Please wait a minute...
New Technology of Library and Information Service  2011, Vol. 27 Issue (4): 64-70    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.1003-3513.2011.04.11
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
A New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals ——Indicator Difficulty Ratio Weighting
Yu Liping1, Wu Yishan2
1. School of Business,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China;
2. Institute of Scientific & Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038,China
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  After summarizing two objective evaluation methods of data waving method and data independent method, this paper gives a new method of indicator difficulty ratio weighting and evaluates the academic journals with standardization score. The results show indicator weighted ratio method has a good differential capacity and is very suitable for academic journal evaluation. The method can’t be used with a few journals and probability weighting method has some shortcomings.
Key wordsAcademic journal evaluation      Data waving      Data independence      Indicator difficulty ratio weighting     
Received: 25 February 2011      Published: 11 June 2011



Cite this article:

Yu Liping, Wu Yishan. A New Method to Evaluate Academic Journals ——Indicator Difficulty Ratio Weighting. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2011, 27(4): 64-70.

URL:     OR

[1] Schubert A, Glanzel W, Braun T. Relative Citation Rate: A New Indicator for Measuring the Impact of Publications[C]. In: Proceeding of the 1st National Conference with International Participation on Scientometrics and Linguistics of Scientific Text. 1983:80-81.

[2] Vinkler P. Evaluation of Some Methods for the Relative Assessment of Scientific Publications[J]. Scientometrics,1986,10 (3-4):157-177.

[3] Braun T, Glanzel W. A Topographical Approach to World Publication Output and Performance in Science, 1981-1985 [J].Scientometrics,1990,19(3-4):159-165.

[4] Moed H F, De Bruin R E,Van Leeuwen T N. New Bibliometric Tools for the Assessment of National Research Performance[J]. Scientometrics,1995,33(3):381-422.

[5] Hirsch J E. An Index to Qualify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2005,102(46):16569-16572.

[6] Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K, et al. Article-count Impact Factor of Materials Science Journals in SCI Database[J]. Scientometrics, 2008,75(2):251-261.

[7] Diakoulaki D,Mavrotas G,Papayannakis L.Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems:The CRlTIC Method[J].Computers & Operations Research,1995,22(7):763-770.

[8] Yue W, Wilson C S. Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis[J]. Scientometrics,2004,60(3):317-332.

[9] 邱均平,张荣,赵蓉英. 期刊评价指标体系及定量方法研究[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2004(7):23-26.

[10] 苏新宁. 构建人文社会科学学术期刊评价体系[J]. 东岳论丛,2008(1):35-42.

[11] 王小唯,杨波,潘启树. 学术期刊质量评估的二次相对评价方法[J]. 编辑学报,2003,15(3):231-232.

[12] 庞景安,张玉华,马峥. 中国学术期刊综合评价指标体系的研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2000,11(4):217-219.

[13] 李凯扬,贾玉萍. 基于AHP的期刊全文数据库的模糊综合评价[J]. 情报科学,2005,23(11):1688-1703.

[14] 陈汉忠. 主成分分析在学术期刊评价中的应用[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2004,15(6):658-660.

[15] 李修杰,陈景武. 运用判别分析法建立的期刊评估指标体系[J]. 江西图书馆学刊,2006,36(3):48-50.

[16] 凌春艳,莫琳. 自然科学学术期刊质量指标体系的属性数学综合评价模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2004,34(5):1-7.

[17] 王玖,徐天和. 秩和比法在医学学术期刊学术质量综合评价中的应用[J]. 数理医药学杂志,2003,16(3):266-267.

[18] Shannon C E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication[J]. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948,27:379-423,623-656.

[19] 俞立平,潘云涛,武夷山. 学术期刊多属性评价中指标相关关系修正研究[J]. 科学学研究,2009,27(7):989-993,1010.

[20] 丁兴烁,谢忠秋. 权数确定的新方法——概率法[J]. 统计与决策,2003(7):13-14.
[1] Yu Liping, Pan Yuntao, Wu Yishan. Study on Testing and Improving Nonlinear Evaluation Methods for Academic Journals[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2011, 27(7/8): 110-115.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938