Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2005, Vol. 21 Issue (12): 17-21    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2005.12.04
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
User Acceptance of Information Systems: A Comparison of Three  Theoretical Models
Wang Wei
(Department of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business, The HongKong  Polytechnic University, HongKong, China)
Download: PDF(0 KB)   HTML  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

User acceptance is an important issue in Information System (IS) research field. Previous research primarily focused on cognitive behavioral models and tried to explain and predict IS usage better. This study introduces and compares three popular models that predict an individual’s intention to use an IS: the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).  Based on the comparison, this study suggests the direction of the future research.

Key wordsInformation system adoption      Information system acceptance      Information system research     
Received: 12 August 2005      Published: 25 December 2005


Corresponding Authors: Wang Wei     E-mail:
About author:: Wang Wei

Cite this article:

Wang Wei. User Acceptance of Information Systems: A Comparison of Three  Theoretical Models. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2005, 21(12): 17-21.

URL:     OR

1Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction of Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975
2Davis F D, Bagozzi R P, and Warshaw P R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science; 1989, 35(8): 982-1003
3Limayem M, ,Hirt S G. Force of Habit and Information Systems Usage: Theory and Initial Validation. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 2003, 4: 65-97
4Davis F D. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986
5Vroom V H. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964
6Zmud R W. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past. Ohio: Pinnaflex Educational Resources, 2000
7Ajzen I, and Madden T J. Prediction of Goal Directed Behaviors: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1986, 22: 453-474
8Kuhl J, and Beckmann J. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. New York: Springer Verlag, 1985
9Pratkanis A R, Breckler S J, and Greenwald A G. Attitude Structure and Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989
10Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50: 179-211
11Mathieson K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research, 1991, 2(3): 173-191
12Davis F D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and End User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13: 318-339
13Taylor S, and Todd P. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 1995, 6(2):144-176
14Taylor S, and Todd P. Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience. MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19(4):561-570
15Mathieson K, Peacock E., and Chin W W. Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 2001, 32(3):86-112

No related articles found!
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938