|
|
|
| Study on Influence of Data Standardization to Evaluation Results in Science and Technology |
| Yu Liping1, Wu Yishan2 |
1. School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2. Institute of Scientific & Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper analyzes data standardization of multiple attribute evaluation in science and technology evaluation. The results show the evaluation score of side standardization is smaller than tunable standardization. Tunable standardization may increase evaluation score of lower level journals, linear standardization may affect evaluation score but cant affect evaluation ranking, and negative indicator standardization may change the evaluation ranking. The authors give a new linear negative indicator standardization method, and point out that the negative classical indicator standardization should be abandoned, and the evaluation institute should make known to the public of data standardization method so as to keep evaluation justice.
|
|
Received: 07 June 2011
Published: 02 December 2011
|
|
|
| [1] Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1980.[2] Shannon C E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication[J]. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948,27:379-429,623-656.[3] Hwang C L,Yoon K.Multiple Attribute Decision Making:Methods and Applications[M].NY:Springer-Verlag,1981:12-34.[4] Diakoulaki D,Mavrotas G,Papayannakis L.Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems:The CRlTIC Method[J].Computers and Operations Research,1995,22(7):763-770.[5] 吴松涛,侯风华,戴锋. 非线性数据标准化处理过程中的线性近似法[J]. 信息工程大学学报,2007,8(2):250-253.[6] 焦立新. 评价指标标准化处理方法的探讨[J]. 安徽农业技术师范学院学报,1999,13(3):7-10.[7] 马立平. 统计数据标准化——无量纲化方法[J]. 北京统计,2000(3):34-35.[8] 刘玉秀,李玉刚. 医院工作质量综合评价指标的非线性标准化[J]. 中国医院统计,1997,4(4):213-215.[9] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山. 学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(12):146-149. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
