Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2009, Vol. 3 Issue (3): 30-37    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2009.03.06
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies
Hak Lae KimSimon ScerriJohn G.BreslinStefan DeckerHong Gee Kim2
1(Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Ireland)
2(Biomedical Knowledge Engineering Lab, Seoul National University,Korea)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

There is a growing interest into how we represent and share tagging data in collaborative tagging systems. Conventional tags, meaning freely created tags that are not associated with a structured Ontology, are not naturally suited for collaborative processes, due to linguistic and grammatical variations, as well as human typing errors. Additionally, tags reflect personal views of the world by individual users, and are not normalised for synonymy, morphology or any other mapping.Our view is that the conventional approach provides very limited semantic value for collaboration. Moreover, in cases where there is some semantic value, automatically sharing semantics via computer manipulations is extremely problematic. This paper explores these problems by discussing approaches for collaborative tagging activities at a semantic level, and presenting conceptual models for collaborative tagging activities and folksonomies. We present criteria for the comparison of existing tag Ontologies and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to these criteria.

Key wordsTags      Tagging      Tagging Ontology      Folksonomy      Semantic tagging     
Received: 09 February 2009      Published: 25 March 2009



Corresponding Authors: Hak Lae Kim     E-mail:;
About author:: Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G.Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim

Cite this article:

Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G.Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim. The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2009, 3(3): 30-37.

URL:     OR

[1] Berners-Lee,Tim.(2006).Linked Data.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[2] Borwankar,Nitin.(2005).TagSchema:Slicing and Dicing Data 2.0:Foundation Data Model for Folksonomy Navigation.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[3] Brooks,Cristopher.H.,and Nancy Montanez.(2006).Improved Annotation of the Blogosphere via Autotagging and Hierarchical WWW 06.Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web,(pp.625-632.).New York:ACM Press.
[4] Cattuto,Ciro,Christoph Schmitz,Andrea Baldassarri,Vito D.P.Servedio,Vittorio Loreto,and Andreas Hotho, Properties of Folksonomies.AI Communications 20(4),245-262.
[5] Echarte,Francisco,José J.Astrain,Alberto  Córdoba,and Jesús Villadangos.(2007).Ontology of Folksonomy:A New Modeling Method.Proceedings of Semantic Authoring,Annotation and Knowledge Markup(SAAKM).
[6] Golder,Scott A.,and Bernardo A.Huberman.(2006).The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems.Journal of Information Sciences,32(2),198-208.
[7] Gruber,Tom.(2007),Ontology of Folksonomy:A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges.Int.Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems,3(2).
[8] Gruber,Tom.(2008).Collective Knowledge Systems:Where the Social Web Meets the Semantic Web.Journal of Web Semantics 6(1),4-13.
[9] Halpin,Harry.,Valentin Robu,and Hana Shepard.(2006).The Dynamics and Semantics of Collaborative Tagging.Proceedings of the 1st Semantic Authoring and Annotation Workshop(SAAW06).
[10] Hendler,James.(2007,November 11).Shirkyng My Responsibility.Message Posted to
[11] Robert,Andreas Hotho,Christoph Schmitz,Bernhard Ganter,and Gerd Stumme.(2008).Discovering Shared Conceptualisations in Folksonomies.Web Semantic,6(1),38-53.
[12] Kim,Hak-Lae.,Sung-Kwon Yang,John G.Breslin,and Hong-Gee Kim.(2007).Simple Algorithms for Representing Tag Frequencies in the SCOT Exporter.IAT Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology,(pp.536-539).
[13] Kim,Hak-Lae,Alexandre Passant,John G.Breslin,Simon Scerri,and Stefan Decker.(2008).Review and Alignment of Tag Ontologies for Semantically-linked Data in Collaborative Tagging Spaces.Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Semantic Computing,San Francisco,USA.
[14] Knerr,Torben.(2006).Tagging Ontology-towards a Common Ontology for Folksonomies.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[15] Marlow,Cameron,Moor Naaman,Danah Boyd,and Mark Davis.(2006).HT06,Tagging Paper,Taxonomy,Flickr,Academic Article,ToRead.Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia,(pp.31-40).New York:ACM Press.
[16] Mathes,Adam.(2004).Folksonomies-Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[17] Mika,Peter.(2005).Ontologies Are Us:A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics.Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference,ISWC 2005,Galway,Ireland,(pp.522-536).Berlin/Heidelberg:Springer.
[18] Miles,Alistair, Dan Brickley.(2005).SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[19] Newman,Richard,Danny Ayers,and Seth Russell.(2005).Tag ontology.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[20] Passant,A.(2007).Using Ontologies to Strengthen Folksonomies and Enrich Information Retrieval in Weblogs.Proceedings of International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
[21] Passant,A.,and Laublet.P.(2008).Meaning of a tag:A Collaborative Approach to Bridge the Gap Between Tagging and Linked Data.Proceedings of Linked Data on the Web(LDOW 2008).
[22] Quintarelli,Emanuele.(2005).Folksonomies:Power to the People.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[23] Scerri.Simon,Michael.Sintek,Ludger.van.Elst,andSiegfriedHandschuh.(2007).NEPOMUK Annotation Ontology.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[24] Shirky,Clay.(2005).Ontology is Overrated:Categories,Links,and Tags.Retrieved June 14,2008,from
[25] Specia,Lucia,and Enrico Motta.(2007).Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web.European SemanticWeb.Conference,2007,Innsbruck,Austria,(pp.624-639).Retrieved from
[26] Spivack,Nova.(2005,January 21).Folktologies-Beyond the Folksonomy vs.Ontology Distinction.Message Posted to
[27] Story,H.(2007,February 6).Search,Tagging and Wikis.Message Posted to
[28] Wal,Thomas.V.(2004).Folksonomy.Retrieved.June14,2008,from

[1] Wang Yifan,Li Bo,Shi Hua,Miao Wei,Jiang Bin. Annotation Method for Extracting Entity Relationship from Ancient Chinese Works[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 63-74.
[2] Zhang Qi,Jiang Chuan,Ji Youshu,Feng Minxuan,Li Bin,Xu Chao,Liu Liu. Unified Model for Word Segmentation and POS Tagging of Multi-Domain Pre-Qin Literature[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(3): 2-11.
[3] Wang Yuan, Shi Kaize, Niu Zhendong. Position-Aware Stepwise Tagging Method for Triples Extraction of Entity-Relationship[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 71-80.
[4] Ye Jiaxin,Xiong Huixiang,Tong Zhaoli,Meng Qiuqing. Collaborative Tagging for Doctors in Online Medical Community[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(6): 118-128.
[5] Xiong Huixiang,Li Xiaomin,Li Yueyan. Group Recommendation Based on Attribute Mining of Book Reviews[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(2/3): 214-222.
[6] Bocheng Li,Yunqiu Zhang,Kaixi Yang. Extracting Emotion Tags from Comments of Microblog Commodities[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(9): 115-123.
[7] Lixin Xia,Jieyan Zeng,Chongwu Bi,Guanghui Ye. Identifying Hierarchy Evolution of User Interests with LDA Topic Model[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 1-13.
[8] Yue Yuan,Dongbo Wang,Shuiqing Huang,Bin Li. The Comparative Study of Different Tagging Sets on Entity Extraction of Classical Books[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 57-65.
[9] Chongwu Bi,Guanghui Ye,Mingqian Li,Jieyan Zeng. Discovering City Profile Based on Tag Semantic Mining[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(12): 41-51.
[10] Lu Wei,Luo Mengqi,Ding Heng,Li Xin. Image Annotation Tags by Deep Learning and Real Users: A Comparative Study[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(5): 1-10.
[11] Xiong Huixiang,Jiang Wuxuan. Clustering and Recommending Users Based on Tags and Relation Network[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(6): 36-46.
[12] Xie Mengyao,Pan Xuwei. Constructing Dynamic Social Tag Cloud for User Interests[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2017, 1(2): 35-40.
[13] Zhu Ling,Xue Chunxiang,Zhang Chengzhi,Fu Zhu. User Tags and Microblog Posts: Case Study of Sina Weibo[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(3): 18-24.
[14] Wang Zhongqun, Jiang Sheng, Xiu Yu, Huang Subin, Wang Qiansong. Information Resource Recommendation Method Based on Dynamic Tag-Resource Network[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(3): 49-57.
[15] Zhang Chengzhi, Li Lei. Automatic Quality Evaluation of Social Tags[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(10): 2-12.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938