Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2015, Vol. 31 Issue (11): 75-81    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2015.11.11
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
用户在社会化引文软件中的阅读数据积累程度与有效性分析——以Altmetrics指标为例
金玮, 赵蓉英, 殷鸽
武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
An Analysis of the Accumulation State and the Validity of User Readership Data in Online Reference Managers ——Take the Indicators of Altmetrics as an Example
Jin Wei, Zhao Rongying, Yin Ge
School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
全文: PDF(356 KB)   HTML  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

[目的]研究目前Mendeley中文献用户阅读数据是否得到充分积累, 及其能否揭示优质文献, 对Altmetrics中用户阅读数据指标在科学评估中的价值进行评价。[方法]选定文献集合, 对Web of Science、Google Scholar上被引数目与Mendeley上用户阅读数目进行统计和相关性分析。[结果]在研究集合中, 用户阅读数据相比原先得到良好的积累, 且和文献被引数据保持良好的相关度, 但高被引文献的被引数据与用户阅读数据的相关度相比总体相关度较低。[局限]文献样本集合仅针对所选定的特定学科和期刊, 在数据的代表性和全面性上存在不足, 是否能推广至其他领域有待进一步研究。[结论]在Altmetrics各类指标中, 以Mendeley的用户阅读数据代表的用户阅读数据是评价文献质量的良好指标, 可对引文分析进行补充。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

[Objective] The research investigates whether user readership data in Mendeley is reliable and useful in evaluating scientific literatures and whether user readership data can reveal high quality articles, to validate the indicators of Altmetrics in scientific evaluation.[Methods] The paper selects a number of articles, collects these articles' citations in Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar (GS) and user readership data in Mendeley, and then makes statistical and correlational analyses.[Results] Mendeley has accumulated much more user data than before. Articles' user readership data have strong relationship with the citations in WoS and GS. However, the relationship between user counts and citations in the articles that have highest citations in WoS is relatively weaker.[Limitations] In this research, articles come from less journals in a specific field, that may make it be lack of representativeness and comprehensiveness.[Conclusions] User readership data could be useful to act as a supplement of present scientific evaluation indicators.

收稿日期: 2015-05-28     
:  G250  
通讯作者: 金玮, ORCID: 0000-0003-4338-9100, E-mail: butterfly_701c@163.com。     E-mail: butterfly_701c@163.com
作者简介: 作者贡献声明:金玮, 赵蓉英: 提出研究思路, 设计研究方案; 金玮, 殷鸽: 进行实验, 起草论文; 金玮: 论文最终版本修订。
引用本文:   
金玮, 赵蓉英, 殷鸽. 用户在社会化引文软件中的阅读数据积累程度与有效性分析——以Altmetrics指标为例[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(11): 75-81.
Jin Wei, Zhao Rongying, Yin Ge. An Analysis of the Accumulation State and the Validity of User Readership Data in Online Reference Managers ——Take the Indicators of Altmetrics as an Example. New Technology of Library and Information Service, DOI:10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2015.11.11.
链接本文:  
http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2015.11.11

[1] Garfield E. Citation Indexing for Studying Science [J]. Nature, 1970, 227(5259): 669-671.
[2] Garfield E. Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation [J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060): 471-479.
[3] McSweeney P, Prince R, Hargood C, et al. Aggregated Erevnametrics: Bringing Together Alt-metrics Through Research Objects [C]. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Web Science Conference, Koblenz, Germany. 2011.
[4] MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of Citation Analysis: A Study of Uncited and Seldom-Cited Influences [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, 61(1): 1-12.
[5] MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of Citation Analysis [J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(3): 435-444.
[6] Alhoori H, Furuta R. Can Social Reference Management Systems Predict a Ranking of Scholarly Venues [A]. // Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries [M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
[7] Thelwall M. Journal Impact Evaluation: A Webometric Perspective [J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 92(2): 429-441.
[8] Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(8): 1060-1072.
[9] Sutherland W J, Goulson D, Potts S G, et al. Quantifying the Impact and Relevance of Scientific Research [J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(11): e27537.
[10] Tarrant D, Carr L. Using the Co-Citation Network to Indicate Article Impact [C]. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Web Science Conference, Koblenz, Germany. 2011.
[11] González-Pereira B, Vicente G B, Moya-Anegón F. A New Approach to the Metric of Journals' Scientific Prestige: The SJR Indicator [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(3): 379-391.
[12] Torres-Salinas D, Cabezas-Clavijo Á, Jiménez-Contreras E. Altmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0 [OL]. arXiv:1306.6595.
[13] Bornmann L. Do Altmetrics Point to the Broader Impact of Research? An Overview of Benefits and Disadvantages of Altmetrics [J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(4): 895-903.
[14] Roemer R C, Borchardt R. From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: A Changing Scholarly Landscape [J]. College & Research Libraries News, 2012, 73(10): 596-600.
[15] De Winter J C F. The Relationship Between Tweets, Citations, and Article Views for PLoS One Articles [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 102(2): 1773-1779.
[16] Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services [J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e64841.
[17] Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, et al. Coverage and Adoption of Altmetrics Sources in the Bibliometric Community [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2): 1145-1163.
[18] Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P. How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-Disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of ‘Alternative Metrics' in Scientific Publications [J]. Scientometrics, 2014,101(2): 1491-1513.
[19] Li X, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating Online Reference Managers for Scholarly Impact Measurement [J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 461-471.
[20] Sud P, Thelwall M. Evaluating Altmetrics [J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(2): 1131-1143.
[21] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(21): 92-98.(Wang Rui, Hu Wenjing, Guo Wei. Research on Academic Influence of High Altmetrics Sci-tech Papers[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(21): 92-98. )
[22] 由庆斌, 韦博, 汤珊红. 基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(22): 5-11. (You Qingbin, Wei Bo, Tang Shanhong. Evaluation Model Construction to Evaluate Article's Influence Based on Altmetrics [J]. Library and Information Service, 2014, 58(22): 5-11.)
[23] 刘春丽, 何钦成. 不同类型选择性计量指标评价论文相关性研究——基于 Mendeley、F1000和Google Scholar三种学术社交网络工具[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(2): 206-212. (Liu Chunli, He Qincheng. Study on Correlation of Different Altmetrics Indicators for Paper Evaluation Based on Three Academic Social Networking Tools: Mendeley, F1000 and Google Scholar [J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2013, 32(2): 206-212.)
[24] Mohammadi E, Thelwall M. Mendeley Readership Altmetrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Research Evaluation and Knowledge Flows [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65(8): 1627-1638.
[25] Mas-Bleda A, Thelwall M, Kousha K, et al. Do Highly Cited Researchers Successfully Use the Social Web? [J]. Sciento­metrics, 2014, 101(1): 337-356.
[26] Moed H F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation [M]. Springer Netherlands, 2006.

[1] 刘峰, 张晓林. 科学数据元数据标准述评及其通用化设计研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 3-12.
[2] 孙轶楠, 顾立平, 宋秀芳, 刘晶晶, 江娴. 学科数据知识库的政策调研与分析——以生命科学领域为例[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 13-20.
[3] 毕强, 刘健. 数字文献资源内容服务推荐方法研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 21-27.
[4] 朱光. 基于零水印的图博档彩色图像资源版权保护策略研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 89-94.
[5] 王政军, 俞小怡, 金玉玲. 利用旁路监听技术约束数字资源过量下载[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(12): 95-100.
[6] 郑飏飏, 徐健, 肖卓. 情感分析及可视化方法在网络视频弹幕数据分析中的应用[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(11): 82-90.
[7] 刘悦如, 郭利敏. 微信公众号互动功能新开发[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(11): 104-109.
[8] 章成志, 顾晓雪. 区分标签质量的机器生成标签聚类研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(10): 22-29.
[9] 顾晓雪, 章成志. 标注内容与用户属性结合的标签聚类研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(10): 30-39.
[10] 刘丹. 利用Apache Mahout部署个性化图书推荐服务[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(10): 102-108.
[11] 马雨萌, 郭进京, 王昉. e-Science环境下科学数据语义组织模型框架研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 48-57.
[12] 吴丹, 冉爱华. 移动阅读应用的用户体验比较研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 73-79.
[13] 陈挺, 韩涛, 李泽霞, 李国鹏, 王小梅. 科研项目布局差异对比方法研究——以NSF和EUFP项目为例[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 89-96.
[14] 郭振英, 赵文兵, 魏育辉. 轻量级书目本体关联数据建设实践[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 139-143.
[15] 郭利敏, 刘悦如, 相明琼. 微信二维码用于图书馆读者身份认证的实践[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(7-8): 144-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn