Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现  2023, Vol. 7 Issue (5): 145-154     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0420
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于在线评论的顾客满意度研究——以健康监测穿戴产品为例*
林伟振,刘洪伟,陈燕君,温展明(),易闽琦
广东工业大学管理学院 广州 510520
Customer Satisfaction Modelling for Healthcare Wearable Devices Through Online Reviews
Lin Weizhen,Liu Hongwei,Chen Yanjun,Wen Zhanming(),Yi Minqi
School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
全文: PDF (778 KB)   HTML ( 18
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

【目的】 识别顾客群体对健康监测穿戴产品的关注维度及其对满意度的影响,启发商家优化产品并提升服务。【方法】 采用知名购物网站亚马逊的11 349条在线评论数据作为语料,使用LDA模型识别顾客满意维度,结合机器学习算法建构满意度模型。【结果】 以多层感知器(MLP)建构的满意度模型预测效果最佳(F1=0.653 4),顾客对产品的关注集中于功能属性、服务属性、质量属性、价值属性、易用属性、社交属性、效用属性等7个综合属性的13个产品维度。功能属性是顾客群体最关注的产品属性,而社交属性、质量属性和服务属性能给顾客满意度带来消极影响,应是商家进行产品优化与服务提升的优先方向。【局限】 未考虑评论真实性。【结论】 得到顾客对产品的关注维度、满意度影响方面与改进次序,为商家提供深刻管理启示。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
林伟振
刘洪伟
陈燕君
温展明
易闽琦
关键词 健康监测穿戴产品顾客满意度在线评论主题模型机器学习    
Abstract

[Objective] This paper identifies the dimensions of customer interest in wearable healthcare devices and their impact on satisfaction, aiming to inspire businesses to optimize their products and services. [Methods] First, we retrieved 11,349 online reviews from Amazon.com as the corpus. Then, we used the LDA model to identify customer satisfaction dimensions. Finally, we constructed a satisfaction model using machine learning algorithms. [Results] The satisfaction model constructed with the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) had the best prediction effect (F1=0.6534). Customers’ attention on products focused on 13 dimensions across seven comprehensive attributes: functionality attributes, service attributes, quality attributes, value attributes, ease of use attributes, social attributes, usefulness attributes. Functionality attributes was the most important product feature for customers. Social, quality, and service attributes had a negative impact on customer satisfaction and should be the priority for businesses to improve products and services. [Limitations] We did not consider the reviews’ authenticity and in future will include cases of false and malicious reviews in the analysis process. [Conclusions] This paper identifies the dimensions of customer attention to products, their impact on satisfaction, and the order in which improvement should be made, providing management insights for business.

Key wordsHealthcare Wearable Devices    Customer Satisfaction    Online Reviews    Topic Models    Machine Learning
收稿日期: 2022-05-02      出版日期: 2023-07-04
ZTFLH:  TP393  
  G250  
基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(71671048);全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题(EIA210424);广东省哲学社会科学“十四五”规划2022年度常规项目的研究成果之一(GD22YJY13)
通讯作者: 温展明,ORCID:0000-0002-5001-334X,E-mail:wenzhanming@gdut.edu.cn。   
引用本文:   
林伟振, 刘洪伟, 陈燕君, 温展明, 易闽琦. 基于在线评论的顾客满意度研究——以健康监测穿戴产品为例*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 145-154.
Lin Weizhen, Liu Hongwei, Chen Yanjun, Wen Zhanming, Yi Minqi. Customer Satisfaction Modelling for Healthcare Wearable Devices Through Online Reviews. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7(5): 145-154.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0420      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2023/V7/I5/145
作者(年份) 数据来源 主题模型 归纳顾客
关注维度/属性
有优先次序的产品改进策略 构建满意度
模型
问卷调查 在线评论
吴江等[8] (2017)
吴江等[9] (2017)
Youm等[10] (2018)
李淑芸[11] (2019)
Kim[12] (2021)
Liu等[13] (2022)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
Jeng等[15] (2020)
本研究
Table 1  健康穿戴产品的满意度研究现状
Fig.1  研究框架
Fig.2  顾客评分分布
Fig.3  不同主题模型的Coherence值
CSD 关键词 参考文献 研究品牌
步数追踪 step, count, time, work, sleep, stair, walk, accurate, take, track 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit
配送服务 delivery, family, complaint, rash, satisfied, push, fantastic, accountable, deliver 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
易用性 exactly, easy, expect, work, arrive, motivator, fast, good, phone, thank 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Kim[12](2021);Youm等[10](2018);
Jeng等[14-15] (2022,2020)
华为、小米、Fitbit
社交属性 gift, daughter, birthday, purchase, present, instruction, receive, friend, happy, time 吴江等[9](2017);Kim[12](2021) 未提及
提醒功能 sleep, alarm, step, track, walk, night, wake, many, time, work 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
表带卡扣 fall, band, clasp, lose, come, secure, apart, motivational, design, worth 吴江等[8](2017);Kim[12](2021) 华为、小米、Fitbit
价格 lose, money, pound, want, spend, waste, extra, since, shape, change 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
售后服务 band, month, fall, work, replacement, customer, replace, time, break, come 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
续航 work, battery, month, stop, last, week, long, return, hold, life 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
李淑芸[11](2019);Youm等[10](2018);
Jeng等[15] (2020)
华为、小米、Fitbit
尺寸 small, large, wrist, size, band, wish, water, flex, waterproof, wear 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
睡眠追踪 track, help, sleep, activity, calorie, step, exercise, weight, daily, food 吴江等[8](2017);Kim[12](2021) 华为、小米、Fitbit
心率追踪 heart, rate, monitor, accurate, step, track, work, wear, seem 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit
效用 everyday, motivate, move, challenge, wear, goal, work, step, friend, enjoy 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
Table 2  主题建模归纳CSD
综合属性 CSD W j
功能属性 步数追踪 0.108 4
睡眠追踪 0.073 7
心率追踪 0.180 8
提醒功能 0.067 6
服务属性 配送服务 0.035 9
售后服务 0.110 8
质量属性 续航 0.076 9
尺寸 0.066 5
表带卡扣 0.048 1
社交属性 社交属性 0.042 6
易用属性 易用性 0.054 5
价值属性 价格 0.037 4
效用属性 效用 0.096 6
Table 3  综合属性汇总表
Fig.4  CSD权重分布
综合属性 CSD关注层级 关注度排序
功能属性 I、II 1
服务属性 I、III 2
效用属性 I 3
质量属性 II、III 4
易用属性 III 5
社交属性 III 6
价值属性 III 7
Table 4  综合属性关注度排序
模型 训练集 测试集
准确率(交叉验证) 准确率 F 1
MNLogit 0.514 8 0.505 3 0.227 6
Bayesian Ridge 0.290 3 0.321 6 0.245 7
SVM 0.498 7 0.512 7 0.222 5
DT 0.386 2 0.390 3 0.275 6
AdaBoost 0.505 0 0.501 3 0.290 1
MLP 0.740 6 0.738 6 0.653 4
Table 5  模型预测表现
CSD

Y
1
不满意
2
较不满意
3
一般
4
较满意
5
满意
步数追踪 0.153 8 1.475 0 5.594 3 17.036 1 29.024 0
配送服务 8.764 6 3.274 4 1.130 6 2.347 9 8.115 3
易用性 -31.944 2 -7.941 3 11.581 0 39.312 4 51.773 6
社交属性 24.289 5 7.939 3 -1.330 4 -7.101 7 -0.636 5
提醒功能 -23.516 7 -4.058 7 15.555 3 50.371 9 74.534 9
表带卡扣 16.468 9 4.429 7 -4.651 0 -16.244 6 -19.8550
价格 -2.234 3 1.380 4 8.422 8 25.958 5 43.062 9
售后服务 20.789 6 5.529 4 -6.117 1 -21.255 9 -26.338 1
续航 7.267 3 2.443 4 -0.130 7 -1.309 9 1.194 4
尺寸 -5.606 6 -0.648 2 4.964 8 15.839 2 24.278 8
睡眠追踪 -64.279 0 -6.504 3 21.240 7 72.816 4 93.492 4
心率追踪 -17.544 6 -4.064 6 7.528 6 25.152 2 34.486 8
效用 -14.538 6 -3.385 1 6.172 1 20.639 9 28.233 3
Table 6  基于MLP顾客满意度模型的特征权重
条件 描述 符号
I e > 0,表示 C S D i提升顾客满意度 +
II e < 0,表示 C S D j抑制顾客满意度 -
Table 7  顾客满意度影响因素分析条件
综合属性 CSD 综合属性关注度 CSD与满意度关系
本研究 现有文献结论 文献来源
功能属性 睡眠追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
提醒功能 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
心率追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
步数追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
服务属性 配送服务 2 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
售后服务 2 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
效用属性 效用 3 + + + 吴江等[8](2017)
Youm等[10](2018)
质量属性 尺寸 4 + - 李淑芸[11](2019)
表带卡扣 4 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
续航 4 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
易用属性 易用性 5 + + - - + Youm等[10](2018)
吴江等[9](2017)
Kim[12](2021)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
吴江等[8](2017)
社交属性 社交属性 6 - + - 吴江等[9](2017)
Kim[12](2021)
价值属性 价格 7 + + - 李淑芸[11] (2019)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
Table 8  综合属性角度分析顾客满意度影响因素
[1] Iqbal S M A, Mahgoub I, Du E, et al. Advances in Healthcare Wearable Devices[J]. npj Flexible Electronics, 2021, 5: Article No.9.
[2] Li H, Wu J, Gao Y, et al. Examining Individuals’ Adoption of Healthcare Wearable Devices: An Empirical Study from Privacy Calculus Perspective[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2016, 88: 8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.010 pmid: 26878757
[3] Fortune Business Insights. Wearable Medical Devices Market Size, Share and Industry Analysis by Product, by Application, by Distribution, and Regional Forecast 2019-2026[EB/OL]. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/wearable-medical-devices-market-101070.
[4] Lee S M, Lee D. Healthcare Wearable Devices: An Analysis of Key Factors for Continuous Use Intention[J]. Service Business, 2020, 14(4): 503-531.
doi: 10.1007/s11628-020-00428-3
[5] Huarng K H, Yu T H K, Lee C F. Adoption Model of Healthcare Wearable Devices[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 174: 121286.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121286
[6] 沙静, 曾巩俐, 杨扬, 等. 基于隐式反馈的个性化游戏推荐方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 809-817.
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0636
[6] (Sha Jing, Zeng Gongli, et al. Personalized Game Recommendation Method Based on Implicit Feedback[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(4): 809-817.)
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0636
[7] 王扶东, 尹倩倩, 刘峰涛. 在线评论中隐式商品特征识别方法[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3): 451-456.
[7] (Wang Fudong, Yin Qianqian, Liu Fengtao. The Identification Method of Implicit Product Feature in the Online Reviews[J]. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science), 2019, 45(3): 451-456.)
[8] 吴江, 周露莎, 刘冠君, 等. 基于LDA的可穿戴设备在线评论主题挖掘研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(3): 24-33.
doi: 10.4018/IRMJ
[8] (Wu Jiang, Zhou Lusha, Liu Guanjun, et al. The Study of Topic Mining on Online Reviews of Wearable Devices Based on LDA Model[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2017, 7(3): 24-33.)
doi: 10.4018/IRMJ
[9] 吴江, 李姗姗, 胡仙, 等. 健康类可穿戴设备用户融入意向影响因素的实证研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(2): 22-30.
[9] (Wu Jiang, Li Shanshan, Hu Xian, et al. An Empirical Study of Users’ Engagement Intention on Healthy Wearable Devices[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2017, 7(2): 22-30.)
[10] Youm D S, Yu S Y. Factors Affecting Satisfaction of Products Implemented by Wearable Devices: Focused on Product Attributes and Customer Attributes International[J]. Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2018, 120(6): 5351-5369.
[11] 李淑芸. 可穿戴设备顾客满意度分析[D]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2019.
[11] (Li Shuyun. Customer Satisfaction Analysis of Wearable Device[D]. Wuhan: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2019.)
[12] Kim M. Conceptualization of E-Servicescapes in the Fitness Applications and Wearable Devices Context: Multi-Dimensions, Consumer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 61: 102562.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102562
[13] Liu Y P, Han M L. Determining the Key Factors of Wearable Devices Consumers’ Adoption Behavior Based on an MADM Model for Product Improvement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(6): 4036-4051.
doi: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2960499
[14] Jeng M Y, Yeh T M, Pai F Y. A Performance Evaluation Matrix for Measuring the Life Satisfaction of Older Adults Using eHealth Wearables[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2022, 10(4): 605.
[15] Jeng M Y, Yeh T M, Pai F Y. Analyzing Older Adults' Perceived Values of Using Smart Bracelets by Means-End Chain[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2020, 8(4): 494.
[16] Guo Y, Barnes S J, Jia Q. Mining Meaning from Online Ratings and Reviews: Tourist Satisfaction Analysis Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Tourism Management, 2017, 59: 467-483.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.009
[17] Tirunillai S, Tellis G J. Mining Marketing Meaning from Online Chatter: Strategic Brand Analysis of Big Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014, 51(4): 463-479.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.12.0106
[18] Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P G. Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(8): 1485-1509.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1370
[19] Bi J W, Liu Y, Fan Z P, et al. Modelling Customer Satisfaction from Online Reviews Using Ensemble Neural Network and Effect-Based Kano Model[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(22): 7068-7088.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1574989
[20] Bi J W, Liu Y, Fan Z P, et al. Wisdom of Crowds: Conducting Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Through Online Reviews[J]. Tourism Management, 2019, 70: 460-478.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.010
[21] Farhadloo M, Patterson R A, Rolland E. Modeling Customer Satisfaction from Unstructured Data Using a Bayesian Approach[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2016, 90: 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.010
[22] Farhadloo M, Rolland E. Multi-Class Sentiment Analysis with Clustering and Score Representation[C]// Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 2014: 904-912.
[23] Qi J, Zhang Z, Jeon S, et al. Mining Customer Requirements from Online Reviews: A Product Improvement Perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(8): 951-963.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.06.002
[24] Joung J, Kim H M. Explainable Neural Network-Based Approach to Kano Categorisation of Product Features from Online Reviews[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2022, 60(23): 7053-7073.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.2000656
[25] Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993-1022.
[26] Liu X, Burns A C, Hou Y J. An Investigation of Brand-Related User-Generated Content on Twitter[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2017, 46(2): 236-247.
doi: 10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273
[27] Deb Roy S, Mei T, Zeng W J, et al. Towards Cross-Domain Learning for Social Video Popularity Prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2013, 15(6): 1255-1267.
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2013.2265079
[28] Lee S M, So W Y, Youn H S. Importance-Performance Analysis of Health Perception Among Korean Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(3): 1280.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031280
[29] Lee S I, Yoo W J, Park H S, et al. An Empirical Study on Acceptance Intention Towards Healthcare Wearable Device[J]. The Journal of Information Systems, 2016, 25(2): 27-50.
doi: 10.5859/KAIS.2016.25.2.27
[30] Wang A N, Zhang Q, Zhao S Y, et al. A Review-Driven Customer Preference Measurement Model for Product Improvement: Sentiment-Based Importance-Performance Analysis[J]. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2020, 18(1): 61-88.
doi: 10.1007/s10257-020-00463-7
[31] Ibrahim N F, Wang X J. A Text Analytics Approach for Online Retailing Service Improvement: Evidence from Twitter[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2019, 121(C): 37-50.
[32] Mou J, Ren G, Qin C X, et al. Understanding the Topics of Export Cross-Border E-Commerce Consumers Feedback: An LDA Approach[J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, 19(4): 749-777.
doi: 10.1007/s10660-019-09338-7
[33] Anderson E W, Fornell C, Lehmann D R. Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(3): 53.
[34] Oliver R L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1980, 17(4): 460-469.
doi: 10.1177/002224378001700405
[35] Woodruff R B, Cadotte E R, Jenkins R L. Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1983, 20(3): 296-304.
doi: 10.1177/002224378302000308
[36] Zhou F, Ayoub J, Xu Q L, et al. A Machine Learning Approach to Customer Needs Analysis for Product Ecosystems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2020, 142(1): 011101.
doi: 10.1115/1.4044435
[37] Groves R M. Survey Nonresponse[M]. New York: Wiley, 2002.
[38] Groves R M. Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2006, 70(5): 646-675.
doi: 10.1093/poq/nfl033
[39] Culotta A, Cutler J. Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks[J]. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(3): 343-362.
doi: 10.1287/mksc.2015.0968
[40] Xiao S, Wei C P, Dong M. Crowd Intelligence: Analyzing Online Product Reviews for Preference Measurement[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(2): 169-182.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.09.010
[1] 蒋林甫, 袁贞明, 张邢炜, 姜华强, 孙晓燕. 基于PCHD-TabNet的十年冠心病预测*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 133-144.
[2] 韦华楠, 雷鸣, 汪雪锋, 余音. 基础研究资助导向识别及演化分析:以NSF为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 10-20.
[3] 吕琦, 上官燕红, 张琳, 黄颖. 基于文本内容自动分类的跨学科测度研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(4): 56-67.
[4] 唐娇, 张力生, 桑春艳. 基于潜在主题分布和长、短期用户表示的新闻推荐模型*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(9): 52-64.
[5] 张治鹏, 毛煜升, 张李义. 基于领域ERNIE和BiLSTM模型的酒店评论观点原因分类研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(9): 65-76.
[6] 曲宗希, 沙勇忠, 李雨桐. 基于灰狼优化与多机器学习的重大传染病集合预测研究——以COVID-19疫情为例*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(8): 122-133.
[7] 王丽, 刘细文. 基于专利数据的技术主题扩散量化研究与实现*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(6): 1-10.
[8] 赵杨, 严周周, 沈棋琦, 李钟航. 基于机器学习的医疗健康APP隐私政策合规性研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(5): 112-126.
[9] 王露, 乐小虬. 科技论文引用内容分析研究进展[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(4): 1-15.
[10] 王若佳, 严承希, 郭凤英, 王继民. 基于用户画像的在线健康社区用户流失预测研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 80-92.
[11] 岳铁骐, 傅友斐, 徐健. 基于招聘广告的岗位人才需求分析框架构建与实证研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 151-166.
[12] 吕璐成, 周健, 王学昭, 刘细文. 基于双层主题模型的技术演化分析框架及其应用*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 18-32.
[13] 吴金红, 穆克亮. 国际期刊异常行为的自动识别与预警研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 385-395.
[14] 周云泽, 闵超. 基于LDA模型与共享语义空间的新兴技术识别——以自动驾驶汽车为例*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 55-66.
[15] 胡雅敏, 吴晓燕, 陈方. 基于机器学习的技术术语识别研究综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 7-17.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn