Scenarized Intelligent Data-Driven Research Model: Concept, Technical Framework, and Experimental Verification
Wang Xuezhao1,2(),Wang Yanpeng1,2,Zhao Ping1,Chen Fang1,Chen Xiaoli1
1National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
[Objective] This paper proposes a scenarized intelligent data-driven research model and conducts preliminary verification through several cases. [Methods] We developed a quantitative characterization model named SDS (S&T decision scenarios(S) - scenarized data alignment(DX) - solution scenarios(S)). The implementation path of SDS was divided into three steps: S&T decision scenarization demands, scenarized data construction, and optional solution generation. [Results] We verified the model through two cases which supported specific decision-making scenarios such as the selection of emerging and disruptive technologies, the perception of S&T frontier trend, the evaluation of scientific research proposals, and situational awareness in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. The research results were recognized by relevant S&T decision-makers. [Limitations] The automation level of data scenarized processes is relatively low, and there is a need to improve the combinations of intelligent technologies and information basic theoretical methods in the process of generating evidence chains. [Conclusions] The scenarized intelligent data-driven research model promotes the breadth and depth of research conclusions, improves the efficiency and speed of research work, and verifies the reusability and portability of scenarized intelligent data. It can provide reference and guidance for the concept, ideas, and implementation path of research and services for future S&T decision-making.
(Zhang Xiaolin. Towards Knowledge Services: Seeking Development Opportunities for Library and Information Services in the 21st Century[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2000, 26(5): 32-37.)
(Ke Ping. To Meet the Birth of the Next Generation of Information Science:The Crisis and Reformation of Information Science[J]. Information Science, 2020, 38(2): 3-10.)
(Liu Ru, Wu Chensheng, Liu Yanjun, et al. History and Development of Scientific and Technical Intelligence in China[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(1): 38-45.)
(Cao Shujin, Cao Ruye. Influence of Generative AI on the Research and Practice of Information Science from the Perspective of ChatGPT[J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2023, 43(4): 3-10.)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2023.04.001
(Liu Xiwen. Paradigm Transformation of Library and Information Science and Trends of Data-Driven Information Services[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(1): 4-11.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.01.001
(Zhang Xiaolin. Disruptive Changes and the Post-Library Era: Toward Supply-Side Structure Reform of Knowledge Services[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2018, 44(1): 4-16.)
(Dai Guoqiang. Intelligence Studies for Innovation in the New Era[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(8): 771-777.)
(Geng Guotong, Lei Shuai, Sun Ying, et al. Understanding and Practice of Intellectualization of Sci-tech Information Research[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(5): 1-6.)
doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2022.05.001
(Yang Jianlin. Thoughts on Reconstructing the Foundational Theory System of Information Science[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(2): 125-134.)
(Su Xinning. Knowledge Service-Oriented Domain Knowledge Organization[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(9): 889-899.)
(Pan Jiaofeng. Double Helix Structure of Think Tank Research[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(7): 907-916.)
[13]
Wan H Y, Zhang Y T, Zhang J, et al. AMiner: Search and Mining of Academic Social Networks[J]. Data Intelligence, 2019, 1(1): 58-76.
doi: 10.1162/dint_a_00006
[14]
Tian Z L, Shi J, Hafsi T, et al. How to Get Evidence? The Role of Government-Business Interaction in Evidence-Based Policy-Making for the Development of Internet of Things Industry in China[J]. Policy Studies, 2017, 38(1): 1-20.
doi: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1161180
(Weng Yongkun, Zhu Jing. Accommodation Evidence: Source, Nature, Function and Significance[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2016(1): 99-105.)
[16]
Parkhurst J, Ghilardi L, Webster J, et al. Understanding Evidence Use from a Programmatic Perspective: Conceptual Development and Empirical Insights from National Malaria Control Programmes[J]. Evidence & Policy, 2021, 17(3): 447-466.
(Wang Danli, Hua Qingyi, Dai Guozhong. Research on User-Centered Scenario-Based Design[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2005, 28(6): 1043-1047.)
[18]
Storbacka K. A Solution Business Model: Capabilities and Management Practices for Integrated Solutions[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011, 40(5): 699-711.
doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.003
[19]
Nordin F, Kowalkowski C. Solutions Offerings: A Critical Review and Reconceptualisation[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2010, 21(4): 441-459.
doi: 10.1108/09564231011066105
[20]
Androutsopoulou A, Charalabidis Y. A Framework for Evidence Based Policy Making Combining Big Data, Dynamic Modelling and Machine Intelligence[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. 2018: 575-583.
[21]
Sakellaris K, Canton J, Zafeiratou E, et al. METIS-An Energy Modelling Tool to Support Transparent Policy Making[J]. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, 22: 127-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.013
[22]
Commission on Evidence-Based Policymaking. The Promise of Evidence-Based Policymaking[R/OL]. [2017-09-07]. https://www.fatherhood.gov/sites/default/files/resource_files/e000004015.pdf.
[23]
Carriger J F, Barron M G, Newman M C. Bayesian Networks Improve Causal Environmental Assessments for Evidence-Based Policy[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(24): 13195-13205.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03220
(Wang Yanpeng, Han Tao, Chen Fang. Identification of Key Technologies Based on Literature Knowledge Clustering and Complex Network[J]. Library and Information Service, 2020, 64(16): 105-113.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.16.011
[25]
Chen Y F, Xia X Z, An Y, et al. Conflict Evidence Combination Based on Evidence Classification Strategy[C]// Proceedings of 2013 Chinese Automation Congress. 2013: 167-170.
[26]
Li V, Han Y, Lam J, et al. Air Pollution and Environmental Injustice: Are the Socially Deprived Exposed to More PM2. 5 Pollution in Hong Kong?[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2018, 80: 53-61.