|
|
Making Research Data Repositories Visible:The re3data.org Registry |
Heinz Pampel1, Paul Vierkant2, Frank Scholze3, Roland Bertelmann1, Maxi Kindling2, Jens Klump1, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker3, Jens Gundlach3, Peter Schirmbacher2, Uwe Dierolf3 |
1 Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Library and Information Services (LIS), Potsdam 14473, Germany;
2 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Berlin 10099, Germany;
3 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT Library, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany |
|
|
Abstract Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarized under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org–Registry of Research Data Repositories–has begun to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organizations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In July 2013 re3data.org lists 400 research data repositories and counting. 288 of these are described in detail using the re3data.org vocabulary. Information icons help researchers to easily identify an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This article describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further the article outlines the features of re3data.org, and shows how this registry helps to identify appropriate repositories for storage and search of research data.
|
Received: 29 November 2013
Published: 15 April 2014
|
|
Cite this article:
Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, Uwe Dierolf . Making Research Data Repositories Visible:The re3data.org Registry. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2014, 30(3): 26-34.
URL:
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2014.03.05 OR https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2014/V30/I3/26
|
[1] Berlin Declaration. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities [OL]. [2009-10- 27]. http://oa. mpg. de/openaccess-berlin/ berlindeclaration. html. [2] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813. pdf. [3] The Royal Society. Science as an Open Enterprise [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://royalsociety. org/uploadedFiles/Royal_ Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE. pdf. [4] European Commission. Commission Recommendation on Access to and Preservation of Scientific Information [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec. europa. eu/research/science-society/ document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en. pdf. [5] Office of Science and Technology Policy. Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/ microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013. pdf. [6] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec. europa. eu/research/science-society/ document_library/pdf_06/era-communication-towards-better-access-to-scientific-information_en. pdf. [7] Kindling M, Schirmbacher P. “Die Digitale Forschungswelt” als Gegenstand der Forschung [J]. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2013, 64: 127-136. [8] Pampel H, Bertelmann R. “Data Policies” im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Empfehlung und Verpflichtung [A]. //Büttner S, Hobohm H C, Müller L, (edt). Handbuch Forschungsdatenm- anagement [M]. Bad Honnef: Bock+Herchen, 2011:49-61. [9] National Science Foundation(NSF). Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Chapter VI - Other Post Award Requirements and Considerations [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/ pappguide/nsf11001/ aag_6. jsp#VID4. [10] National Science Foundation(NSF). Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Grant Proposal Guide. Chapter II - Proposal Preparation Instructions [OL]. [2013- 05-16]. http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/ nsf11001/gpg_2. jsp#dmp. [11] Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Proposal Preparation Instructions. DFG form 54. 01. [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http:// www. dfg. de/formulare/54_01/54_01_en. pdf. [12] Nature. Availability of Data and Materials [OL]. [2013-05- 16]. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability. html. [13] Kuipers T, Van der Hoeven J. Insight into Digital Preservation of Research Output in Europe [R/OL]. [2013- 05-16]. http://www. parse-insight. eu/downloads/PARSE- Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_hq. pdf. [14] Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, et al. Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions [J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(6): e21101. [15] Nature Biotechnology. Credit Where Credit is Overdue [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27: 579. [16] Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S. Open Research Data - From Vision to Practice [A]. //Bartling S, Friesike S, (edt). Opening Science–The Evolving Guide on How the Internet Is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing [M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. [17] Klump J, Bertelmann R, Brase J, et al. Data Publication in the Open Access Initiative [J]. Data Science Journal, 2006, 5: 79-83. [18] Chavan V, Penev L. The Data Paper: A Mechanism to Incentivize Data Publishing in Biodiversity Science [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011, 12: S2. DOI:10. 1186/1471-2105- 12-S15-S2. [19] Woutersen-Windhouwer S, Brandsma R, Hogenaar A, et al. Enhanced Publications?: Linking Publications and Research Data in Digital Repositories [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dare. uva. nl/aup/nl/record/316849. [20] European Commission. ICT Infrastructures for e-Science [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2009:0108:FIN:EN:PDF. [21] Lagoze C, Sompel H Van De. The Open Archives Initiative: Building a Low-Barrier Interoperability Framework [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/papers/Papers/2001/ JCDLlagoze. pdf. [22] Marcial L H, Hemminger B M. Scientific Data Repositories on the Web: An Initial Survey [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61: 2029-2048. [23] Schaaf I. Forschungsdaten im Netz – Untersuchung Von Online Verfügbaren Repositorien. Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart [A]. //Schäfer L, Pampel H, Klump J, et al. Bericht Symposium“Forschungsdaten-Infrastrukturen (FDI 2013)” [C]. 2013. DOI:10. 2312/radieschen_003. [24] Fernández-Suárez X M, Galperin M Y. The 2013 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the Online Molecular Biology Database Collection [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/23203983. [25] ELIXIR . The ELIXIR Strategy for Data Resources [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. elixir-europe. org/prep/sites/elixir- europe.org.prep/files/documents/reports/elixir_strategy_for_data_resources_report. pdf. [26] European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures. European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures. Report 2006 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/ pdf/esfri/esfri_roadmap/roadmap_2006/esfri_roadmap_2006_en. pdf. [27] Suber P. Open Access. Cambridge, Massachusetts [OL]. [2013-03-15]. The MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/ open-access. [28] Pampel H, Goebelbecker H J, Vierkant P. re3data. org: Aufbau eines Verzeichnisses von Forschungsdaten- Repositorien. Ein Werkstattbericht [A]. //Mittermaier B, Wissen V. Daten, Menschen, Systeme. WissKom 2012. Jülich: Verlag des Forschungszentrums Jülich, 2012: 61-73. [29] Edinburgh DataShare. What is Edinburgh DataShare? [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk. [30] Rice R. DISC-UK DataShare [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http:// ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/336/. [31] Schallehn V. Open Data LMU. Universitätsbibliothek München [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. ub. uni-muenchen. de/no_cache/aktuelles/einzelne-nachricht/article/open-data-lmu/. [32] Cravedi K. GenBank Celebrates 25 Years of Service with Two-Day Conference [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.nih. gov/news/health/apr2008/nlm-03.htm. [33] Benson D A, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Clark K, et al. GenBank [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40: D48-D53. [34] PANGAEA. About/Imprint [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. pangaea.de/about/. [35] Diepenbroek M, Grobe H, Reinke M, et al. Data Management of Proxy Parameters with PANGAEA [A]. //Fischer G, Wefer G. Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999:715-727. [36] Schindler U, Diepenbroek M, Grobe H. PANGAEA- Research Data Enters Scholarly Communication [J]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2012, 14: EGU2012– 13378-1. [37] Figshare. FAQs [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://figshare.com/faqs. [38] Fenner M. Figshare: Interview with Mark Hahnel [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://blogs. plos. org/mfenner/2012/02/16/ figshare-interview-with-mark-hahnel/. [39] LabArchives. Electronic Notebook Software for Laboratory Notebooks FAQ [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.labarchives. com/faqs.php. [40] Klump J, Conze R. The Scientific Drilling Database (SDDB) -Data from Deep Earth Monitoring and Sounding [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.iodp.org/images/stories/downloads/ sd4_07.pdf#page=32. [41] Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Darby R, Gitmans K, et al. Summary of the Studies, Thematic Publications and Recommendations [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. alliancepermanentaccess. org/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id= Summaryofthestudies%2Cthematicpublicationsandrecommendations. [42] Kroes N. Opening Science Through e-Infrastructures [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do? reference=SPEECH/12/258. [43] Kroes N. Making Open Access a Reality for Science [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do? reference=SPEECH/12/392. [44] Pfeiffenberger H, Pampel H, Schäfer A, et al. Report and Strategy on Annotation, Reputation and Data Quality [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.alliancepermanentaccess. org/wp- content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=D26.1R eportandStrategyonAnnotation%2CReputationandDataQuality. [45] High Level Expert Group on Scientific Data. Riding the Wave. How Europe can Gain from the Rising Tide of Scientific Data [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://cordis. europa. eu/fp7/ict/e-infrastructure/docs/hlg-sdi-report. pdf. [46] Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Dobratz S, Gradmann S, et al. Positionspapier Forschungsdaten. 1. 0 ed [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10098082. [47] Graaf M, Waaijers L. A Surfboard for Riding the Wave- Towards a Four Country Action Programme on Research Data [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. knowledge-exchange. info/ Default. aspx?ID=469. [48] Vierkant P, Spier S, Rücknagel J, et al. Vocabulary for the Registration and Description of Research Data Repositories [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2312/re3. 001. [49] Vierkant P, Spier S, Rücknagel J, et al. Vocabulary for the Registration and Description of Research Data Repositories (Version 2.0) [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2312/re3. 002. [50] Braun K, Buddenbohm S, Dobratz S, et al. DINI Certificate Document and Publication Services 2010 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100182800. [51] Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories [OL].[2013-05-16].http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/652x0m1.pdf. [52] Data Seal of Approval. Data Seal of Approval. Guidelines Version 1 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://assessment.datasealof approval. org/documentation/. [53] ESF & EUROHORCs (2011) Basic Requirements for Research Infrastructures in Europe [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/wgi/ basic_requirements_research_infrastructures. pdf. [54] ICSU World Data System (2011) Certification of World Data System Members Introduction [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://icsu-wds.org/images/files/Certification_summary_6_Jul_2011.pdf. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|