Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2021, Vol. 5 Issue (11): 80-88    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0347
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Analyzing Implicit Discourse Relation with Single Classifier and Multi-Task Network
Wang Hong,Shu Zhan,Gao Yinquan,Tian Wenhong()
School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China
Yangtze Delta Region Institute of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou 313001, China
Download: PDF (1046 KB)   HTML ( 8 ) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper proposes a new method to identify implicit discourse relations based on a single classifier and multi-task learning model. [Methods] First,we modeled the implicit and explicit discourse relationships with the multi-task learning method. Then, we converted the four classification problems to two and trained the single classifier. [Results] We examined our new method with the HIT-CDTB data set. For the corpus with extended and parallel relations, the F1 values reached 0.94 and 0.81 respectively, which were significantly improved with four inter-sentence relations. [Limitations] The performance of our model could be improved with more distributed and expanded datasets. [Conclusions] The proposed method yields the best results with the HIT-CDTB data set. Deleting connectives will add noise to the training set and negatively affect the model’s performance.
Key words： Single Classifier      Multi-Task Network      Implicit dDiscourse Relation     
Received: 08 April 2021      Published: 26 August 2021
ZTFLH:  TP391  
Fund:Key Research and Development Program of Ministry of Science and Technology(2018AAA0103203)
Corresponding Authors: Tian Wenhong,ORCID：0000-0002-5551-9796     E-mail: tian_wenhong@uestc.edu.cn
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hong Wang
Zhan Shu
Yinquan Gao
Wenhong Tian

Cite this article:

Wang Hong, Shu Zhan, Gao Yinquan, Tian Wenhong. Analyzing Implicit Discourse Relation with Single Classifier and Multi-Task Network. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 5(11): 80-88.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0347     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2021/V5/I11/80

f x = w 1 x 2 + w 2 x + b Model Loss
">
f x = w 1 x 2 + w 2 x + b Model Loss
f x = w 1 x + b Model Loss
">
f x = w 1 x + b Model Loss
Single Classifier Learning Structure
Multi-task Learning Structure
关系 隐式 显式
时序关系 178 672
因果关系 1 014 1 465
条件关系 39 632
对比关系 461 1 923
扩展关系 12 055 2 183
并列关系 1 288 993
Corpus Statistics
关系 多任务+单分类器 SVM[1] SVM[20]
P R F1 P R F1 P R F1
因果 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.46 0.22 0.30 0.59 0.06 0.11
对比 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.77 0.09 0.16 0.33 0.01 0.02
扩展 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.63 0.84 0.72 0.65 0.93 0.77
并列 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.33 0.53 0.41 0.65 0.54 0.59
Recognition Results of Implicit Inter Sentence Relationships
关系 多任务+单分类器 RNN-Att[8] 多任务[10] BiGRU
P R F1 P R F1 P R F1 P R F1
因果 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.27 0.12 0.17 0.43 0.34 0.38 0.31 0.26 0.28
对比 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.04 0.07 0.19 0.14 0.16 0.06 0.07 0.06
扩展 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.76 0.80 0.78 0.90 0.92 0.91
并列 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.58 0.62 0.83 0.77 0.80 0.73 0.59 0.65
Comparative Experiment of RNN-Att Model
Multi-task Network Structure
关系 多任务BiLSTM 多任务+单分类器
P R F1 P R F1
因果 0.24 0.17 0.20 0.50 0.51 0.50
对比 0.29 0.10 0.15 0.39 0.38 0.38
扩展 0.89 0.95 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
并列 0.87 0.68 0.76 0.82 0.81 0.81
Single Classifier Comparison Experiment 1
关系 多任务BiLSTM单分类器
P R F1
因果 0.35 0.15 0.21
对比 0.33 0.10 0.15
扩展 0.89 0.64 0.74
并列 0.88 0.49 0.63
Single Classifier Comparison Experiment 2
[1] 张牧宇, 宋原, 秦兵, 等. 中文篇章级句间语义关系识别[J]. 中文信息学报, 2013, 27(6):51-58.
[1] (Zhang Muyu, Song Yuan, Qin Bing, et al. Chinese Discourse Relation Recognition[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2013, 27(6):51-58.)
[2] 张牧宇, 秦兵, 刘挺. 中文篇章级句间语义关系体系及标注[J]. 中文信息学报, 2014, 28(2):28-36.
[2] (Zhang Muyu, Qin Bing, Liu Ting. Chinese Discourse Relation Semantic Taxonomy and Annotation[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2014, 28(2):28-36.)
[3] Miltsakaki E, Prasad R, Joshi A, et al. The Penn Discourse Treebank[C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation. 2004: 342-351.
[4] Lei W Q, Xiang Y X, Wang Y W, et al. Linguistic Properties Matter for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition: Combining Semantic Interaction, Topic Continuity and Attribution[C]//Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2018: 4848-4855.
[5] Xue N W. Annotating Discourse Connectives in the Chinese Treebank[C]// Proceedings of the ACL Workshop in Frontiers in Annotation II: Pie in the Sky.ACL, 2005: 84-91.
[6] Graves A. Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.
[7] Schuster M, Paliwal K K. Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1997, 45(11):2673-2681.
doi: 10.1109/78.650093
[8] Rönnqvist S, Schenk N, Chiarcos C. A Recurrent Neural Model with Attention for the Recognition of Chinese Implicit Discourse Relations[C]// Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 2017:256-262.
[9] Liu Y, Li S J, Zhang X D, et al. Implicit Discourse Relation Classification via Multi-task Neural Networks[C]//Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2016: 2750-2756.
[10] 田文洪, 高印权, 黄厚文, 等. 基于多任务双向长短时记忆网络的隐式句间关系分析[J]. 中文信息学报, 2019, 33(5):47-53.
[10] (Tian Wenhong, Gao Yinquan, Huang Houwen, et al. Implicit Discourse Relation Analysis Based on Multi-Task Bi-LSTM[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2019, 33(5):47-53.)
[11] Liu P F, Qiu X P, Huang X J. Recurrent Neural Network for Text Classification with Multi-Task Learning[C]// Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2016: 2873-2879.
[12] Liu P F, Qiu X P, Huang X J. Adversarial Multi-Task Learning for Text Classification[C]// Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2017: 1-10.
[13] Sanh V, Wolf T, Ruder S. A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, 33:6949-6956.
doi: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016949
[14] 张雅星. 汉语篇章句间关系分析[D]. 太原:山西大学, 2018.
[14] (Zhang Yaxing. Chinese Discourse Relation Analysis[D]. Taiyuan: Shanxi University, 2018.)
[15] 孙凯丽, 邓沌华, 李源, 等. 基于句内注意力机制多路CNN的汉语复句关系识别方法[J]. 中文信息学报, 2020, 34(6):9-17, 26.
[15] (Zhang Kaili, Deng Dunhua, Li Yuan, et al. Inner-Attention Based Multi-Way Convolutional Neural Network for Relation Recognition in Chinese Compound Sentence[J]. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 2020, 34(6):9-17, 26.)
[16] 万常选, 甘丽新, 江腾蛟, 等. 基于协陪义动词的中文隐式实体关系抽取[J]. 计算机学报, 2019, 42(12):2795-2820.
[16] (Wan Changxuan, Gan Lixin, Jiang Tengjiao, et al. Chinese Named Entity Implicit Relation Extraction Based on Company Verbs[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2019, 42(12):2795-2820.)
[17] Gilbert R A, Davis M H, Gaskell M G, et al. The Relationship Between Sentence Comprehension and Lexical-Semantic Retuning[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2021, 116:104188.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2020.104188
[18] Cho K, van Merrienboer B, Gulcehre C, et al. Learning Phrase Representations Using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation[C]// Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2014:1724-1734.
[19] Pennington J, Socher R, Manning C. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation[C]// Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2014: 1532-1543.
[20] 姬建辉, 张牧宇, 秦兵, 等. 中文篇章级句间关系自动分析[J]. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(2):124-131.
[20] (Ji Jianhui, Zhang Muyu, Qin Bing, et al. The Chinese Discourse Parser[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(2):124-131.)
[21] Rutherford A, Xue N W. Improving the Inference of Implicit Discourse Relations via Classifying Explicit Discourse Connectives[C]// Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015: 799-808.
[1] Wu Yanwen, Cai Qiuting, Liu Zhi, Deng Yunze. Digital Resource Recommendation Based on Multi-Source Data and Scene Similarity Calculation[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 114-123.
[2] Li Zhenyu, Li Shuqing. Deep Collaborative Filtering Algorithm with Embedding Implicit Similarity Groups[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 124-134.
[3] Dong Miao, Su Zhongqi, Zhou Xiaobei, Lan Xue, Cui Zhigang, Cui Lei. Improving PubMedBERT for CID-Entity-Relation Classification Using Text-CNN[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 145-152.
[4] Yu Chuanming, Zhang Zhengang, Kong Lingge. Comparing Knowledge Graph Representation Models for Link Prediction[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 29-44.
[5] Ding Hao, Ai Wenhua, Hu Guangwei, Li Shuqing, Suo Wei. A Personalized Recommendation Model with Time Series Fluctuation of User Interest[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 45-58.
[6] Hua Bin, Wu Nuo, He Xin. Integrating Expert Reviews for Government Information Projects with Knowledge Fusion[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 124-136.
[7] Wang Yuan, Shi Kaize, Niu Zhendong. Position-Aware Stepwise Tagging Method for Triples Extraction of Entity-Relationship[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 71-80.
[8] Yang Chen, Chen Xiaohong, Wang Chuhan, Liu Tingting. Recommendation Strategy Based on Users’ Preferences for Fine-Grained Attributes[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 94-102.
[9] Dai Zhihong, Hao Xiaoling. Extracting Hypernym-Hyponym Relationship for Financial Market Applications[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(10): 60-70.
[10] Wang Xuefeng, Ren Huichao, Liu Yuqin. Research on the Visualization Method of Drawing Technology Theme Map with Clusters [J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 0, (): 1-.
[11] Wang Yifan,Li Bo,Shi Hua,Miao Wei,Jiang Bin. Annotation Method for Extracting Entity Relationship from Ancient Chinese Works[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 63-74.
[12] Che Hongxin,Wang Tong,Wang Wei. Comparing Prediction Models for Prostate Cancer[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 107-114.
[13] Zhou Yang,Li Xuejun,Wang Donglei,Chen Fang,Peng Lijuan. Visualizing Knowledge Graph for Explosive Formula Design[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(9): 42-53.
[14] Ma Jiangwei, Lv Xueqiang, You Xindong, Xiao Gang, Han Junmei. Extracting Relationship Among Military Domains with BERT and Relation Position Features[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(8): 1-12.
[15] Liu Yuanchen, Wang Hao, Gao Yaqi. Predicting Online Music Playbacks and Influencing Factors[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(8): 100-112.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626，82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn