Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现  2022, Vol. 6 Issue (12): 32-42     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0064
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于对抗神经网络的跨模态谣言检测*
孟佳娜,王晓培,李婷,刘爽(),赵迪
大连民族大学计算机科学与工程学院 大连 116600
Cross-Modal Rumor Detection Based on Adversarial Neural Network
Meng Jiana,Wang Xiaopei,Li Ting,Liu Shuang(),Zhao Di
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Dalian Minzu University, Dalian 116600, China
全文: PDF (2235 KB)   HTML ( 19
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

目的】 通过结合文本和图像模数据,提出跨模态对抗神经网络模型,提高谣言检测对新数据的泛化能力。【方法】 采用融合自注意力机制的双向长短时记忆网络模型表示文本特征,使用预训练的VGG19网络模型表示图像特征,通过对抗神经网络学习事件共同特征。【结果】 所提模型在准确率、精确率、召回率和F1值得分等方面都优于对比模型,在微博、推特两个数据集上的准确率分别比基线模型的最优结果提高了3.6个百分点和3.5个百分点。【局限】 不同模态信息下的特征关联分析不够,跨模态数据的语义鸿沟问题没有很好解决。【结论】 所提模型能够比现有方法更好地学习特征表示,在谣言检测上取得了较好的结果。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孟佳娜
王晓培
李婷
刘爽
赵迪
关键词 谣言检测对抗神经网络双向长短时记忆网络自注意力机制VGG19    
Abstract

[Objective] This paper proposes an adversarial neural network model combining the text and image data, aiming to improve the effectiveness of rumor detection. [Methods] First, we integrated the self-attention mechanism with the Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory network (BiLSTM) model to represent the text features. Then, we used the pre-trained VGG19 network model to represent the image features. Finally, we used the adversarial neural network to study the events’ common features. [Results] It is superior to the existing baseline models in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F1 scores. The accuracy on Weibo and Twitter data sets is 3.6% and 3.5%, higher than the best result compared with the baseline models respectively. [Limitations] More research is needed to examine the feature association between the modal information, and bridge the semantic gap of cross-modal data. [Conclusions] The proposed model could more effectively learn feature representation and detect rumors.

Key wordsRumor Detection    Adversarial Neural Network    Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory    Self-Attentional Mechanism    VGG19
收稿日期: 2022-01-21      出版日期: 2023-02-03
ZTFLH:  TP391  
基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(61876031);辽宁省自然科学基金计划项目(2022-BS-104)
通讯作者: 刘爽,ORCID: 0000-0002-0095-4328     E-mail: liushuang@dlnu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
孟佳娜, 王晓培, 李婷, 刘爽, 赵迪. 基于对抗神经网络的跨模态谣言检测*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(12): 32-42.
Meng Jiana, Wang Xiaopei, Li Ting, Liu Shuang, Zhao Di. Cross-Modal Rumor Detection Based on Adversarial Neural Network. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6(12): 32-42.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0064      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2022/V6/I12/32
Fig.1  整体模型框架
数据集 标签 数量 总计
微博 4 749 9 528
4 779
推特 7 021 12 995
5 974
Table 1  数据集统计信息
数据集 模型 准确率 F1值 精确率 召回率
微博 TextCNN 0.764 0.748 0.827 0.683
BiLSTM-Attention 0.787 0.763 0.851 0.692
推特 TextCNN 0.532 0.568 0.598 0.541
BiLSTM-Attention 0.585 0.629 0.642 0.618
Table 2  单文本模态的谣言检测结果
数据集 模型 准确率 F1值 精确率 召回率
微博 ResNet152 0.690 0.675 0.705 0.647
RCNN 0.689 0.690 0.690 0.700
VGG19 0.730 0.698 0.789 0.626
推特 ResNet152 0.591 0.558 0.731 0.452
RCNN 0.590 0.570 0.720 0.470
VGG19 0.596 0.593 0.695 0.518
Table 3  单视觉模态的谣言检测结果
数据集 模型 准确率 F1值 精确率 召回率
微博 VQA 0.736 0.706 0.797 0.634
Att-RNN 0.772 0.789 0.778 0.799
MSRD 0.794 0.779 0.854 0.716
DCNN 0.803 0.799 0.801 0.809
本文 0.839 0.835 0.853 0.818
推特 VQA 0.631 0.611 0.765 0.509
Att-RNN 0.664 0.676 0.749 0.615
MSRD 0.685 0.678 0.725 0.636
DCNN - - - -
本文 0.720 0.725 0.832 0.643
Table 4  跨模态谣言检测性能对比
数据集 模型 准确率 F1值 精确率 召回率
微博 Ours 0.839 0.835 0.853 0.818
Ours w/o adv 0.806 0.812 0.816 0.809
Ours w/o VGG19 0.774 0.775 0.775 0.774
Ours w/o BiLSTM-Attention 0.757 0.746 0.756 0.738
推特 Ours 0.720 0.725 0.832 0.643
Ours w/o adv 0.656 0.629 0.824 0.509
Ours w/o VGG19 0.620 0.604 0.615 0.606
Ours w/o BiLSTM-Attention 0.592 0.597 0.604 0.590
Table 5  消融实验结果对比
Fig.2  微博数据集中训练集损失、测试集损失以及对抗性损失对比
Fig.3  推特数据集中训练集损失、测试集损失以及对抗性损失对比
Fig.4  微博测试集上学习的文本特征表示的可视化
Fig.5  推特测试集上学习的文本特征表示的可视化
[1] 谭荧, 张进, 夏立新. 社交媒体情境下的情感分析研究综述[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(1):1-11.
[1] (Tan Ying, Zhang Jin, Xia Lixin. A Survey of Sentiment Analysis on Social Media[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 4(1): 1-11.)
[2] Castillo C, Mendoza M, Poblete B. Information Credibility on Twitter[C]// Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2011: 675-684.
[3] Wu K, Yang S, Zhu K Q. False Rumors Detection on Sina Weibo by Propagation Structures[C]// Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Data Engineering. 2015: 651-662.
[4] Rashkin H, Choi E, Jang J Y, et al. Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking[C]// Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2017: 2931-2937.
[5] Gupta A, Lamba H, Kumaraguru P, et al. Faking Sandy: Characterizing and Identifying Fake Images on Twitter During Hurricane Sandy[C]// Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. 2013: 729-736.
[6] Guo H, Cao J, Zhang Y Z, et al. Rumor Detection with Hierarchical Social Attention Network[C]// Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2018: 943-951.
[7] 蒋雨肖, 丁晟春, 吴鹏. 基于BiLSTM-VGG16的多模态信息特征分类研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(11): 180-186, 179.
[7] (Jiang Yuxiao, Ding Shengchun, Wu Peng. A Study on the Classification of Features of Multi-Modal Information Based on BiLSTM-VGG16[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(11): 180-186, 179.)
[8] 李莎, 张怀文, 钱胜胜, 等. 多模态多层次事件网络的谣言检测[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2021, 26(7): 1648-1657.
[8] (Li Sha, Zhang Huaiwen, Qian Shengsheng, et al. Multi-Modal Multi-Level Event Network for Rumor Detection[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2021, 26(7): 1648-1657.)
[9] Jin Z W, Cao J, Guo H, et al. Multimodal Fusion with Recurrent Neural Networks for Rumor Detection on Microblogs[C]// Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2017: 795-816.
[10] 宋之杰, 王建, 贾杰. 基于 SIHR1R2的突发事件谣言传播研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2016, 35(3):118-124, 136.
[10] (Song Zhijie, Wang Jian, Jia Jie. Research on Rumor Spreading in Emergency Based on SIHR1R2 Model[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016, 35(3):118-124, 136.)
[11] Kwon S, Cha M, Jung K, et al. Prominent Features of Rumor Propagation in Online Social Media[C]// Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Mining. 2013: 1103-1108.
[12] Tong S, Koller D. Support Vector Machine Active Learning with Applications to Text Classification[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2002, 2:45-66.
[13] Ma J, Gao W, Mitra P, et al. Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016: 3818-3824.
[14] 刘政, 卫志华, 张韧弦. 基于卷积神经网络的谣言检测[J]. 计算机应用, 2017, 37(11): 3053-3056.
doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.11.3053
[14] (Liu Zheng, Wei Zhihua, Zhang Renxian. Rumor Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Network[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2017, 37(11): 3053-3056.)
doi: 10.11772/j.issn.1001-9081.2017.11.3053
[15] Chen T, Li X, Yin H Z, et al. Call Attention to Rumors: Deep Attention Based Recurrent Neural Networks for Early Rumor Detection[C]// Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2018: 40-52.
[16] Popat K, Mukherjee S, Yates A, et al. DeClarE: Debunking Fake News and False Claims Using Evidence-Aware Deep Learning[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 1809.06416.
[17] Wang Y Q, Ma F L, Jin Z W, et al. EANN: Event Adversarial Neural Networks for Multi-Modal Fake News Detection[C]// Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2018: 849-857.
[18] Yang X Y, Lyu Y F, Tian T, et al. Rumor Detection on Social Media with Graph Structured Adversarial Learning[C]// Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2021: 1417-1423.
[19] Ni S W, Li J W, Kao H Y. Rumor Detection on Social Media with Hierarchical Adversarial Training[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 2110.00425.
[20] 李奥, 但志平, 董方敏, 等. 基于改进生成对抗网络的谣言检测方法[J]. 中文信息学报, 2020, 34(9): 78-88.
[20] (Li Ao, Dan Zhiping, Dong Fangmin, et al. An Improved Generative Adversarial Network for Rumor Detection[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2020, 34(9): 78-88.)
[21] Ganin Y, Lempitsky V. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagation[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning. 2015: 1180-1189.
[22] Ganin Y, Ustinova E, Ajakan H, et al. Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks[J]. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2016, 17(1): 2096-2030.
[23] Maigrot C, Claveau V, Kijak E, et al. MediaEval 2016:A Multimodal System for the Verifying Multimedia Use Task[C]// Proceedings of the 2016 MediaEval Workshop. 2016.
[24] Chen Y H. Convolutional Neural Network for Sentence Classification[D]. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo, 2015.
[25] Schuster M, Paliwal K K. Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1997, 45(11): 2673-2681.
doi: 10.1109/78.650093
[26] Antol S, Agrawal A, Lu J S, et al. VQA: Visual Question Answering[C]// Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015: 2425-2433.
[27] 刘金硕, 冯阔, Jeff Z. Pan, 等. MSRD: 多模态网络谣言检测方法[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2020, 57(11): 2328-2336.
[27] (Liu Jinshuo, Feng Kuo, Pan J Z, et al. MSRD: Multi-Modal Web Rumor Detection Method[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2020, 57(11): 2328-2336.)
[28] 陈志毅, 隋杰. 基于DeepFM和卷积神经网络的集成式多模态谣言检测方法[J]. 计算机科学, 2022, 49(1): 101-107.
doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.201200007
[28] (Chen Zhiyi, Sui Jie. DeepFM and Convolutional Neural Networks Ensembles for Multimodal Rumor Detection[J]. Computer Science, 2022, 49(1): 101-107.)
doi: 10.11896/jsjkx.201200007
[1] 郭航程, 何彦青, 兰天, 吴振峰, 董诚. 基于Paragraph-BERT-CRF的科技论文摘要语步功能信息识别方法研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 298-307.
[2] 范涛,王昊,吴鹏. 基于图卷积神经网络和依存句法分析的网民负面情感分析研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 97-106.
[3] 杨晗迅, 周德群, 马静, 罗永聪. 基于不确定性损失函数和任务层级注意力机制的多任务谣言检测研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(7): 101-110.
[4] 韩普,张展鹏,张明淘,顾亮. 基于多特征融合的中文疾病名称归一化研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(5): 83-94.
[5] 余本功, 张书文. 基于BAGCNN的方面级别情感分析研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(12): 37-47.
[6] 陶志勇,李小兵,刘影,刘晓芳. 基于双向长短时记忆网络的改进注意力短文本分类方法 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(12): 21-29.
[7] 肖连杰,孟涛,王伟,吴志祥. 基于深度学习的情报分析方法识别研究 * ——以安全情报领域为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 20-28.
[8] 刘勘,杜好宸. 基于深度迁移网络的Twitter谣言检测研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 47-55.
[9] 首欢容, 邓淑卿, 徐健. 基于情感分析的网络谣言识别方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(7): 44-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn