[Objective] This paper evaluates academic journals with the help of their source indexes and impact indicators. [Methods] We collected data from the Journal Citation Report (JCR) in 2015 for Mathematics ones, and then conducted canonical correlation analysis with the data. [Results] Firstly, eigenfactor was the major indicator of the influence of journals. Secondly, the journal source indexes and impact indicators were significantly correlated with each other. Thirdly, total citation numbers, citation half-life, journal impact factors and journal impact factor percentile had higher contribution to the eigenfactor. Fourthly, impact indicators contain more information than the source indexes. [Limitations] More research is needed to investigate the relationship between the source indexes and impact indicators. [Conclusions] The impact indicators are more important than the source indexes. We need to increase the eigenfactor score and the weight of normalized eigenfactor. We should also decrease the weights of impact factor without journal self citations, 5-year impact factor and immediacy index.
俞立平. 来源指标与被引指标关系及对期刊评价的影响*——以JCR数学期刊为例[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 94-100.
Yu Liping. New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals: Case Study of Mathematics Journals. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2016, 32(7-8): 94-100.
Hirsch J E.An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
[2]
Bergstrom C T, West J D, Wiseman M A.The Eigenfactor Metrics[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2008, 28(45): 11433-11434.
(Yu Liping, Pan Yuntao, Wu Yishan.Study on Source Indexes and Influence of the Academic Journal Evaluation[J]. Science Research Management, 2010, 31(6): 173-179.)
[4]
Tsay M Y, Chen Y L.Journals of General & Internal Medicine and Surgery: An Analysis and Comparison of Citation[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 64(1): 17-30.
[5]
Sangam S L.Obsolescence of Literature in the Field of Psychology[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 44(1): 33-46.
(Zhou Zhizhong.Half-life Period Analysis of Library and Information Journals[J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities: Humanities and Social Science, 2013(9): 233-240.)
(Huang Mingrui.The Effect of Paper Quantity in Evaluation of Scientific Journals’ Influence[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2015, 26(7): 749-757.)
(Yan Meijuan.The Relationship of Paper Amounts, Impacting Factors and 5-year Impacting Factors Among 239 Kinds of Neuroscience Journals[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University: Social Science Edition, 2012, 10(5): 83-85.)
(Yu Jianqing.Statistic Analysis of the Citing Source Indicators of the Journals of Agricultural University[J]. Journal of Library and Information Sciences in Agriculture, 2009, 21(9): 63-65.)
(Liu Yan.Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis on the Academic Influence Index of Editing and Publishing Journals [J]. Science and Publish, 2013(10): 108-112.)
(Liu Ruiyuan, Liu Xueli, Wang Bu, et al.The Rationality of Ratio of Fund-subsidized Papers on Academic Journals Evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2013, 24(3): 473-476.)
(Wang Qian, Lin Ping, Sun Changpeng.The Relationship and Influencing Factors of Medical Journals’ Funding Ratio, Impact Factor, and Other Evaluation Indexes[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2015, 26(6): 634-638.)
(Yan Yan, Gu Guanhua.Ratio of Fund-subsidized Papers: An Unreasonable Evaluation Index of Journals[J]. Journal of Southeast University: Philosophy and Social Science, 2011, 13(6): 123-125.)
[16]
Hotelling H.Ralations Between Two Sets of Variates[J]. Biometrics, 1936, 28(3-4): 321-377.