1School of Economics & Management, Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211167, China 2School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China 3School of Economics & Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China 4 College of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
[Objective] This paper proposes a new system to extract methodological entities from the full texts of academic literature, aiming to identify their indexing features and usages. [Methods] Firstly, we extracted feature sentences and methodological entities based on dictionaries, rules, and manual annotations. Then, we implemented a methodology knowledge extraction module with the help of Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 and SQL Server 2012. [Results] The precision of extracting methodological features was 76%, while the recall rate was greater than 42%. Each feature sentence had 1.42 method entities on average. The formal indexing ratio for methodological entities was less than 27%, while the ratio for feature sentences was less than 35%. We also found low formal indexing rate for subject-specific methodological entities. [Limitations] This system’s recall and precision rates were not very satisfactory. The manual workload was intensive for entity extraction and did not include the semantic features. [Conclusions] The proposed method has inter-disciplinary versatility and helps us explore the dissemination routes of interdisciplinary knowledge.
徐浩,朱学芳,章成志,江川. 面向学术文献全文本的方法论知识抽取系统分析与设计 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 29-36.
Hao Xu,Xuefang Zhu,Chengzhi Zhang,Chuan Jiang. System Analysis and Design for Methodological Entities Extraction in Full Text of Academic Literature. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2019, 3(10): 29-36.
( Cui Ming, Pan Xuelian, Hua Weina . Software Usage and Citation in the Field of Library and Information Science in China[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2018,44(3):68-78.)
[2]
Hafer L, Kirkpatrick A E . Assessing Open Source Software as a Scholarly Contribution[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2009,52(12):126-129.
[3]
Piwowar H . Altmetrics: Value All Research Products[J]. Nature, 2013,493(7431):159.
[4]
Research Excellence Framework. Output Information Requirements[EB/OL]. [ 2018- 11- 18]. .
( Sun Jianjun, Pei Lei, Jiang Ting . Research on Semantic Annotation in Academic Literature[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2018,37(11):1077-1086.)
( Wang Jiamin, Li Xin, Liu Qijin . A Review of the Academic Salon on Full-text Bibliometric Analysis[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2018,8(4):119-125.)
[7]
Gupta S, Manning C D . Analyzing the Dynamics of Research by Extracting Key Aspects of Scientific Papers [C]// Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 2011: 1-9.
[8]
Kondo T, Nanba H, Takezawa T , et al. Technical Trend Analysis by Analyzing Research Papers’ Titles [C]// Proceedings of the 4th Language and Technology Conference. 2009: 512-521.
( Hua Bolin . Extracting Information Method Term from Chinese Academic Literature[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2013(6):68-75.)
[10]
Girju R, Beamer B, Rozovskaya A , et al. A Knowledge-Rich Approach to Identifying Semantic Relations Between Nominals[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2010,46(5):589-610.
[11]
Pan X, Yan E, Wang Q , et al. Assessing the Impact of Software on Science: A Bootstrapped Learning of Software Entities in Full-Text Papers[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015,9(4):860-871.
[12]
Nanba H, Kondo T, Takezawa T . Automatic Creation of a Technical Trend Map from Research Papers and Patents [C]// Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Patent Information Retrieval. ACM, 2010: 11-16.
[13]
Tsai C T, Kundu G, Roth D . Concept-Based Analysis of Scientific Literature [C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2013: 1733-1738.
[14]
Houngbo H, Mercer R E . Method Mention Extraction from Scientific Research Papers [C]// Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2012: 1211-1222.
[15]
Guo Y, Silins I, Stenius U , et al. Active Learning-Based Information Structure Analysis of Full Scientific Articles and Two Applications for Biomedical Literature Review[J]. Bioinformatics, 2013,29(11):1440-1447.
( Qian Li, Zhang Xiaolin, Wang Qian . Building and Implement on Automatic Identification Method of Research Design Fingerprint of Scientific Papers[J]. Library and Information Service, 2018,62(2):135-143.)
[17]
程齐凯 . 学术文本的词汇功能识别[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2015.
[17]
( Cheng Qikai . Term Function Recognition from Academic Text[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2015.)
( Li Xin, Cheng Qikai, Liu Xingbang . Design and Implementation of Scientific Literature Analysis System Based on Term Function Recognition[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017,61(1):109-116.)
[19]
Pettigrew K E, McKechnie L E F . The Use of Theory in Information Science Research[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001,52(1):62-73.
( Wang Fang, Chen Feng, Zhu Na , et al. Theories of Information Science in China: Source, Uses and Discipline Exclusive Degrees[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2016,35(11):1148-1164.)
( Wang Fang, Zhu Na, Zhai Yujia . Application of Mixed Methods and Their Field Distribution in Information Science Research in China[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2017,36(11):1119-1129.)
( Xu Hao, Qian Aibing, Zhu Xuefang , et al. Discipline Diffusion Features of the Mapping Knowledge Domains Software: CiteSpace[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2017,36(5):69-74,68.)
[23]
JATS数据标准[EB/OL]. [ 2018- 11- 09]. .
[23]
( Journal Archiving and Interchange Tag Set[EB/OL]. [ 2018- 11- 09].