|
|
Realizing Semantic Web Services Description with OWL-S Ontology |
Wang Xin Zhang Xiaolin |
(Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080,China) |
|
|
Abstract Beginning with the structure of OWL-S upper-level Ontology, this paper introduces the methods and rules for semantic Web services description using ServiceProfile, ServiceModel and ServiceGrounding, all of which are subontologies of OWL-S. A book-seller e-commerce application instance are also illustrated here.
|
Received: 14 September 2004
Published: 25 February 2005
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Wang Xin
E-mail: wangx@mail.las.ac.cn
|
About author:: Wang Xin,Zhang Xiaolin |
1 Web Services Architecture, W3C Working Group Note, 11 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/ (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
2 Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, W3C Working Draft, 26 March 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20 (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
3 UDDI Version 3.0.1, UDDI Spec Technical Committee Specification, 14 October, 2003. http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi_v3.htm (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
4 SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, W3C Recommendation, 24 June 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
5 Web Service Flow Language. 1.0. May 2001http://www-306.ibm.com/software/solutions/webservices/pdf/WSFL.pdf (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
6 Business Process Execution Language for Web Services Version 1.1, 05 May 2003, http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel/ (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
7 M. Ghallab et al. PDDL-The Planning Domain Definition Language V. 2. Technical Report, report CVC TR-98-003/DCS TR-1165, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control, 1998. (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
8 H. Levesque, R. Reiter, Y. Lesperance, F. Lin, and R. Scherl. GOLOG: A Logic programming language for dynamic domains. Journal of Logic Programming, 31(1-3):59-84, April-June 1997
9 D. Martin, A. Cheyer, and D. Moran. The Open Agent Architecture: A Framework for Building Distributed Software Systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(1-2):92-128, 1999
10 The OWL Services Coalition. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/owl-s.html (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
11 OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation of February 2004.http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-absyn/ (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
12 OWL-S 1.0 Release. November 2003. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/ (Accessed Jul. 14,2004)
13 OWL-S ServiceProfile Ontology. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0DL/Profile.owl (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)
14 OWL-S ProcessModel Ontology. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0DL/Process.owl (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)15 OWL-S ServiceGrounding Ontology. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0DL/Grounding.owl (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)
16 The United Nations Standard Products and Services Code? (UNSPSC?). http://www.unspsc.org/ (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)
17 SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, Version 0.5 of 19 November 2003. http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/ (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)
18 Drew McDermott. DRS: A Set of Conventions for Representing Logical Languages in RDF, January 12, 2004 http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/daml/DRSguide.pdf (Accessed Jul. 16,2004)
19 OWL-S 1.0 Release: Examples. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/examples.html (Accessed Jul. 16,2004) |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|