Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2011, Vol. 27 Issue (5): 1-6     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2011.05.01
  数字图书馆 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
Web数据关联创建策略研究
邓兰兰1,2, 李春旺1
1. 中国科学院国家科学图书馆 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院研究生院 北京 100049
Study on Linkage Creation Strategies of Web Data
Deng Lanlan1,2, Li Chunwang1
1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
全文: PDF (1032 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 调研关联数据的关联关系创建算法和策略,分析同构模式下属性相似度和图形相似度算法以及相应的组合策略,对比研究异构模式下包含和不包含实例信息的架构映射方法,对可创建丰富语义关联的推导传递的思想进行剖析,并提出关联创建面临的挑战。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
邓兰兰
李春旺
关键词 关联数据语义网关联创建知识融合    
Abstract:The linkage creation algorithms and strategies are surveyed. Based on some available work, properties similarity measurements, graph similarity measurements, as well as integrated similarity measurements to objects in homogeneous dataset are analyzed, and different schema mapping methodologies with/without instance information under heterogeneous data environment are compared. Afterwards, inferring and transfering approaches conducive to rich semantic link establishment are highlighted. Finally, challenges of linkage creation are proposed.
Key wordsLinked data    Semantic    Web Linkage creation    Knowledge mashup
收稿日期: 2011-04-08      出版日期: 2011-07-11
: 

TP393

 
基金资助:

本文系国家自然科学基金项目“基于概念格的数字图书馆知识构建研究”(项目编号:70973044)和教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于概念格的高校图书馆开放存取资源知识服务体系构建研究”(项目编号:10YJC870035)的研究成果之一。

引用本文:   
邓兰兰, 李春旺. Web数据关联创建策略研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2011, 27(5): 1-6.
Deng Lanlan, Li Chunwang. Study on Linkage Creation Strategies of Web Data. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011, 27(5): 1-6.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2011.05.01      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2011/V27/I5/1
[1] Elmagarmid A K, Ipeirotis P G, Verykios V S. Duplicate Record Detection: A Survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2007,19(1):1-16.

[2] Bhattacharya I, Getoor L. Iterative Record Linkage for Cleaning and Integration . In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGMOD Workshop on Research Issues in Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery(DMKD'04), Paris, France. 2004:11-18.

[3] Winkler W E, Thibaudeau Y. An Application of the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage to the 1990 U.S. Decennial Census . Technical Report Statistical Research Report Series RR91/09, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., 1991.

[4] Winkler W E. The State of Record Linkage and Current Research Problems . Technical Report Statistical Research Report Series RR99/04, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., 1999.

[5] Voz J, Bizer C, Gaedke M, et al. Silk-A Link Discovery Framework for the Web of Data . In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, Madrid, Spain. 2009.

[6] Nikolov A, Uren V, De Motta E, et al. Integration of Semantically Annotated Data by the KnoFuss Architecture . In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns(EKAW'08), Acitrezza, Italy. 2008:265-274.

[7] Jentzsch A, Zhao J, Hassanzadeh O, et al. Linking Open Drug Data . In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS'09), Graz, Austria. 2009.

[8] Hassanzadeh O, Consens M. Linked Movie Data Base . In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, Madrid, Spain. 2009.

[9] Raimond Y, Sutton C, Sandler M. Automatic Interlinking of Music Datasets on the Semantic Web . In: Proceedings of LDOW2008, Beijing, China. 2008.

[10] Glaser H, Millard I C. RKBPlatform: Opening up Services in the Web of Data . In: Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference(ISWC2009), Washington, USA. 2009.

[11] Thor A, Rahm E. MOMA-A Mapping-based Object Matching System . In: Proceedings of CIDR2007, California, USA. 2007:247-258.

[12] Mi J, Chen H, Lu B, et al. Deriving Similarity Graphs from Open Linked Data on Semantic Web . In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration(IEEE IRI2009), Nevada, USA. 2009:157-162.

[13] Kobilarov G, Scott T, Raimond Y, et al. Media Meets Semantic Web-How the BBC Uses DBpedia and Linked Data to Make Connections . In: Proceedings of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference on the Semantic Web: Research and Applications (ESWC2009), Heraklion, Greece. 2009:723-737.

[14] Sleeman J, Finin T. A Machine Learning Approach to Linking FOAF Instances . In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. 2010:107-113.

[15] Ehrig M. Ontology Alignment: Bridging the Semantic Gap[M]. 1st Edition. New York: Springer, 2006.

[16] Shvaiko P, Euzenat J. A Survey of Schema-based Matching Approaches[J]. Journal on Data Semantics, 2005(4):146-171.

[17] Rahm E, Bernstein P A. A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching[J]. International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 2001,10 (4): 334-350.

[18] Euzenat J, Shvaiko P. Ontology Matching[M]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2007.

[19] Evermann J. Theories of Meaning in Schema Matching: A Review[J]. Journal of Database Management, 2008, 19(3):55-82.

[20] Jian N, Hu W, Cheng G, et al. Falcon-AO: Aligning Ontologies with Falcon . In: Proceedings of K-CAP Workshop on Integrating Ontologies, Banff, CA. 2005:87-93.

[21] Jain P, Hitzler P, Sheth A P, et al. Ontology Alignment for Linked Open Data . In: Proceedings of ISWC2010, Shanghai, China. 2010:401-416.

[22] Jain P, Yeh P Z, Verma K, et al. Contextual Ontology Alignment of LOD with an Upper Ontology: A Case Study with Proton . In: Proceedings of ESWC2011, Heraklion, Greece. 2011.

[23] Nikolov A, Uren V, Motta E, et al. Handling Instance Coreferencing in the KnoFuss Architecture . In: Proceedings of ESWC 2008, Tenerife, Spain. 2008.

[24] Nikolov A, Motta E. Capturing Emerging Relations Between Schema Ontologies on the Web of Data . In: Proceedings of COLD2010, Shanghai, China. 2010.

[25] Par R, Knoblock C A, Ambite J L. Aligning Ontologies of Geospatial Linked Data . In: Proceedings of Workshop on Linked Spatiotemporal Data, in GIScience 2010, Zurich.2010.

[26] Nikolov A, Uren V, Motta E. Data Linking: Captureing and Utilising Implicit Schema-level Relations . In: Proceedings of LDOW2010, Raleigh, USA. 2010.

[27] Cudr'e-Mauroux P, Haghani P, Jost M, et al. idMesh: Graph-based Disambiguation of Linked Data . In: Proceedings of WWW 2009, Madrid, Spain. 2009.

[28] Rodriguez M A. A Graph Analysis of the Linked Data Cloud[J]. Computer and Information Science:Miscellaneous Papers, 2009(3):1-7.
[1] 华斌, 吴诺, 贺欣. 基于知识融合的政务信息化项目多专家审批意见整合*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 124-136.
[2] 刘欢,张智雄,王宇飞. BERT模型的主要优化改进方法研究综述*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(1): 3-15.
[3] 邵琦,牟冬梅,王萍,靳春妍. 基于语义的突发公共卫生事件网络舆情主题发现研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(9): 68-80.
[4] 操玉杰,毛进,潘荣清,巴志超,李纲. 学科交叉研究的演化阶段特征分析*——以医学信息学为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 107-116.
[5] 沈志宏, 姚畅, 侯艳飞, 吴林寰, 李跃鹏. 关联大数据管理技术: 挑战、对策与实践*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(1): 9-20.
[6] 崔家旺, 李春旺. 基于关联数据的类簇语义揭示模型研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(4): 57-66.
[7] 姜赢, 张婧, 朱玲萱. 面向Cytoscape平台的关联数据知识图谱概览抽取与可视化*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(3): 29-37.
[8] 齐云飞, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华. 关联数据在数字图书馆移动视觉搜索系统中的应用研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(1): 81-90.
[9] 杨小平,马奇凤,余力,莫雨婷,吴佳楠,张悦. 评论簇在网络舆论中的情感倾向代表性研究*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 51-59.
[10] 赵夷平,毕强. 关联数据在学术资源网相似文献发现中的应用研究*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(3): 41-49.
[11] 郭振英, 赵文兵, 魏育辉. 轻量级书目本体关联数据建设实践[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 139-143.
[12] 高劲松, 程娅, 梁艳琪. 面向关联数据集的本体匹配方法研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(6): 33-40.
[13] 李纲, 叶光辉, 张岩. “小众专家”特征识别——基于MetaFilter的实证分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(6): 71-77.
[14] 梁艺多, 翟军. 本体推理在关联数据链接发现中的应用研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(4): 87-95.
[15] 陈涛, 张永娟, 陈恒. Web数据到RDF数据的框架实现[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(2): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn