Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2013, Vol. 29 Issue (7/8): 82-88    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2013.07-08.12
  情报分析与研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
周群, 左文革, 陈仕吉
中国农业大学图书馆 北京 100193
Review on Percentile-based Bibliometric Indicator
Zhou Qun, Zuo Wenge, Chen Shiji
China Agricultural University Library, Beijing 100193, China
全文: PDF(455 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 基于百分位数的文献计量指标是在关于相对引用指标的讨论中提出,随后被逐渐应用于研究绩效评价。在说明百分位数指标提出背景的基础上,对其概念和类型进行简要总结和比较。详细阐述百分位数指标在计算过程中论文百分位等级确定和论文百分数归类的问题,并进一步分析百分位数指标的应用现状和存在的问题。
E-mail Alert
关键词 文献计量学百分位数研究绩效被引频次    
Abstract:Percentile is established in bibliometrics as an important alternative to Relative Citation Rate, and then applied to the evaluation of research performance. This paper introduces the background of percentile-based bibliometric indicator and describes the concept and types and advantages of using percentiles in bibliometric. It also elaborates the problems in the calculation of percentiles and further assignment of percentile rank, and further analyzes the application of percentile-based bibliometric indicator.
Key wordsBibliometric    Percentile    Research performance    Citation counts
收稿日期: 2013-07-01     


通讯作者: 陈仕吉     E-mail:
周群, 左文革, 陈仕吉. 基于百分位数的文献计量指标研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, 29(7/8): 82-88.
Zhou Qun, Zuo Wenge, Chen Shiji. Review on Percentile-based Bibliometric Indicator. New Technology of Library and Information Service, DOI:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2013.07-08.12.
[1] Opthof T, Leydesdorff L. Caveats for the Journal and Field Normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") Evaluations of Research Performance[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(3):423-430.

[2] Bornmann L, Mutz R. Further Steps Towards an Ideal Method of Measuring Citation Performance: The Avoidance of Citation (Ratio) Averages in Field-normalization[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):228-230.

[3] Schubert A, Braun T.Cross-field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators[J].Scientometrics,1996, 36(3):311-324.

[4] Schubert A, Braun T. Relative Indicators and Relational Charts for Comparative Assessment of Publication Output and Citation Impact[J].Scientometrics,1986,9(5-6):281-291.

[5] Glanzel W, Thijs B, Schubert A, et al. Subfield-specific Normalized Relative Indicators and a New Generation of Relational Charts: Methodological Foundations Illustrated on the Assessment of Institutional Research Performance[J].Scientometrics,2009,78(1):165-188.

[6] Moed H F, De Bruin R E, Van Leeuwen T N. New Bibliometric Tools for the Assessment of National Research Performance: Database Description, Overview of Indicators and First Applications[J]. Scientometrics,1995, 33(3):381-422.

[7] Van Raan A F J. Measuring Science: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues[A].//Moed H F, Glnzel W, Schmoch U. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research[M].Springer,2005:19-50.

[8] Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L, Mutz R, et al. Turning the Tables on Citation Analysis One More Time: Principles for Comparing Sets of Documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011,62(7):1370-1381.

[9] Waltman L, Van Eck N J, Van Leeuwen T N, et al. Towards a New Crown Indicator: An Empirical Analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2011,87(3):467-481.

[10] Waltman L, Van Eck N J, Van Leeuwen T N, et al. Towards a New Crown Indicator: Some Theoretical Considerations[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):37-47.

[11] Seglen P O. The Skewness of Science[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1992, 43(9):628-638.

[12] Seglen P O. Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should not be Used for Evaluating Research[J]. British Medical Journal,1997,314(7079):498-502.

[13] Bornmann L.Towards an Ideal Method of Measuring Research Performance: Some Comments to the Opthof and Leydesdorff (2010) Paper[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010,4(3):441-443.

[14] 吴喜之. 非参数统计[M]. 第二版.北京:中国统计出版社, 2006:85.(Wu Xizhi. Nonparametric Statistics[M].The 2nd Edition. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006:85.)

[15] 徐建邦, 李培军. 统计学[M]. 第二版.大连:东北财经大学出版社,2006:67.(Xu Jianbang, Li Peijun. Statistics[M]. The 2nd Edition. Dalian: Dongbei University of Finance & Economics Press, 2006:67.)

[16] National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators:2010[EB/OL].[2013-07-31].

[17] Rousseau R. Basic Properties of Both Percentile Rank Scores and the I3 Indicator[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(2):416-420.

[18] Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L. Integrated Impact Indicators Compared with Impact Factors: An Alternative Research Design with Policy Implications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011,62(11):2133-2146.

[19] Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L, Mutz R. The Use of Percentiles and Percentile Rank Classes in the Analysis of Bibliometric Data: Opportunities and Limits[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(1):158-165.

[20] Bornmann L.A Better Alternative to the h Index[J].Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(1):100.

[21] Bornmann L, De Moya-Anegón F, Leydesdorff L. The New Excellence Indicator in the World Report of the SCImago Institutions Rankings 2011[J].Journal of Informetrics,2012,6(2):333-335.

[22] Leydesdorff L,Bornmann L. Mapping (USPTO) Patent Data Using Overlays to Google Maps[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(7):1442-1458.

[23] Leydesdorff L. Alternatives to the Journal Impact Factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the Most-highly Cited Papers[J].Scientometrics,2012,92(2):355-365.

[24] Waltman L, Calero-Medina C, Kosten J, et al. The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012:Data Collection, Indicators, and Interpretation[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012, 63(12):2419-2432.

[25] Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Which Cities Produce More Excellent Papers than Can be Expected? A New Mapping Approach, Using Google Maps, Based on Statistical Significance Testing[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(10):1954-1962.

[26] StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12[DB]. College Station, TX, USA: Stata Corporation.

[27] Schreiber M. Inconsistencies of Recently Proposed Citation Impact Indicators and How to Avoid Them[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(10):2062-2073.

[28] InCites[EB/OL].[2013-05-15].

[29] Leydesdorff L. Accounting for the Uncertainty in the Evaluation of Percentile Ranks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2012,63(11):2349-2350.

[30] Hazen A. Storage to be Provided in Impounding Reservoirs for Municipal Water Supply[J]. Transactions of American Society of Civil Engineers,1914,77:1539-1640.

[31] Harter H L. Another Look at Plotting Positions[J].Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods,1984, 13(13):1613-1633.

[32] Gringorten I I. A Plotting Rule for Extreme Probability Paper[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1963, 68(3):813-814.

[33] Waltman L, Schreiber M. On the Calculation of Percentile-based Bibliometric Indicators[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(2):372-379.

[34] SCImago Research Group. SCImago Institutions Ranking[EB/OL].[2013-07-15]. Institutions Rankings IBER en.pdf.

[35] National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicator:2012[EB/OL].[2013-07-31].

[36] Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands. Leiden Ranking[EB/OL].[2013-07-15].

[37] Rousseau R, Leydesdorff L. Non-consistency, Non-cited Items, and the Impact Factor: A Consequence of the Arithmetic[OL]. arXiv Preprint,arXiv:1102.2567,2011.

[38] Wagner C S, Leydesdorff L. An Integrated Impact Indicator: A New Definition of "Impact" with Policy Relevance[J]. Research Evaluation,2012,21(3):183-188.

[39] Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Which are the Best Performing Regions in Information Science in Terms of Highly Cited Papers? Some Improvements of Our Previous Mapping Approaches[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2012,6(2):336-345.

[40] Rafols I, Leydesdorff L. Content-based and Algorithmic Classifications of Journals: Perspectives on the Dynamics of Scientific Communication and Indexer Effects[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(9):1823-1835.

[41] 陈仕吉,史丽文,左文革. 基于ESI的学术影响力指标测度方法与实证[J]. 图书情报工作,2013,57(2):97-102,123. (Chen Shiji, Shi Liwen, Zuo Wenge. Theoretical and Empirical Study on Measure Method of Academic Influence Indicator Based on ESI[J]. Library and Information Service,2013,57(2):97-102,123.)

[42] Bouyssou D, Marchant T. Ranking Scientists and Departments in a Consistent Manner[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2011,62(9):1761-1769.

[43] Bornmann L. The Problem of Percentile Rank Scores Used with Small Reference Sets[J]. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology,2013,64(3):650.

[44] Boyack K W, Klavans R. Multiple Dimensions of Journal Specificity: Why Journals Can't be Assigned to Disciplines[C].In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.2011:123-133.

[45] Bornmann L. How to Analyze Percentile Citation Impact Data Meaningfully in Bibliometrics: The Statistical Analysis of Distributions, Percentile Rank Classes, and Top-Cited Papers[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(3):587-595.

[46] Waltman L, Van Eck N J. A Systematic Empirical Comparison of Different Approaches for Normalizing Citation Impact Indicators[OL]. arXiv Preprint,arXiv:1301.4941, 2013.
[1] 肖学斌,柴艳菊. 论文的相关参数与被引频次的关系研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(6): 46-53.
[2] 陈仕吉, 史丽文, 李冬梅, 左文革. 论文被引频次标准化方法述评[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, 28(4): 54-60.
[3] 万锦堃,花平寰,孙秀坤. 期刊论文被引用及其Web全文下载的文献计量分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005, 21(4): 58-62.
[4] 方小容,万秀梅. 期刊载文被引年代分布模式转型机理及影响的研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2004, 20(8): 31-33.
[5] 邓湘琳. 1996—2001年《现代图书情报技术》载文及作者统计分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2003, 19(1): 28-30.
[6] 崔新琴. 2001年 四种图书馆情报学核心期刊自引情况分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2002, 18(6): 75-76.
[7] 夏旭. 光盘研究十年论文的定量分析及其建议[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2000, 16(2): 52-55.
Full text



版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190