[Objective] This research establishes an assessment mechanism for digital library’s micro-services from the perspectives of user, information and technology. It provides the theoretical foundation and criteria for us to improve the micro-services. [Methods] First, we proposed a Group AHP method based on clustering technique to construct a judgment matrix to evaluate the target system. Second, conducted an empirical analysis of 10 representative digital libraries from China and abroad with the fuzzy membership degree function. [Results] The proposed mechanism was practical and could help us improve the micro-services of digital libraries. [Limitations] The assessment criteria should be further examined under the specific circumstances facing the digital libraries. The sample size of the empirical analysis is small, thus, the conclusion might be limited and subjective. [Conclusions] This paper provides new research perspectives for the digital library micro-services, as well as methods to improve their quality and efficiency.
刘健,毕强,马卓. 数字图书馆微服务评价指标体系构建及实证研究*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(5): 22-29.
Liu Jian,Bi Qiang,Ma Zhuo. Assessment of Digital Library’s Micro-services: An Empirical Study. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2016, 32(5): 22-29.
(Yang Yanni, Ming Junren.Present Situation and Optimization of Micro Service in University Libraries[J]. Researches in Library Science, 2015(19): 8-14, 30.)
Borsje S.How We Build Microservices at Karma [EB/OL]. [2015-06-15].https://blog.yourkarma.com/building-microservices-at-karma.
[7]
Asimakopoulou E, Sotiriadis S, Bessis N, et al.Centralized Micro-clouds: An Infrastructure for Service Distribution in Collaborative Smart Devices[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 21: 83-90.
[8]
申晓娟. 国家图书馆数字资源建设与共享[J].数字与缩微影像, 2009(4): 1-5.
[8]
(Shen Xiaojuan.Construction and Shared of Digital Resources of National Library[J]. Digital & Micrographic Imaging, 2009(4): 1-5.)
(Zhai Xiaojuan, Nie Na.Construction of Catalog on Demand Model Based on Micro-Service Re-grouping[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2010(10): 23-27.)
[10]
Cullen R.Perspectives on User Satisfaction Surveys[J]. Library Trends, 2001, 49(4): 662-686.
[11]
Lincoln Y S.Insights into Library Services and Users from Qualitative Research[J]. Library & Information Science Rearch, 2002, 24(1): 3-16.
(Liang Menghua.Construction and Empirical Test About Digital Library Evaluation Model Oriented to Users’ Interaction[J]. Library and Information Service, 2012, 56(7): 72-78.)
(Li He, Shen Wang, Guo Jia, et al.A Review on Overseas Evaluation of Digital Library[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2010, 36(6): 88-94.)
[14]
Fagan J C.The Dimensions of Library Service Quality: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the LibQUAL Plus Instrument[J]. Library & Information Science Research, 2014, 36(1): 36-48.
[15]
Evandrino G B, Alberto H F L. A Digital Library Environment for Integrating, Disseminating and Exploring Ecological Data[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2008, 4(3): 295-308.
[16]
Lankes R D, Gross M, McClure C R. Cost, Statistics, Measures, and Standards for Digital Reference Services : A Preliminary View[J].Library Trends, 2003, 51(3): 401-413.
(Liu Bing, Lu Shuang.Information Quality Comprehensive Evaluation System Based on User Experience[J]. Library and Information Service, 2011, 55(22): 56-59.)
[19]
Ngai E.Selection of Web Sites for Online Advertising Using the AHP[J]. Information & Management, 2003, 40(4): 233-242.
(Xia Ping, Wang Kai, Li Ningxiu, et al.Improvement of Index Weight in Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2011, 28(2): 151-157.)
(Yan Jun, Zeng Zhaoqiang, Sun Qiuye, et al.A Distributed Wind Farms Siting Method Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Electric Power, 2015, 48(4): 151-155.)