Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2022, Vol. 6 Issue (5): 1-9    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0976
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Review of Studies Analyzing Interdisciplinary Dynamics
Chen Shiji1,2,Cui Tengteng1,Qiu Junping1,2()
1Chinese Academy of Science and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2Academy of Data Science and Informetrics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Download: PDF (723 KB)   HTML ( 33 ) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper summarizes studies analyzing interdisciplinary dynamics, aiming to construct their research framework, contents, and the latest developments. [Coverage] A total of 46 representative papers were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection and CNKI. The interdisciplinary dynamics and the related research topics such as interdisciplinary knowledge transfer, diffusion, integration, and topic evolution were used to conduct searches. We also expanded our search to include more related literature. [Methods] From the perspectives of interdisciplinary dynamics definition and theoretical research, we summarized the analytical framework of interdisciplinary dynamics. Then, we described the methods and technologies based on this framework. Finally, we summarized the developing trends of interdisciplinary dynamics from their formation mechanism and process. [Results] Interdisciplinary dynamics includes three areas of research: interdisciplinary development dynamics, interdisciplinary formation mechanism, and interdisciplinary formation process. The development of bibliometrics and scientometrics provides methods and techniques for quantitative analysis of interdisciplinary dynamics. [Limitations] There are many research on transplantation and topic evolution in interdisciplinary dynamics analysis, however, only some typical documents were reviewed by this paper. [Conclusions] At present, the studies on interdisciplinary dynamics mainly focuses on theory and mechanism, and relatively few studies on the formation mechanism and process of the interdisciplinary from a quantitative point of view. With the development of data science and bibliometrics, interdisciplinary dynamics will tend to reveal the development and evolution process of related fields from a quantitative perspective.
Key words： Interdisciplinary Research      Dynamics Analysis      Formation Mechanism      Formation Process     
Received: 01 September 2021      Published: 28 February 2022
ZTFLH:  G350  
Fund:National Social Science Fund of China(20BTQ083)
Corresponding Authors: Qiu Junping,ORCID：0000-0001-8660-3491     E-mail: jpqiu@hdu.edu.cn
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Shiji Chen
Tengteng Cui
Junping Qiu

Cite this article:

Chen Shiji, Cui Tengteng, Qiu Junping. Review of Studies Analyzing Interdisciplinary Dynamics. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6(5): 1-9.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2021.0976     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2022/V6/I5/1

The Framework on Interdisciplinary Dynamics Analysis
学科交叉类型 可用于数据分析的特征或现象
单向移植/
话语移植		 （1）学科A被学科B频繁引用,但学科A很少引用学科B
（2）学科A的学位获得者成规模地迁移到学科B（即从事学科B的工作）
（3）学科A作者在学科B期刊上发表论文,但学科B作者很少在学科A期刊上发表论文
（4）在知识结构图谱中紧密相连的文献簇从学科A移动到学科B
互补共融/
双科融合		 （1）学科A和学科B间相互引用,引用比例相差不大
（2）学科A和学科B的学位获得者相互迁移
（3）学科A和学科B的作者均有一定规模地在对方学科发表论文
（4）有稳定的跨学科合作团队和模式（合作网络的学科组成和比例相对均衡）
连锁辐射 （1）多学科引用某个学科A的同一主题
（2）学科A学位获得者迁移到多个学科
（3）学科A学位获得者有规模地在多个学科发表论文
Transplant-based Interdisciplinary Formation Mechanism
[1] Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies[M]. Stockholm: SAGE Publications, 1994.
[2] 张春美, 郝凤霞, 闫宏秀. 学科交叉研究的神韵——百年诺贝尔自然科学奖探析[J]. 科学技术与辩证法, 2001, 18(6): 63-67.
[2] ( Zhang Chunmei, Hao Fengxia, Yan Hongxiu. Interdisciplinary Research Charm: Analysis of One Hundred Years of Nobel Prize in Natural Sciences[J]. Science, Technology and Dialectics, 2001, 18(6): 63-67.)
[3] Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical Combinations and Scie.pngic Impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
doi: 10.1126/science.1240474
[4] Wang J, Veugelers R, Stephan P. Bias Against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(8): 1416-1436.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006
[5] 李喜先. 论交叉科学[J]. 科学学研究, 2001, 19(1): 22-27.
[5] ( Li Xixian. On Interdisciplinary Sciences[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2001, 19(1): 22-27.)
[6] 王晶华, 施红玉. 从系统科学角度看学科交叉现象[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2002, 23(12): 5-8.
[6] ( Wang Jinghua, Shi Hongyu. Viewing the Interdisciplinary Phenomenon from the Perspective of System Science[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2002, 23(12): 5-8.)
[7] 张琳, 黄颖. 交叉科学:测度、评价与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021.
[7] ( Zhang Lin, Huang Ying. Interdisciplinarity:Measurement, Evaluation and Application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.)
[8] 马跃, 蔡兵, 于小娟. 交叉学科研究的成长环境与动力机制分析[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2007, 19(5): 105-110.
[8] ( Ma Yue, Cai Bing, Yu Xiaojuan. Analysis on the Growth Environment and the Motive Force Mechanism of the Cross-Disciplinaryresearch[J]. R＆D Management, 2007, 19(5): 105-110.)
[9] 徐梦玲. 合法性视角下新兴交叉学科形成演化机制研究: 以合成生物学为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
[9] ( Xu Mengling. The Formation and Evolution Mechanism of Emerging Interdisciplines from the Perspective of Legitimacy—Taking Synthetic Biology as an Example[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021.)
[10] 刘仲林. 现代交叉科学[M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 1998.
[10] ( Liu Zhonglin. XIANDAI JIAOCHA KEXUE[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Publishing House, 1998.)
[11] Shrimpton B, Astbury B. Motivations for Doing Interdisciplinary Research: Results from an Australian Qualitative Study[J]. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 2011, 6(1): 195-206.
doi: 10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v06i01/51990
[12] Milman A, Marston J M, Godsey S E, et al. Scholarly Motivations to Conduct Interdisciplinary Climate Change Research[J]. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2017, 7(2): 239-250.
doi: 10.1007/s13412-015-0307-z
[13] 赵玉林. 交叉科学的崛起及其形成机制[J]. 自然杂志, 1995, 17(3): 157-159.
[13] ( Zhao Yulin. The Emergence of Interdisciplines[J]. Nature Magazine, 1995, 17(3): 157-159.)
[14] 解恩泽, 赵树智, 刘永振. 交叉科学概论[M]. 济南: 山东教育出版社, 1991.
[14] ( Xie Enze, Zhao Shuzhi, Liu Yongzhen. JIAOCHA XUEKE GAILUN[M]. Jinan: Shandong Education Press, 1991.)
[15] 金薇吟. 学科交叉方法探析[J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24(5): 667-671.
[15] ( Jin Weiyin. Analysis of the Discipline-Crossing Method[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2006, 24(5): 667-671.)
[16] 周文娟. 基于诺贝尔自然科学奖的学科交叉研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2010.
[16] ( Zhou Wenjuan. The Research on Discipline-Crossing Based on the Nobel Science Prize[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2010.)
[17] Yan E J, Ding Y, Cronin B, et al. A Bird’s-Eye View of Scie.pngic Trading: Dependency Relations Among Fields of Science[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(2): 249-264.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.008
[18] Rinia E J. Measurement and Evaluation of Interdisciplinary Research and Knowledge Transfer[D]. Leiden: Leiden University, 2007.
[19] 赵星, 谭旻, 余小萍, 等. 我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(5): 59-67.
[19] ( Zhao Xing, Tan Min, Yu Xiaoping, et al. Exploring the Citation Networks for Knowledge Diffusion of Humanities and Social Sciences in China[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2012, 38(5): 59-67.)
[20] Larivière V, Sugimoto C R, Cronin B. A Bibliometric Chronicling of Library and Information Science’s First Hundred Years[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(5): 997-1016.
doi: 10.1002/asi.22645
[21] Cronin B, Meho L I. The Shifting Balance of Intellectual Trade in Information Studies[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(4): 551-564.
doi: 10.1002/asi.20764
[22] Wilson T D. The Transfer of Theories and Models from Information Behaviour Research into Other Disciplines[J]. Information Research, 2020, 25(3): 873.
[23] Mugabushaka A M, Kyriakou A, Papazoglou T. Bibliometric Indicators of Interdisciplinarity: The Potential of the Leinster-Cobbold Diversity Indices to Study Disciplinary Diversity[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(2): 593-607.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1865-x
[24] Urata H. Information Flows among Academic Disciplines in Japan[J]. Scientometrics, 1990, 18(3-4): 309-319.
doi: 10.1007/BF02017767
[25] Pierce S J. Boundary Crossing in Research Literatures as a Means of Interdisciplinary Information Transfer[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1999, 50(3): 271-279.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3<271::AID-ASI10>3.0.CO;2-M
[26] le Pair C. Switching Between Academic Disciplines in Universities in the Netherlands[J]. Scientometrics, 1980, 2(3): 177-191.
doi: 10.1007/BF02016696
[27] Hargens L L. Migration Patterns of US Ph. D. s among Disciplines and Specialties[J]. Scientometrics, 1986, 9(3-4): 145-164.
doi: 10.1007/BF02017238
[28] Small H, Upham P. Citation Structure of an Emerging Research Area on the Verge of Application[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 79(2): 365-375.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0424-0
[29] Shibata N, Kajikawa Y, Takeda Y, et al. Detecting Emerging Research Fronts Based on Topological Measures in Citation Networks of Scie.pngic Publications[J]. Technovation, 2008, 28(11): 758-775.
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.03.009
[30] Chen S J, Zhang X L. Research on Overlapping Structures and Evolution Properties of Co-Citation Network[J]. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 2013, 6(1): 1-13.
[31] Vugteveen P, Lenders R, van den Besselaar P. The Dynamics of Interdisciplinary Research Fields: The Case of River Research[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(1): 73-96.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1286-7
[32] Donoho D. 50 Years of Data Science[J]. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2017, 26(4): 745-766.
doi: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734
[33] Kalantari A, Kamsin A, Kamaruddin H S, et al. A Bibliometric Approach to Tracking Big Data Research Trends[J]. Journal of Big Data, 2017, 4: 30.
doi: 10.1186/s40537-017-0088-1
[34] Singh V K, Banshal S K, Singhal K, et al. Scientometric Mapping of Research On ‘Big Data’[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(2): 727-741.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1729-9
[35] 操玉杰, 毛进, 潘荣清, 等. 学科交叉研究的演化阶段特征分析——以医学信息学为例[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(5): 107-116.
[35] ( Cao Yujie, Mao Jin, Pan Rongqing, et al. Analyzing Characteristics of Interdisciplinary Research Evolutions: Case Study of Medical Informatics[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2019, 3(5): 107-116.)
[36] Xu J, Bu Y, Ding Y, et al. Understanding the Formation of Interdisciplinary Research from the Perspective of Keyword Evolution: A Case Study on Joint Attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(2): 973-995.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2897-1
[37] 陈仕吉, 陈晨, 韩涛, 等. 基于重叠结构的跨学科链接探测与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(15): 94-100.
[37] ( Chen Shiji, Han Tao, et al. Interdisciplinary Link Detection and Analysis Based on Overlapping Community Structure[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016, 60(15): 94-100.)
[38] 许海云, 郭婷, 岳增慧, 等. 基于TI指标系列的情报学学科交叉主题研究[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(10): 1067-1078.
[38] ( Xu Haiyun, Guo Ting, Yue Zenghui, et al. Study on the Interdisciplinary Topics of Information Science Based on TI Index Series[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scie.pngic and Technical Information, 2015, 34(10): 1067-1078.)
[39] Buter R K, Noyons E C M, van Raan A F J. Ide.pngication of Converging Research Areas Using Publication and Citation Data[J]. Research Evaluation, 2010, 19(1): 19-27.
doi: 10.3152/095820210X492503
[40] Dong K, Xu H Y, Luo R, et al. An Integrated Method for Interdisciplinary Topic Ide.pngication and Prediction: A Case Study on Information Science and Library Science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(2): 849-868.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2694-x
[41] Bettencourt L M A, Kaiser D I, Kaur J. Scie.pngic Discovery and Topological Transitions in Collaboration Networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3(3): 210-221.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.001
[42] Porter A L, Rafols I. Is Science Becoming More Interdisciplinary? Measuring and Mapping Six Research Fields over Time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
[43] Chen S J, Arsenault C, Gingras Y, et al. Exploring the Interdisciplinary Evolution of a Discipline: The Case of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2): 1307-1323.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1457-6
[44] 陈仕吉. 基于重叠结构的知识演化分析方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院, 2010.
[44] ( Chen Shiji. The Research of Knowledge Evolution Analysis Method Based on Overlapping Community Structure[D]. Beijing: Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010.)
[45] Chen C M. CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scie.pngic Literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
doi: 10.1002/asi.20317
[46] Munoz-Sandoval E. Trends in Nanoscience, Nanotechnology, and Carbon Nanotubes: A Bibliometric Approach[J]. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2013, 16(1): 1-22.
[1] Ke Qing, Ding Songyun, Qin Qin. Health Information Readability Affects Users’ Cognitive Load and Information Processing: An Eye-Tracking Study[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(2): 70-82.
[2] Liang Jiwen,Jiang Chuan,Wang Dongbo. Chinese-English Sentence Alignment of Ancient Literature Based on Multi-feature Fusion[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(9): 123-132.
[3] Yue Yuan,Dongbo Wang,Shuiqing Huang,Bin Li. The Comparative Study of Different Tagging Sets on Entity Extraction of Classical Books[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 57-65.
[4] Hui Zhu,Hao Wang,Chengzhi Zhang. Research Methods and Technologies for Information Science from Process-Problem Perspective: Case Study of Public Opinion[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 2-11.
[5] Yufeng Duan,Sisi Huang. Information Extraction from Chinese Plant Species Diversity Description Text[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(1): 87-96.
[6] Xiong Jing, Gao Feng, Wu Qinxia. Research on Semantic Mining for Large-scale Oracle Bone Inscriptions Foundation Data[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2015, 31(2): 7-14.
[7] Deng Shasha, Zhang Pengzhu, Li Xinmiao. A Method for Network Opinion Modeling Based on Governmental Public Decision Domain[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, (9): 69-74.
[8] Jiang Hua, Su Xiaoguang. Chinese High-frequency Words Extraction Algorithm Without Thesaurus[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2012, 28(6): 50-53.
[9] Zhang Chengzhi,Huilin Wang. Survey on Multilingual Documents Clustering[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009, 25(6): 31-36.
[10] Tan Chunmei,Yan Shiwei,Liu Zimu. Design and Realization of Knowledge Element Automatic Extraction of Network Special Subject Knowledge Organization[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2008, 24(3): 62-67.
[11] Yao Xingshan. The Improvement in a Chinese Word Segmentation Based on Hash Algorism[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2008, 24(3): 78-81.
[12] Zhang Chengzhi,Su Xinning . Recognition Mutually Exclusive Words for Information Retrieval[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2007, 2(2): 44-48.
[13] Huang Kun. An Overview on Affective Information Processing[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2007, 2(11): 67-71.
[14] Zhang Chengzhi,Su Xinning . Lexical Knowledge Discovery for Information Retrieval[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2007, 2(1): 10-14.
[15] Zhai Xikui . Application of Chinese Information Processing in the Digital Library[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2006, 1(8): 8-11.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626，82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn