|
|
|
| Reviewing Research on Semantic Novelty in Sci-Tech Literature |
Wu Xinyu1,2,Li Hanyu1,2( ),Zhang Zhixiong1,2,Wu Zhenxin1,2 |
1National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract [Objective] This paper reviews the research progress on semantic novelty in China and abroad. It explores relevant techniques and provides references for future studies. [Coverage] We used keywords such as “novelty of the literature”, “semantic novelty”, “literature novelty”, and search expressions like “semantic novelty and literature evaluation” to retrieve literature from Web of Science, Elsevier, Springer, Google Scholar, as well as Chinese databases like CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP. A total of 70 representative literature were selected for review. [Methods] We summarized research on semantic novelty, focusing on the definition of novelty, evaluation indicators, and different evaluation methods. We also discussed the current development status and future trends of evaluating semantic novelty in scientific literature. [Results] Semantic novelty evaluation has gradually received widespread attention from the academic community. Related studies have evaluated semantic content without establishing a unified measurement index. [Limitations] Existing evaluation of literature novelty mainly focuses on external features. Fewer research papers directly addressed semantic novelty, limiting support for reviews. [Conclusions] The evaluation of semantic novelty in scientific literature fundamentally lies in the novelty of semantic content. Quantitative research has become the mainstream method, but the calculation method of evaluation indicators needs to be clarified. Future studies on novelty evaluation should combine qualitative and quantitative methods for more comprehensive evaluations.
|
|
Received: 18 November 2022
Published: 12 April 2024
|
|
|
| Fund:National Social Science Fund of China(21&ZD329);National Key R&D Program of China(2022YFF0711900) |
|
Corresponding Authors:
Li Hanyu，ORCID：0000-0003-1426-3242，E-mail：lihy@mail.las.ac.cn。
|
| [1] |
孙晓玲. 科技论文写作旨在突出创新[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(6):111-114.
|
| [1] |
(Sun Xiaoling. Highlighting New Ideas is the Core of Writing Scientific Paper[J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University(Natural Science), 2007, 43(6):111-114.)
|
| [2] |
索传军, 盖双双, 周志超. 认知计算——单篇学术论文评价的新视角[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2018, 44(1): 50-61.
|
| [2] |
(Suo Chuanjun, Gai Shuangshuang, Zhou Zhichao. Cognitive Computing: A New Perspective for Evaluating the Individual Academic Paper[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2018, 44(1): 50-61.)
|
| [3] |
曾建勋. 推动科研论文语义评价体系建设[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2021(11): 1.
|
| [3] |
(Zeng Jianxun. Promote the Construction of Semantic Evaluation System for Scientific Research Papers[J]. Digital Library Forum, 2021(11): 1.)
|
| [4] |
Schumpeter J A. The Theory of Economic Development[M]. London: Oxford University Press,1978.
|
| [5] |
WIPO. World Intellectual Property Report 2022:The Direction of Innovation[R/OL]. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-944-2022-en-world-intellectual-property-report-2022-the-direction-of-innovation.pdf.
|
| [6] |
OECD, Statistical Office of the European Communities. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data[M]. The 3rd Edition. Paris: OECD, 2005.
|
| [7] |
European Commission. Green Paper on Innovation[R]. Publications Office of the European Union, 1995.
|
| [8] |
罗卓然, 陆伟, 蔡乐, 等. 学术文本词汇功能识别——在论文新颖性度量上的应用[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(7): 720-732.
|
| [8] |
(Luo Zhuoran, Lu Wei, Cai Le, et al. Application of Lexical Functions in Novelty Measurement of Academic Papers[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(7): 720-732.)
|
| [9] |
高自龙. 创新性学术成果的发现与评鉴策略——基于编辑工作的思考[J]. 编辑之友, 2018(1): 81-85.
|
| [9] |
(Gao Zilong. Discovery and Evaluation Strategy of Innovative Academic Achievements: Thoughts Based on Editing Practice[J]. Editorial Friend, 2018(1): 81-85.)
|
| [10] |
索传军. 知识转移视角下的学术论文老化与创新研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(5): 5-12.
|
| [10] |
(Suo Chuanjun. Study on Obsolescence and Innovation of Academic Papers from Perspective of Knowledge Transfer[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(5): 5-12.)
|
| [11] |
《科技查新教程》编写组. 科技查新教程[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2001.
|
| [11] |
(Science and Technology Novel Search Course Writing Group. Science and Technology Novelty Search Course[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2001.)
|
| [12] |
张京辉, 胡淑礼, 王亚非, 等. 软科学成果查新研究[J]. 软科学, 1993, 7(4): 28-33.
|
| [12] |
(Zhang Jinghui, Hu Shuli, Wang Yafei, et al. Research on Novelty Retrieval of Soft Science Achievements[J]. Soft Science, 1993, 7(4): 28-33.)
|
| [13] |
陈永胜, 孙昌玲. 社会科学查新工作指标体系的结构模型与价值分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2002(6): 6-8.
|
| [13] |
(Chen Yongsheng, Sun Changling. The Indicator System for Innovation Verification in Social Sciences: Structural Model & Value Analysis[J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2002(6): 6-8.)
|
| [14] |
徐华. 浅谈学术论文的创新[J]. 价值工程, 2013, 32(36): 259-260.
|
| [14] |
(Xu Hua. On Academic Paper Innovation[J]. Value Engineering, 2013, 32(36): 259-260.)
|
| [15] |
魏绪秋, 申力旭. 学术论文创新性研究述评[J]. 图书情报知识, 2022, 39(4): 68-79.
|
| [15] |
(Wei Xuqiu, Shen Lixu. A Research Review of the Academic Paper Innovativeness[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2022, 39(4): 68-79.)
|
| [16] |
Mishra S, Torvik V I. Quantifying Conceptual Novelty in the Biomedical Literature[J]. D-Lib Magazine, 2016, 22(9-10): 10.1045/september2016-mishra.
|
| [17] |
Heinze T, Shapira P, Rogers J, et al. Creativity Capabilities and the Promotion of Highly Innovative Research in Europe and the United States[R]. EU-NEST/CREA-511889, Karlsruhe, 2007.
|
| [18] |
Kaplan S, Vakili K. The Double-Edged Sword of Recombination in Breakthrough Innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(10): 1435-1457.
doi: 10.1002/smj.2294
|
| [19] |
黄红, 陈翀, 张婧莹. 科技文献内容语义识别研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2022, 41(9): 991-1002.
|
| [19] |
(Huang Hong, Chen Chong, Zhang Jingying. Review on Identifying the Semantics of Scientific Literature Content[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2022, 41(9): 991-1002.)
|
| [20] |
Nasar Z, Jaffry S W, Malik M K. Information Extraction from Scientific Articles: A Survey[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(3): 1931-1990.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2921-5
|
| [21] |
李姗, 单磊, 崔雷. 学术论文新颖性评价方式[J]. 中华医学图书情报杂志, 2020, 29(8): 71-74.
|
| [21] |
(Li Shan, Shan Lei, Cui Lei. Novelty Assessment Methods of Academic Papers[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science, 2020, 29(8): 71-74.)
|
| [22] |
逯万辉, 苏金燕, 余倩. 学术成果主题新颖性与学术引用的相关关系研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2018(6): 68-73.
|
| [22] |
(Lu Wanhui, Su Jinyan, Yu Qian. Research on Correlation of Academic Achievement Theme Novelty and Academic Citation[J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2018(6): 68-73.)
|
| [23] |
张智雄, 刘欢, 于改红. 构建基于科技文献知识的人工智能引擎[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2021, 33(1): 17-31.
doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0797
|
| [23] |
(Zhang Zhixiong, Liu Huan, Yu Gaihong. Building an Artificial Intelligence Engine Based on Scientific and Technological Literature Knowledge[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2021, 33(1): 17-31.)
doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.20-0797
|
| [24] |
陈云伟. 科技评价计量方法述评[J]. 农业图书情报学报, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.
doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.08.20-0467
|
| [24] |
(Chen Yunwei. Review on Quantitative Methods of Science and Technology Evaluation[J]. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture, 2020, 32(8): 4-11.)
doi: 10.13998/j.cnki.issn1002-1248.2020.08.20-0467
|
| [25] |
卢超, 侯海燕, Ding Ying, 等. 国外新兴研究话题发现研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(1): 97-110.
|
| [25] |
(Lu Chao, Hou Haiyan, Ding Ying, et al. Review of Internationnal Studies on Discovering Emerging Topics[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(1): 97-110.)
|
| [26] |
Jarić I, Knežević-Jarić J, Lenhardt M. Relative Age of References as a Tool to Identify Emerging Research Fields with an Application to the Field of Ecology and Environmental Sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(2): 519-529.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1268-9
|
| [27] |
González-Alcaide G, Llorente P, Ramos J M. Bibliometric Indicators to Identify Emerging Research Fields: Publications on Mass Gatherings[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 109(2): 1283-1298.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2083-2
|
| [28] |
Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(3): 791-817.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366
|
| [29] |
Lee Y N, Walsh J P, Wang J. Creativity in Scientific Teams: Unpacking Novelty and Impact[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(3): 684-697.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007
|
| [30] |
Wang J, Veugelers R, Stephan P. Bias Against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006
|
| [31] |
He Y J, Luo J X. Novelty, Conventionality, and Value of Invention[M]// Design Computing and Cognition’16. Cham: Springer, 2017: 23-38.
|
| [32] |
Carayol N, Lahatte A, Llopis O. Novelty and Academic Impact[EB/OL]. [2023-02-11]. https://digital.csic.es/bitstream/10261/162613/1/novelty.pdf.
|
| [33] |
Trapido D. How Novelty in Knowledge Earns Recognition: The Role of Consistent Identities[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(8): 1488-1500.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.007
|
| [34] |
Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large Teams Develop and Small Teams Disrupt Science and Technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566: 378-382.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
|
| [35] |
刘小慧, 廖宇, 朱曼曼. 颠覆性指数用于科研评价初探[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 34-40.
|
| [35] |
(Liu Xiaohui, Liao Yu, Zhu Manman. A Preliminary Study on the Application of Disruption Index to Scientific Research Evaluation[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(12): 34-40.)
|
| [36] |
Frigotto M L, Riccaboni M. A Few Special Cases: Scientific Creativity and Network Dynamics in the Field of Rare Diseases[J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(1): 397-420.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0431-9
|
| [37] |
王军辉, 谭宗颖. 基于文献计量的科学创造力评价研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(3): 131-139.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.03.017
|
| [37] |
(Wang Junhui, Tan Zongying. A Review of Bibliometric Evaluation Research of Scientific Creativity[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(3): 131-139.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.03.017
|
| [38] |
Zhang Y, Tsai F S. Chinese Novelty Mining[C]// Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process. 2009: 1561-1570.
|
| [39] |
杨建林, 钱玲飞. 基于关键词对逆文档频率的主题新颖度度量方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(3): 99-102.
|
| [39] |
(Yang Jianlin, Qian Lingfei. Topic Novelty Measurement Method Based on Keyword Versus Inverse Document Frequency[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2013, 36(3): 99-102.)
|
| [40] |
郭丽娜, 李星琛, 左文革, 等. 颠覆性研究文献计量识别方法述评[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(3):17-24.
|
| [40] |
(Guo Lina, Li Xingchen, Zuo Wenge, et al. A Review of Disruptive Work and Its Bibliometric Identification Methods[J]. Digital Library Forum, 2020(3): 17-24.)
|
| [41] |
Allan J, Carbonell J, Doddington G, et al. Topic Detection and Tracking Pilot Study Final Report[C]// Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Transcription and Understanding Workshop.1998.
|
| [42] |
Harman D. Overview of the TREC 2002 Novelty Track[C]// Proceedings of Text Retrieval Conference. 2002.
|
| [43] |
曾建勋. 破除“SCI至上”需要弘扬“同行评议”[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2020(2): 1-2.
|
| [43] |
(Zeng Jianxun. Eliminate SCI-Supremacy Requires Promoting Peer Review[J]. Digital Library Forum, 2020(2): 1-2.)
|
| [44] |
邢美凤, 过仕明. 文本内容新颖性探测研究综述[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(7): 1098-1103.
|
| [44] |
(Xing Meifeng, Guo Shiming. Overview of Novelty Detection for Text Document[J]. Information Science, 2011, 29(7): 1098-1103.)
|
| [45] |
逯万辉, 谭宗颖. 学术成果主题新颖性测度方法研究——基于Doc2Vec和HMM算法[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(3): 22-29.
|
| [45] |
(Lu Wanhui, Tan Zongying. Measuring Novelty of Scholarly Articles[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2018, 2(3): 22-29.)
|
| [46] |
Tsai F S, Tang W Y, Chan K L. Evaluation of Novelty Metrics for Sentence-Level Novelty Mining[J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(12): 2359-2374.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.02.020
|
| [47] |
王平, 侯景瑞, 吴任力. 基于递归张量神经网络的微信公众号文章的新颖度评估方法[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(2): 159-169.
|
| [47] |
(Wang Ping, Hou Jingrui, Wu Renli. The Novelty Evaluation of Articles on WeChat Subscription Based on Recursive Neural Tensor Network[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2019, 38(2): 159-169.)
|
| [48] |
Luo Z R, Lu W, He J G, et al. Combination of Research Questions and Methods: A New Measurement of Scientific Novelty[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101282.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2022.101282
|
| [49] |
褚婧丹. 科技论文创新点原创性测度方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院大学, 2020.
|
| [49] |
(Chu Jingdan. Research on the Method of Measuring the Originality of Innovation in Scientific Papers[D]. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020.)
|
| [50] |
陈娜. 基于知识组合视角的技术新颖性测度研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2021.
|
| [50] |
(Chen Na. Research on Technology Novelty Measurement Based on Knowledge Combination Perspective[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2021.)
|
| [51] |
Sendhilkumar S, Mahalakshmi G S, Harish S, et al. Assessing Novelty of Research Articles Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps[M]//Intelligent Informatics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 73-79.
|
| [52] |
秦岩, 代君, 廖莹驰. 学术会议论文新颖性测度研究——以计算机学科人工智能领域为例[J]. 情报科学, 2021, 39(1): 104-110.
|
| [52] |
(Qin Yan, Dai Jun, Liao Yingchi. Novelty Measurement of Academic Conference Papers—Taking Artificial Intelligence Field of Computer Science as the Example[J]. Information Science, 2021, 39(1): 104-110.)
|
| [53] |
Hautamaki V, Karkkainen I, Franti P. Outlier Detection Using K-Nearest Neighbour Graph[C]// Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 2004: 430-433.
|
| [54] |
廖莹驰. 基于论文文本内容角度的学术会议新颖性及影响力评价[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2019.
|
| [54] |
(Liao Yingchi. Novelty and Influence Evaluation of Academic Conference Based on the Content of the Text[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2019.)
|
| [55] |
Zhang K, Zi J, Wu L G. New Event Detection Based on Indexing-Tree and Named Entity[C]// Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2007: 215-222.
|
| [56] |
Amplayo R K, Hong S L, Song M. Network-Based Approach to Detect Novelty of Scholarly Literature[J]. Information Sciences, 2018, 422: 542-557.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.037
|
| [57] |
丁芳媛. 基于新颖性和影响力的论文推荐方法研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2020.
|
| [57] |
(Ding Fangyuan. Research on Paper Recommendation Algorithm Based on Novelty and Influence[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2020.)
|
| [58] |
任海英, 王德营, 王菲菲. 主题词组合新颖性与论文学术影响力的关系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 87-93.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011
|
| [58] |
(Ren Haiying, Wang Deying, Wang Feifei. Relationship Between Novelty of Key-Term Combinations and Papers’ Scientific Impact[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(9): 87-93.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.09.011
|
| [59] |
Matsumoto K, Shibayama S, Kang B, et al. Introducing a Novelty Indicator for Scientific Research: Validating the Knowledge-Based Combinatorial Approach[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(8): 6891-6915.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04049-z
|
| [60] |
许丹, 徐爽, 陈斯斯, 等. 基于自然语言词对法的文献主题新颖性探测研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(8):130-138.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.08.017
|
| [60] |
(Xu Dan, Xu Shuang, Chen Sisi, et al. Document Theme Novelty Detection Research Based on Natural Language Pairs[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018, 62(8): 130-138.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.08.017
|
| [61] |
杨京, 王芳, 白如江. 一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(17): 75-83.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.17.010
|
| [61] |
(Yang Jing, Wang Fang, Bai Rujiang. A Method to Evaluate Academic Papers’ Innovation Based on the Research Theme Comparing[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018, 62(17): 75-83.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.17.010
|
| [62] |
张吉玉, 张均胜. 考虑时序的单篇科技文献新颖性评估方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 93-105.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.17.009
|
| [62] |
(Zhang Jiyu, Zhang Junsheng. Novelty Evaluation Method of Single Scientific and Technical Literature Considering Time Series[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(17): 93-105.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.17.009
|
| [63] |
钱佳佳, 罗卓然, 陆伟. 基于问题-方法组合的科技论文新颖性度量与创新类型识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(14): 82-89.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.14.010
|
| [63] |
(Qian Jiajia, Luo Zhuoran, Lu Wei. Novelty Measurement and Innovation Type Identification of Scientific Literature Based on Question-Method Combination[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(14): 82-89.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.14.010
|
| [64] |
王艳艳, 张均胜, 乔晓东, 等. 基于问题-方法矩阵的文献新颖性评估方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(2): 90-95.
|
| [64] |
(Wang Yanyan, Zhang Junsheng, Qiao Xiaodong, et al. Evaluating Novelty of Scientific Literature Based on Question-Method Matrix[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(2): 90-95.)
|
| [65] |
曹树金, 闫颂. 基于语义角色信息的科技论文创新段落定位及功能句识别方法研究——以中文情报学领域论文为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 4 5(11): 1-9, 20.
|
| [65] |
(Cao Shujin, Yan Song. Research on Innovative Paragraph Positioning and Functional Sentence Identification Method of Scientific and Technical Papers Based on Semantic Role Information: A Case Study of Papers in the Field of Chinese Intelligence[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(11): 1-9, 20.)
|
| [66] |
张颖怡, 章成志, He Daqing. 学术论文中问题与方法识别及其关系抽取研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(12): 125-138.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.12.012
|
| [66] |
(Zhang Yingyi, Zhang Chengzhi, He Daqing. A Review of Problem and Method Recognition and Relation Extraction in Academic Papers[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(12): 125-138.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.12.012
|
| [67] |
罗卓然, 王玉琦, 钱佳佳, 等. 学术论文创新性评价研究综述[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(7): 780-790.
|
| [67] |
(Luo Zhuoran, Wang Yuqi, Qian Jiajia, et al. Research Review on Innovation Evaluation of Academic Papers[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(7): 780-790.)
|
| [68] |
丁堃, 赵昕航, 林原, 等. 面向学术评价的论文画像研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2022, 45(9): 94-101.
doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2022.09.013
|
| [68] |
(Ding Kun, Zhao Xinhang, Lin Yuan, et al. Research on the Paper Profile for Academic Evaluation[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2022, 45(9): 94-101.)
doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2022.09.013
|
| [69] |
中华人民共和国教育部. 第五轮学科评估工作方案[EB/OL]. [2022-11-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_1946/fj_2020/202011/t20201102_497819.html.
|
| [69] |
(Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. Programme of Work for the Fifth-round of Discipline Assessment[EB/OL]. [2022-11-16]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/moe_1946/fj_2020/202011/t20201102_497819.html.)
|
| [70] |
谢珍, 马建霞, 胡文静. 学术代表作评价:方法述评与研究展望[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 190-196.
|
| [70] |
(Xie Zhen, Ma Jianxia, Hu Wenjing. Evaluation of Academic Representative Works: Methods Review and Research Prospects[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2021, 44(12): 190-196.)
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
