Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2014, Vol. 30 Issue (3): 26-34    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2014.03.05
  数字图书馆 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
呈现科研数据知识库:re3data.org注册机制
Heinz Pampel1, Paul Vierkant2, Frank Scholze3, Roland Bertelmann1, Maxi Kindling2, Jens Klump1, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker3, Jens Gundlach3, Peter Schirmbacher2, Uwe Dierolf3, 顾立平(译)4
1 Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Library and Information Services (LIS), Potsdam 14473, Germany;
2 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Berlin 10099, Germany;
3 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT Library, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany
4. 中国科学院国家科学图书馆 北京 100190
Making Research Data Repositories Visible:The re3data.org Registry
Heinz Pampel1, Paul Vierkant2, Frank Scholze3, Roland Bertelmann1, Maxi Kindling2, Jens Klump1, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker3, Jens Gundlach3, Peter Schirmbacher2, Uwe Dierolf3
1 Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Library and Information Services (LIS), Potsdam 14473, Germany;
2 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Berlin 10099, Germany;
3 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT Library, Karlsruhe 76131, Germany
全文: PDF(1240 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 科研人员在钻研科研问题与分享科研数据的过程中,需要某种基础设施来确保数据最大程度的获取性、稳定性和可用性。这类基础设施可以统称为科研数据知识库(Research Data Repository,RDR)。自2012年启动的re3data.org项目,主要从事科研数据知识库的登记注册,以及为科研人员、科研资助组织、图书馆和出版商等提供有关异构科研数据知识库的全景概述。截至2013年7月,已有400个科研数据知识库向re3data.org登记,其中288个采用re3data.org的信息图标,以协助科研人员遴选合适的知识库,并且存储与重用他们的数据。这篇论文描绘异构RDR的全景,表述机构的、学科的、跨学科的以及项目专业的RDR类型。深入描述re3data.org的特性,以及这套注册系统如何协助科研人员分辨适合存储和搜索科研数据的知识库。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Heinz Pampel
Paul Vierkant
Frank Scholze
Roland Bertelmann
Maxi Kindling
Jens Klump
rgen Goebelbecker
Jens Gundlach
Peter Schirmbacher
Uwe Dierolf
Hans-Jü
关键词 科研数据科研数据管理开放获取机构知识库发展开放科学科研数据知识库信息管理    
Abstract:Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarized under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org–Registry of Research Data Repositories–has begun to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organizations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In July 2013 re3data.org lists 400 research data repositories and counting. 288 of these are described in detail using the re3data.org vocabulary. Information icons help researchers to easily identify an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This article describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further the article outlines the features of re3data.org, and shows how this registry helps to identify appropriate repositories for storage and search of research data.
Key wordsResearch data    Research data management    Open access    Institutional repositories development    Open science    Research data repositories    Information management
收稿日期: 2013-11-29     
: 

G250

 
通讯作者: 顾立平 E-mail:gulp@mail.las.ac.cn     E-mail: gulp@mail.las.ac.cn
引用本文:   
Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, Uwe Dierolf . 呈现科研数据知识库:re3data.org注册机制[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(3): 26-34.
Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant, Frank Scholze, Roland Bertelmann, Maxi Kindling, Jens Klump, Hans-Jürgen Goebelbecker, Jens Gundlach, Peter Schirmbacher, Uwe Dierolf . Making Research Data Repositories Visible:The re3data.org Registry. New Technology of Library and Information Service, DOI:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2014.03.05.
链接本文:  
http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2014.03.05
[1] Berlin Declaration. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities [OL]. [2009-10- 27]. http://oa. mpg. de/openaccess-berlin/ berlindeclaration. html.

[2] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) . Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813. pdf.

[3] The Royal Society. Science as an Open Enterprise [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://royalsociety. org/uploadedFiles/Royal_ Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE. pdf.

[4] European Commission. Commission Recommendation on Access to and Preservation of Scientific Information [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec. europa. eu/research/science-society/ document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en. pdf.

[5] Office of Science and Technology Policy. Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/ microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013. pdf.

[6] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec. europa. eu/research/science-society/ document_library/pdf_06/era-communication-towards-better-access-to-scientific-information_en. pdf.

[7] Kindling M, Schirmbacher P. “Die Digitale Forschungswelt” als Gegenstand der Forschung [J]. Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis, 2013, 64: 127-136.

[8] Pampel H, Bertelmann R. “Data Policies” im Spannungsfeld Zwischen Empfehlung und Verpflichtung [A]. //Büttner S, Hobohm H C, Müller L, (edt). Handbuch Forschungsdatenm- anagement [M]. Bad Honnef: Bock+Herchen, 2011:49-61.

[9] National Science Foundation(NSF). Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Chapter VI - Other Post Award Requirements and Considerations [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/ pappguide/nsf11001/ aag_6. jsp#VID4.

[10] National Science Foundation(NSF). Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Grant Proposal Guide. Chapter II - Proposal Preparation Instructions [OL]. [2013- 05-16]. http://www. nsf. gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/ nsf11001/gpg_2. jsp#dmp.

[11] Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Proposal Preparation Instructions. DFG form 54. 01. [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http:// www. dfg. de/formulare/54_01/54_01_en. pdf.

[12] Nature. Availability of Data and Materials [OL]. [2013-05- 16]. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability. html.

[13] Kuipers T, Van der Hoeven J. Insight into Digital Preservation of Research Output in Europe [R/OL]. [2013- 05-16]. http://www. parse-insight. eu/downloads/PARSE- Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_hq. pdf.

[14] Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K, et al. Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions [J]. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(6): e21101.

[15] Nature Biotechnology. Credit Where Credit is Overdue [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2009, 27: 579.

[16] Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S. Open Research Data - From Vision to Practice [A]. //Bartling S, Friesike S, (edt). Opening Science–The Evolving Guide on How the Internet Is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing [M]. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009.

[17] Klump J, Bertelmann R, Brase J, et al. Data Publication in the Open Access Initiative [J]. Data Science Journal, 2006, 5: 79-83.

[18] Chavan V, Penev L. The Data Paper: A Mechanism to Incentivize Data Publishing in Biodiversity Science [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011, 12: S2. DOI:10. 1186/1471-2105- 12-S15-S2.

[19] Woutersen-Windhouwer S, Brandsma R, Hogenaar A, et al. Enhanced Publications?: Linking Publications and Research Data in Digital Repositories [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dare. uva. nl/aup/nl/record/316849.

[20] European Commission. ICT Infrastructures for e-Science [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://eur-lex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/ LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2009:0108:FIN:EN:PDF.

[21] Lagoze C, Sompel H Van De. The Open Archives Initiative: Building a Low-Barrier Interoperability Framework [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/papers/Papers/2001/ JCDLlagoze. pdf.

[22] Marcial L H, Hemminger B M. Scientific Data Repositories on the Web: An Initial Survey [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61: 2029-2048.

[23] Schaaf I. Forschungsdaten im Netz – Untersuchung Von Online Verfügbaren Repositorien. Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart [A]. //Schäfer L, Pampel H, Klump J, et al. Bericht Symposium“Forschungsdaten-Infrastrukturen (FDI 2013)” [C]. 2013. DOI:10. 2312/radieschen_003.

[24] Fernández-Suárez X M, Galperin M Y. The 2013 Nucleic Acids Research Database Issue and the Online Molecular Biology Database Collection [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/23203983.

[25] ELIXIR . The ELIXIR Strategy for Data Resources [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. elixir-europe. org/prep/sites/elixir- europe.org.prep/files/documents/reports/elixir_strategy_for_data_resources_report. pdf.

[26] European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures. European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures. Report 2006 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/ pdf/esfri/esfri_roadmap/roadmap_2006/esfri_roadmap_2006_en. pdf.

[27] Suber P. Open Access. Cambridge, Massachusetts [OL]. [2013-03-15]. The MIT Press. http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/ open-access.

[28] Pampel H, Goebelbecker H J, Vierkant P. re3data. org: Aufbau eines Verzeichnisses von Forschungsdaten- Repositorien. Ein Werkstattbericht [A]. //Mittermaier B, Wissen V. Daten, Menschen, Systeme. WissKom 2012. Jülich: Verlag des Forschungszentrums Jülich, 2012: 61-73.

[29] Edinburgh DataShare. What is Edinburgh DataShare? [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://datashare.is.ed.ac.uk.

[30] Rice R. DISC-UK DataShare [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http:// ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/336/.

[31] Schallehn V. Open Data LMU. Universitätsbibliothek München [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. ub. uni-muenchen. de/no_cache/aktuelles/einzelne-nachricht/article/open-data-lmu/.

[32] Cravedi K. GenBank Celebrates 25 Years of Service with Two-Day Conference [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.nih. gov/news/health/apr2008/nlm-03.htm.

[33] Benson D A, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Clark K, et al. GenBank [J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2012, 40: D48-D53.

[34] PANGAEA. About/Imprint [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. pangaea.de/about/.

[35] Diepenbroek M, Grobe H, Reinke M, et al. Data Management of Proxy Parameters with PANGAEA [A]. //Fischer G, Wefer G. Use of Proxies in Paleoceanography [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999:715-727.

[36] Schindler U, Diepenbroek M, Grobe H. PANGAEA- Research Data Enters Scholarly Communication [J]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2012, 14: EGU2012– 13378-1.

[37] Figshare. FAQs [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://figshare.com/faqs.

[38] Fenner M. Figshare: Interview with Mark Hahnel [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://blogs. plos. org/mfenner/2012/02/16/ figshare-interview-with-mark-hahnel/.

[39] LabArchives. Electronic Notebook Software for Laboratory Notebooks FAQ [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.labarchives. com/faqs.php.

[40] Klump J, Conze R. The Scientific Drilling Database (SDDB) -Data from Deep Earth Monitoring and Sounding [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.iodp.org/images/stories/downloads/ sd4_07.pdf#page=32.

[41] Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Darby R, Gitmans K, et al. Summary of the Studies, Thematic Publications and Recommendations [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. alliancepermanentaccess. org/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id= Summaryofthestudies%2Cthematicpublicationsandrecommendations.

[42] Kroes N. Opening Science Through e-Infrastructures [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do? reference=SPEECH/12/258.

[43] Kroes N. Making Open Access a Reality for Science [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do? reference=SPEECH/12/392.

[44] Pfeiffenberger H, Pampel H, Schäfer A, et al. Report and Strategy on Annotation, Reputation and Data Quality [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.alliancepermanentaccess. org/wp- content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=D26.1R eportandStrategyonAnnotation%2CReputationandDataQuality.

[45] High Level Expert Group on Scientific Data. Riding the Wave. How Europe can Gain from the Rising Tide of Scientific Data [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://cordis. europa. eu/fp7/ict/e-infrastructure/docs/hlg-sdi-report. pdf.

[46] Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Dobratz S, Gradmann S, et al. Positionspapier Forschungsdaten. 1. 0 ed [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-10098082.

[47] Graaf M, Waaijers L. A Surfboard for Riding the Wave- Towards a Four Country Action Programme on Research Data [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www. knowledge-exchange. info/ Default. aspx?ID=469.

[48] Vierkant P, Spier S, Rücknagel J, et al. Vocabulary for the Registration and Description of Research Data Repositories [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2312/re3. 001.

[49] Vierkant P, Spier S, Rücknagel J, et al. Vocabulary for the Registration and Description of Research Data Repositories (Version 2.0) [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2312/re3. 002.

[50] Braun K, Buddenbohm S, Dobratz S, et al. DINI Certificate Document and Publication Services 2010 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://nbn-resolving. de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100182800.

[51] Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories [OL].[2013-05-16].http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/652x0m1.pdf.

[52] Data Seal of Approval. Data Seal of Approval. Guidelines Version 1 [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://assessment.datasealof approval. org/documentation/.

[53] ESF & EUROHORCs (2011) Basic Requirements for Research Infrastructures in Europe [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/programme/wgi/ basic_requirements_research_infrastructures. pdf.

[54] ICSU World Data System (2011) Certification of World Data System Members Introduction [OL]. [2013-05-16]. http://icsu-wds.org/images/files/Certification_summary_6_Jul_2011.pdf.
[1] 钱力,谢靖,常志军,吴振新,张冬荣. 基于科技大数据的智能知识服务体系研究设计*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 4-14.
[2] 张旺强,祝忠明,姚晓娜,刘巍. 基于开放获取论文推送转发服务系统iSwitch的机构知识库内容建设*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(4): 91-96.
[3] 钱力, 师洪波, 张晓林, 梁娜. 开放获取论文推送转发服务系统iSwitch: 论文分发推送[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(6): 7-12.
[4] 赵瑞雪, 杜若鹏. 中国农业科学院机构知识库的实践探索[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(2): 72-77.
[5] 孙轶楠, 顾立平, 宋秀芳, 刘晶晶, 江娴. 学科数据知识库的政策调研与分析——以生命科学领域为例[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 13-20.
[6] 刘晶晶, 顾立平, 范少萍. 国外通用型数据知识库的政策调研与分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(11): 4-11.
[7] 张晓丹, 乔晓东, 顾立平, 姚长青, 初景利. 中国学术期刊对机构知识库存缴政策调查分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(6): 1-7.
[8] 姚晓霞, 聂华, 顾立平, 张冬荣, 吴越, 韦成府. 我国教育科研机构知识库建设现状调查与分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(5): 1-9.
[9] 王峰, 魏凤, 刘毅, 周洪, 赵德. 应用开源搜索引擎Solr构建标准信息管理与分析平台[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(2): 92-98.
[10] 张晓林, 梁娜, 钱力, 师洪波. 开放获取论文推送转发服务系统iSwitch:概念、功能与基本框架[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(10): 4-8.
[11] 梁娜, 张晓林, 钱力, 师洪波. 开放获取论文推送转发服务系统iSwitch:技术流程与标准[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(10): 9-13.
[12] 高丽, 周津慧, 刘雅静. 3O会聚网站数据特性分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, 29(7/8): 1-12.
[13] 顾立平. 开放数据计量研究综述:计算网络用户行为和科学社群影响力的Altmetrics计量[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, (6): 1-8.
[14] Christine L. Borgman(著), 青秀玲(译). 科研数据共享的挑战[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, (5): 1-20.
[15] 黄永文, 张建勇, 黄金霞, 王昉. 国外开放科学数据研究综述[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, (5): 21-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn