Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2012, Vol. Issue (9): 62-68    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.09.11
  情报分析与研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
用户协同信息检索行为与系统评价研究——以任务类型和协同能力为视角
邱瑾, 吴丹
武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
A Study on Users’ Collaborative Information Seeking Behavior and System Evaluation——A Perspective of Tasks and Collaborative Abilities
Qiu Jin, Wu Dan
School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
全文: PDF(6389 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 采用系统日志法、问卷调查法、半结构化访谈法等数据收集方法,以及统计分析法和内容分析法等数据分析方法在Coagmento系统上进行用户协同信息检索实验及结果分析。实验结果显示,协同能力和任务类型均对用户的协同信息检索行为产生影响:协同能力不同的用户在“推荐”行为上差异显著;任务类型不同对用户的“浏览网页”、“检索”和“使用图片”行为影响较大。且协同能力较强的用户在实验中获得更好的检索效果,因此,协同检索系统更适合由协同能力较强的用户通过合作来完成复杂任务。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
吴丹
邱瑾
关键词 协同信息检索用户行为系统评价协同能力任务    
Abstract:Several data collection methods such as log analysis, semi-structured interview, questionnaires and data analysis methods such as mathematical statistics, content analysis are adopted in an experiment and its result analysis of users’ collaborative information search on the Coagmento system. The results show that tasks and collaborative abilities do have impacts on users’ collaborative information seeking behaviors. Collaborative abilities have influence on the behavior of “Recommend”, while tasks have influence on the behaviors of “Webpage”, “Search”, and “Image”. The participants with higher collaborative abilities get better retrieval effectiveness than those with lower collaborative abilities in the experiment. Therefore, collaborative information retrieval system is more suitable for users with strong collaborative abilities to collaborate on complex tasks.
Key wordsCollaborative information search    User behavior    System evaluation    Collaborative ability    Task
收稿日期: 2012-07-18     
: 

G354

 
基金资助:

本文系中组部青年拔尖人才支持计划项目“多语言信息环境下学术交流中的用户行为研究”的研究成果之一。

通讯作者: 吴丹     E-mail: woodan@whu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
邱瑾, 吴丹. 用户协同信息检索行为与系统评价研究——以任务类型和协同能力为视角[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, (9): 62-68.
Qiu Jin, Wu Dan. A Study on Users’ Collaborative Information Seeking Behavior and System Evaluation——A Perspective of Tasks and Collaborative Abilities. New Technology of Library and Information Service, DOI:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.09.11.
链接本文:  
http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.09.11
[1] Kim S, Soergel D. Selecting and Measuring Task Characteristics as Independent Variables[C]. In:Proceedings of the 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.2005.
[2] Bilal D. Children’s Use of the Yahooligans! Web Search Engine:II. Cognitive and Physical Behaviors on Research Tasks [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001, 52(2):118-136.
[3] Amershi S, Morris M R. CoSearch:A System for Co-located Collaborative Web Search [C].In:Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI’08),Florence. New York:ACM, 2008:1647-1656.
[4] Hildegard J. Beyond the Search Process-Exploring Group Members’ Information [J]. Information Processing & Management,2009,45(1):142-158.
[5] Romano N C, Roussnov D, Nunamaker J F, et al. Collaborative Information Retrieval Environment:Integration of Information Retrieval with Group Support Systems[C]. In:Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences(HICSS’09). Washington DC:IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
[6] Hertzum M. Collaborative Information Seeking:The Combined Activity of Information Seeking and Collaborative Grounding[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2008, 44(2):957-962.
[7] Spring M B, Vathanophas V. Peripheral Social Awareness Information in Collaborative Work[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(11):1006-1013.
[8] Veryard R. The Component-based Business:Plug and Play [M]. London:Springer,2001.
[9] Blomqvist K, Levy J. Collaboration Capability-A Focal Concept in Collaborative Knowledge Creation and Innovation in Networks [J]. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2006, 2(1):31-48.
[10] Ingwersen P. Information Retrieval Interaction [M]. London:Taylor Graham, 1992:246.
[11] Broder A. A Taxonomy of Web Search [J]. ACM SIGIR Forum, 2002, 36(2):3-10.
[12] Faraway J J. Practical Regression and Anova Using R[M/OL].2002:179-184.[2012-03-11].http://www.maths.bath.ac.uk/~jjf23/book/.
[13] Strauss A, Corbin J M. Basics of Qualitative Research–Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory [M]. The 2nd Edition. London:Sage Publications, 1998.
[14] McGrath J E. Groups:Interaction and Performance [M]. New Jersey:Prentice-Hall, 1984.
[15] Hackman J R. Work Redesign and Motivation[J]. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 1980, 11(3):445-455.
[16] Foschi M. Gender, Performance Level, and Competence Standards in Task Groups [J].Social Science Research, 2009, 38(2):447-457.
[17] Kriksciuniene D, Strigunaite S. Virtual Team Tasks Performance Evaluation Based on Multi-level Fuzzy Comprehensive Method[C]. In:Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Future Computational Technologies and Applications.2011:20-25.
[1] 姚俊良,乐小虬. 科技查新查新点语义匹配方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(6): 50-56.
[2] 安璐,梁艳平. 突发公共卫生事件微博话题与用户行为选择研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(4): 33-41.
[3] 席林娜,窦永香. 基于计划行为理论的微博用户转发行为影响因素研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 13-20.
[4] 张亭亭,赵宇翔,朱庆华. 众包社区中基于敏感性分析的用户偏好挖掘模型及实验*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(5): 23-31.
[5] 陈远,刘福珍,吴江. 基于二模复杂网络的共享经济平台用户交互行为研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6): 72-82.
[6] 夏立新,杨金庆,程秀峰. 基于情境感知技术的移动数据自动采集系统设计与实现*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(5): 82-93.
[7] 吴聪,赵宇翔,朱庆华. 基于任务展示示能性的众筹项目视频分析*——以众筹网为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(10): 64-76.
[8] 王曰芬,贾新露,傅柱. 学术社交网络用户内容使用行为研究*——基于科学网热门博文的实证分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(6): 63-72.
[9] 张鹏翼,周翔,王军. 商品检索中的多任务识别与分析*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(3): 1-7.
[10] 刘畅, 张璐. 时间限制和搜索任务类型对搜索体验的影响分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(9): 1-8.
[11] 童国平, 孙建军. 基于搜索日志的用户行为分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 80-88.
[12] 黄文彬, 徐山川, 马龙, 王军. 利用通信数据的移动用户行为分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(5): 80-87.
[13] 杨宁, 黄飞虎, 文奕, 陈云伟. 基于微博用户行为的观点传播模型[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 34-41.
[14] 张晓娟, 唐祥彬. 面向用户任务的查询推荐研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(4): 34-40.
[15] 李鹏, 朱礼军, 刘亚洁, 闫莹莹. 一种改进RBAC模型在规范概念协同工作平台任务管理中的实现[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(2): 86-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn