|
|
Review of Methods for Interdisciplinary Topic Identification |
Li Jialei1,2,An Peijun1(),Xiao Xiantao1 |
1Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China 2Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China |
|
|
Abstract [Objective] This paper summarizes various methods for interdisciplinary topic identification through a literature review and tries to find shortcomings with potential improvements. [Coverage] We retrieved 74 articles on the concepts and methods of interdisciplinary topic identification from the CNKI and Web of Science databases. [Methods] Based on clarifying the concepts of “interdisciplinarity” and related terms, this paper reviewed the method for interdisciplinary topic identification from three perspectives: recognition based on external characteristics, recognition based on internal features, and a combination of both. [Results] There are still some deficiencies in the existing methods, such as limited data source and identification corpus, insufficient semantics of identification method, coarse identification granularity, a lack of interdisciplinary measurement indicators at the subject level, as well as a lack of forward-looking and dynamic exploration in the identification results. [Limitations] We mainly selected representative literature and did not provide an in-depth exploration of the technical details of interdisciplinary topic identification. We did not review the study of interdisciplinary literature discovery. More research is needed to expand the application of trend tracking and subject clustering in interdisciplinary topic identification. [Conclusions] Future research should expand the identification methods based on multi-source data or full text, improve the semantic mining ability, conduct fine-grained identification, build multi-dimensional interdisciplinary topic measurement indices, and strengthen research on potential interdisciplinary topics and dynamic trends.
|
Received: 05 July 2022
Published: 09 November 2022
|
|
Fund:Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No. XDA2010030802);Strategic Research and Decision Support System Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Grant No. GHJ-ZLZX-2020-31-3). |
Corresponding Authors:
An Peijun,ORCID:0000-0002-7184-007X,E-mail:anpj@llas.ac.cn
|
[1] |
郑晓瑛. 交叉学科的重要性及其发展[J]. 北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2007, 44(3):144-147.
|
[1] |
Zheng Xiaoying. Interdisciplinary Developing: Important Contents of Flourishing Philosophy and Social Science[J]. Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2007, 44(3):144-147.)
|
[2] |
Alvargonzález D. Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Sciences[J]. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2011, 25(4): 387-403.
doi: 10.1080/02698595.2011.623366
|
[3] |
胡志刚, 徐晖, 谭跃进, 等. 跨学科的辨证视野[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2008(1): 21-26.
|
[3] |
(Hu Zhigang, Xu Hui, Tan Yuejin, et al. The Interdisciplinary Dialectical Vision[J]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 2008(1): 21-26.)
|
[4] |
李江. “跨学科性”的概念框架与测度[J]. 图书情报知识, 2014(3): 87-93.
|
[4] |
(Li Jiang. The Concept and Measurement of Interdisciplinarity[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2014(3): 87-93.)
|
[5] |
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research[M]. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2005.
|
[6] |
刘仲林. 现代交叉科学[M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 1998.
|
[6] |
(Liu Zhonglin. Modern Interdisciplinary science[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Publishing House, 1998.)
|
[7] |
徐飞. 科学交叉论[M]. 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 1991.
|
[7] |
(Xu Fei. Cross-Science Theory[M]. Hefei: Anhui Education Press, 1991.)
|
[8] |
Aboelela S W, Larson E, Bakken S, et al. Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature[J]. Health Services Research, 2007, 42(1 P 1):329-346.
pmid: 17355595
|
[9] |
Bruhn J G. Interdisciplinary Research: A Philosophy, Art Form, Artifact or Antidote?[J]. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2000, 35(1):58-66.
doi: 10.1007/BF02911166
|
[10] |
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities[M]. Paris: OECD Publications, 1972.
|
[11] |
路甬祥. 学科交叉与交叉科学的意义[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2005, 20(1): 58-60.
|
[11] |
(Lu Yongxiang. Significance of Interdisciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2005, 20(1): 58-60.)
|
[12] |
金薇吟. 学科交叉理论与高校交叉学科建设研究[D]. 苏州: 苏州大学, 2005.
|
[12] |
(Jin Weiyin. Study on Discipline-Crossing Theory and Cross-Disciplinary Construction in Universities[D]. Suzhou: Soochow University, 2005.)
|
[13] |
Huutoniemi K, Klein J T, Bruun H, et al. Analyzing Interdisciplinarity: Typology and Indicators[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(1): 79-88.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.011
|
[14] |
杨永福, 朱桂龙, 海峰. “交叉科学”与“科学交叉”特征探析[J]. 科学学研究, 1997, 15(4): 5-10.
|
[14] |
(Yang Yongfu, Zhu Guilong, Hai Feng. Analysis on the Characteristics of “Interdisciplinary Science” and “Scientific Intersection”[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 1997, 15(4): 5-10.)
|
[15] |
刘仲林. 交叉科学时代的交叉研究[J]. 科学学研究, 1993, 11(2): 9-16.
|
[15] |
(Liu Zhonglin. Interdisciplinary Research in the New Era of Interdisciplinary Science[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 1993, 11(2): 9-16.)
|
[16] |
许海云, 尹春晓, 郭婷, 等. 学科交叉研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(5): 119-127.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.05.019
|
[16] |
(Xu Haiyun, Yin Chunxiao, Guo Ting, et al. Interdisciplinary Research Review[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015, 59(5): 119-127.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.05.019
|
[17] |
Stirling A. A General Framework for Analysing Diversity in Science, Technology and Society[J]. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2007, 4(15):707-719.
pmid: 17327202
|
[18] |
Porter A L, Rafols I. Is Science Becoming More Interdisciplinary? Measuring and Mapping Six Research Fields over Time[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
|
[19] |
Wang Q, Schneider J W. Consistency and Validity of Interdisciplinarity Measures[J]. Quantitative Science Studies, 2020, 1(1): 239-263.
doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00011
|
[20] |
Chi R B, Young J. The Interdisciplinary Structure of Research on Intercultural Relations: A Co-citation Network Analysis Study[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 96(1): 147-171.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-012-0894-3
|
[21] |
Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, et al. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6157): 468-472.
doi: 10.1126/science.1240474
pmid: 24159044
|
[22] |
张艺蔓, 李秀霞, 韩牧哲. 基于引文耦合的情报学学科结构时序分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2015, 34(3): 100-106.
|
[22] |
(Zhang Yiman, Li Xiuxia, Han Muzhe. Time Series Analysis of Information Science Subject Structure Based on Bibliographic Coupling[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2015, 34(3): 100-106.)
|
[23] |
Adams J, Light R. Mapping Interdisciplinary Fields: Efficiencies, Gaps and Redundancies in HIV/AIDS Research[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(12): e115092.
|
[24] |
Wang Q. Measuring Interdisciplinarity of a Given Body of Research[C]// Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics. 2015: 372-383.
|
[25] |
van Noorden R. Interdisciplinary Research by the Numbers[J]. Nature, 2015, 525(7569): 306-307.
doi: 10.1038/525306a
|
[26] |
Chua A Y K, Yang C C. The Shift Towards Multi-disciplinarity in Information Science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13): 2156-2170.
doi: 10.1002/asi.v59:13
|
[27] |
Abramo G, D’Angelo C A, di Costa F. Identifying Interdisciplinarity Through the Disciplinary Classification of Coauthors of Scientific Publications[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63(11): 2206-2222.
doi: 10.1002/asi.22647
|
[28] |
孙晓玲. 作者合作网络的结构及其演化与预测研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2014.
|
[28] |
(Sun Xiaoling. Research on Structure, Evolution and Prediction of Co-authorship Networks[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2014.)
|
[29] |
He B, Ding Y, Tang J, et al. Mining Diversity Subgraph in Multidisciplinary Scientific Collaboration Networks: A Meso Perspective[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7(1): 117-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.09.005
|
[30] |
Sun X L, Ding K, Lin Y. Mapping the Evolution of Scientific Fields Based on Cross-Field Authors[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2016, 10(3): 750-761.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.016
|
[31] |
Porter A L, Cohen A S, Roessner J D, et al. Measuring Researcher Interdisciplinarity[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(1): 117-147.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1700-5
|
[32] |
Gálvez C. Delimitación temÁtica de la Investigación en Lingüísticay Comunicación a Través Del Análisis de Co-palabras[J]. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 2019, 77: 187-200.
doi: 10.5209/CLAC.63283
|
[33] |
闵超, 孙建军. 基于关键词交集的学科交叉研究热点分析——以图书情报学和新闻传播学为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2014, 33(5): 76-82.
|
[33] |
(Min Chao, Sun Jianjun. Discipline-Crossing Research Hotspots Analysis Based on Keyword Intersection: An Example of Library and Information Science and Journalism and Communication Studies[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2014, 33(5): 76-82.)
|
[34] |
隗玲, 许海云, 郭婷, 等. 基于弱共现和突发监测的情报学学科研究主题及交叉性分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(21): 105-114.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.21.016
|
[34] |
(Wei Ling, Xu Haiyun, Guo Ting, et al. Study on the Interisciplinary Topics of Information Science Based on Weak Co-occurrence and Burst Detecting[J]. Library and Information Service, 2015, 59(21): 105-114.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.21.016
|
[35] |
Xu H Y, Guo T, Yue Z H, et al. Interdisciplinary Topics of Information Science: A Study Based on the Terms Interdisciplinarity Index Series[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 106(2): 583-601.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1792-2
|
[36] |
Dong K, Xu H Y, Luo R, et al. An Integrated Method for Interdisciplinary Topic Identification and Prediction: A Case Study on Information Science and Library Science[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(2): 849-868.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2694-x
|
[37] |
李长玲, 郭凤娇, 魏绪秋. 基于时序关键词的学科交叉研究主题分析——以情报学与计算机科学为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2014(6): 44-48.
|
[37] |
(Li Changling, Guo Fengjiao, Wei Xuqiu. Timing Keywords-Based Interdisciplinary Research Topics Analysis: A Case Study of Information Science and Computer Science[J]. Information and Documentation Services, 2014(6): 44-48.)
|
[38] |
Kleinberg J. Bursty and Hierarchical Structure in Streams[J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2003, 7(4):373-397.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024940629314
|
[39] |
魏建香. 学科交叉知识发现及其可视化研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2010.
|
[39] |
(Wei Jianxiang. Interdiscipline Knowledge Discovery and Its Visualization Research[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2010.)
|
[40] |
Li M N. An Exploration to Visualise the Emerging Trends of Technology Foresight Based on an Improved Technique of Co-word Analysis and Relevant Literature Data of WOS[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(6): 655-671.
|
[41] |
李长玲, 刘非凡, 郭凤娇. 运用重叠社群可视化软件CFinder分析学科交叉研究主题——以情报学和计算机科学为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(7): 75-80.
|
[41] |
(Li Changling, Liu Feifan, Guo Fengjiao. Analysis on Interdisciplinary Research Topics with CFinder of Overlapping Communities Visualization Software——Taking the Information Science and Computer Science for Example[J]. Library and Information Service, 2013, 57(7): 75-80.)
|
[42] |
李长玲, 郭凤娇, 支岭. 基于SNA的学科交叉研究主题分析——以情报学与计算机科学为例[J]. 情报科学, 2014, 32(12): 61-66.
|
[42] |
(Li Changling, Guo Fengjiao, Zhi Ling. Topic Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Research Based on SNA——Taking Information Science and Computer Science as an Example[J]. Information Science, 2014, 32(12): 61-66.)
|
[43] |
孙海生. 情报学跨学科知识引用实证研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(7):113-118, 100.
|
[43] |
(Sun Haisheng. Empirical Study on Knowledge Citations of Other Disciplines to Information Science[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2013, 32(7):113-118, 100.)
|
[44] |
Kim H, Park H, Song M. Developing a Topic-Driven Method for Interdisciplinarity Analysis[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2022, 16(2): 101255.
|
[45] |
Zhang Y, Chen M D, Liu L Z. A Review on Text Mining[C]// Proceedings of 2015 6th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science. 2015: 681-685.
|
[46] |
Blei D M. Probabilistic Topic Models[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2012, 55(4): 77-84.
doi: 10.1145/2133806.2133826
|
[47] |
Figuerola C G, Marco F J G, Pinto M. Mapping the Evolution of Library and Information Science (1978-2014) Using Topic Modeling on LISA[J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1507-1535.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
|
[48] |
Lee W S. Analyzing the Evolution of Interdisciplinary Areas: Case of Smart Cities[J]. Journal of Global Information Management, 2022, 30(1):1-23.
|
[49] |
Blei D M, Lafferty J D. A Correlated Topic Model of Science[J]. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2007, 1(1): 17-35.
|
[50] |
史盛楠. CTM主题模型在学科主题识别与学科文献分类中的应用研究[D]. 曲阜: 曲阜师范大学, 2019.
|
[50] |
(Shi Shengnan. Research on the Application of CTM Theme Model in Subject Theme Recognition and Subject Literature Classification[D]. Qufu: Qufu Normal University, 2019.)
|
[51] |
Rosen-Zvi M, Griffiths T, Steyvers M, et al. The Author-Topic Model for Authors and Documents[C]// Proceedings of the 20th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2004: 487-494.
|
[52] |
王明蕊. 作者主题模型在跨学科研究中的应用——以基因编辑领域为例[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020.
|
[52] |
(Wang Mingrui. Application of Author-Topic Model in Interdisciplinary Research——Taking the Field of Gene Editing as an Example[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020.)
|
[53] |
Jin J, Geng Q, Mou H K, et al. Author-Subject-Topic Model for Reviewer Recommendation[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2019, 45(4): 554-570.
doi: 10.1177/0165551518806116
|
[54] |
Heo G E, Kang K Y, Song M, et al. Analyzing the Field of Bioinformatics with the Multi-faceted Topic Modeling Technique[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017, 18(Suppl 7): Article No. 251.
|
[55] |
Zielinski A. Impact of Model Settings on the Text-Based Rao Diversity Index[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(12): 7751-7768.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04312-x
|
[56] |
张琳, 梁立明, Frizo Janssens, 等. 混合聚类方法用于科学结构研究——以“心理学、社会学和教育学”领域为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(6): 837-845.
|
[56] |
(Zhang Lin, Liang Liming, Frizo Janssens, et al. Hybrid Clustering for the Analysis of Subject-Classification: A Case Study of “Psychology, Sociology & Education” Domain[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2010, 28(6): 837-845.)
|
[57] |
Thorleuchter D, van den Poel D. Identification of Interdisciplinary Ideas[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2016, 52(6): 1074-1085.
doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.04.010
|
[58] |
Xu H Y, Wang C, Dong K, et al. Identification and Prediction of Interdisciplinary Research Topics: A Study Based on the Concept Lattice Theory[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2019, 4(1): 60-88.
doi: 10.2478/jdis-2019-0004
|
[59] |
Kiss A, Fritz P, Lakner Z, et al. Linking the Dimensions of Policy-Related Research on Obesity: A Hybrid Mapping with Multicluster Topics and Interdisciplinarity Maps[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 122(1): 159-213.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03293-8
|
[60] |
Thaicharoen S, Altman T, Gardiner K J, et al. Discovering Relational Knowledge from Two Disjoint sets of Literatures Using Inductive Logic Programming[C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining. 2009: 283-290.
|
[61] |
Swanson D R. Fish Oil, Raynaud’s Syndrome, and Undiscovered Public Knowledge[J]. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 1986, 30(1): 7-18.
pmid: 3797213
|
[62] |
刘小慧, 李长玲, 崔斌, 等. 基于闭合式非相关知识发现的潜在跨学科合作研究主题识别——以情报学与计算机科学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2017, 40(9): 71-76.
|
[62] |
(Liu Xiaohui, Li Changling, Cui Bin, et al. Research Topics Identification of Potential Interdisciplinary Collaboration Based on Closed and Irrelevant Knowledge Discovery[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2017, 40(9): 71-76.)
|
[63] |
李长玲, 刘小慧, 刘运梅, 等. 基于开放式非相关知识发现的潜在跨学科合作研究主题识别——以情报学与计算机科学为例[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018, 41(2): 100-104.
|
[63] |
(Li Changling, Liu Xiaohui, Liu Yunmei, et al. Identifying Potential Disciplinary Collaboration Research Topics by Open Literature-Based Discovery——Taking Information Science and Computer Science as Examples[J]. Information Studies: Theory & Application, 2018, 41(2): 100-104.)
|
[64] |
Gubiani D, Fabbretti E, Cestnik B, et al. Outlier Based Literature Exploration for Cross-Domain Linking of Alzheimer’s Disease and Gut Microbiota[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 85: 386-396.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.026
|
[65] |
吴蕾, 田儒雅, 张学福. 基于主题相关分析的跨学科主题发现方法及实证研究——以动物资源与育种领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(1):72-79.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.01.009
|
[65] |
(Wu Lei, Tian Ruya, Zhang Xuefu. Interdisciplinary Topic Detection Method and Empirical Research Based on Topic Correlation Analysis: A Case Study of Animal Resource and Breeding[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(1):72-79.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.01.009
|
[66] |
Qi J, Ohsawa Y, Ohsawa Y, et al. Matrix-like Visualization Based on Topic Modeling for Discovering Connections Between Disjoint Disciplines[J]. Intelligent Decision Technologies, 2016, 10(3): 273-283.
doi: 10.3233/IDT-150252
|
[67] |
徐庶睿, 章成志, 卢超. 利用引文内容进行主题级学科交叉类型分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(23):15-24.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.23.002
|
[67] |
(Xu Shurui, Zhang Chengzhi, Lu Chao. Using Citation Contents for the Interdisciplinary Type Analysis at a Topical Level[J]. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(23): 15-24.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2017.23.002
|
[68] |
Small H. Co-citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1980, 36(3): 183-196.
doi: 10.1108/eb026695
|
[69] |
Wang S Y, Mao J, Cao Y J, et al. Integrated Knowledge Content in an Interdisciplinary Field: Identification, Classification, and Application[J]. Scientometrics, 2022, 127(11): 6581-6614.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04282-0
|
[70] |
Thijs B. Using Neural-Network Based Paragraph Embeddings for the Calculation of within and Between Document Similarities[J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125(2): 835-849.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03583-6
|
[71] |
王露, 乐小虬. 科技论文引用内容分析研究进展[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(4): 1-15.
|
[71] |
(Wang Lu, Le Xiaoqiu. Research Progress on Citation Analysis of Scientific Papers[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6(4): 1-15.)
|
[72] |
杜德慧, 李长玲, 相富钟, 等. 基于引文关键词的跨学科相关知识发现方法探讨[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(9): 189-194.
|
[72] |
(Du Dehui, Li Changling, Xiang Fuzhong, et al. Discussion on the Method of Interdisciplinary Related Knowledge Discovery Based on Citation Keywords[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2020, 39(9): 189-194.)
|
[73] |
Small H. Maps of Science as Interdisciplinary Discourse: Co-citation Contexts and the Role of Analogy[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83(3): 835-849.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0121-z
|
[74] |
章成志, 徐庶睿, 卢超. 利用引文内容监测多学科交叉现象的方法与实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(19): 108-115.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.19.014
|
[74] |
(Zhang Chengzhi, Xu Shurui, Lu Chao. Using Citation Content for Interdisciplinary Phenomenon[J]. Library and Information Service, 2016, 60(19): 108-115.)
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.19.014
|
[75] |
Mao J, Liang Z T, Cao Y J, et al. Quantifying Cross-Disciplinary Knowledge Flow from the Perspective of Content: Introducing an Approach Based on Knowledge Memes[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101092.
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|