Please wait a minute...
Advanced Search
数据分析与知识发现  2024, Vol. 8 Issue (6): 82-94     https://doi.org/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0542
  研究论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
融合用户传播倾向信息的超图网络谣言检测模型*
彭竞杰,顾益军(),张岚泽
中国人民公安大学信息网络安全学院 北京 100038
Hypergraph-Based Rumor Detection Model Integrating User Propagation Bias Information
Peng Jingjie,Gu Yijun(),Zhang Lanze
College of Information and Cyber Security, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China
全文: PDF (1822 KB)   HTML ( 4
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

【目的】构造融合用户传播倾向信息的推文交互超图谣言检测模型,提高谣言检测准确率。【方法】提出一种名为UPBI_HGRD的谣言检测模型。该模型在获取推文节点嵌入表示时融合了用户传播倾向信息,并根据用户ID构造超边,形成能够反映推文交互关系的超图。此外,提出推文节点-用户超边级多层双级多头注意力机制关注重要的推文关系,从而有效学习节点的嵌入表示,最后将其输入分类器中判断是否是谣言。【结果】在三个公开数据集上的实验结果表明,所提模型的准确率分别达到了94.57%、97.82%和94.76%,优于基线模型,并具有优秀的谣言早期检测性能,证明了模型的有效性。【局限】获取融合用户传播倾向信息的推文嵌入表示以及构建超图的过程有一定时间开销,未来将从提高模型的时间效率等方面开展进一步研究。【结论】UPBI_HGRD模型可以有效提高谣言检测的准确率,为网络谣言的识别提供了新思路。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
彭竞杰
顾益军
张岚泽
关键词 谣言检测节点嵌入用户传播倾向信息超图多层双级多头注意力机制    
Abstract

[Objective] This paper aims to construct a tweet interaction hypergraph-based rumor detection model that integrates user propagation bias information to improve the accuracy of rumor detection. [Methods] A rumor detection model named UPBI_HGRD is proposed. The model integrates the user propagation bias information when obtaining the tweet node embedding representation, and constructs hyperedges based on user IDs to form a hypergraph that can reflect the interactive relationship of tweets. In addition, this paper proposes a tweet node-user hyperedge level multi-layer dual-level multi-head attention mechanism to focus on important tweet relationships, so as to effectively learn the embedding representation of nodes, and finally input it into a classifier to judge whether it is a rumor or not. [Results] The experimental results on three publicly available datasets show that the accuracy of the model reaches 94.57%, 97.82% and 94.76%, respectively, which is better than the existing baseline model, and has an excellent performance in early detection of rumors, which proves the effectiveness of the model. [Limitations] The limitation of the model in this paper is that the process of obtaining the tweet embedding representation that integrates the user propagation bias information and constructing the hypergraph has a certain time overhead. In the future, further research will be done to improve the time efficiency of the model. [Conclusions] The proposed method effectively improves the accuracy of rumor detection and provides a novel approach to identifying online rumors.

Key wordsRumor Detection    Node Embedding    User Propagation Bias Information    Hypergraph    Multi-layer Dual-level Multi-head Attention Mechanism
收稿日期: 2023-06-07      出版日期: 2024-01-08
ZTFLH:  TP183  
  G35  
基金资助:*中国人民公安大学网络空间安全执法技术双一流创新研究专项(2023SYL07)
通讯作者: 顾益军,E-mail:guyijun@ppsuc.edu.cn。   
引用本文:   
彭竞杰, 顾益军, 张岚泽. 融合用户传播倾向信息的超图网络谣言检测模型*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(6): 82-94.
Peng Jingjie, Gu Yijun, Zhang Lanze. Hypergraph-Based Rumor Detection Model Integrating User Propagation Bias Information. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8(6): 82-94.
链接本文:  
https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0542      或      https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/CN/Y2024/V8/I6/82
Fig.1  UPBI_HGRD模型结构
Fig.2  基于用户ID构造超图
数据集 推文传播子图总数 谣言事件数量 非谣言事件数量 节点总数 边总数 事件平均时间跨度/h
Politifact 314 157 157 41 054 40 740 21 094
Gossipcop 5 464 2 732 2 732 314 262 308 798 4 633
Weibo 2 078 1 039 1 039 279 177 277 099 1 096
Table 1  数据统计
模型 Politifact Gossipcop Weibo
准确率/% F1值/% 时间/ms 准确率/% F1值/% 时间/ms 准确率/% F1值/% 时间/ms
Bi-GCN 77.38 77.27 1 363 87.04 86.91 15 102 89.67 89.60 13 516
GNN-CL 68.78 68.65 234 94.22 94.20 1 973 85.93 85.79 1 665
GCNFN 81.45 81.33 113 92.42 92.38 1 526 90.36 90.33 1 396
UPFD-SAGE 82.81 82.72 122 95.87 95.85 1 317 92.79 92.68 1 209
HGAT 82.80 82.71 5 667 OOM OOM OOM OOM OOM OOM
HGNN 81.89 81.78 1 161 93.27 93.23 10 565 90.08 89.96 8 945
UPBI_HGRD 94.57 94.56 336 97.82 97.79 3 648 94.76 94.71 2 898
Table 2  Politifact、Gossipcop和Weibo数据集谣言检测实验结果
模型 Politifact Gossipcop Weibo
准确率 F1值 准确率 F1值 准确率 F1值
w/o UPBI 85.97 85.95 95.54 95.49 91.57 91.48
w/o MLDMHA 84.16 84.08 95.30 95.26 90.89 90.78
UPBI_HGRD 94.57 94.56 97.82 97.79 94.76 94.71
Table 3  消融实验结果对比/%
Fig.3  Politifact、Gossipcop和Weibo数据集上早期检测实验结果
[1] Chandra S, Mishra P, Yannakoudakis H, et al. Graph-Based Modeling of Online Communities for Fake News Detection[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 2008.06274.
[2] Zhou X Y, Wu J D, Zafarani R. SAFE: Similarity-Aware Multi-modal Fake News Detection[C]// Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2020: 354-367.
[3] Kaliyar R K, Goswami A, Narang P. FakeBERT: Fake News Detection in Social Media with a BERT-Based Deep Learning Approach[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2021, 80(8): 11765-11788.
[4] Zhang Y, Wallace B. A Sensitivity Analysis of (and Practitioners’ Guide to) Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1510.03820.
[5] Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1810.04805.
[6] Sun L C, Hashimoto K, Yin W P, et al. Adv-BERT: BERT is not Robust on Misspellings! Generating Nature Adversarial Samples on BERT[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2003.04985.
[7] Sun L C, Xia C Y, Yin W P, et al. Mixup-Transformer: Dynamic Data Augmentation for NLP Tasks[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2010.02394.
[8] Monti F, Frasca F, Eynard D, et al. Fake News Detection on Social Media Using Geometric Deep Learning[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1902.06673.
[9] Han Y, Karunasekera S, Leckie C. Graph Neural Networks with Continual Learning for Fake News Detection from Social Media[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2007.03316.
[10] Kipf T N, Welling M. Semi-supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:1609.02907.
[11] Nickerson R S. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises[J]. Review of general psychology, 1998, 2(2): 175-220.
[12] Yang F, Liu Y, Yu X H, et al. Automatic Detection of Rumor On sina Weibo[C]// Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data Semantics. 2012: 1-7.
[13] Castillo C, Mendoza M, Poblete B. Information Credibility on Twitter[C]// Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2011: 675-684.
[14] Kwon S, Cha M, Jung K, et al. Prominent Features of Rumor Propagation in Online Social Media[C]// Proceedings of 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining. 2013: 1103-1108.
[15] Ma J, Gao W, Wei Z Y, et al. Detect Rumors Using Time Series of Social Context Information on Microblogging Websites[C]// Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2015: 1751-1754.
[16] Zhao Z, Resnick P, Mei Q Z. Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts[C]// Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. 2015: 1395-1405.
[17] Yang Y Q. COVID-19 Fake News Detection via Graph Neural Networks in Social Media[C]// Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine. 2021: 3178-3180.
[18] Yuan C Y, Ma Q W, Zhou W, et al. Jointly Embedding the Local and Global Relations of Heterogeneous Graph for Rumor Detection[C]// Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. 2019: 796-805.
[19] Ran H Y, Jia C Y, Zhang P F, et al. MGAT-ESM: Multi-channel Graph Attention Neural Network with Event-Sharing Module for Rumor Detection[J]. Information Sciences, 2022, 592: 402-416.
[20] Ma J, Gao W, Wong K F. Rumor Detection on Twitter with Tree-Structured Recursive Neural Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1:Long Papers). 2018: 1980-1989.
[21] Khoo L M S, Chieu H L, Qian Z, et al. Interpretable Rumor Detection in Microblogs by Attending to User Interactions[C]// Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2020: 8783-8790.
[22] Bian T, Xiao X, Xu T, et al. Rumor Detection on Social Media with Bi-directional Graph Convolutional Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2020: 549-556.
[23] Ma J, Gao W. Debunking Rumors on Twitter with Tree Transformer[C]// Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 2020: 5455-5466.
[24] Wu Z Y, Pi D C, Chen J F, et al. Rumor Detection Based on Propagation Graph Neural Network with Attention Mechanism[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, 158: 113595.
[25] Tu K F, Chen C, Hou C Y, et al. Rumor2vec: A Rumor Detection Framework with Joint Text and Propagation Structure Representation Learning[J]. Information Sciences, 2021, 560: 137-151.
[26] Luo Z R, Li Q Q, Zheng J. Deep Feature Fusion for Rumor Detection on Twitter[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9: 126065-126074.
[27] Wei L W, Hu D, Zhou W, et al. Towards Propagation Uncertainty: Edge-Enhanced Bayesian Graph Convolutional Networks for Rumor Detection[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 2107.11934.
[28] Ren Y X, Zhang J W. Fake News Detection on News-Oriented Heterogeneous Information Networks Through Hierarchical Graph Attention[C]// Proceedings of 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. 2021: 1-8.
[29] 强子珊, 顾益军. 基于多模态异质图的社交媒体谣言检测模型[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(11): 68-78.
[29] (Qaing Zishan, Gu Yijun. Detecting Social Media Rumors Based on Multimodal Heterogeneous Graph[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2023, 7(11): 68-78.)
[30] 韩晓鸿, 赵梦凡, 张钰涛. 联合异质图卷积网络和注意力机制的假新闻检测[J]. 小型微型计算机系统, 2024, 45(2): 301-308.
[30] (Han Xiaohong, Zhao Mengfan, Zhang Yutao. Joint Heterogeneous Graph Convolutional Network and Attention Mechanism for Fake News Detection[J]. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2024, 45(2): 301-308.)
[31] Dou Y T, Shu K, Xia C Y, et al. User Preference-Aware Fake News Detection[C]// Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2021: 2051-2055.
[32] Jiang J W, Wei Y X, Feng Y F, et al. Dynamic Hypergraph Neural Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019: 2635-2641.
[33] Feng Y F, You H X, Zhang Z Z, et al. Hypergraph Neural Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 33th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2019: 3558-3565.
[34] Jeong U, Ding K Z, Cheng L, et al. Nothing Stands Alone: Relational Fake News Detection with Hypergraph Neural Networks[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 2212.12621.
[35] Ding K Z, Wang J L, Li J D, et al. Be More with Less: Hypergraph Attention Networks for Inductive Text Classification[OL]. arXiv Preprint, arXiv: 2011.00387.
[36] Shu K, Mahudeswaran D, Wang S H, et al. FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context, and Spatiotemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media[J]. Big Data, 2020, 8(3): 171-188.
[37] Ma J, Gao W, Mitra P, et al. Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016: 3818-3824.
[38] Ying R, You J X, Morris C, et al. Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Pooling[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2018: 4805-4815.
[39] Godbole S, Sarawagi S. Discriminative Methods for Multi-labeled Classification[C]// Proceedings of Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2004: 22-30.
[1] 凤丽洲, 刘馥榕, 王友卫. 基于图卷积网络和注意力机制的谣言检测方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(4): 125-136.
[2] 贺国秀, 任佳渝, 李宗耀, 林晨曦, 蔚海燕. 以可解释工具重探基于深度学习的谣言检测*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2024, 8(4): 1-13.
[3] 黄学坚, 马廷淮, 王根生. 基于分层语义特征学习模型的微博谣言事件检测*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(5): 81-91.
[4] 陈文杰. 基于超图的科研合作推荐研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(4): 68-76.
[5] 强子珊, 顾益军. 基于多模态异质图的社交媒体谣言检测模型*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2023, 7(11): 68-78.
[6] 孟佳娜, 王晓培, 李婷, 刘爽, 赵迪. 基于对抗神经网络的跨模态谣言检测*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(12): 32-42.
[7] 白思萌,牛振东,何慧,时恺泽,易坤,马原驰. 基于超图注意力网络的生物医学文本分类方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(11): 13-24.
[8] 杨晗迅, 周德群, 马静, 罗永聪. 基于不确定性损失函数和任务层级注意力机制的多任务谣言检测研究*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(7): 101-110.
[9] 刘勘,杜好宸. 基于深度迁移网络的Twitter谣言检测研究 *[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 47-55.
[10] 首欢容, 邓淑卿, 徐健. 基于情感分析的网络谣言识别方法*[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(7): 44-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《数据分析与知识发现》编辑部
地址:北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 邮编:100190
电话/传真:(010)82626611-6626,82624938
E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn