Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
现代图书情报技术  2016, Vol. 32 Issue (4): 72-80     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2016.04.09
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
一种利用用户学习树改进的协同过滤推荐方法
马莉()
天津外国语大学教育技术与实验室管理中心 天津 300204
Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Method Based on User Learning Tree
Ma Li()
Education Technology & Lab Management Center, Tianjin Foreign Studies University, Tianjin 300204, China
全文: PDF (833 KB)   HTML ( 46
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

目的】利用学习树中知识点的属性和学习访问序列, 对知识点进行预测评分, 进而进行用户相似性聚类以实施协同过滤推荐, 改进传统在线学习推荐方法, 提高推荐质量。【方法】对用户所学知识点属性、知识点学习访问序列、学习频率、学习时间进行标准化处理构建学习树; 基于学习树, 对树中知识点进行预测评分; 基于预测评分和知识点属性、知识点学习序列分别利用Pearson相似性和余弦相似性进行用户相似性计算, 利用K均值聚类方法进行相似用户聚类, 进而利用协同过滤推荐方法进行在线学习推荐。【结果】通过F-measure指标进行实验评价, 结果表明该方法与传统在线学习协同过滤推荐方法相比, F-measure指标超过奇异值分解协同过滤8.22%, 超过平均分预测协同过滤3.75%。【局限】仅基于某在线学习平台的52 456条学生的学习记录和日志进行建模和测试, 未在其他数据集上进一步检验。【结论】解决了依赖用户评分进行协同过滤推荐的缺陷, 同时考虑了用户兴趣迁移对推荐准确率的影响, 对在线学习冷启动与可扩展性问题的解决具有较好的指导意义。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
马莉
关键词 在线学习推荐协同过滤学习树学习访问序列    
Abstract

[Objective] This paper aims to improve traditionlal recommendation method and quality of E-Learning enviroment, which used attributes and access orders of resources in learning tree to predict learner’s rate. The collaborative filtering recommendation was then carried out through similar learner clustring. [Methods] First, “attributes of resources”“resource access order” “learning frequency and time” were standardized to construct users’ learning tree and then predict resouces rating. Second, learner’s similarity was calculated through Pearson and Cosine function respectivly based on predicted ratings. Third, K-means clustering method was used to group similar learners to establish collaborative filteing system for online E-learing. [Results] Compared with traditional collaborative filtering method, F-measure experimental result of the proposed method was 8.22% higher than the singular value decomposition CF and was 3.75% higher than the average score forecast CF. [Limitations] The proposed method was only tested on the dataset from one online learing platform with 52,456 students’ learning records and access logs. More research is needed to examine the method with other data sets. [Conclusions] The proposed collaborative filtering recommendation system does not rely on learners’ ratings and considers the influence of learners’ interest changes. It could help us deal with the starting and expanding issues.

Key wordsE-Learning recommendation    Collaborative Filtering    Learning tree    Study access sequence
收稿日期: 2015-11-09      出版日期: 2016-05-13
引用本文:   
马莉. 一种利用用户学习树改进的协同过滤推荐方法[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(4): 72-80.
Ma Li. Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Method Based on User Learning Tree. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2016, 32(4): 72-80.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2016.04.09      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2016/V32/I4/72
[1] Verbert K, Manouselis N, Ochoa X, et al.Context-Aware Recommender Systems for Learning: A Survey and Future Challenges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2012, 5(4): 318-335.
[2] Khribi M K, Jemni M, Nasraoui O.Automatic Recommendations for E-learning Personalization Based on Web Usage Mining Techniques and Information Retrieval[J]. Educational Technology and Society, 2009, 12(4): 30-42.
[3] Sharif N, Afzal M T, Helic D.A Framework for Resource Recommendations for Learners Using Social Bookmarking [C]. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computing and Networking Technology. IEEE, 2012: 71-76.
[4] Salehi M, Kamalabadi I N, Ghoushchi M B G. Personalized Recommendation of Learning Material Using Sequential Pattern Mining and Attribute Based Collaborative Filtering[J]. Education and Information Technologies, 2014, 19(4): 713-735.
[5] Salehi M, Kamalabadi I N.Hybrid Recommendation Approach for Learning Material Based on Sequential Pattern of the Accessed Material and the Learner’s Preference Tree[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 48: 57-69.
[6] Chen W, Niu Z, Zhao X.A Hybrid Recommendation Algorithm Adapted in E-learning Environments[J]. 2014, 17(2): 271-284.
[7] Aher S B, Lobo L.Applicability of Data Mining Algorithms for Recommendation System in E-learning [C]. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics. 2012: 1034-1040.
[8] Salehi M, Kamalabadi I N, Attribute-based Recommender System for Learning Resource by Learner Preference Tree[C]. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International e-Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering. IEEE, 2012: 133-138.
[9] Ge L, Kong W, Luo J.Courseware Recommendation in E-learning System [C]. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Advances in Web Based Learning. 2006: 10-24.
[10] Wan L, Zhao C.A Hybrid Learning Object Recommendation Algorithm in E-learning Context[J]. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications, 2012, 6(18): 442-448.
[11] Wang S, Xie Y, Fang M.A Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithm Based on Item and Cloud Model[J]. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, 2011, 16(1): 16-20.
[12] Kim K, Ahn H.A Recommender System Using GA K-means Clustering in an Online Shopping Market[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2008, 34(2): 1200-1209.
[13] Jalali M, Mustapha N, Sulaiman M N B, et al. OPWUMP: An Architecture for Online Predicting in WUM-Based Personalization System [A]. // Advances in Computer Science and Engineering[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
[14] Albadvi A, Shahbazi M.Integrating Rating-based Collaborative Filtering with Customer Lifetime Value: New Product Recommendation Technique[J]. Intelligent Data Analysis, 2010, 14(1): 143-155.
[15] Nielsen J. The 90-9-1 Rule for Participation Inequality in Social Media and Online Communities [EB/OL]. [2015-09-01]. .
[16] Ebbinghaus H.Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology[M]. New York: Dover, 1885.
[17] Devi M K K, Venkatesh P. Kernel Based Collaborative Recommender System for E-Purchasing[J]. Academy of Sciences, 2010, 35(5): 513-524.
[18] Kla?nja-Mili?evi? A, Vesin B, Ivanovic M, et al.E-learning Personalization Based on Hybrid Recommendation Strategy and Learning Style Identification[J]. Computers in Education, 2011, 56(3): 885-899.
[19] Sarwar B M, Karypis G, Konstan J A, et al.Application of Dimensionality Reduction in Recommender Systems [EB/ OL]. [2015-10-25]. .
[1] 李振宇, 李树青. 嵌入隐式相似群的深度协同过滤算法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 124-134.
[2] 杨辰, 陈晓虹, 王楚涵, 刘婷婷. 基于用户细粒度属性偏好聚类的推荐策略*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 94-102.
[3] 杨恒,王思丽,祝忠明,刘巍,王楠. 基于并行协同过滤算法的领域知识推荐模型研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6): 15-21.
[4] 苏庆,陈思兆,吴伟民,李小妹,黄佃宽. 基于学习情况协同过滤算法的个性化学习推荐模型研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(5): 105-117.
[5] 郑淞尹,谈国新,史中超. 基于分段用户群与时间上下文的旅游景点推荐模型研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(5): 92-104.
[6] 丁勇,陈夕,蒋翠清,王钊. 一种融合网络表示学习与XGBoost的评分预测模型*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(11): 52-62.
[7] 焦富森,李树青. 基于物品质量和用户评分修正的协同过滤推荐算法 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(8): 62-67.
[8] 李珊,姚叶慧,厉浩,刘洁,嘎玛白姆. 基于ISA联合聚类的组推荐算法研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(8): 77-87.
[9] 李杰, 杨芳, 徐晨曦. 考虑时间动态性和序列模式的个性化推荐算法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(7): 72-80.
[10] 王道平, 蒋中杨, 张博卿. 基于灰色关联分析和时间因素的协同过滤算法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 102-109.
[11] 王永, 王永东, 郭慧芳, 周玉敏. 一种基于离散增量的项目相似性度量方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(5): 70-76.
[12] 花凌锋, 杨高明, 王修君. 面向位置的多样性兴趣新闻推荐研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(5): 94-104.
[13] 薛福亮, 刘君玲. 基于用户间信任关系改进的协同过滤推荐方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(7): 90-99.
[14] 覃幸新, 王荣波, 黄孝喜, 谌志群. 基于多权值的Slope One协同过滤算法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6): 65-71.
[15] 李道国,李连杰,申恩平. 基于用户评分时间改进的协同过滤推荐算法*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(9): 65-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn