Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2006, Vol. 1 Issue (6): 22-25     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2006.06.06
  数字图书馆 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
数字图书馆评价研究综述
吴清强1 韩涛2
1(中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100080)
2(中国科学院研究生院 北京 100049)
The Overview of the Evaluation of Digital Library
Wu Qingqiang1    Han Tao2
1(Library of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China)
2(Graduate  University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
全文:
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

通过查找文献和网站,对目前数字图书馆评价的研究状况做一个分类和综述,分析数字图书馆评估的意义及目前发展滞后的原因。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
韩涛
吴清强
关键词 数字图书馆评价数字图书馆评价综述    
Abstract

By retrieving from the literature documents and seeking on the Websites, this paper tries to classify and make an overview to the projects and research of the evaluations of digital library by far, and analyses the meaning of the evaluation of digital library and the reasons why the evaluation of digital library is lagged.

Key wordsDigital library    Evaluation    Evaluation of digital library    Overview
收稿日期: 2006-03-23      出版日期: 2006-06-25
: 

G250.7

 
通讯作者: 吴清强     E-mail: wuqq@mail.las.ac.cn
作者简介: 吴清强,韩涛
引用本文:   
吴清强,韩涛 . 数字图书馆评价研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 1(6): 22-25.
Wu Qingqiang,Han Tao . The Overview of the Evaluation of Digital Library. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2006, 1(6): 22-25.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2006.06.06      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2006/V1/I6/22

1Association of Research Libraries Definition and Purpose of a Digital Library. http://www.arl.org/sunsite/definition.html (Accessed Feb.23,2006)
2Stephen Griffin. Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics Hungarian Academy of Sciences Computer and Automation Research Institute (MTA SZTAKI) Budapest, Hungary 6-7 June 2002.http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations.html (Accessed Feb.22,2006)
3赵凯威,张桂玲.国外数字图书馆评价研究综述.情报科学 2003,21(5):479-482
4Jane Barton. Measurement, management and the digital library.Library Review, 2004, 53(3):138-141
5Kilker J, Gay G. The social construction of a digital library: A case study examining implications for evaluation.Information Technology and Libraries, 1998, 17 (2): 60-70
6Mabe, M. DL classification & evaluation: a publisher’s view of the work of the DELOS.http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations/mabe.ppt (Accessed Feb.23,2006)
7Sandusky, R. Digital Library Attributes: Framing Research and Results. http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations/sandusky.ppt (Accessed Feb.24,2006)
8Saracevic, T. Digital Library Evaluation: Toward an Evolution of Concepts.Library Trends,2000,49(2):350-369
9Marchionini, G. Evaluating Digital Libraries: A Longitudinal and Multifaceted View.Library Trends, 2000, 49(2): 304-333
10Jeffrey K. Mackie-MasonAlexandra L.L. Jankovich Peak: Pricing electronic access to knowledge.Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 1997, 21(3): 281-295
11Hill, L. L., Dolin, R., Frew, J., Kemp, R. B., Larsgaard, M., Montello, D. R., Rae, M.-A., & Simpson, J. User evaluation: summary of the methodologies and results for the Alexandria Digital Library, University of California at Santa Barbara. In: C. Schwartz & M. Rorvig (Eds.). Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS) Annual Meeting. Washington D.C.:1997.225-243, 369
12Hill, L. L., Carver, L., Dolin, R et al. Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and system design.Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Special Issue on Digital Libraries), 2000,51(3):246-259
13Nancy A. Van House, Mark Butler, and Lisa Schiff, Needs Assessment and Evaluation of a Digital Environmental Library: the Berkeley Experience, October, 1995. http://info.sims.berkeley.edu/~vanhouse/dl96.html (Accessed Feb.25,2006)
14Nancy A. Van House, User Needs Assessment and Evaluation for the UC Berkeley Electronic Environmental Library Project Digital Libraries ’95: The Second Annual Conference on the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, June 11-13, 1995 - Austin, Texas, USA
15Frances F. Jacobson, Emily N. Ignacio. Teaching Reflection: Information Seeking and Evaluation in a Digital Library Environment.Library Trends,1997,45(4): 771-802
16Leazer, G. H., A.J. Gilliland-Swetland, C.L. Borgman. Evaluating the Use of a Geographic Digital Library in Undergraduate Classrooms. In:ADEPT Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, June 2-7, 2000. San Antonio: ACM Press, 2000. 248-249
17Hill, L. L., Carver, L., Dolin, R. et al. Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and system design.Journal of the American Society for Information Science (Special Issue on Digital Libraries), 2000,51 (3):246-259
18于良芝 英国电子图书馆评价.津图学刊,2001(1): 7-11
19D-Lib Test Suite.http://www.dlib.org/test-suite/testbeds.html (Accessed Feb.26,2006)
20Braschler, M., Peters, C. The CLEF Campaigns: Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems. http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/issues/2002/3/upgrade-vIII-3.html (Accessed Feb.26,2006)
21Norbert Fuhr Digital Library Test Suite. http://www.iei.pi.cnr.it/DELOS/delos2/International/Presentations/Evaluation/DELOSNoE.ppt (Accessed Feb.24,2006)
22Fourth DELOS Workshop Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics. http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations/final_report.html (Accessed Feb.26,2006)
23Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval. http://qmir.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/INEX/ (Accessed Feb.24,2006)
24Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval. http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de:2003/ (Accessed Feb.24,2006)
25Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval. http://inex.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de:2004/ (Accessed Feb.27,2006)
26ARL New Measures Initiatives. http://www.arl.org/stats/newmeas/index.html
27Roswitha Poll. Performance measures for library networked services and resources.The Electronic Library, 2002, 19(5): 307-314
28Tefko Saracevic. Evaluation of digital libraries: An overview Presentation at the DELOS WP7 Workshop on the Evaluation of Digital Libraries, 4-5 October 2004. http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/DL_evaluation_LIDA.pdf (Accessed Feb.27,2006)

[1] 徐曾旭林, 谢靖, 于倩倩. 人才多元评价模型设计方法研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(8): 122-131.
[2] 岳名亮,李富山,汤宏波,吕新华,马廷灿. 期刊审稿专家一致性评价方法及其有效性验证 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(4): 115-122.
[3] 沈旺, 李世钰, 刘嘉宇, 李贺. 问答社区回答质量评价体系优化方法研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(2): 83-93.
[4] 姜霖,张麒麟. 基于引文细粒度情感量化的学术评价研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6): 129-138.
[5] 洪闯,李贺,彭丽徽,许一明. 在线健康咨询平台信息服务质量的物元模型及可拓评价研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(8): 41-52.
[6] 李想,钱晓东. 商品在线评价对消费趋同影响研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 102-111.
[7] 丁晟春,侯琳琳,王颖. 基于电商数据的产品知识图谱构建研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 45-56.
[8] 李健,王明月,许路明,田英春. 基于用户感知价值的医疗信息服务评价体系构建*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 118-126.
[9] 章成志,李铮. 基于学术论文全文的创新研究评价句抽取研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 12-18.
[10] 徐艳华, 苗雨洁, 苗琳, 吕学强. 基于LDA模型的HSK作文生成*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(9): 80-87.
[11] 俞立平, 宋夏云, 王作功. 自然权重对非线性科技评价的影响及纠正研究*——以TOPSIS方法评价为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 48-57.
[12] 孟虎, 梁晓蓓, 杨以雄, 李敏. 大数据背景下基于LMBP算法的供应链绩效评价与优化*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(11): 37-45.
[13] 史昱天, 朱庆华, 赵宇翔, 陈晓威. 基于链接分析法对国内网络直播平台综合影响力的评价研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 40-48.
[14] 王雪颖, 张紫玄, 王昊, 邓三鸿. 中国农产品品牌评价研究的内容解析*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(7): 13-21.
[15] 卿雅娴, 李锐, 吴华意. 基于论文合著网络的学术社区分析方法研究* ——以《美国地理学家联合会会刊》为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(4): 20-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn