Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现  2021, Vol. 5 Issue (2): 61-69     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0691
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
国家自然科学基金资助论文的高被引率变化研究 *
禾雪瑶1,2,马廷灿1,2,3(),岳名亮1,3,欧桂燕1,2
1中国科学院武汉文献情报中心 武汉 430071
2中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
3科技大数据湖北省重点实验室 武汉 430071
Analyzing Highly Cited Papers Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China
He Xueyao1,2,Ma Tingcan1,2,3(),Yue Mingliang1,3,Ou Guiyan1,2
1Wuhan Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
2Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3Hubei Key Laboratory of Big Data in Science and Technology, Wuhan 430071, China
全文: PDF (5075 KB)   HTML ( 27
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

【目的】 以基本科学指标(ESI)Top1%高被引论文为对象,研究中国国家自然科学基金资助论文的高被引率变化情况。【方法】 对比分析中国国家自然科学基金与美国主要基金、国内其他基金及国内无基金资助的高被引论文在数量、引用等方面的表现。【结果】 国家自然科学基金资助的高被引论文在2009-2018年间数量上有大幅提升,引用影响力也在不断扩大,但相比美国主要基金仍有一定差距;国家自然科学基金资助的高被引论文在我国高被引论文中占比高达80%。【局限】 本文以英文高被引论文为研究对象,暂未考虑中文文献和其他类型的科研产出。【结论】 研究表明国家自然科学基金对我国高被引论文的产出及科研影响力的提升起到了重要推进作用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
禾雪瑶
马廷灿
岳名亮
欧桂燕
关键词 国家自然科学基金高被引论文科研产出    
Abstract

[Objective] This study analyzes the Essential Science Indicators (ESI) of highly cited papers, aiming to assess scientific outcomes of research projects sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC). [Methods] We compared the total number and citations of highly cited articles sponsored by NSFC, U.S. funding, other Chinese funding, or no funding. [Results] The number of highly cited papers sponsored by NSFC soared from 2009 to 2018, which was still less than those supported by the U.S. funding. More than 80% of Highly Cited Papers from China were funded by NSFC. [Limitations] We only studied highly cited papers in English. [Conclusions] NSFC plays significant role in promoting scientific publication and influence expansion.

Key wordsNational Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)    Highly Cited Papers    Scientific Outcomes
收稿日期: 2020-07-16      出版日期: 2020-10-29
ZTFLH:  G350  
基金资助:*中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项基金项目(E290001)
通讯作者: 马廷灿 ORCID:0000-0001-5985-384X     E-mail: matc@whlib.ac.cn
引用本文:   
禾雪瑶, 马廷灿, 岳名亮, 欧桂燕. 国家自然科学基金资助论文的高被引率变化研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(2): 61-69.
He Xueyao, Ma Tingcan, Yue Mingliang, Ou Guiyan. Analyzing Highly Cited Papers Sponsored by National Natural Science Foundation of China. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 5(2): 61-69.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0691      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2021/V5/I2/61
Fig.1  国家自然科学基金资助论文的高被引率变化研究思路
Fig.2  中美基金高被引论文和极高被引论文数量年度变化情况
Fig.3  中(NSFC)美(NSF+NIH)基金高被引论文的平均学科规范化被引频次变化趋势
Fig.4  我国高被引论文中受NSFC、其他基金以及无基金资助的论文占比变化
Fig.5  三组高被引论文的平均学科规范化被引频次变化趋势
Fig.6  中国高被引论文、NSFC高被引论文数量和占比
学科 2009-2013 2014-2018
NSFC高被引论文数量/篇 NSFC高被引在
全国高被引占比
趋势图 NSFC高被引论文数量/篇 NSFC高被引在
全国高被引占比
趋势图
化学 1 313 0.86 2 849 0.88
计算机科学 171 0.72 942 0.88
材料科学 648 0.85 2 056 0.87
物理 357 0.84 823 0.83
工程 798 0.67 2 908 0.83
数学 250 0.68 826 0.83
多学科 220 0.76 749 0.81
分子生物与遗传学 36 0.84 130 0.77
生物与生物化学 74 0.67 308 0.76
环境/生态学 90 0.74 391 0.76
地球科学 149 0.83 390 0.76
神经系统科学与行为 18 0.64 58 0.74
微生物学 12 0.63 37 0.73
植物与动物科学 121 0.69 341 0.67
农业科学 66 0.43 291 0.59
免疫学 13 0.76 21 0.57
临床医学 114 0.42 349 0.56
  ESI Top 1% Perception Trend in Some Categories
Fig.7  2009-2018年13个ESI学科受NSFC资助占比的演变
[1] 周萍, 张旭, 周冬梅. 中国主要基金的中文论文产出绩效比较[J]. 科技管理研究, 2012,32(19):43-48, 53.
[1] ( Zhou Ping, Zhang Xu, Zhou Dongmei. Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publication[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2012,32(19):43-48, 53.)
[2] 岳名亮, 马廷灿, 王桂芳, 等. 跨领域合作对科研产出的影响: 以国家自然科学基金资助的SCI论文为例[J]. 中国科学基金, 2016,30(6):551-555.
[2] ( Yue Mingliang, Ma Tingcan, Wang Guifang, et al. Influence of Interdisciplinary Cooperation on Research Output Based on SCI Papers Supported by NSFC[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2016,30(6):551-555.)
[3] Wang X W, Liu D, Ding K, et al. Science Funding and Research Output: A Study on 10 Countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2012,91(2):591-599.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0576-6
[4] 刘伟. 中美基础研究科技政策决策与执行比较研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2011.
[4] ( Liu Wei. Comparing and Analyzing Decision and Execution of Chinese and American Fundamental Research Science and Technical Policies——Taking National Natural Science Foundation of China and U.S. National Science Foundation for example[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2011.)
[5] Jacob B A, Lefgren L. The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific Productivity[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2011,95(9/10):1168-1177.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005
[6] 吴小兰, 章成志, 朱紫阳, 等. 国家自然科学基金资助项目中期刊论文的中英文发文差异性研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019,33(5):486-495.
[6] ( Wu Xiaolan, Zhang Chengzhi, Zhu Ziyang, et al. A Study on the Differences Between Chinese and English Journal Papers Supported by the National Natural Science Funds[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019,33(5):486-495.)
[7] 马路, 高书春, 戈一冰. 临床医学领域国家自然科学基金项目资助效果分析: 基于论文产出视角[J]. 中国科学基金, 2019,33(2):180-185.
[7] ( Ma Lu, Gao Shuchun, Ge Yibing. Funding Effectiveness of the National Natural Science Foundation of China in Clinical Medicine: Based on the Perspective of the Paper Production[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2019,33(2):180-185.)
[8] 刘雪立. 基于Web of Science和ESI数据库高被引论文的界定方法[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012,23(6):975-978.
[8] ( Liu Xueli. Method for Defining Highly Cited Papers Based on Web of Science and ESI Database[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2012,23(6):975-978.)
[9] 张璇, 郑兰琴. 国内外教育技术领域研究的比较与反思——以近10年190篇高被引论文为例[J]. 现代教育技术, 2019,29(9):5-12.
[9] ( Zhang Xuan, Zheng Lanqin. The Comparison and Reflection of the Research in the Field of Educational Technology at Home and Abrroad ——Taking 190 Highly-Cited Papers in the Past 10 Years as an Example[J]. Modern Educational Technology, 2019,29(9):5-12.)
[10] 张诗博. 2004-2008年国内图书馆学研究高被引论文的统计与分析[J]. 情报科学, 2011,29(3):387-390.
[10] ( Zhang Shibo. Statistics and Analysis on Highly Cited Papers of China Library Science in 2004-2008[J]. Information Science, 2011,29(3):387-390.)
[11] Radicchi F, Weissman A, Bollen J. Quantifying Perceived Impact of Scientific Publications[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2017,11(3):704-712.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.010
[12] van Raan A F J. Fatal Attraction: Conceptual and Methodological Problems in the Ranking of Universities by Bibliometric Methods[J]. Scientometrics, 2005,32(1):133-143.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016891
[13] 刘多, 宋敏, 谢亚南, 等. 2009-2015年国家自然科学基金资助产出ESI高被引论文分析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2017,31(4):353-358.
[13] ( Liu Duo, Song Min, Xie Yanan, et al. Analysis of ESI Highly Cited Papers Supported by NSFC During 2009-2015[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2017,31(4):353-358.)
[14] 俞征鹿, 马峥, 郭红, 等. 中国科技计划项目论文产出和影响力分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2013,32(4):1-5, 15.
[14] ( Yu Zhenglu, Ma Zheng, Guo Hong, et al. A Quantitative Analysis of Papers Sponsored by National Science and Technology Programs[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2013,32(4):1-5, 15.)
[15] 季子翔. 中美化学领域基金资助项目与论文对比研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2018.
[15] ( Ji Zixiang. A Comparative Study on Funded Projects and Publications of China and the USA in Chemistry[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2018.)
[16] 马涛, 孙瑞娟. 2003-2008年度消化内科研究领域NSFC和NIH基金资助对比分析[J]. 中国科学基金, 2010,24(1):57-60.
[16] ( Ma Tao, Sun Ruijuan. Comparative Analysis of the Research Funding for Digestive Internal Medicine Between NSFC and NIH from 2003 to 2008[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2010,24(1):57-60.)
[17] 邱长波, 刘兆恒, 张风. SCI收录中国主导国际合作论文被引频次研究[J]. 情报科学, 2014,32(8):108-111.
[17] ( Qiu Changbo, Liu Zhaoheng, Zhang Feng. Research on the Cited Times of International Cooperation Papers with Chinese Corresponding Author Indexed by SCI[J]. Information Science, 2014,32(8):108-111.)
[18] Wang D S, Song C M, Barabasi A L. Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact[J]. Science, 2013,342(6154):127-132.
doi: 10.1126/science.1237825 pmid: 24092745
[19] Moed H F. Measuring Contextual Citation Impact of Scientific Journals[J]. Journal of Informetric, 2010,4(3):265-277.
[20] 祁海萍, 申希平. Kruskal-Wallis H检验平均秩多重比较在SPSS软件中的实现[J]. 兰州工业学院学报, 2015,22(2):76-78.
[20] ( Qi Haipin, Sheng Xiping. Implementation of Kruskal-Wallis H Test Average Rank Multiple Comparison in SPSS Software[J]. Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Technology, 2015,22(2):76-78.)
[21] 俞征鹿, 马峥, 潘云涛, 等. 1989-2017年中国科技期刊发表论文统计分析[J]. 科技导报, 2019,37(18):146-154.
[21] ( Yu Zhenglu, Ma Zheng, Pan Yuntao, et al. Statistics and Analysis of Chinese S&T Papers from 1989 to 2017[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2019,37(18):146-154.)
[22] 马廷灿. 从国家自然科学基金看我国基础研究力量的变化趋势[J]. 中国科学基金, 2011,25(5):282-285.
[22] ( Ma Tingcan. Analysis on the Trends of China’s Basic Research Power Based on National Natural Science Funds[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2011,25(5):282-285.)
[1] 匡登辉. 高被引论文的在线使用与分享研究*——基于ALMs的实证分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(11): 54-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn