融合主题模型与决策树的跨地区专利合作关系发现与推荐<sup>*</sup>——以广东省和武汉市高校专利库为例

doi:10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0194

数据分析与知识发现

2021, Vol. 5

Issue (10): 37-50 https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0194

研究论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

融合主题模型与决策树的跨地区专利合作关系发现与推荐^*——以广东省和武汉市高校专利库为例

陈浩(

),张梦毅,程秀峰

华中师范大学信息管理学院武汉 430079

Identifying Cross-Region Patent Collaboration Opportunities Using LDA and Decision Trees——Case Study of Universities from Guangdong and Wuhan

Chen Hao(

),Zhang Mengyi,Cheng Xiufeng

School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF (1569 KB) HTML ( 16 )
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

【目的】 为促进跨地区的专利合作与知识交流,充分挖掘专利的人物关系特征和内容特征,扩展创新合作空间,优化创新要素的分配,整体提升创新水平,提出一种融合LDA与决策树模型的跨地区专利合作关系发现方法。【方法】 选取incoPat专利数据库中广东省和武汉市985高校的22 855条专利数据。利用LDA主题模型,对专利的领域离散度、权威度和技术度三个维度进行主题抽取和聚类,构建决策树并调整决策边界,从而动态识别出最优合作关系;最后根据发明人网络有效规模值选出最优挖掘策略,从而实现合作关系的发现与推荐。【结果】 该方法可从专利数量排名前4的专利大类里发现18对潜在跨地区合作关系,而在链路预测方法下,合作网络的节点邻接关系稀疏,无法完成跨地区合作关系推荐。【局限】 采集的数据范围有限,且需进一步从横向和纵向两个方面考虑企业等产学研主体和技术产业链上、中、下游对实际创新生态的影响,确认方法的适用性。【结论】 融合LDA与决策树的跨地区专利合作关系发现方法,可以有效识别网络中的潜在合作关系,充分发挥不同地区之间的领域组合在提升创新水平上的优势,为跨地区、多领域条件下的专利合作提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈浩
	张梦毅
	程秀峰

关键词 ：专利合作, 决策树, 主题模型, 跨地区

Abstract：

[Objective] This paper proposes an algorithm to identify potential collaboration opportunities for patents with the LDA and decision tree models, aiming to enhance the cross-region innovation. [Methods] First, we retrieved 22 855 patents from the incoPat database, which were developed by higher education institutions from Guangdong Province and Wuhan City. Then, we used the LDA to extract and cluster patent topics. Third, we constructed decision tree to identify the best potential cooperative relations by adjusting the decision boundaries. Finally, we chose the optimal data mining strategy based on the effective size of the inventors’ network, which helps us identify and recommend cooperative relationships. [Results] We found 18 pairs of potential cross-regional partners from the top four patent categories in the data set, which was much better than the link prediction method. [Limitations] The coverage of patent data needs to be expanded. More research is also needed to study the impacts of the university and industry on the innovation ecology. [Conclusions] The proposed method could identify the potential cross region partners for patents and innovation.

Key words： Patent Cooperation Decision Tree Topic Model Cross-Region

收稿日期: 2021-03-01 出版日期: 2021-11-23

ZTFLH:

G306

基金资助:*国家自然科学基金面上项目(71974069)

通讯作者: 陈浩,ORCID：0000-0002-3460-2769 E-mail: 18071283828@163.com

引用本文:

陈浩, 张梦毅, 程秀峰. 融合主题模型与决策树的跨地区专利合作关系发现与推荐^*——以广东省和武汉市高校专利库为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 37-50.
Chen Hao, Zhang Mengyi, Cheng Xiufeng. Identifying Cross-Region Patent Collaboration Opportunities Using LDA and Decision Trees——Case Study of Universities from Guangdong and Wuhan. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 5(10): 37-50.

链接本文:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0194 或 https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2021/V5/I10/37

Fig.1 研究框架

Table 1 具有潜在合作关系专利特征-标准对照表

Table 2 原始数据描述

Fig.2 不同主题数对应的模型困惑度

Table 3 主题分类结果

Table 4 用于聚类分析的矩阵样例

Fig.3 聚合系数随聚类个数的变化曲线

Table 5 构建决策树的数据样例

Fig.4 特征指标均值分布

Fig.5 决策树

Fig.6 决策树最大深度和对应网络中节点有效规模指数离群值比例关系

Table 6 最佳决策边界下BCCC中专利样例

Table 7 跨地区合作预选推荐对象

Fig.7 各领域发明人专利数量饼图

Table 8 医学、兽医学或卫生学领域联合推荐列表

Table 9 金属加工领域联合推荐列表

Table 10 有机高分子化合物领域联合推荐列表

Table 11 测量;测试领域联合推荐列表

Table 12 CN相似性指标方阵

Table 13 邻接矩阵

Table 14 链路预测最终推荐结果（部分）

Table 15 按主合作人“薛龙建”分类展示

Table 16 按主合作人“郑国兴”分类展示

Table 17 按主合作人“曹强”分类展示

[1]	杨勇, 王露涵. 我国发明专利合作网络特征与演化研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(7): 1227-1235.
[1]	(Yang Yong, Wang Luhan. Research on the Structure and Evolution Characteristics of Patent Cooperation Network in China[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(7): 1227-1235.)
[2]	Liben-Nowell D, Kleinberg J. The Link-prediction Problem for Social Networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(7): 1019-1031. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
[3]	张金柱, 韩涛, 王小梅. 作者-关键词二分网络中的合著关系预测研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(21): 74-80.
[3]	(Zhang Jinzhu, Han Tao, Wang Xiaomei. Co-authorship Prediction in the Author-Keyword Bipartite Networks[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016, 60(21): 74-80.)
[4]	Luong N T, Nguyen T T, Jung J J, et al. Discovering Co-author Relationship in Bibliographic Data Using Similarity Measures and Random Walk Model [C]//Proceedings of Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. Springer, Cham, 2015: 127-136.
[5]	Zhang J Z. Uncovering Mechanisms of Co-authorship Evolution by Multirelations-Based Link Prediction[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2017, 53(1): 42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.06.005
[6]	Lee D H, Brusilovsky P, Schleyer T. Recommending Collaborators Using Social Features and MeSH Terms[J]. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 48(1): 1-10.
[7]	翟东升, 郭程, 张杰, 等. 基于专利的企业潜在研发伙伴推荐方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(3): 10-20.
[7]	(Zhai Dongsheng, Guo Cheng, Zhang Jie, et al. Recommending Potential R&D Partners Based on Patents[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2017, 1(3): 10-20.)
[8]	陈文杰. 基于翻译模型的科研合作预测研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(10): 28-36.
[8]	(Chen Wenjie. Predicting Research Collaboration Based on Translation Model[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 4(10): 28-36.)
[9]	汪俊, 岳峰, 王刚, 等. 科研社交网络中基于链接预测的专家推荐研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(6): 151-157.
[9]	(Wang Jun, Yue Feng, Wang Gang, et al. Expert Recommendation in Scientific Social Network Based on Link Prediction[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(6): 151-157.)
[10]	蒲姗姗. 基于知识互补的科研合作专家推荐模型研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(8): 96-101.
[10]	(Pu Shanshan. Expert Recommendation Model in Scientific and Technical Collaboration Based on Complementary Knowledge[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2018, 41(8): 96-101.)
[11]	盛嘉祺, 许鑫. 融合主题相似度与合著网络的学者标签扩展方法研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(8): 75-85.
[11]	(Sheng Jiaqi, Xu Xin. Expanding Scholar Labels with Research Similarity and Co-authorship Network[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 4(8): 75-85.)
[12]	熊回香, 杨雪萍, 蒋武轩, 等. 基于学术能力及合作关系网络的学者推荐研究[J]. 情报科学, 2019, 37(5): 71-78.
[12]	(Xiong Huixiang, Yang Xueping, Jiang Wuxuan, et al. Scholars Recommend Research Based on Academic Competence and Collaborative Networks[J]. Information Science, 2019, 37(5): 71-78.)
[13]	刘萍, 郑凯伦, 邹德安. 基于LDA模型的科研合作推荐研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2015, 38(9): 79-85.
[13]	(Liu Ping, Zheng Kailun, Zou Dean. Research on the Recommendation of S&T Collaboration Based on LDA Model[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2015, 38(9): 79-85.)
[14]	刘海鸥, 孙晶晶, 张亚明, 等. 在线社交活动中的用户画像及其信息传播行为研究[J]. 情报科学, 2018, 36(12): 17-21.
[14]	(Liu Haiou, Sun Jingjing, Zhang Yaming, et al. Research on User Portrayal and Information Dissemination Behavior in Online Social Activities[J]. Information Science, 2018, 36(12): 17-21.)
[15]	刘竟, 孙薇. 基于链路预测的潜在科研合作关系发现研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(7): 88-92, 121.
[15]	(Liu Jing, Sun Wei. Discovery of Potential Scientific and Technical Collaborative Relationship Based on Link Prediction[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2017, 40(7): 88-92, 121.)
[16]	Eslami H, Ebadi A, Schiffauerova A. Effect of Collaboration Network Structure on Knowledge Creation and Technological Performance: The Case of Biotechnology in Canada[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(1): 99-119. doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1069-6
[17]	胡杨, 李郇. 地理邻近对产学研合作创新的影响途径与作用机制[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(6): 109-115.
[17]	(Hu Yang, Li Xun. Effect of Geographical Proximity on University-Industry Cooperative Innovation and the Mechanism[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(6): 109-115.)
[18]	陈光华, 王烨, 杨国梁. 地理距离阻碍跨区域产学研合作绩效了吗?[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(1): 76-82.
[18]	(Chen Guanghua, Wang Ye, Yang Guoliang. Geographical Distance and Non-local University-Industry Collaborations Performance[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(1): 76-82.)
[19]	Burt R S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1992.
[20]	Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M L. Latent Dirichlet Allocation[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 993-1022.
[21]	邱均平, 陈木佩. 我国计量学领域作者合作关系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2012, 35(11): 56-60.
[21]	(Qiu Junping, Chen Mupei. Research on Author Collaboration in the Metrology Field in China[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2012, 35(11): 56-60.)
[22]	李睿. 专利引文分析法与共词分析法在揭示科学-技术知识关联方面的差异对比[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54(6): 91-93, 140.
[22]	(Li Rui. Comparing Co-words Analysis and Citations Analysis Between Academic Papers and Patents in the Presentation of Knowledge Transfer[J]. Library and Information Service, 2010, 54(6): 91-93, 140.)
[23]	Freeman L C. Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification[J]. Social Networks, 1978, 1(3): 215-239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
[24]	蔡克勇. 论知识积累与知识创新[J]. 教育科学研究, 2001(1): 8-11.
[24]	(Cai Keyong. Discussion on Knowledge Accumulation and Knowledge Innovation[J]. Educational Science Research, 2001(1): 8-11.)
[25]	刘亭亭, 吴洁, 张宇洁. 产学研合作中高校知识创新能力提升的系统动力学研究——基于知识转移视角[J]. 情报杂志, 2012, 31(10): 195-200.
[25]	(Liu Tingting, Wu Jie, Zhang Yujie. Research on the University's Knowledge Innovation Capability in the Industry University-Institute Cooperation Using System Dynamics—Based on the Knowledge Transfer Perspective[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2012, 31(10): 195-200.)
[26]	Yan B W, Luo J X. Measuring Technological Distance for Patent Mapping[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(2): 423-437. doi: 10.1002/asi.2017.68.issue-2
[27]	刘阳, 杜艳艳. 我国农业高校专利合作网络演化研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(7): 110-116.
[27]	(Liu Yang, Du Yanyan. Evolution of the Patent Cooperation Network of Agricultural Universities in China[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(7): 110-116.)
[28]	刘桂锋, 卢章平, 刘琼, 等. 基于社会网络分析的江苏省高校产学研专利合作研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(1): 122-126.
[28]	(Liu Guifeng, Lu Zhangping, Liu Qiong, et al. A Study on University-industry Patent Cooperation in Jiangsu Province Based on Social Network Analysis[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(1): 122-126.)
[29]	Rosen Z M, Griffiths T, Steyvers M, et al. The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Document [C]//Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2004: 487-494.
[30]	Hirschanman A O. National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade[M]. University of California Press, 1980: 98-99.
[31]	Hamburg B, Hoffmann M, Keller J. Consumption, Wealth and Business Cycles in Germany[J]. Empirical Economics, 2008, 34(3): 451-476. doi: 10.1007/s00181-007-0130-9
[32]	Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981: 58-191.
[33]	Shannon C E. A mathematical Theory of Communication[J]. The Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3): 379-423. doi: 10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3
[34]	Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S. K-Means++: The Advantages of Careful Seeding [C]// Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 2007: 1027-1035.
[35]	Han J, Kambr M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques[M]. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2001: 279-333.
[36]	Guan J C, Liu N. Exploitative and Exploratory Innovations in Knowledge Network and Collaboration Network: A Patent Analysis in the Technological Field of Nano-energy[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 97-112. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.002

[1]	伊惠芳,刘细文. 一种专利技术主题分析的IPC语境增强Context-LDA模型研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(4): 25-36.
[2]	张鑫,文奕,许海云. 一种融合表示学习与主题表征的作者合作预测模型^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(3): 88-100.
[3]	赵天资, 段亮, 岳昆, 乔少杰, 马子娟. 基于Biterm主题模型的新闻线索生成方法 ^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(2): 1-13.
[4]	关鹏,王曰芬,靳嘉林,傅柱. 专利合作视角下技术创新合作网络演化分析——以国内语音识别技术领域为例*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(1): 112-127.
[5]	余传明,原赛,朱星宇,林虹君,张普亮,安璐. 基于深度学习的热点事件主题表示研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(4): 1-14.
[6]	潘有能,倪秀丽. 基于Labeled-LDA模型的在线医疗专家推荐研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(4): 34-43.
[7]	陈文杰. 基于翻译模型的科研合作预测研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(10): 28-36.
[8]	凌洪飞,欧石燕. 面向主题模型的主题自动语义标注研究综述 ^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(9): 16-26.
[9]	聂维民,陈永洲,马静. 融合多粒度信息的文本向量表示模型 ^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(9): 45-52.
[10]	曾庆田,胡晓慧,李超. 融合主题词嵌入和网络结构分析的主题关键词提取方法 ^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 52-60.
[11]	余本功,陈杨楠,杨颖. 基于nBD-SVM模型的投诉短文本分类^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 77-85.
[12]	席林娜,窦永香. 基于计划行为理论的微博用户转发行为影响因素研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 13-20.
[13]	张杰,赵君博,翟东升,孙宁宁. 基于主题模型的微藻生物燃料产业链专利技术分析^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(2): 52-64.
[14]	刘俊婉,龙志昕,王菲菲. 基于LDA主题模型与链路预测的新兴主题关联机会发现研究^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 104-117.
[15]	杨贵军,徐雪,赵富强. 基于XGBoost算法的用户评分预测模型及应用^*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 118-126.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed