Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2011, Vol. 27 Issue (10): 1-6    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2011.10.01
article Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Review of the Ontology Patterns Classification
Li Xiaohui1,2,3, Sun Tan1, Song Wen1
1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Harbin Normal University Library, Harbin 150025, China
Download: PDF(969 KB)   HTML  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Ontology patterns classification research is the first stage of understanding and the basis of patterns using. There are 3 kinds of Ontology patterns classification: the whole Ontology patterns Classification framework proposed by Blomqvist, NeOn, and the Ontology design patterns classification researched by the University of Manchester. This paper describes each kind topology by examples, then proposes existing questions and future work.
Key wordsOntology      Ontology patterns      Ontology design patterns      Ontology patterns classification     
Received: 27 June 2011      Published: 03 December 2011



Cite this article:

Li Xiaohui, Sun Tan, Song Wen. Review of the Ontology Patterns Classification. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011, 27(10): 1-6.

URL:     OR

[1] Blomqvist E.Semi-automatic Ontology Construction Based on Patterns . Linkping:Linkping University, 2009.

[2] Clark P, Thompson J, Porter B. Knowledge Patterns . In: Proceedings of International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.2000:90-94.

[3] Gangemi A. Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content .In: Proceedings of International Semantic Web Conference,Sardinia.2005:262-276.

[4] Svatek V. Design Patterns for Semantic Web Ontologies: Motivation and Discussion . In: Proceedings of Conference on Business Information Systems.2004.

[5] Ontology Engineering and Patterns Task Force (OEP) . . OEP/.

[6] Ontology Design Patterns . .

[7] Ontology Design Patterns(ODPs)Public Catalog . .

[8] WOP 2009 - Workshop on Ontology Patterns . .

[9] Welcome to the 2nd Workshop on Ontology Patterns - WOP2010 . . Topics.

[10] Blomqvist E. Ontology Patterns - Typology and Experiences from Design Pattern Development .In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Workshop of the Swedish Artificial Intelligence Society. Uppsala: Linkping University Electronic Press,2010.

[11] Sabou M. D2.2.3 Methods and Tools for the Evaluation and Selection of Knowledge Components . .

[12] Presutti V. D2.5.1:A Library of Ontology Design Patterns: Reusable Solutions for Collaborative Design of Networked Ontologies.

[13] Suarez-Figueroa M C, Brockmans S, Gangemi A.NeOn Modelling Components. NeOn Deliverable D5.1.1, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid . .

[14] Parameter.

[15] Noy N, Rector A. Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web .(2006-04-12). .

[16] N-Ary Relation Pattern (OWL 2).

[17] View Inheritance.

[18] Submissions:Lexico Syntactic ODP Corresponding to Equivalence Relation Between Classes ODP . .

[19] Ond r ˇ ej váb-Zamazal.Pattern-based Ontology Matching and Ontology Alignment Evaluation .Prague:University of Economics,2010.

[20] Class by Attribute Value . .

[21] Scharffe F. Correspondence Patterns Representation .Innsbruck: the University of Innsbruck,2009.

[22] ReengineeringOP.
[1] Shiqi Deng,Liang Hong. Constructing Domain Ontology for Intelligent Applications: Case Study of Anti Tele-Fraud[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 73-84.
[2] Zhu Fu,Yuefen Wang,Xuhui Ding. Semantic Representation of Design Process Knowledge Reuse[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(6): 21-29.
[3] Guangshang Gao. A Survey of User Profiles Methods[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 25-35.
[4] Ying Wang,Li Qian,Jing Xie,Zhijun Chang,Beibei Kong. Building Knowledge Graph with Sci-Tech Big Data[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 15-26.
[5] Youshi He,Shufang He. Sentiment Mining of Online Product Reviews Based on Domain Ontology[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(8): 60-68.
[6] Huihui Tang,Hao Wang,Zixuan Zhang,Xueying Wang. Extracting Names of Historical Events Based on Chinese Character Tags[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(7): 89-100.
[7] Beibei Pang,Juanqiong Gou,Wenxin Mu. Extracting Topics and Their Relationship from College Student Mentoring[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 92-101.
[8] Shengchun Ding,Menglu Liu,Zhu Fu. Unified Multidimensional Model Based on Knowledge Flow in Conceptual Design[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(2): 11-19.
[9] Haili Tu,Xiaobo Tang. Building Product Recommendation Model Based on Tags[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 28-39.
[10] Erjing Chen,Enbo Jiang. Review of Studies on Text Similarity Measures[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6): 1-11.
[11] Rujiang Bai,Fuhai Leng,Junhua Liao. An Improved Cosine Text Similarity Computing Method Based on Semantic Chunk Feature[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6): 56-64.
[12] Dan Wu,Chang Liu,Yi Li. Changing Sentiments of Pedestrian Navigation System Users[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(5): 42-51.
[13] Liu Jian,Bi Qiang,Liu Qingxu,Wang Fu. New Content Recommendation Service of Digital Literature[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(9): 70-77.
[14] Ding Heng,Lu Wei. Building Standard Literature Knowledge Service System[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 120-128.
[15] Lu Jiaying,Yuan Qinjian,Huang Qi,Qian Yunjie. Building Product Domain Ontology with Concept Lattice Theory[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(5): 38-46.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938