Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现
  本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
专业技术领域核心专利组合识别方法构建及其应用比较
曾闻,王曰芬
(南京理工大学知识产权学院 南京  210094) (天津师范大学管理学院 天津  300380) (天津师范大学大数据科学研究院 天津  300380)
Construction and application comparison of core patent portfolio identification methods in professional technical fields
Zeng Wen,Wang Yuefen
(School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China) (School of Management, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300380, China) (Institute for Big Data Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300380, China)
全文:
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

[目的]从识别指标信息的多元与不同赋权及排序算法组配的综合视角,结合大规模数据集的特点,研究核心专利组合识别方法的构建及其应用对比。[方法]通过交叉组配构建5种组合识别方法,选取6项专利特征信息,以人工智能领域为例,从整体与局部层次对比各方法的特征和应用情境。[结果]不同组合识别方法在各自不同的数据集与时间段应用时保持较高的一致性。同时不同方法识别的结果,随着要识别的核心专利数量增加而两两间重合率逐渐减少,例如方法一与方法四的核心专利重合率由80%降至47%。[局限]仅应用一个领域,组合识别方法应用的特点可进一步挖掘。[结论]所构建的5种组合识别方法,基于专利数据集的规模、分散程度、时间跨度和特征值表现及技术领域发展的差异,可分别应用到核心专利识别的不同结果需求与具体情境中。针对快速发展的人工智能领域,熵权法赋权结合灰色关联分析和熵权法赋权结合TOPSIS这两种方法识别效果更优。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 核心专利识别组合识别方法单一赋权组合赋权     
Abstract

[Objective] Based on the comprehensive perspective of the diversity of identification index information and the combination of different weighting and sorting algorithms, combined with the characteristics of large-scale data sets, the construction of core patent portfolio identification methods and their application comparisons are studied.[Methods] Through cross-combination, 5 combined identification methods are constructed, and 6 patent feature information is selected. Taking the field of artificial intelligence as an example, the characteristics and application scenarios of each method are compared from the overall and local levels. [Results] Different combined identification methods maintain high consistency when applied to different datasets and time periods. At the same time, as the number of core patents to be identified increases, the coincidence rate between the two methods gradually decreases. For example, the core patent coincidence rate of method 1 and method 4 has dropped from 80% to 47%. [Limitations] Only one field is applied, and the application characteristics of combination method can be further excavated. [Conclusions] The five combined identification methods constructed can be applied to different results requirements and specific situations of core patent identification based on the scale, dispersion, time span and feature value performance of patent data sets and differences in the development of technical fields. For the rapidly developing field of artificial intelligence, the two methods of entropy weight method weighting combined with grey relational analysis and entropy weight method weighting combined with TOPSIS have better recognition effect.

Key words Core patent identification    Combination identification methods    Single weighting    Combination weighting
     出版日期: 2022-07-01
ZTFLH:  G306  
引用本文:   
曾闻, 王曰芬. 专业技术领域核心专利组合识别方法构建及其应用比较 [J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022-0161.
Zeng Wen, Wang Yuefen. Construction and application comparison of core patent portfolio identification methods in professional technical fields . Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 0, (): 1-.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022-0161      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y0/V/I/1
[1] 曾闻,王曰芬. 专业技术领域核心专利组合识别方法构建及其应用比较*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(11): 61-71.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn