Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现  2021, Vol. 5 Issue (4): 60-71     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0751
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
情感距离视角下奖励式众筹用户投资决策行为研究*——基于项目文本的分析
陈君(),梁昊,钱晨
武汉大学信息管理学院 武汉 430072
Studying Investment Decisions of Rewarded Crowdfunding Users with Emotional Distance and Text Analysis
Chen Jun(),Liang Hao,Qian Chen
School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
全文: PDF (808 KB)   HTML ( 11
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

【目的】 基于情感距离视角,探究奖励式众筹项目的描述文本特征对用户投资决策行为的影响。【方法】 基于心理距离理论,定义投融资双方的文本情感距离及其三个维度。通过文本分析方法开发文本情感距离各维度的测度指标;构建文本情感距离对用户投资决策影响的计量模型,并通过Kickstarter众筹平台161 279个项目文本进行实证分析。【结果】 文本的积极情感倾向、文本亲和性与文本交互性对用户投资决策存在显著正向影响作用;文本的消极情感倾向对投资者决策存在显著负向影响作用;不同项目类别下,文本情感距离特征对用户投资决策行为的影响存在明显差异。【局限】 本研究未涉及其他众筹形式,研究结论在适用范围上存在局限;对语言的心理学和社会学等领域的定性研究在技术等方面尚存局限。【结论】 奖励式众筹融资者应重视项目文本描述的情感表达,着重展现积极的情感倾向与亲和性等特征;针对不同类别的项目,情感表达应有不同程度的侧重,以提高项目融资率。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
陈君
梁昊
钱晨
关键词 奖励式众筹投资决策文本分析情感距离    
Abstract

[Objective] This study explores the key factors that influence the investment decision-making behaviors of rewarded crowdfunding users. [Methods] First, we applied psychological distance theory to define text emotional distance and its three dimensions. Then, we developed a measurement index for the distance based on text analysis. Third, we constructed an econometric model to investigate the influence of text emotional distance on user’s investment decisions. Finally, we conducted an empirical analysis with 161,279 project-descriptions from Kickstarter. [Results] The positive emotional tendency, affinity and interactivity of the texts have significant positive impacts on the users’ investment decisions. Negative emotional tendency poses significant negative effects on investors. Influences of text emotional distance change with different project categories. [Limitations] Findings from our study may not be applied to other crowdfunding business. Also, the qualitative research on text language in psychology and sociology is limited due to technical issues. [Conclusions] The rewarded crowdfunding projects could improve their financing rates with positive emotional tendency and affinity in their descriptions.

Key wordsRewarded Crowdfunding    Investment Decision    Text Analysis    Emotional Distance
收稿日期: 2020-07-31      出版日期: 2020-12-15
ZTFLH:  分类号: G203  
基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(71871168);武汉大学社会科学基金项目的研究成果之一
通讯作者: 陈君     E-mail: christina_cj@whu.edu.cn
引用本文:   
陈君,梁昊,钱晨. 情感距离视角下奖励式众筹用户投资决策行为研究*——基于项目文本的分析[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(4): 60-71.
Chen Jun,Liang Hao,Qian Chen. Studying Investment Decisions of Rewarded Crowdfunding Users with Emotional Distance and Text Analysis. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 5(4): 60-71.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0751      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2021/V5/I4/60
Fig.1  本文研究模型
词性 r a v n
词条数量 5 580 30 002 25 047 146 312
Table 1  SWN主要词性统计(单位/个)
项目类别 项目数量 成功项目
数量
失败项目
数量
项目
成功率
影视 54 322 23 614 30 708 43.4%
艺术 47 911 23 833 24 078 49.7%
设计与科技 51 389 17 107 34 282 33.2%
漫画与插图 10 460 6 111 4 349 58.4%
食品与手工 46 473 13 596 32 877 29.2%
游戏 27 358 12 364 14 994 45.1%
音乐 47 395 26 201 21 194 55.2%
出版 37 017 12 879 24 138 34.7%
总数量统计 322 325 135 705 186 620 42.1%
Table 2  项目分类统计
变量 数据
类型
平均值 标准差 非空
项目数
中位数
筹资目标 数值型 45 107 1 135 032 322 325 5 000
图片数量 数值型 5.75 10.42 321 479 1
对外链接数量 数值型 1.92 4.44 321 479 0
文本长度 数值型 536.17 533.44 322 325 369
是否首次发起 布尔型 - - - -
是否含有视频 布尔型 - - - -
积极情感倾向 数值型 11.00 11.62 322 325 7.40
消极情感倾向 数值型 7.52 111.69 322 325 4.54
文本亲和性 数值型 2.10 2.32 322 325 1.36
文本交互性 数值型 1.47 1.46 322 325 1.13
Table 3  变量均值、标准差统计
变量类型 变量名称 变量代号 变量含义
因变量 投资者人数 BC 项目的投资者数量
控制变量 筹资目标金额 GO 由发起人设立,平台规定实际筹资额不小于筹资目标时项目筹资成功
图片数量 PC 项目说明页面中的图片数量
对外链接数量 HC 项目说明页面中的外部链接数量
文本长度 DEL 项目说明页面描述文本长度
项目(发起人)是否首次发起 IFC 项目发起人是否是首次在平台上发起项目,若是,则值为1,否则值为0
是否含有视频 HV 项目说明页面中是否含有视频介绍,若是,则值为1,否则值为0
自变量 积极情感倾向 POS 文本描述中所代表的积极倾向值
消极情感倾向 NEG 文本描述中所代表的消极倾向值
文本亲和性 AFF 文本描述中的第一人称代词的词频
文本交互性 INT 文本描述中的第二人称代词的词频
Table 4  变量描述
变量 被解释变量:投资者数量
模型1 模型2
系数 T 系数 T
筹资目标 0.060 5*** 27.511 0.058 9*** 26.922
图片数量 0.027 7*** 12.357 0.028 9*** 12.896
对外链接数量 0.072 9*** 33.118 0.069 6*** 31.719
是否首次发起 -0.827 2*** -186.729 -0.819 9*** -186.027
是否含有视频 0.385 5*** 84.802 0.368 3*** 81.165
文本长度 0.125 7*** 53.535 0.152 4*** 36.249
积极倾向情感 0.027 4*** 7.014
消极倾向情感 -0.058 4*** -17.118
文本亲和性 0.083 7*** 39.505
文本交互性 0.004 5** 2.132
截距项 0.200 8*** 44.677 0.207 7*** 46.458
F值 10 770*** 6 741***
R-squared 0.286 0.295
Table 5  线性回归结果
项目类别 积极情感 消极情感 文本亲和性 文本交互性
影视 0.020 6**
(2.212)
-0.011 3
(-1.406)
0.050 0***
(8.431)
0.017 1**
(2.583)
艺术 -0.017 5**
(-1.909)
-0.016 6**
(-1.939)
0.116 5***
(20.290)
-0.018 5***
(-3.220)
设计与科技 0.018 0**
(1.907)
-0.016 1**
(-1.858)
0.063 6***
(10.322)
-0.011 6***
(-2.904)
漫画与插画 0.029 7
(1.075)
0.008 4
(0.354)
0.067 9***
(3.203)
0.067 9***
(3.546)
食品与手工 8.616e-05
(0.010)
0.017 7**
(2.147)
0.065 5***
(15.810)
-0.003 5
(-0.749)
游戏 0.064 8***
(4.492)
-0.056 1***
(-5.958)
0.016 2*
(1.841)
-0.008 1
(-1.400)
音乐 0.081 1***
(7.028)
-0.019 6*
(-1.691)
0.060 7***
(13.574)
0.057 5***
(10.139)
出版 0.020 8**
(2.130)
-0.016 7**
(-1.989)
0.096 8***
(13.527)
0.001 1
(0.185)
Table 6  主效应的分类回归结果
[1] Mollick E. The Dynamics of Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014,29(1):1-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005
[2] 曾江洪, 陈斯琪. 众筹模式下项目支持者价值共创与满意度关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2016,13(9):1383-1391.
[2] ( Zeng Jianghong, Chen Siqi. Relationship Between Value Co-Creation and Satisfaction of the Project Supporters: An Study in the Context of Crowd-Funding[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2016,13(9):1383-1391.)
[3] Haas P, Scheiner C, Witt M, et al. Der Einfluss von Gamification auf die Empfundene Selbstwirksamkeit von Teilnehmern von Online-Ideengenerierungswettbewerben über die Zeit[C]// Proceedings of Lecture Notes in Informatics, Gesellschaft für Informatik. 2012.
[4] Bretschneider U, Leimeister J M. Not Just an Ego-Trip: Exploring Backers’ Motivation for Funding in Incentive-Based Crowdfunding[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2017,26(4):246-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.002
[5] Zhao Q, Chen C D, Wang J L, et al. Determinants of Backers’ Funding Intention in Crowdfunding: Social Exchange Theory and Regulatory Focus[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2017,34(1):370-384.
doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2016.06.006
[6] Du Q Z, Fan W G, Qiao Z L, et al. Money Talks: A Predictive Model on Crowdfunding Success Using Project Description[C]// Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems. 2015.
[7] Bi S, Liu Z, Usman K. The Influence of Online Information on Investing Decisions of Reward-Based Crowdfunding[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017,71:10-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.001
[8] 姚卓, 陈晓红, 张希, 等. 基于质量信号的众筹融资影响因素研究[J]. 金融经济学研究, 2016,31(4):60-71.
[8] ( Yao Zhuo, Chen Xiaohong, Zhang Xi, et al. Research of Factors in Crowd Funding Financing Based on Quality Signal Theory[J]. Financial Economics Research, 2016,31(4):60-71.)
[9] Thies F, Wessel M, Benlian A. Understanding the Dynamic Interplay of Social Buzz and Contribution Behavior Within and Between Online Platforms-Evidence from Crowdfunding[C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, 2014.
[10] Kang L, Jiang Q, Tan C H. Remarkable Advocates: An Investigation of Geographic Distance and Social Capital for Crowdfunding[J]. Information & Management, 2017,54(3):336-348.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.09.001
[11] Müllerleile T, Joenssen D W. Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis[A]//Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery[M]. Springer, 2015: 271-281.
[12] Parhankangas A, Renko M. Linguistic Style and Crowdfunding Success Among Social and Commercial Entrepreneurs[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2017,32(2):215-236.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
[13] Wang W, Zhu K, Wang H W, et al. The Impact of Sentiment Orientations on Successful Crowdfunding Campaigns through Text Analytics[J]. IET Software, 2017,11(5):229-238.
doi: 10.1049/sfw2.v11.5
[14] 王伟, 陈伟, 祝效国, 等. 众筹融资成功率与语言风格的说服性——基于Kickstarter的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016(5):81-98.
[14] ( Wang Wei, Chen Wei, Zhu Xiaoguo, et al. Success Rate of Crowdfunding and Persuasion of Language Style -An Empirical Study Based on Kickstarter[J]. Management World, 2016(5):81-98.)
[15] Chung S, Park J. Exploring Consumer Evaluations in Social Media: The Role of Psychological Distance Between Company and Consumer[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2017,76:312-320.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.042
[16] Lim S, Cha S Y, Park C, et al. Getting Closer and Experiencing Together: Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Distance in Social Media-Enhanced Real-Time Streaming Video[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012,28(4):1365-1378.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.022
[17] Fiedler K. Construal Level Theory as an Integrative Framework for Behavioral Decision-Making Research and Consumer Psychology[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2007,17(2):101-106.
doi: 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70015-3
[18] Larsen R J, Diener E. Affect Intensity as an Individual Difference Characteristic: A Review[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1987,21(1):1-39.
doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7
[19] Dickert S, Sagara N, Slovic P. Affective Motivations to Help Others: A Two-Stage Model of Donation Decisions[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2011,24(4):361-376.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v24.4
[20] Huang Y L, Starbird K, Orand M, et al. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online[C]//Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press, 2015: 969-980.
[21] Marcin M, Kristian H. Shine Bright like a Diamond-Exploring the Effects of Online-Product Presentation on Backing Behavior in Reward-Based Crowdfunding[C]// Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems. 2015.
[22] Vismara S. Information Cascades among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding [C]//Proceedings of Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 2015: 11519.
[23] Liu Q, Feng C, Huang H. Emotional Tendency Identification for Micro-blog Topics Based on Multiple Characteristics[C]// Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation. 2012: 280-288.
[24] Abe J A A. Changes in Alan Greenspan’s Language Use Across the Economic Cycle: A Text Analysis of His Testimonies and Speeches[J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2011,30(2):212-223.
doi: 10.1177/0261927X10397152
[25] Page R. Interactivity and Interaction: Text and Talk in Online Communities[A]//Intermediality and Storytelling[M]. De Gruyter, 2011.
[26] Warnick B, Xenos M, Endres D, et al. Effects of Campaign-to-User and Text-Based Interactivity in Political Candidate Campaign Web Sites[J]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2005,10(3). DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00253.x.
[27] Endres D, Warnick B. Text‐Based Interactivity in Candidate Campaign Web Sites: A Case Study from the 2002 Elections[J]. Western Journal of Communication, 2004,68(3):322-342.
doi: 10.1080/10570310409374804
[28] Kemp E, Kennett-Hensel P A, Kees J . Pulling on the Heartstrings: Examining the Effects of Emotions and Gender in Persuasive Appeals[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2013,42(1):69-79.
doi: 10.1080/00913367.2012.749084
[29] 王英, 龚花萍. 基于情感维度的大数据网络舆情情感倾向性分析研究——以“南昌大学自主保洁”微博舆情事件为例[J]. 情报科学, 2017,35(4):37-42.
[29] ( Wang Ying, Gong Huaping. Analysis of Sentiment Tendency of Big Data Online Public Opinion Based on the Sentiment Dimension——Taking “the Independent Cleaning of Nanchang University” Weibo Public Opinion Event as an Example[J]. Information Science, 2017,35(4):37-42.)
[30] Kahneman D A, Tversky A N. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk[J]. Econometrica, 2013,47(2):263-291.
doi: 10.2307/1914185
[31] Kim J, Gupta P. Emotional Expressions in Online User Reviews: How They Influence Consumers’ Product Evaluations[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2012,65(7):985-992.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.013
[32] Folkes V S. Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988,14(4):548-565.
doi: 10.1086/jcr.1988.14.issue-4
[33] Pennebaker J W, Mehl M R, Niederhoffer K G. Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2003,54(1):547-577.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
[34] Campbell R S, Pennebaker J W. The Secret Life of Pronouns: Flexibility in Writing Style and Physical Health[J]. Psychological Science, 2003,14(1):60-65.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01419
[35] Sexton J B, Helmreich R L. Analyzing Cockpit Communication: The Links Between Language, Performance, Error, and Workload[J]. Human Performance in Extreme Environments, 2000,5(1):63-68.
[36] Tausczik Y R, Pennebaker J W. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods[J]. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2010,29(1):24-54.
doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676
[37] Taboada M, Brooke J, Tofiloski M, et al. Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis[J]. Computational Linguistics, 2011,37(2):267-307.
doi: 10.1162/COLI_a_00049
[38] Chu C H, Roopa A H, Chang Y C, et al. Constructing Sentiment Sensitive Vectors for Word Polarity Classification[C]// Proceedings of 2015 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (TAAI). 2015: 252-259.
[39] Basiri M E, Kabiri A. Translation is not Enough: Comparing Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis in Persian[C]//Proceedings of 2017 International Symposium on Computer Science and Software Engineering Conference (CSSE). IEEE, 2017: 36-41.
[40] Hu M Q, Liu B. Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews[C]// Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2004: 168-177.
[41] Subrahmanian V S, Reforgiato D. AVA: Adjective-Verb-Adverb Combinations for Sentiment Analysis[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2008,23(4):43-50.
doi: 10.1109/MIS.2008.57
[42] Kennedy A, Inkpen D. Sentiment Classification of Movie Reviews Using Contextual Valence Shifters[J]. Computational Intelligence, 2006,22(2):110-125.
doi: 10.1111/coin.2006.22.issue-2
[43] Gunsch M A, Brownlow S, Haynes S E, et al. Differential Forms Linguistic Content of Various of Political Advertising[J]. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2000,44(1):27-42.
[44] Cruz R E, Leonhardt J M, Pezzuti T. Second Person Pronouns Enhance Consumer Involvement and Brand Attitude[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2017,39:104-116.
doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2017.05.001
[45] Martínez-Cámara E, Martín-Valdivia M T, Ureña-López L A , et al. Sentiment Analysis in Twitter[J]. Natural Language Engineering, 2014,20(1):1-28.
doi: 10.1017/S1351324912000332
[46] Scheaf D J, Davis B C, Webb J W, et al. Signals’ Flexibility and Interaction with Visual Cues: Insights from Crowdfunding[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2018,33(6):720-741.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.04.007
[47] Kim P H, Buffart M, Croidieu G. TMI: Signaling Credible Claims in Crowdfunding Campaign Narratives[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2016,41(6):717-750.
[48] 戴静, 叶翠红, 陈义国, 等. 质量信号对众筹投资者决策的影响——来自京东商品众筹的证据[J]. 金融评论, 2016(3):53-66.
[48] ( Dai Jing, Ye Cuihong, Chen Yiguo, et al. Effect of Quality Signal on Investment Decision in Reward Crowdfunding——Evidence from Jingdong Reward Crowdfunding Platform[J]. Chinese Review of Financial Studies, 2016(3):53-66.)
[49] Park H J, Dhandra T K. Relation Between Dispositional Mindfulness and Impulsive Buying Tendency: Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence[J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 2017,105:208-212.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.061
[1] 田钟林,吴旭,颉夏青,许晋,陆月明. 一种基于领域语义关系图的短文本实时分析模型*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(2/3): 239-248.
[2] 吴江,赵颖慧,高嘉慧. 医疗舆情事件的微博意见领袖识别与分析研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(4): 53-62.
[3] 俞琰, 赵乃瑄. 加权专利文本主题模型研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(4): 81-89.
[4] 马天翼,张朋柱,冯浩垠. 网络外包任务的知识需求建模研究*[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(3): 74-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn