Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2023, Vol. 7 Issue (5): 145-154    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0420
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Customer Satisfaction Modelling for Healthcare Wearable Devices Through Online Reviews
Lin Weizhen,Liu Hongwei,Chen Yanjun,Wen Zhanming(),Yi Minqi
School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
Download: PDF (778 KB)   HTML ( 18
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper identifies the dimensions of customer interest in wearable healthcare devices and their impact on satisfaction, aiming to inspire businesses to optimize their products and services. [Methods] First, we retrieved 11,349 online reviews from Amazon.com as the corpus. Then, we used the LDA model to identify customer satisfaction dimensions. Finally, we constructed a satisfaction model using machine learning algorithms. [Results] The satisfaction model constructed with the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) had the best prediction effect (F1=0.6534). Customers’ attention on products focused on 13 dimensions across seven comprehensive attributes: functionality attributes, service attributes, quality attributes, value attributes, ease of use attributes, social attributes, usefulness attributes. Functionality attributes was the most important product feature for customers. Social, quality, and service attributes had a negative impact on customer satisfaction and should be the priority for businesses to improve products and services. [Limitations] We did not consider the reviews’ authenticity and in future will include cases of false and malicious reviews in the analysis process. [Conclusions] This paper identifies the dimensions of customer attention to products, their impact on satisfaction, and the order in which improvement should be made, providing management insights for business.

Key wordsHealthcare Wearable Devices      Customer Satisfaction      Online Reviews      Topic Models      Machine Learning     
Received: 02 May 2022      Published: 04 July 2023
ZTFLH:  TP393  
  G250  
Fund:National Natural Science Foundation of China(71671048);National Education Science Planning Youth Project of the Ministry of Education(EIA210424);14th Five-Year Plan of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guangdong Province 2022 Regular Projects(GD22YJY13)
Corresponding Authors: Wen Zhanming,ORCID:0000-0002-5001-334X,E-mail:wenzhanming@gdut.edu.cn。   

Cite this article:

Lin Weizhen, Liu Hongwei, Chen Yanjun, Wen Zhanming, Yi Minqi. Customer Satisfaction Modelling for Healthcare Wearable Devices Through Online Reviews. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7(5): 145-154.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2022.0420     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2023/V7/I5/145

作者(年份) 数据来源 主题模型 归纳顾客
关注维度/属性
有优先次序的产品改进策略 构建满意度
模型
问卷调查 在线评论
吴江等[8] (2017)
吴江等[9] (2017)
Youm等[10] (2018)
李淑芸[11] (2019)
Kim[12] (2021)
Liu等[13] (2022)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
Jeng等[15] (2020)
本研究
Research Review on Satisfaction with HWDs
Research Framework
Distribution of Customer Ratings
Coherence Values for Different Topic Models
CSD 关键词 参考文献 研究品牌
步数追踪 step, count, time, work, sleep, stair, walk, accurate, take, track 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit
配送服务 delivery, family, complaint, rash, satisfied, push, fantastic, accountable, deliver 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
易用性 exactly, easy, expect, work, arrive, motivator, fast, good, phone, thank 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Kim[12](2021);Youm等[10](2018);
Jeng等[14-15] (2022,2020)
华为、小米、Fitbit
社交属性 gift, daughter, birthday, purchase, present, instruction, receive, friend, happy, time 吴江等[9](2017);Kim[12](2021) 未提及
提醒功能 sleep, alarm, step, track, walk, night, wake, many, time, work 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
表带卡扣 fall, band, clasp, lose, come, secure, apart, motivational, design, worth 吴江等[8](2017);Kim[12](2021) 华为、小米、Fitbit
价格 lose, money, pound, want, spend, waste, extra, since, shape, change 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
售后服务 band, month, fall, work, replacement, customer, replace, time, break, come 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
续航 work, battery, month, stop, last, week, long, return, hold, life 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
李淑芸[11](2019);Youm等[10](2018);
Jeng等[15] (2020)
华为、小米、Fitbit
尺寸 small, large, wrist, size, band, wish, water, flex, waterproof, wear 吴江等[8](2017) 华为、小米、Fitbit
睡眠追踪 track, help, sleep, activity, calorie, step, exercise, weight, daily, food 吴江等[8](2017);Kim[12](2021) 华为、小米、Fitbit
心率追踪 heart, rate, monitor, accurate, step, track, work, wear, seem 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit
效用 everyday, motivate, move, challenge, wear, goal, work, step, friend, enjoy 吴江等[8](2017);吴江等[9](2017);
Jeng等[14] (2022)
华为、小米、Fitbit、荣耀
Topic Modelling Summarization of CSD
综合属性 CSD W j
功能属性 步数追踪 0.108 4
睡眠追踪 0.073 7
心率追踪 0.180 8
提醒功能 0.067 6
服务属性 配送服务 0.035 9
售后服务 0.110 8
质量属性 续航 0.076 9
尺寸 0.066 5
表带卡扣 0.048 1
社交属性 社交属性 0.042 6
易用属性 易用性 0.054 5
价值属性 价格 0.037 4
效用属性 效用 0.096 6
Summary of Combined Attributes
Weight Distribution of CSD
综合属性 CSD关注层级 关注度排序
功能属性 I、II 1
服务属性 I、III 2
效用属性 I 3
质量属性 II、III 4
易用属性 III 5
社交属性 III 6
价值属性 III 7
Combined Attributes in Order of Customer’s Concern
模型 训练集 测试集
准确率(交叉验证) 准确率 F 1
MNLogit 0.514 8 0.505 3 0.227 6
Bayesian Ridge 0.290 3 0.321 6 0.245 7
SVM 0.498 7 0.512 7 0.222 5
DT 0.386 2 0.390 3 0.275 6
AdaBoost 0.505 0 0.501 3 0.290 1
MLP 0.740 6 0.738 6 0.653 4
Model Predictive Performance
CSD

Y
1
不满意
2
较不满意
3
一般
4
较满意
5
满意
步数追踪 0.153 8 1.475 0 5.594 3 17.036 1 29.024 0
配送服务 8.764 6 3.274 4 1.130 6 2.347 9 8.115 3
易用性 -31.944 2 -7.941 3 11.581 0 39.312 4 51.773 6
社交属性 24.289 5 7.939 3 -1.330 4 -7.101 7 -0.636 5
提醒功能 -23.516 7 -4.058 7 15.555 3 50.371 9 74.534 9
表带卡扣 16.468 9 4.429 7 -4.651 0 -16.244 6 -19.8550
价格 -2.234 3 1.380 4 8.422 8 25.958 5 43.062 9
售后服务 20.789 6 5.529 4 -6.117 1 -21.255 9 -26.338 1
续航 7.267 3 2.443 4 -0.130 7 -1.309 9 1.194 4
尺寸 -5.606 6 -0.648 2 4.964 8 15.839 2 24.278 8
睡眠追踪 -64.279 0 -6.504 3 21.240 7 72.816 4 93.492 4
心率追踪 -17.544 6 -4.064 6 7.528 6 25.152 2 34.486 8
效用 -14.538 6 -3.385 1 6.172 1 20.639 9 28.233 3
Feature Weights Based on the MLP Customer Satisfaction Model
条件 描述 符号
I e > 0,表示 C S D i提升顾客满意度 +
II e < 0,表示 C S D j抑制顾客满意度 -
Conditions for Analysis of Factors Influencing Customer Satisfaction
综合属性 CSD 综合属性关注度 CSD与满意度关系
本研究 现有文献结论 文献来源
功能属性 睡眠追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
提醒功能 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
心率追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
步数追踪 1 + + 吴江等[8](2017)
服务属性 配送服务 2 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
售后服务 2 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
效用属性 效用 3 + + + 吴江等[8](2017)
Youm等[10](2018)
质量属性 尺寸 4 + - 李淑芸[11](2019)
表带卡扣 4 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
续航 4 - - 李淑芸[11](2019)
易用属性 易用性 5 + + - - + Youm等[10](2018)
吴江等[9](2017)
Kim[12](2021)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
吴江等[8](2017)
社交属性 社交属性 6 - + - 吴江等[9](2017)
Kim[12](2021)
价值属性 价格 7 + + - 李淑芸[11] (2019)
Jeng等[14] (2022)
Analysis of Factors Influencing Customer Satisfaction Based on Comprehensive Attribute
[1] Iqbal S M A, Mahgoub I, Du E, et al. Advances in Healthcare Wearable Devices[J]. npj Flexible Electronics, 2021, 5: Article No.9.
[2] Li H, Wu J, Gao Y, et al. Examining Individuals’ Adoption of Healthcare Wearable Devices: An Empirical Study from Privacy Calculus Perspective[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2016, 88: 8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.010 pmid: 26878757
[3] Fortune Business Insights. Wearable Medical Devices Market Size, Share and Industry Analysis by Product, by Application, by Distribution, and Regional Forecast 2019-2026[EB/OL]. https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/wearable-medical-devices-market-101070.
[4] Lee S M, Lee D. Healthcare Wearable Devices: An Analysis of Key Factors for Continuous Use Intention[J]. Service Business, 2020, 14(4): 503-531.
doi: 10.1007/s11628-020-00428-3
[5] Huarng K H, Yu T H K, Lee C F. Adoption Model of Healthcare Wearable Devices[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 174: 121286.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121286
[6] 沙静, 曾巩俐, 杨扬, 等. 基于隐式反馈的个性化游戏推荐方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2021, 33(4): 809-817.
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0636
[6] (Sha Jing, Zeng Gongli, et al. Personalized Game Recommendation Method Based on Implicit Feedback[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2021, 33(4): 809-817.)
doi: 10.16182/j.issn1004731x.joss.19-0636
[7] 王扶东, 尹倩倩, 刘峰涛. 在线评论中隐式商品特征识别方法[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3): 451-456.
[7] (Wang Fudong, Yin Qianqian, Liu Fengtao. The Identification Method of Implicit Product Feature in the Online Reviews[J]. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science), 2019, 45(3): 451-456.)
[8] 吴江, 周露莎, 刘冠君, 等. 基于LDA的可穿戴设备在线评论主题挖掘研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(3): 24-33.
doi: 10.4018/IRMJ
[8] (Wu Jiang, Zhou Lusha, Liu Guanjun, et al. The Study of Topic Mining on Online Reviews of Wearable Devices Based on LDA Model[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2017, 7(3): 24-33.)
doi: 10.4018/IRMJ
[9] 吴江, 李姗姗, 胡仙, 等. 健康类可穿戴设备用户融入意向影响因素的实证研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2017, 7(2): 22-30.
[9] (Wu Jiang, Li Shanshan, Hu Xian, et al. An Empirical Study of Users’ Engagement Intention on Healthy Wearable Devices[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2017, 7(2): 22-30.)
[10] Youm D S, Yu S Y. Factors Affecting Satisfaction of Products Implemented by Wearable Devices: Focused on Product Attributes and Customer Attributes International[J]. Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2018, 120(6): 5351-5369.
[11] 李淑芸. 可穿戴设备顾客满意度分析[D]. 武汉: 中南财经政法大学, 2019.
[11] (Li Shuyun. Customer Satisfaction Analysis of Wearable Device[D]. Wuhan: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2019.)
[12] Kim M. Conceptualization of E-Servicescapes in the Fitness Applications and Wearable Devices Context: Multi-Dimensions, Consumer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intention[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2021, 61: 102562.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102562
[13] Liu Y P, Han M L. Determining the Key Factors of Wearable Devices Consumers’ Adoption Behavior Based on an MADM Model for Product Improvement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022, 69(6): 4036-4051.
doi: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2960499
[14] Jeng M Y, Yeh T M, Pai F Y. A Performance Evaluation Matrix for Measuring the Life Satisfaction of Older Adults Using eHealth Wearables[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2022, 10(4): 605.
[15] Jeng M Y, Yeh T M, Pai F Y. Analyzing Older Adults' Perceived Values of Using Smart Bracelets by Means-End Chain[J]. Healthcare (Basel), 2020, 8(4): 494.
[16] Guo Y, Barnes S J, Jia Q. Mining Meaning from Online Ratings and Reviews: Tourist Satisfaction Analysis Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Tourism Management, 2017, 59: 467-483.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.009
[17] Tirunillai S, Tellis G J. Mining Marketing Meaning from Online Chatter: Strategic Brand Analysis of Big Data Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2014, 51(4): 463-479.
doi: 10.1509/jmr.12.0106
[18] Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P G. Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews[J]. Management Science, 2011, 57(8): 1485-1509.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1370
[19] Bi J W, Liu Y, Fan Z P, et al. Modelling Customer Satisfaction from Online Reviews Using Ensemble Neural Network and Effect-Based Kano Model[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(22): 7068-7088.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1574989
[20] Bi J W, Liu Y, Fan Z P, et al. Wisdom of Crowds: Conducting Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Through Online Reviews[J]. Tourism Management, 2019, 70: 460-478.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.010
[21] Farhadloo M, Patterson R A, Rolland E. Modeling Customer Satisfaction from Unstructured Data Using a Bayesian Approach[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2016, 90: 1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.010
[22] Farhadloo M, Rolland E. Multi-Class Sentiment Analysis with Clustering and Score Representation[C]// Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 2014: 904-912.
[23] Qi J, Zhang Z, Jeon S, et al. Mining Customer Requirements from Online Reviews: A Product Improvement Perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(8): 951-963.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.06.002
[24] Joung J, Kim H M. Explainable Neural Network-Based Approach to Kano Categorisation of Product Features from Online Reviews[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2022, 60(23): 7053-7073.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2021.2000656
[25] Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993-1022.
[26] Liu X, Burns A C, Hou Y J. An Investigation of Brand-Related User-Generated Content on Twitter[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2017, 46(2): 236-247.
doi: 10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273
[27] Deb Roy S, Mei T, Zeng W J, et al. Towards Cross-Domain Learning for Social Video Popularity Prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2013, 15(6): 1255-1267.
doi: 10.1109/TMM.2013.2265079
[28] Lee S M, So W Y, Youn H S. Importance-Performance Analysis of Health Perception Among Korean Adolescents During the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(3): 1280.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031280
[29] Lee S I, Yoo W J, Park H S, et al. An Empirical Study on Acceptance Intention Towards Healthcare Wearable Device[J]. The Journal of Information Systems, 2016, 25(2): 27-50.
doi: 10.5859/KAIS.2016.25.2.27
[30] Wang A N, Zhang Q, Zhao S Y, et al. A Review-Driven Customer Preference Measurement Model for Product Improvement: Sentiment-Based Importance-Performance Analysis[J]. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2020, 18(1): 61-88.
doi: 10.1007/s10257-020-00463-7
[31] Ibrahim N F, Wang X J. A Text Analytics Approach for Online Retailing Service Improvement: Evidence from Twitter[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2019, 121(C): 37-50.
[32] Mou J, Ren G, Qin C X, et al. Understanding the Topics of Export Cross-Border E-Commerce Consumers Feedback: An LDA Approach[J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, 19(4): 749-777.
doi: 10.1007/s10660-019-09338-7
[33] Anderson E W, Fornell C, Lehmann D R. Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58(3): 53.
[34] Oliver R L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1980, 17(4): 460-469.
doi: 10.1177/002224378001700405
[35] Woodruff R B, Cadotte E R, Jenkins R L. Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1983, 20(3): 296-304.
doi: 10.1177/002224378302000308
[36] Zhou F, Ayoub J, Xu Q L, et al. A Machine Learning Approach to Customer Needs Analysis for Product Ecosystems[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2020, 142(1): 011101.
doi: 10.1115/1.4044435
[37] Groves R M. Survey Nonresponse[M]. New York: Wiley, 2002.
[38] Groves R M. Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2006, 70(5): 646-675.
doi: 10.1093/poq/nfl033
[39] Culotta A, Cutler J. Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks[J]. Marketing Science, 2016, 35(3): 343-362.
doi: 10.1287/mksc.2015.0968
[40] Xiao S, Wei C P, Dong M. Crowd Intelligence: Analyzing Online Product Reviews for Preference Measurement[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(2): 169-182.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.09.010
[1] Jiang Linfu, Yuan Zhenming, Zhang Xingwei, Jiang Huaqiang, Sun Xiaoyan. Ten-Year Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Based on PCHD-TabNet[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 133-144.
[2] Wei Huanan, Lei Ming, Wang Xuefeng, Yu Yin. Analyzing Evolution of Basic Research Funding Orientation: Case Study of NSF[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 10-20.
[3] Lv Qi, Shangguan Yanhong, Zhang Lin, Huang Ying. Interdisciplinary Measurement Based on Automatic Classification of Text Content[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(4): 56-67.
[4] Qu Zongxi, Sha Yongzhong, Li Yutong. Predicting Major Infectious Diseases Based on Grey Wolf Optimization and Multi-machine Learning: Case Study of COVID-19[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(8): 122-133.
[5] Zhao Yang, Yan Zhouzhou, Shen Qiqi, Li Zhonghang. Evaluating Privacy Policy for Mobile Health APPs with Machine Learning[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(5): 112-126.
[6] Wang Lu, Le Xiaoqiu. Research Progress on Citation Analysis of Scientific Papers[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(4): 1-15.
[7] Wang Ruojia, Yan Chengxi, Guo Fengying, Wang Jimin. Predicting Churners of Online Health Communities Based on the User Persona[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 80-92.
[8] Wu Jinhong, Mu Keliang. Automatic Identifying Abnormal Behaviors of International Journals[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 385-395.
[9] Hu Yamin, Wu Xiaoyan, Chen Fang. Review of Technology Term Recognition Studies Based on Machine Learning[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 7-17.
[10] Shang Lili, Tang Huayun, Wang Yanzhao, Zuo Meiyun. Identifying Actionable Information from Online Reviews[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(12): 1-12.
[11] Chen Donghua,Zhao Hongmei,Shang Xiaopu,Zhang Runtong. Optimizing Large Hospital Operating Rooms with Data Analytics[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 115-128.
[12] Che Hongxin,Wang Tong,Wang Wei. Comparing Prediction Models for Prostate Cancer[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 107-114.
[13] Wang Hanxue,Cui Wenjuan,Zhou Yuanchun,Du Yi. Identifying Pathogens of Foodborne Diseases with Machine Learning[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 54-62.
[14] Su Qiang, Hou Xiaoli, Zou Ni. Predicting Surgical Infections Based on Machine Learning[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(8): 65-75.
[15] Cao Rui,Liao Bin,Li Min,Sun Ruina. Predicting Prices and Analyzing Features of Online Short-Term Rentals Based on XGBoost[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(6): 51-65.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn