct[J]. Chinese University Science & Technology, 2011(11): 15-17.)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2333.2011.11.005
[6]
Van Raan A F J. Advanced Bibliometric Methods as Quantitative Core of Peer Review Based Evaluation and Boresight Exercises[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(3): 400-411.
doi: 10.1007/BF02129602
(Xu Hua.Appraisement Model Design of Science and Technology Credit Based on Scientific Research Personnel[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2009, 30(6): 182-191.)
[8]
Crouhy M, Galai D, Mark R.A Comparative Analysis of Current Credit Risk Models[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2000, 24: 59-117.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00053-9
[9]
Masoud N.Credit Scoring for Billions of Financing Decision[C]//Proceedings of the 20th NAFIPS International Conference. 2001.
(Lv Liangwen, Chen Yushan, Xiong Xiaoman.Study on the Credit Evaluation Index System of Science and Technology Project Leader in Guangdong Province[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2016, 33(20): 122-127.)
[11]
王淑芹. 信用概念疏义[J]. 哲学动态, 2004(3): 16-19.
[11]
(Wang Shuqin.The Concept of the Credit[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2004(3): 16-19.)
[12]
Steneck N H.Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2006, 12(1): 53-74.
doi: 10.1007/PL00022268
pmid: 16501647
(Zhang Li’na.Application of AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in Assessment of Eco-industrial Park [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2006.)