Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2018, Vol. 2 Issue (12): 1-11    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.0452
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Analyzing Interdisciplinarity and Scientists’ Academic Impacts
Li Dong1, Tong Shouchuan1, Li Jiang2()
1Department of Information Resource Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
Download: PDF (6003 KB)   HTML ( 10
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper explores the relationship between the scientists’ interdisciplinary knowledge and their academic impacts. [Methods] First, we collected 200 candidates from the 2016 National Natural Science Foundation Outstanding Youth Program and their articles indexed by the Web of Science. Then, we retrieved interdisciplinary co-authorship and citation data. Third, we used Brillouin’s index as a measure of interdisciplinarity and h index as a measure of academic influence. Finally, we calculated the correlation coefficients between interdisciplinarity and academic influence. [Results] We found no significant correlation between inter-disciplinary collaboration and academic influence except for the field of biology, and no significant correlation between interdisciplinary citations and academic influence except the areas of medicine or biology. [Limitations] Deciding a scientist’s discipline based on his/her affiliation might be biased. [Conclusions] A scientist’s interdisciplinary collaborations and citations are not necessarily correlated to his/her academic influence.

Key wordsInterdisciplianry      H Index      Brillouin’s Index      Collaboration Interdisciplinarity      Citation Interdisciplinarity      Correlation Analysis     
Received: 26 April 2018      Published: 16 January 2019
ZTFLH:  G250  

Cite this article:

Li Dong,Tong Shouchuan,Li Jiang. Analyzing Interdisciplinarity and Scientists’ Academic Impacts. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2018, 2(12): 1-11.

URL:

http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.0452     OR     http://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2018/V2/I12/1

学部 跨学科合作与H指数的
相关系数
地学部 -0.083
工程与材料科学部 0.168
管理学部 0.252
化学学部 -0.131
生物学部 0.541**
数学物理学部 0.394
信息学部 0.351
医学学部 -0.225
学部 相关系数
地学部 0.127
工程与材料科学部 0.237**
管理学部 0.042
化学学部 0.288**
生物学部 0.377**
数学物理学部 0.205**
信息学部 0.262**
医学部 0.452**
学部 相关系数
地学部 -0.052
工程与材料科学部 -0.099
管理学部 -0.046
化学学部 0.049
生物学部 0.181**
数学物理学部 0.002
信息学部 0.072
医学学部 0.241**
[1] 迈克尔·吉本斯, 卡米耶·利摩日, 黑尔佳·诺沃提尼, 等. 知识生产的新模式: 当代社会科学与研究的动力学[M]. 陈洪捷, 沈钦, 等译.第1版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2011.
[1] (Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al.The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies[M]. Translated by Chen Hongjie, Shen Qin, et al. The 1st Edition. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2011.)
[2] 李江. “跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014(3):87-93.
doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2014.03.087
[2] (Li Jiang.The Concept and Measurement of Interdisciplinarity[J]. Document, Information & Knowledge, 2014(3): 87-93.)
doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2014.03.087
[3] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室. 现代汉语词典[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2001: 1429.
[3] (Institute of Linguistics CASS. Modern Chinese Dictionary[M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2001: 1429.)
[4] Darden L, Maull N.Interfield Theories[J]. Philosophy of Science, 1977, 44(1): 43-64.
doi: 10.1086/288723
[5] 魏巍. “跨学科研究”评价方法与资助对策[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2011.
[5] (Wei Wei.Evaluation Methods and Financing Countermeasures of “Interdisciplinarity Research” [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2011.)
[6] 路甬祥. 学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2005, 20(1): 58-60.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2005.01.015
[6] (Lu Yongxiang.Implications in the Disciplinary Crossbreeding and Interdisciplinary Sciences[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005, 20(1): 58-60.)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3045.2005.01.015
[7] Morillo F, Bordons M, Gómez I.An Approach to Interdisciplinarity Through Bibliometric Indicators[J]. Scientometrics, 2001, 51(1): 203-222.
doi: 10.1023/A:1010529114941
[8] Rosenfield P L.The Potential of Transdisciplinary Research for Sustaining and Extending Linkages Between the Health and Social Sciences[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 1992, 35(11): 1343-1357.
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R pmid: 1462174
[9] Porter A L, Roessner D J, Heberger A E.How Interdisciplinary is a Given Body of Research?[J]. Research Evaluation, 2008, 17(4): 273-282.
doi: 10.3152/095820208X364553
[10] Stirling A.A General Framework for Analysing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.0213 pmid: 2373389
[11] Rafols I, Meyer M.Diversity and Network Coherence as Indicators of Interdisciplinarity: Case Studies in Bionanoscience[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 82(2): 263-287.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y
[12] Porter A L, Chubin D E.An Indicator of Cross-Disciplinary Research[J]. Scientometrics, 1985, 8(3-4): 161-176.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016934
[13] Brillouin L, Hellwarth R W.Science and Information Theory[J]. Physics Today, 1956, 9(12): 39-40.
[14] Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al.Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
[15] Way S F, Morgan A C, Clauset A, et al.The Misleading Narrative of the Canonical Faculty Productivity Trajectory[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 114(44): E9216-E9223.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702121114 pmid: 29042510
[16] Wang W, Yu S, Bekele T M, et al.Scientific Collaboration Patterns Vary with Scholars’ Academic Ages[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 329-343.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2388-9
[17] 邓侨侨, 王琪, 刘念才. 国别迁移:高被引科学家美国集聚的特征与原因分析[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2014, 35(2): 51-59.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2014.02.007
[17] (Deng Qiaoqiao, Wang Qi, Liu Niancai.International Migration: An Empirical Study on Highly-cited Scientists’ Agglomeration in the USA[J]. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 2014, 35(2): 51-59.)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2014.02.007
[18] Amjad T, Ding Y, Xu J, et al.Standing on the Shoulders of Giants[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 11(1): 307-323.
[19] 王晓红, 金子祺, 姜华. 跨学科团队的知识创新及其演化特征——基于创新单元和创新个体的双重视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(5): 732-741.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2013.05.012
[19] (Wang Xiaohong, Jin Ziqi, Jiang Hua.Knowledge Innovation of Interdisciplinary Research Team and Evolving Features: Based on Innovation Unit and Innovation Individual Views[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2013, 31(5): 732-741.)
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2013.05.012
[20] Steele T W, Stier J C.The Impact of Interdisciplinary Research in the Environmental Sciences: A Forestry Case Study[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2000, 51(5): 476-484.
[21] Hirsch J E.An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
[22] Google Scholar Metrics[EB/OL]. [2012-11-15]. .
[23] 童寿传, 李江, 李东. 我国图书情报学国际化发展的现状与趋势[J]. 图书情报知识, 2017(6): 24-34.
doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2017.06.024
[23] (Tong Shouchuan, Li Jiang, Li Dong.The Development and Trend of China’s International Publications in the Field of Library and Information Science[J]. Document, Informaiton & Knowledge, 2017(6): 24-34.)
doi: 10.13366/j.dik.2017.06.024
[1] Ming Yi,Tingting Zhang. Ranking Answer Quality of Popular Q&A Community[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(6): 12-20.
[2] Jiang Wu,Yinghui Zhao,Jiahui Gao. Research on Weibo Opinion Leaders Identification and Analysis in Medical Public Opinion Incidents[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(4): 53-62.
[3] Xinrui Wang,Yue He. Predicting Stock Market Fluctuations with Social Media Behaviors: Case Study of Sina Finance Blog[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(11): 108-119.
[4] Daoping Wang,Zhongyang Jiang,Boqing Zhang. Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Based on Gray Correlation Analysis and Time Factor[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 102-109.
[5] Pengmin Wu,Ting Chen,Xiaomei Wang. The Correlation Between Altmetrics and Citations[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 58-69.
[6] He Yue,Zhu Can. Sentiment Analysis of Weibo Opinion Leaders——Case Study of “Illegal Vaccine” Event[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(9): 65-73.
[7] Yu Liping. New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals: Case Study of Mathematics Journals[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(7-8): 94-100.
[8] Bi Dayu, Xia Xiaoxu, Wang Jing. The Analysis of Credit Standing of E-businessman Based on the Data Mining of Users' Online Evaluation[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014, 30(7): 77-83.
[9] Li Junlian, Li Danya, Sun Haixia, Ji Yujing, Li Fang. The Mechanism of MeSH Subheading Automatic Attachment for Chinese Biomedical Literatures[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, 28(6): 17-21.
[10] Kan Detao. Design and Implementation of Service Quality Analysis System[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009, 25(5): 76-80.
[11] Huang Yuanyuan,Zhu Donghua,Ren Zhijun,Zhang Cheng . Applicatian Study of Correlation Analysis in Patent Information Analysis[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 1(10): 60-65.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn