Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2012, Vol. 28 Issue (7): 103-108    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2012.07.16
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Study on Key Indicators Definition and Its Impact in the Evaluation of Academic Journals
Wang Lingzhi1, Yu Liping2
1. Faculty of Liberal Arts and Communication, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
2. School of Business, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
Download: PDF(436 KB)   HTML  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  This paper proposes a new key indicators definition method which is key ratio. The key ratio gives a field vision of statistics, and the data standardization method and maximum have impacts to key ratio. The key ratio may affect indictor weight, and the method of key ratio is suitable for linear and nonlinear evaluation method.
Key wordsAcademic journal      Evaluation      Key indicator      Key ratio     
Received: 18 April 2012      Published: 11 October 2012



Cite this article:

Wang Lingzhi, Yu Liping. Study on Key Indicators Definition and Its Impact in the Evaluation of Academic Journals. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2012, 28(7): 103-108.

URL:     OR

[1] Hirsch J E. An Index to Qualify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46):16569-16572.

[2] Bergstrom C T, West J D, Wiseman M A. The EigenfactorTM Metrics[J]. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2008,28(45):11433-11434.

[3] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山. 学术期刊非线性评价模拟权重的动态变化研究[J]. 软科学 ,2011,25(4):135-140.(Yu Liping, Pan Yuntao, Wu Yishan. Research on Dynamic Change of Nonlinear Evaluation Simulated Weight of Academic Journal[J].Soft Science, 2011,25(4):135-140.)

[4] 徐耀玲. 评估指标权重设计方法与案例分析[J]. 科技促进发展 ,2011(1):62-67.(Xu Yaoling. The Evaluation Indicator Weight Design and the Case Analysis[J].Science & Technology for Development,2011(1):62-67.)

[5] 李华,李政,顾才东,等. 文献计量指标在科技期刊学术影响力评价中权重分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究 ,2010,21(6):817-819.(Li Hua, Li Zheng, Gu Caidong, et al. Bibliometric Indicators in the Evaluation of Academic Influence of Sci-tech Periodicals in Weight Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals,2010,21(6):817-819.)

[6] 李卓青,刘贤,刘明寿,等. 学术质量评价指标权重的确定与商榷[J]. 编辑学报 ,2007,19(5):389-390.(Li Zhuoqing, Liu Xian, Liu Mingshou, et al. Ascertainment and Discussion on Weighted Value of Academic Quality Evaluation Indexes of Journals[J]. Acta Editologica,2007,19(5):389-390.)

[7] 刘自远,刘成福. 综合评价中指标权重系数确定方法探讨[J]. 中国卫生质量管理 ,2006,13(2):44-46,48.(Liu Ziyuan, Liu Chengfu. Study on Methods of Determining Weight Coefficient of Index in Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Chinese Health Quality Management,2006,13(2):44-46,48.)

[8] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山. 学术期刊综合评价数据标准化方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作 ,2009,53(12):136-139.(Yu Liping, Pan Yuntao, Wu Yishan. Research on Data Normalization Methods in Multi-attribute Evaluation[J]. Library and Information Service,2009,53(12):136-139.)

[9] Huang C L,Yoon K.Multiattribute Decision Making:Methods and Applications[M].NY:Springer-Verlag,1981:12-34.
[1] Shiqi Deng,Liang Hong. Constructing Domain Ontology for Intelligent Applications: Case Study of Anti Tele-Fraud[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 73-84.
[2] Cheng Zhou,Hongqin Wei. Evaluating and Classifying Patent Values Based on Self-Organizing Maps and Support Vector Machine[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 117-124.
[3] Wancheng Chen,Haoran Dai,Yinghan Jin. Appraising Home Prices with HEDONIC Model: Case Study of Seattle, U.S.[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 19-26.
[4] Xiang Li,Xiaodong Qian. Research on Impact of Commodity Online Evaluation for Consumption Convergence[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 102-111.
[5] Jian Li,Mingyue Wang,Luming Xu,Yingchun Tian. The Construction of Digital Medical Information Service Evaluation System Based on User Perceived Value[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 118-126.
[6] Yanhua Xu,Yujie Miao,Lin Miao,Xueqiang Lv. Generating HSK Writing Essays with LDA Model[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(9): 80-87.
[7] Liping Yu,Xiayun Song,Zuogong Wang. Impacts and Corrections of Natural Weight on Nonlinear Sci-tech Reviews——Case Study of TOPSIS Method[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 48-57.
[8] Cao Yang, Fan Wenfei, Yuan Tengfei. Is Big Data Analytics Beyond the Reach of Small Companies?[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 1-7.
[9] Yutian Shi,Qinghua Zhu,Yuxiang Zhao,Xiaowei Chen. Evaluating the Influence of China’s Webcast Platforms Based on Link Analysis[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 40-48.
[10] Xueying Wang,Zixuan Zhang,Hao Wang,Sanhong Deng. Evaluating Brands of Agriculture Products: A Literature Review[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(7): 13-21.
[11] Yaxian Qing,Rui Li,Huayi Wu. Analyzing Academic Community Based on Co-author Network[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(4): 20-29.
[12] Guanghui Ye, Lixin Xia. Review of Expert Retrieval and Expert Ranking Studies[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(2): 1-10.
[13] Mengjiao Huai,Yuntao Pan,Junpeng Yuan. Evaluating Academic Credits of Scientific Research Project Leaders[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(11): 94-102.
[14] Yu Liping. New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals: Case Study of Mathematics Journals[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 94-100.
[15] Liu Jian,Bi Qiang,Ma Zhuo. Assessment of Digital Library’s Micro-services: An Empirical Study[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(5): 22-29.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938