[Objective] his study explores the structure of user interest hierarchy, as well as its evolution laws, aiming to improve the quality of personalized information services. [Methods] First, we used the LDA topic model to retrieve the topics of users’ tags. Then, we calculated the tag’s degree of interests, which were combined with their topics to identify user’s interests. Finally, we created the “core-edge” structure for user’s interests based on the interest network to analyze the evolution laws of their hierarchy. [Results] The “core-edge” structure of user’s interests gradually converged and became stable with the determination of interest domain. The evolution of user interest hierarchy in time series mainly included three types: always in the core layer, the core layer faded to the edge layer, and the edge layer promoted to the core layer. [Limitations] More research is needed to predict user’s interests in future time nodes. [Conclusions] This proposed method could accurately evaluate the existing users’ dynamic interests, and the evolution laws of their hierarchy, which optimizes personalized information services.
夏立新,曾杰妍,毕崇武,叶光辉. 基于LDA主题模型的用户兴趣层级演化研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 1-13.
Lixin Xia,Jieyan Zeng,Chongwu Bi,Guanghui Ye. Identifying Hierarchy Evolution of User Interests with LDA Topic Model. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2019, 3(7): 1-13.
( Wu Xiaolan, Zhang Chengzhi . Microblogger Tag Predication Based on User Network and Tag Co-occurrence Network[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2015,34(5):459-465.)
( Zhao Kaihui , Recommendation Method of Personalized Information Based on Socialized Tagging[J]. Information Science, 2015,33(6):39-42.)
Kim Y, Shim K . TWILITE: A Recommendation System for Twitter Using a Probabilistic Model Based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Information Systems, 2014,42:59-77.
Jayarathna S, Patra A, Shipman F. Mining User Interest from Search Tasks and Annotations [C]// Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2013: 1849-1852.
( Tang Xiaobo, Zhu Li, Xie Li . Two-level MicroBlog Friend Recommendation Based on Topic Model[J]. Library and Information Service, 2014,58(9):105-113.)
Widmer G, Kubat M . Learning in the Presence of Concept Drift and Hidden Contexts[J]. Machine Learning, 1996,23(1):69-101.
Xu S, Shi Q, Qiao X , et al. A Dynamic Users’ Interest Discovery Model with Distributed Inference Algorithm[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, 10(4): Article ID 280892.
Liu X, Turtle H . Real-Time User Interest Modeling for Real-Time Ranking[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2013,64(8):1557-1576.
Li H, Fang L, Wang P, et al. Longitudinal Data Based Research on Web User Interests Drift Modeling [C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer Science and Engineering. 2013.
Heymann P, Garcia-Molina H . Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems[R]. Technical Report of Stanford InfoLab. USA: Stanford InfoLab Publication Server, 2006.
Cantador I, Szomszor M, Alani H, et al. Enriching Ontological User Profiles with Tagging History for Multi-Domain Recommendations [C]// Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Collective Semantics: Collective Intelligence and the Semantic Web. 2008: 5-19.
Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, et al. Swoogle: A Search and Metadata Engine for the Semantic Web [C]// Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2004: 652-659.
( Yu Hongtao, Cui Ruifei, Dong Qinqin . Micro-Blog User Interest Model Based on Forgetting Curve[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2014,35(10):3367-3372, 3379.)
( Ye Ying, Zhang Li, Zhao Xing , et al. An Experimental Study on Revealing Domain Knowledge Structure by Co-keyword Networks[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2012,31(12):1245-1251.)
张瑞 . 网络信息半衰期测度研究述评[J]. 图书情报知识, 2009(1):97-100.
( Zhang Rui . Reviews on Half-life of Network Information[J]. Document, Information & Knowledge, 2009(1):97-100.)