[Objective] Study on co-evolution rules of social networks and public opinion considering the effects of trust and authority. [Methods] Design a computational model of trust and authority, express interactive mechanism of public opinion by relative agreement model, then analyse the co-evolving process of dynamic social networks and public opinion based on computational experiment. [Results] The experiment results show that the consistency of public opinion in the scenario of dynamic social networks is lower than the static networks, and the informal groups are easier to form. The trust values follow the power-law distribution, but it is not sure that the authoritative individuals hold high trust friendship. [Limitations] The cognitive computational models are embedded into the opinion model through parameter passing, and the synergistic mode between them needs to be improved. [Conclusions] Trust and authority influence the co-evolution process significantly; the organization should control the authoritative individuals to guide the direction of public opinion.
朱侯. 考虑信任与权威影响的社会网络-舆论协同演化的研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(10): 50-57.
Zhu Hou. Co-evolution of Social Networks and Public Opinion Considering the Effect of Trust and Authority. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2015, 31(10): 50-57.
[1] Deffuant G, Amblard F, Weisbuch G, et al. How can Extremism Prevail? A Study Based on the Relative Agreement Interaction Model [J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002, 5(4): Article No.1.
[2] Gandica Y, del Castillo-Mussot M, Vázquez G J, et al. Continuous Opinion Model in Small-World Directed Networks [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010, 389: 5864-5870.
[3] Kozma B, Barrat A. Consensus Formation on Adaptive Networks [J]. Physical Review E, 2008, 77(1): 016102.
[4] Wood W. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2000, 51(1): 539-570.
[5] Centola D, Eguíluz V M, Macy M W. Cascade Dynamics of Complex Propagation [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2007, 374: 449-456.
[6] Christakis N A, Fowler J H. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, 357(4): 370-379.
[7] Centola D, Macy M. Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2007, 113(3): 702-734.
[8] Christakis N A, Fowler J H. The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network [J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2008, 358(21): 2249-2258.
[9] Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective Dynamics of ‘Small- World' Networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442.
[10] Amblard F, Deffuant G. The Role of Network Topology on Extremism Propagation with the Relative Agreement Opinion Dynamics [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2004, 343: 725-738.
[11] 阮冰, 朱建冲, 姜礼平, 等. 复杂网络上的舆论形成演化建模与仿真研究[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2010, 24(1): 53-58. (Ruan Bing, Zhu Jianchong, Jiang Liping, et al. Modeling and Simulation on Opinion Formation in Complex Networks [J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2010, 24(1): 53-58.)
[12] 程寅钊, 徐涛, 彭勤科, 等. 具有社团和个体差异性的舆论传播动力学分析[J]. 系统工程学报, 2012, 27(4): 431-438. (Cheng Yinzhao, Xu Tao, Peng Qinke, et al. Opinion Dynamics with the Different Community and Individual Characteristics [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2012, 27(4): 431-438. )
[13] 杨波. 舆论传播网络微观组织模式: 基于子图与群结构的分析[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(1): 128-132. (Yang Bo. Micro-topological Patterns of Opinion Diffusion Network: Subgraph and Community Structure [J]. Information Science, 2014, 32(1): 128-132.)
[14] 唐晓波, 宋承伟. 基于复杂网络的微博舆情分析[J]. 情报学报, 2012, 31(11): 1153-1162. (Tang Xiaobo, Song Chengwei. Microblog Public Opinion Analysis Based on Complex Network [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2012, 31(11): 1153-1162.)
[15] Bianconi G, Barabási A L. Competition and Multiscaling in Evolving Networks[J]. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 2001, 54(4): 436-442.
[16] Haddadi H, Rio M, Iannaccone G, et al. Network Topologies: Inference, Modeling, and Generation [J]. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, 2008, 10(2): 48-69.
[17] Liu X, Liu T, Wang H, et al. A Novel Evolving Scale-Free Model with Tunable Attractiveness [J]. Chinese Physics B, 2010, 19(7): 35-39.
[18] Aristotle. The Art of Rhetoric [M]. Penguin Classics, 1991 .
[19] Jackson V C. Transnational Discourse, Relational Authority, and the US Court: Gender Equality [J]. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2003, 37(2): 271.
[20] Gilbert N, Troitzsch K G. Simulation for the Social Scientist [M]. The 2nd Edition, Open University Press, 2005.
[21] Dunbar R I M. The Social Brain Hypothesis [J]. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1998, 6(5): 178-190.
[22] Dunbar R I M. Coevolution of Neocortical Size, Group Size and Language in Humans [J]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1993, 16(4): 681-694.
[23] Stiller J, Dunbar R I M. Perspective-Taking and Memory Capacity Predict Social Network Size [J]. Social Networks, 2007, 29(1): 93-104.
[24] Roberts S G B, Dunbar R I M, Pollet T V, et al. Exploring Variation in Active Network Size: Constraints and Ego Characteristics [J]. Social Networks, 2009, 31(2): 138-146.
[25] Sutcliffe A, Wang D. Computational Modeling of Trust and Social Relationships [J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2012, 15(1): Article No.3.
[26] Prettejohn B J, Berryman M J, McDonnell M D. A Model of the Effects of Authority on Consensus Formation in Adaptive Networks: Impact on Network Topology and Robustness [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2013, 392(4): 857-868.
[27] Roberts S G B, Dunbar R I M. The Costs of Family and Friends: An 18-Month Longitudinal Study of Relationship Maintenance and Decay [J]. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2011, 32(3): 186-197.