Studying Content Interaction Data with Topic Model and Sentiment Analysis
Xu Hongxia,Yu Qianqian(),Qian Li
National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
[Objective] This paper explores data mining techniques for confrontational opinions from interaction data of online community.[Methods] First, we constructed a new algorithm to analyze emotional confrontations based on sentiment analysis and topic model. Then, we included the characteristics of knowledge, topic, and interaction data to the new model. Finally, we conducted an empirical study on the topic of AlphaGo.[Results] There was significant “Pro-AlphaGo” and “Anti-AlphaGo” confrontations online. The “Pro-AlphaGo” topics included human intelligence, competition and ability. The “Anti-AlphaGo” opinions covered AI companies, products and comprehension abilities.[Limitations] We only examined the proposed model with the topic of AlphaGo.[Conclusions] The proposed method benefits intelligence analysis.
徐红霞,于倩倩,钱力. 基于主题模型和情感分析的话题交互数据观点对抗性分析 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(7): 110-117.
Xu Hongxia,Yu Qianqian,Qian Li. Studying Content Interaction Data with Topic Model and Sentiment Analysis. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 4(7): 110-117.
Jurczyk P, Agichtein E. Discovering Authorities in Question Answer Communities by Using Link Analysis[C] //Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2007: 919-922.
[2]
John B M, Chua A Y K, Goh D H L. What Makes a High-quality User-generated Answer?[J]. IEEE Internet Computing, 2011,15(1):66-71.
[3]
Fu H Y, Wu S H, Oh S H. Evaluating Answer Quality Across Knowledge Domains: Using Textual and Non-textual Features in Social Q&A[C] // Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community. 2015: Article No. 88.
[4]
Agichtein E, Castillo C, Donato D, et al. Finding High-quality Content in Social Media[C] // Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 2008: 183-194.
[5]
Hatzivassiloglou V, McKeown K R. Predicting the Semantic Orientation of Adjectives[C] //Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1997: 174-181.
( Cheng Ya’nan, Wang Yu. Research on Ranking Q&A Community Answers Based on Semantic Emotional and Similarity[J]. Information Science, 2018,36(8):72-76, 83.)
( Jiang Wen, Xu Xin, Wu Gaofeng. Online Q&A Community Automatically Information Quality Evaluation with Sentiment Feature[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015,59(4):100-105.)
[8]
刘渊杰. 社区问答系统最佳回答机制的研究[D]. 上海:上海交通大学, 2010.
[8]
( Liu Yuanjie. Study on Best Answer Policies in Community-based Question Answering Services[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai JiaoTong University, 2010.)
[9]
邹杰. 面向编程问答网站的主题挖掘及其应用研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2017.
[9]
( Zou Jie. Research on Topic Mining on Programming Question Answering Sites and Its Application[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017.)
( Zhan Xuegang, Wang Xiao. LDA-based Q&A Websites Question Label Extraction Algorithm[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2016,33(4):95-98.)
[11]
倪兴良. 问答系统中的短文本聚类研究与应用[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2011.
[11]
( Ni Xingliang. Short Text Clustering Research and Application in Q&A System[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2011.)
[12]
Madria S K, Bhowmick S S, Ng W K, et al. Research Issues in Web Data Mining[C] // Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. 1999: 303-312.
[13]
Ortigosa-Hernández J, Rodríguez J D, Alzate L, et al. Approaching Sentiment Analysis by Using Semi-supervised Learning of Multi-dimensional Classifiers[J]. Neurocomputing, 2012,92(3):98-115.
[14]
Socher R, Pennington J, Huang E H, et al. Semi-supervised Recursive Autoencoders for Predicting Sentiment Distributions[C] //Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2011: 151-161.
