Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2018, Vol. 2 Issue (4): 10-19    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2017.1095
Orginal Article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Evaluating Web Information for Ancient Villages Based on Rank Aggregation
Guo Chonghui(), Li Minqian
Institute of Systems Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
Download: PDF (1832 KB)   HTML ( 3
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper tries to evaluate Web information for ancient villages based on the rank aggregation method. [Methods] First, we proposed the framework and method to evaluate Web information resources for the ancient villages. Then, we selected six dimensions of observation, and constructed the evaluation index system. Third, we aggregated several evaluation methods using the BILPS technique, as well as combining subjective and objective weights. Finally, we evaluated the ancient village’s online presence with the proposed algorithm. [Results] We examined 64 ancient villages in China’s Guangdong Province and found that most of the Top 10 ancient villages were in the provincial city of Guangzhou. [Limitations] We only investigated the web information resources for ancient villages in Guangdong Province, more research is needed to study ancient villages in other regions. [Conclusions] This study could help decision-makers, managers and local residents better understand the ancient villages’ online impacts, and then promote their development.

Key wordsAncient Villages      Web Information Resources      Rank Aggregation     
Received: 05 November 2017      Published: 11 May 2018
ZTFLH:  G203  

Cite this article:

Guo Chonghui,Li Minqian. Evaluating Web Information for Ancient Villages Based on Rank Aggregation. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2018, 2(4): 10-19.

URL:

http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2017.1095     OR     http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2018/V2/I4/10

考察维度 具体指标
百度百科词条 古村落词条的数量
古村落词条的编辑次数
古村落词条的浏览次数
古村落词条的时效性
古村落词条的长度
古村落主页 是否有主页
网络地图 古村落地图的精确度
古村落地图的详情页数量
旅游网站 古村落评论的条数
古村落游记的篇数
中国知网 中国知网中古村落文献的数量
百度新闻 古村落的新闻报道数量
具体指标 熵值法权重 AHP权重
古村落词条数量 1.56% 5.99%
古村落词条的编辑次数 2.84% 5.02%
古村落词条的浏览次数 15.15% 7.71%
古村落词条的时效性 3.60% 1.84%
古村落词条的长度 3.23% 5.72%
是否有主页 19.17% 24.74%
古村落地图的精确度 0.49% 2.22%
古村落地图的详情页数量 5.72% 2.19%
古村落评论的条数 18.12% 14.77%
古村落游记的篇数 17.65% 15.79%
中国知网中古村落的文献数量 7.05% 4.13%
古村落的新闻报道数量 5.43% 9.87%
NUM TOP_ENT TOP_AHP MAR_ENT MAR_AHP SIM_ENT SIM_AHP PCA
1 0.7762 0.6791 0.8862 0.8434 0.7619 0.6546 5.6411
2 0.4566 0.4964 0.3404 0.3609 0.5688 0.6051 2.7181
3 0.2436 0.3466 0.1347 0.1892 0.3835 0.4742 1.6073
4 0.2343 0.3301 0.1071 0.1366 0.3467 0.4069 0.9500
5 0.2365 0.3273 0.1093 0.1357 0.3271 0.3857 0.7313
6 0.2279 0.3197 0.0952 0.1267 0.3003 0.3679 0.4486
7 0.2276 0.3199 0.0957 0.1215 0.2517 0.3354 0.1373
8 0.1202 0.1155 0.0692 0.0694 0.1879 0.1833 1.0593
9 0.0737 0.1232 0.0451 0.0764 0.1554 0.2021 1.1254
10 0.0805 0.0972 0.0460 0.0542 0.1585 0.1586 0.9839
11 0.0659 0.1244 0.0523 0.0854 0.0926 0.1617 0.8905
12 0.0893 0.0778 0.0568 0.0469 0.1424 0.1253 0.6339
13 0.0629 0.0700 0.0374 0.0368 0.1477 0.1439 0.6719
14 0.0706 0.1247 0.0284 0.0408 0.1148 0.1458 0.2337
15 0.0550 0.0884 0.0344 0.0550 0.1196 0.1507 0.4739
20 0.0517 0.1030 0.0377 0.0591 0.0575 0.1196 0.1642
41 0.0246 0.0338 0.0164 0.0162 0.0544 0.0709 -0.4864
44 0.0141 0.0500 0.0166 0.0238 0.0250 0.0743 -0.4827
46 0.0283 0.0502 0.0220 0.0263 0.0365 0.0523 -0.6027
NUM TOP_ENT TOP_AHP MAR_ENT MAR_AHP SIM_ENT SIM_AHP PCA BILPS
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 5 4 5 4 4 4 7 4
5 4 5 4 5 5 5 9 5
6 6 7 7 6 6 6 14 6
7 7 6 6 7 7 7 20 7
8 8 11 8 10 8 9 5 8
9 11 10 12 9 10 8 4 9
10 10 13 11 13 9 11 6 10
11 13 9 10 8 24 10 8 11
12 9 16 9 14 12 19 11 12
13 14 18 15 18 11 15 10 13
14 12 8 20 15 20 13 18 14
15 20 14 16 12 17 12 13 15
20 23 12 14 11 35 21 19 20
41 42 51 47 52 37 41 46 41
44 51 30 44 29 53 37 44 44
46 39 29 30 26 46 54 49 46
Spearman TOP_ENT TOP_AHP MAR_ENT MAR_AHP SIM_ENT SIM_AHP PCA
$\rho_{k}$ 0.9785 0.9462 0.9698 0.9543 0.9632 0.9899 0.9872
[1] 编写组. 古村落信息采集操作手册[M]. 广州:华南理工大学出版社, 2015.
[1] (Writing Group.Operation Manual for Ancient Village Information Collection[M]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2015.)
[2] Guo Z F, Sun L. The Planning, Development and Management of Tourism: The Case of Dangjia, An Ancient Village in China[J]. Tourism Management, 2016, 56: 52-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2016.03.017
[3] 李连璞. 基于多维属性整合的古村落旅游发展模式研究——以历史文化名村为例[J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(4): 155-160.
[3] (Li Lianpu.Tourism Sustainable Development of Village Based on Multi-Attributes: A Case Study of National Historic Cultural Village[J]. Human Grography, 2013, 28(4): 155-160.)
[4] 刘沛林, 于海波. 旅游开发中的古村落乡村性传承评价——以北京市门头沟区爨底下村为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(11): 1304-1310.
[4] (Liu Peilin, Yu Haibo.Study on the AHP Model of Rurality Inheritance in the Ancient Village of Tourism Development: A Case Study of Cuandixia Village, Mentougou District, Beijing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(11): 1304-1310.)
[5] 赵金龙. 广州市小洲村公共空间的现状评价和更新策略研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2013.
[5] (Zhao Jinlong.Status Evaluation and Update Strategy Research on Public Space of Xiao Zhou Village in Guanzhou[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2013.)
[6] 朱雪梅. 粤北传统村落形态及建筑特色研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2013.
[6] (Zhu Xuemei.Research on the Morphonlogy of Traditional Village and Architectrural Features in Northern Guangdong[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2013.)
[7] Lin B, Tan G, Wang P, et al.Study on the Thermal Performance of the Chinese Traditional Vernacular Dwellings in Summer[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2004, 36(1): 73-79.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-7788(03)00090-2
[8] Gou S, Li Z, Zhao Q, et al.Climate Responsive STRATEGIES of traditional Dwellings Located in an Ancient Village in Hot Summer and Cold Winter Region of China[J]. Building and Environment, 2015, 86: 151-165.
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.003
[9] 朱庆华. 网络信息资源评价指标体系的建立和测定[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012.
[9] (Zhu Qinghua.Establishment and Determination of Index System for Evaluating the Network Information Resources[M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2012.)
[10] 张洋, 张磊. 网络信息资源评价研究综述[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2010, 36(5): 75-89.
[10] (Zhang Yang, Zhang Lei.Review of Web Information Resources Evaluation[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2010, 36(5): 75-89.)
[11] 范佳佳, 叶继元. 21世纪以来网站评价研究进展与趋势[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(2): 92-106.
doi: 10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.142010
[11] (Fan Jiajia, Ye Jiyuan.Research Progress and Trends of Website Evaluation Since the 21st Century[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2014, 40(2): 92-106.)
doi: 10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.142010
[12] 马海群, 吕红. 网络信息资源评价指标体系及其动态模糊评价模型构建研究[J]. 情报科学, 2011, 29(2): 166-171.
[12] (Ma Haiqun, Lv Hong.Research on Network Information Resources Evaluation Index System and Construction of Dynamic Fuzzy Evaluation Mode[J]. Information Science, 2011, 29(2): 166-171.)
[13] 李珠瑞, 马溪骏, 彭张林. 基于离差最大化的组合评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(1): 174-179.
[13] (Li Zhurui, Ma Xijun, Peng Zhanglin.Research on the Combination Evaluation Method Based on Maximizing Deviations[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(1): 174-179.)
[14] 郭崇慧, 张震. 基于组合评价方法的关联规则兴趣度评价[J]. 情报学报, 2011, 30(4): 353-360.
doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2011.04.003
[14] (Guo Chonghui, Zhang Zhen.Interestingness Evaluation of Association Rules Based on Combination Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2011, 30(4): 353-360.)
doi: 10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2011.04.003
[15] Dwork C, Kumar R, Naor M, et al.Rank Aggregation Methods for the Web[C]// Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong, China. New York, USA: ACM, 2001: 613-622.
[16] Baltrunas L, Makcinskas T, Ricci F.Group Recommendations with Rank Aggregation and Collaborative Filtering[C]// Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, Barcelona, Spain. New York, USA: ACM, 2010: 119-126.
[17] 陈兆荣, 雷勋平. 基于熵权可拓的我国能源安全评价模型[J]. 系统工程, 2015, 33(7): 153-158.
[17] (Chen Zhaorong, Lei Xunping.Evaluating Energy Security in China Based on Entropy Weight Extension Model[J]. Systems Engineering, 2015, 33(7): 153-158.)
[18] Saaty T L.How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48(1): 9-26.
doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
[19] Opricovic S, Tzeng G.Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 156(2): 445-455.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
[20] Langville A, Meyer C D.Who’s #1?: The Science of Rating and Ranking[M]. Princeton University Press, 2013: 183-200.
[21] 何晓群. 多元统计分析[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 113-141.
[21] (He Xiaoqun.Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. The 4th Edition. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2015: 113-141.)
[22] Pedings K E, Langville A N, Yamamoto Y.A Minimum Violations Ranking Method[J]. Optimization and Engineering, 2012, 13(2): 349-370.
doi: 10.1007/s11081-011-9135-5
[1] Wu Zhenxin,Qu Yunpeng,Li Chengwen,Xiang Jing. Constructing a System for Harvesting and Preserving Chinese Web Information Resources Based on Open Source Software[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009, 25(7-8): 6-10.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn