|
|
|
| A Survey Analysis of the Intention of Chinese Academic Journals Toward the Institutional Repository Deposit Policies |
| Zhang Xiaodan1, Qiao Xiaodong1, Gu Liping2, Yao Changqing1, Chu Jingli2 |
1. Institute of Scientific & Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038, China;
2. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract [Objective] Understand the attitudes of Chinese academic journals toward Institutional Repositories deposit policies. [Methods]Select 326 samples from the list of "Report of Chinese S&T Journals Citations", telephone them to make sure that they answer this online survey. [Results]195 valid surveys are returned and the effective rate is more than 65%. 74.9% journals agree that the papers can be stored in the Institutional Repository, so their attitudes and recommendations about the article deposit and communication by Institutional Repositories are positive. [Limitations]The survey scale is limited on the high quality, well-known and digital journals, and the result is not applicable to the whole Chinese journals. [Conclusions] Most of investigated targets agree the policy of article deposit and communication of Institutional Repositories, but as the recommendation of this survey, they wish that the consulting service about the rights of journal article open access is provided in future.
|
|
Received: 15 January 2014
Published: 09 July 2014
|
|
|
| [1] Berlin Declaration. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities [EB/OL]. [2009-10-27]. http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berli?ndeclaration. html.
[2] 张晓林, 李麟, 刘细文, 等. 开放获取学术信息资源: 逼近“主流化”转折点[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(9): 42-47. (Zhang Xiaolin, Li Lin, Liu Xiwen, et al. Open Access Scholarly Resources: Getting Close to Being the Main-stream[J]. Library and Information Service, 2012, 56(9): 42-47.)
[3] 张晓林. 机构知识库的发展趋势与挑战[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(2): 1-7. (Zhang Xiaolin. Trends and Challenges for Institutional Repositories[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2014 (2): 1-7.)
[4] 唐义, 肖希明. 港台学术机构知识库的调查与分析[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2011, 31(4): 38-41, 9.(Tang Yi, Xiao Ximing. Survey and Analysis to the Institutional Repository in Hong Kong and Taiwan[J]. Library Tribune, 2011, 31(4):38-41, 9.)
[5] 张晓林, 张冬荣, 李麟, 等. 机构知识库内容保存与传播权利管理[J].中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(4): 46-54. (Zhang Xiaolin, Zhang Dongrong, Li Lin, et al. Rights Management for Content Deposit and Distribution in Institutional Repositories[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2012, 38(4): 46-54.)
[6] 王应宽, 吴卓晶, 程维红, 等. 国内外开放存取期刊研究进展综述与发展动态分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(5): 715-724. (Wang Yingkuan, Wu Zhuojing, Cheng Weihong, et al. Development of Open Access Publishing[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodical, 2012, 23(5): 715-724.)
[7] 程维红, 任胜利. 中国科技期刊开放存取出版现状[J]. 编辑学报, 2007, 19(3): 196-198. (Cheng Weihong, Ren Shengli. Situation of Open Access Publishing for Chinese Scientific Journals [J]. ACTA Editologica, 2007, 19(3): 196-198.)
[8] 沈波, 夏爱红, 周广礼, 等.我国高校学报Open Access现状调查与分析[J]. 科技与出版, 2008(11): 52-54. (Shen Bo, Xia Aihong, Zhou Guangli, et al. Survey of Open Access University Journal[J]. Science Technology and Publication, 2008(11): 52-54.)
[9] 中国科技论文统计与分析课题组. 2010 年中国科技论文统计与分析简报[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2012, 23(1): 43-50. (Group of Chinese S&T Papers Statistic and Analysis. Report of Chinese S&T Papers Statistic and Analysis 2010[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodical, 2012, 23(1): 43-50.)
[10] 张晓林, 李麟, 李姝影.国外教育科研机构支持作者发表开放出版论文的政策研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(1): 32-36, 42. (Zhang Xiaolin, Li Lin, Li Shuying. Policies of International Research and Education Institutions to Support Authors' Open Access Publishing[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013, 57(1): 32-36, 42.)
[11] 顾立平, 张晓林, 初景利, 等. 开放获取期刊的评价与遴选: 质量水平、开放程度和服务能力[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(1): 49-54. (Gu Liping, Zhang Xiaolin, Chu Jingli, et al. Evaluation and Selection for Open Access Journal: Quality, Openness and Service Abilities[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013, 57(1): 49-54.) |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
