Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2009, Vol. 3 Issue (3): 30-37     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2009.03.06
  专题 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
最新标签本体:标签和民俗分类法语义模型
Hak Lae KimSimon ScerriJohn G.BreslinStefan DeckerHong Gee Kim2
1(爱尔兰国立大学数字化企业研究所 爱尔兰)
2(韩国首尔国立大学生物医学知识工程实验室 韩国)
The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies
Hak Lae KimSimon ScerriJohn G.BreslinStefan DeckerHong Gee Kim2
1(Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Ireland)
2(Biomedical Knowledge Engineering Lab, Seoul National University,Korea)
全文: PDF (408 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

当前,人们越来越关注协作化标签系统中标签数据的表示和共享。传统的标签(指随意标注的、没有与结构化本体相关联的标签)由于语言和语法的差异以及录入错误等,不适于做协作化处理。而且标签反映的是用户个人的观点,也不对同义词、词形变化或者其他对照映射关系做规范处理。因此笔者认为,标签的常规处理方法对语义协作的贡献非常有限,即便是有,要让计算机实现自动共享也是极其困难的。在语义层面上讨论数种协作标签标注的方法,提出一个标签协作标注和设计民俗分类法的概念模型,同时比较已有的标签本体,提出一个评价标准,并参照该标准讨论这些标签本体的优缺点。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Stefan Decker
Hong Gee Kim
Hak Lae Kim
Simon Scerri
John G.Breslin
关键词 标签标签标注标签本体民俗分类语义标注    
Abstract

There is a growing interest into how we represent and share tagging data in collaborative tagging systems. Conventional tags, meaning freely created tags that are not associated with a structured Ontology, are not naturally suited for collaborative processes, due to linguistic and grammatical variations, as well as human typing errors. Additionally, tags reflect personal views of the world by individual users, and are not normalised for synonymy, morphology or any other mapping.Our view is that the conventional approach provides very limited semantic value for collaboration. Moreover, in cases where there is some semantic value, automatically sharing semantics via computer manipulations is extremely problematic. This paper explores these problems by discussing approaches for collaborative tagging activities at a semantic level, and presenting conceptual models for collaborative tagging activities and folksonomies. We present criteria for the comparison of existing tag Ontologies and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to these criteria.

Key wordsTags    Tagging    Tagging Ontology    Folksonomy    Semantic tagging
收稿日期: 2009-02-09      出版日期: 2009-03-25
: 

 

 
  G250

 
通讯作者: Hak Lae Kim     E-mail: haklae.kim@deri.org;hgkim@snu.ac.kr
作者简介: Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G.Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim
引用本文:   
Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G.Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim. 最新标签本体:标签和民俗分类法语义模型[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009, 3(3): 30-37.
Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G.Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim. The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2009, 3(3): 30-37.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2009.03.06      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2009/V3/I3/30

[1] Berners-Lee,Tim.(2006).Linked Data.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
[2] Borwankar,Nitin.(2005).TagSchema:Slicing and Dicing Data 2.0:Foundation Data Model for Folksonomy Navigation.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://tagschema.com/blogs/tagschema/2005/06/slicing-and-dicing-data-20-part-2.html.
[3] Brooks,Cristopher.H.,and Nancy Montanez.(2006).Improved Annotation of the Blogosphere via Autotagging and Hierarchical Clustering.in WWW 06.Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web,(pp.625-632.).New York:ACM Press.
[4] Cattuto,Ciro,Christoph Schmitz,Andrea Baldassarri,Vito D.P.Servedio,Vittorio Loreto,and Andreas Hotho,et.al.(2007).Network Properties of Folksonomies.AI Communications 20(4),245-262.
[5] Echarte,Francisco,José J.Astrain,Alberto  Córdoba,and Jesús Villadangos.(2007).Ontology of Folksonomy:A New Modeling Method.Proceedings of Semantic Authoring,Annotation and Knowledge Markup(SAAKM).
[6] Golder,Scott A.,and Bernardo A.Huberman.(2006).The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems.Journal of Information Sciences,32(2),198-208.
[7] Gruber,Tom.(2007),Ontology of Folksonomy:A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges.Int.Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems,3(2).
[8] Gruber,Tom.(2008).Collective Knowledge Systems:Where the Social Web Meets the Semantic Web.Journal of Web Semantics 6(1),4-13.
[9] Halpin,Harry.,Valentin Robu,and Hana Shepard.(2006).The Dynamics and Semantics of Collaborative Tagging.Proceedings of the 1st Semantic Authoring and Annotation Workshop(SAAW06).
[10] Hendler,James.(2007,November 11).Shirkyng My Responsibility.Message Posted to http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2007/11/21/shirkyng-my-responsibility/.Jaschke.
[11] Robert,Andreas Hotho,Christoph Schmitz,Bernhard Ganter,and Gerd Stumme.(2008).Discovering Shared Conceptualisations in Folksonomies.Web Semantic,6(1),38-53.
[12] Kim,Hak-Lae.,Sung-Kwon Yang,John G.Breslin,and Hong-Gee Kim.(2007).Simple Algorithms for Representing Tag Frequencies in the SCOT Exporter.IAT Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology,(pp.536-539).
[13] Kim,Hak-Lae,Alexandre Passant,John G.Breslin,Simon Scerri,and Stefan Decker.(2008).Review and Alignment of Tag Ontologies for Semantically-linked Data in Collaborative Tagging Spaces.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Computing,San Francisco,USA.
[14] Knerr,Torben.(2006).Tagging Ontology-towards a Common Ontology for Folksonomies.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://tagont.googlecode.com/files/TagOntPaper.pdf.
[15] Marlow,Cameron,Moor Naaman,Danah Boyd,and Mark Davis.(2006).HT06,Tagging Paper,Taxonomy,Flickr,Academic Article,ToRead.Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia,(pp.31-40).New York:ACM Press.
[16] Mathes,Adam.(2004).Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html.
[17] Mika,Peter.(2005).Ontologies Are Us:A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics.Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference,ISWC 2005,Galway,Ireland,(pp.522-536).Berlin/Heidelberg:Springer.
[18] Miles,Alistair, Dan Brickley.(2005).SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec.
[19] Newman,Richard,Danny Ayers,and Seth Russell.(2005).Tag ontology.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.holygoat.co.uk/owl/redwood/0.1/tags/.
[20] Passant,A.(2007).Using Ontologies to Strengthen Folksonomies and Enrich Information Retrieval in Weblogs.Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[21] Passant,A.,and Laublet.P.(2008).Meaning of a tag:A Collaborative Approach to Bridge the Gap Between Tagging and Linked Data.Proceedings of Linked Data on the Web(LDOW 2008).
[22] Quintarelli,Emanuele.(2005).Folksonomies:Power to the People.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.iskoi.org/doc/folksonomies.htm.
[23] Scerri.Simon,Michael.Sintek,Ludger.van.Elst,andSiegfriedHandschuh.(2007).NEPOMUK Annotation Ontology.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.semanticdesktop.org/ontologies/nao/.
[24] Shirky,Clay.(2005).Ontology is Overrated:Categories,Links,and Tags.Retrieved June 14,2008,from http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.
[25] Specia,Lucia,and Enrico Motta.(2007).Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web.European SemanticWeb.Conference,2007,Innsbruck,Austria,(pp.624-639).Retrieved from  http://www.eswc2007.org/pdf/eswc07-specia.pdf.
[26] Spivack,Nova.(2005,January 21).Folktologies-Beyond the Folksonomy vs.Ontology Distinction.Message Posted to http://novaspivack.typepad.com/nova_spivacks_weblog/2005/01/whats_after_fol.html.
[27] Story,H.(2007,February 6).Search,Tagging and Wikis.Message Posted to http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/search_tagging_and_wikis.
[28] Wal,Thomas.V.(2004).Folksonomy.Retrieved.June14,2008,from http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html.

[1] 陆泉, 何超, 陈静, 田敏, 刘婷. 基于两阶段迁移学习的多标签分类模型研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(7): 91-100.
[2] 盛嘉祺, 许鑫. 融合主题相似度与合著网络的学者标签扩展方法研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(8): 75-85.
[3] 叶佳鑫,熊回香,童兆莉,孟秋晴. 在线医疗社区中面向医生的协同标注研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6): 118-128.
[4] 马娜,张智雄,吴朋民. 基于特征融合的术语型引用对象自动识别方法研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(1): 89-98.
[5] 李博诚,张云秋,杨铠西. 面向微博商品评论的情感标签抽取研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(9): 115-123.
[6] 凌洪飞,欧石燕. 面向主题模型的主题自动语义标注研究综述 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(9): 16-26.
[7] 夏立新,曾杰妍,毕崇武,叶光辉. 基于LDA主题模型的用户兴趣层级演化研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 1-13.
[8] 叶佳鑫,熊回香. 基于标签的跨领域资源个性化推荐研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 21-32.
[9] 毕崇武,叶光辉,李明倩,曾杰妍. 基于标签语义挖掘的城市画像感知研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(12): 41-51.
[10] 李钰曼,陈志泊,许福. 基于KACC模型的文本分类研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 89-97.
[11] 蒋武轩,熊回香,叶佳鑫,安宁. 网络社交平台中社群标签动态生成研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 98-109.
[12] 叶光辉, 胡婧岚, 徐健, 夏立新. 社交博客标签增长态势与连接模式分析*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 70-78.
[13] 陆伟, 罗梦奇, 丁恒, 李信. 深度学习图像标注与用户标注比较研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(5): 1-10.
[14] 张素琪, 高星, 霍士杰, 郭京津, 顾军华. 基于速度优化和社区偏向的标签传播算法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(3): 60-69.
[15] 熊回香, 叶佳鑫, 蒋武轩. 改进的DBSCAN聚类算法在社会化标注中的应用*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(12): 77-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn