Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2008, Vol. 24 Issue (6): 67-71    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2008.06.13
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Study on Performance Evaluation Model and  Indicators Weight Assignment of College Information Commons Based on Balanced Score Card
Zhu Lei1   Sun Zhenqiu 2   WangMeilan 1
1 (Medical Library of Central South University, Changsha 410013, China)
2 (School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078,China)
Download: PDF(411 KB)   HTML  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

A new service model called information commons emerges in university libraries, and more and more people pay attention to the performance evaluation for it. This paper designs the performance evaluation indicators system model of information commons on current condition of university libraries with balanced score card, and assigns rational weight to the indicators based on Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP).
Key words： Balanced score card      Information commons      Evaluation indicator      Indicator weight     
Received: 03 March 2008      Published: 25 June 2008
: 

G250

 		 
Corresponding Authors: Zhu Lei     E-mail: zhuleimed@163.com
About author:: Zhu Lei,Sun Zhenqiu,Wang Meilan
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors

Cite this article:

Zhu Lei,Sun Zhenqiu,Wang Meilan. Study on Performance Evaluation Model and  Indicators Weight Assignment of College Information Commons Based on Balanced Score Card. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2008, 24(6): 67-71.

URL:

http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2008.06.13     OR     http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2008/V24/I6/67

［1］ Beagle D. Information Commons Task Force Report［R］. Charlotte: University of North Carolina, 1999.
［2］ 李秋实,冯承柏,温宇龙.美国高校图书馆的信息共享空间建设［J］.现代情报,2007，27(4):76-78,82.
［3］ 任静,周凤飞,杨丰全，等.试论大学图书馆信息共享空间的建设［J］.情报资料工作,2007(2):86-89.
［4］ 成俊颖,李梅,郝群,等.复旦大学图书馆“信息共享空间”调查问卷分析［J］.图书馆杂志,2007(7):39-41.
［5］ 任树怀.信息共享空间的规划与建设［J］.图书情报工作,2006，50(5):122-124，143.
［6］ 罗伯特.卡普兰.平衡计分卡:化战略为行动［M］.广州:广东经济出版社,2004:35-259.
［7］ 孙振球.医学统计学［M］.北京：人民卫生出版社,2002:386-389.
［8］ 唐建新,卢雄波,付爱春.基于模糊层次分析法的公益性、基础性投资项目经济评价研究［J］. 财会通讯(学术版),2007(11):90-93.
［9］ 徐革.我国大学图书馆电子资源绩效评价方法及其应用研究［D］.成都：西南交通大学,2006.
［10］ 严复海,燕洪国.用层次分析法确定平衡计分卡中评价指标的权重［J］.广东财经职业学院学报,2006,5(1):18-23.
［11］ 汪丽娟.基于平衡记分卡的非营利性医院绩效评价指标体系研究［D］.山东:山东大学,2006.
[1] Shen Kuilin, Zhao Hua, Shao Bo. The Research and Implementation of Online Reservation System of the Study Room[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, (5): 87-91.
[2] Hu Xiaoqing,Zhang Jianyong. Usability Evaluation Indicators and Empirical Study of Database Retrieval System[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009, 3(2): 46-50.
[3] Pang Qinghua . A Study on the Method of Comprehensive Evaluation for Library Website[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 1(6): 52-54.
[4] Wang Zunxin. Study of Evaluation Indicators System for College Library Website[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005, 21(3): 60-62.
[5] Xu Ge. Grey Statistic Study on the Impact Factors of the Electronic Resources Evaluation[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2005, 21(11): 83-85.
[6] Wu Xiaoxing. The Evaluation Indicators of Library Website[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2004, 20(4): 50-52.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626，82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn