自然权重对非线性科技评价的影响及纠正研究*——以TOPSIS方法评价为例
|
俞立平, 宋夏云, 王作功
|
Impacts and Corrections of Natural Weight on Nonlinear Sci-tech Reviews——Case Study of TOPSIS Method
|
Yu Liping,Song Xiayun,Wang Zuogong
|
|
表4 自然权重消除前后加权TOPSIS评价结果比较 |
|
|
期刊名称 | 消除前 评价值 | 排名 | 消除后 评价值 | 排名 | KINET RELAT MOD | 0.178 | 48 | 0.194 | 50 | RANDOM STRUCT ALGOR | 0.172 | 51 | 0.194 | 51 | INDIANA U MATH J | 0.165 | 53 | 0.192 | 52 | J COMB THEORY A | 0.161 | 56 | 0.191 | 53 | COMMUN CONTEMP MATH | 0.170 | 52 | 0.188 | 54 | ADV CALC VAR | 0.173 | 49 | 0.187 | 55 | COMBINATORICA | 0.161 | 55 | 0.182 | 56 | MEM AM MATH SOC | 0.153 | 59 | 0.181 | 57 | J PURE APPL ALGEBRA | 0.147 | 66 | 0.180 | 58 | J ANAL MATH | 0.158 | 58 | 0.179 | 59 | ERGOD THEOR DYN SYST | 0.149 | 63 | 0.176 | 60 | CAN J MATH | 0.152 | 60 | 0.175 | 61 | COMMUN NUMBER THEORY | 0.160 | 57 | 0.173 | 62 | EUR J COMBIN | 0.140 | 74 | 0.171 | 63 | SCI CHINA MATH | 0.142 | 72 | 0.168 | 64 | MOSC MATH J | 0.150 | 61 | 0.167 | 65 | POTENTIAL ANAL | 0.146 | 67 | 0.167 | 66 | ELECTRON J COMB | 0.134 | 78 | 0.166 | 67 | J EVOL EQU | 0.149 | 62 | 0.166 | 68 | ELECTRON J DIFFER EQ | 0.138 | 75 | 0.165 | 69 | RUSS MATH SURV+ | 0.141 | 73 | 0.165 | 70 | ALGEBR NUMBER THEORY | 0.142 | 70 | 0.165 | 71 | INTERFACE FREE BOUND | 0.149 | 64 | 0.163 | 72 | PAC J MATH | 0.128 | 87 | 0.163 | 73 | REND LINCEI-MAT APPL | 0.148 | 65 | 0.162 | 74 | REV MAT COMPLUT | 0.146 | 68 | 0.161 | 75 | B LOND MATH SOC | 0.129 | 83 | 0.159 | 76 | ADV NONLINEAR STUD | 0.142 | 71 | 0.159 | 77 | J NUMBER THEORY | 0.125 | 91 | 0.158 | 78 | J GEOM ANAL | 0.133 | 79 | 0.158 | 79 |
|
|
|