Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2006, Vol. 1 Issue (11): 36-40    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2006.11.10
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A Comparison Study on OWL Knowledge Base Systems
Xu Dezhi    Liu Zheng
(College of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
Download: PDF(0 KB)   HTML  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

This paper introduces the most of OWL knowledge base systems at present, maintenances an evaluation application for the comparison of these OWL knowledge base systems with a Chinese GUI. At last, this paper gives the experiment results of most systems. This can be a reference for users’ choices for application development.

Key wordsOntology store      OWL knowledge base system      Comparison research      Evaluation method     
Received: 01 August 2006      Published: 25 November 2006


Corresponding Authors: Liu Zheng     E-mail:
About author:: Xu Dezhi,Liu Zheng

Cite this article:

Xu Dezhi,Liu Zheng . A Comparison Study on OWL Knowledge Base Systems. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2006, 1(11): 36-40.

URL:     OR

1T. Berners-Lee,J. Hendler,O. Lassila.The semantic Web.Scientific American, 2001, 284 (5) : 34-43
2李善平等.本体论研究综述.计算机研究与发展,2004,41(7): 1041-1052
3T. Berners-Lee.The Semantic Web Architecture. Accessed May.12,2006)
4OWL web ontology language, W3C Recommendation. (Accessed May.12,2006)
5Meditskos Georgios, Bassiliades.O-DEVICE: An object-oriented knowledge base system for OWL ontologies.4th Helenic Conference on AI, SETN 2006, Proceedings, 2006.256-266
6Atanas Kiryakov, Damyan Ognyanov, Dimitar Manov. OWLIM – a Pragmatic Semantic Repository for OWL In Proc. of Int. Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems (SSWS 2005), WISE 2005, 20 Nov, New York City, USA
7Pan, Z., Heflin, J. DLDB: Extending Relational Databases to Support Semantic Web Queries. In Workshop on Practical and Scalable Semantic Systems, ISWC2003
8D. J. DeWitt. The Wisconsin benchmark: Past, present, and future. In Database and Transaction Processing System Performance Handbook. Morgan-Kaufman, San Mateo, Calif
9Y. Guo, Z. Pan and J. Hefin, An Evaluation of Knowledge Base Systems for Large Owl Datasets. ISWC 2004
11Jeremy J. Carroll, Dave Reynolds, Ian Dickinson, Andy Seaborne, Chris Dollin, Kevin Wilkinson. Jena: Implementing the Semantic Web Recommendations. WWW 2004, May.17-22, 2004
12R.G.G,Cattell. An Engineering Database Benchmark. In the Benchmark Handbook for Database and Transaction Processing Systems, Morgan Kaufman 1991.247-281
13J. Broekstra, A. Kampman, F. Harmelen, Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema, Proc. of the 1st International Semantic Web Conference(ISWC), 2002.54-68

[1] Liping Yu,Xiayun Song,Zuogong Wang. Impacts and Corrections of Natural Weight on Nonlinear Sci-tech Reviews——Case Study of TOPSIS Method[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 48-57.
[2] Sun Zhen Wang Huilin. Overview on the Advance of the Research on Named Entity Recognition[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2010, 26(6): 42-47.
[3] Zhao Wei,Zhang Xiuhua,Zhang Xiaoqing . Network Information Resource Validity Evaluation Study Based on BP Algorithm[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 1(7): 52-55.
[4] Jiao Yuying,Yu Caixia. A Study on the Enterprise’s Information Literacy and Its Evaluation Methods[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005, 21(3): 70-76.
[5] Bao Dongmei,Zhou Yueqing. An Evaluation of Some Famous Chinese and English Search Engines[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2004, 20(1): 36-40.
[6] Zhang Liyang. A Comparative Study and Evaluation of Chinese and English Web Search Tools[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2001, 17(5): 42-45.
[7] Cao Jun. Research on the Comparison Among ASP,PHP and JSP[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2001, 17(4): 59-61.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938