Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2024, Vol. 8 Issue (5): 1-17    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0409
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Constructing Semantic Association Model for Narrative-Oriented Archaeological Excavation Data
Han Muzhe1,2,Gao Jinsong2(),Fang Xiaoyin2,Li Shuaike2,Sun Yanling2,Li Yu3
1Institute of Science and Technology Information, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
3School of Archaeology and Museology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610225, China
Download: PDF (7738 KB)   HTML ( 46
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper aims to ensure the shareability of knowledge in Archaeological Excavation Data (AED) and promote knowledge integration across humanity disciplines. It constructs an ontology model based on narrative logic analysis of multi-dimensional semantic decomposition to achieve a multi-dimensional associative combination and narrative representation of AED knowledge. [Methods] Firstly, we thoroughly analyzed the knowledge structure and narrative logic within AED to determine a plan for ontology construction. Secondly, we examined the widely-used CIDOC CRM ontology model and its expanded CRM ontology family in cultural heritage to assess the reusability of related ontology. Thirdly, we semantically aligned the knowledge from archaeological sites, remains, and relics to define entity classes. Finally, targeting the narrative logic in AED, we determined each entity class’s object and data properties to construct the ontology model. [Results] Using the AED data from the Yanbulake cemetery in Hami, Xinjiang, we identified the semantic association between the site and archaeological excavation activities. It also explored extensive semantic association methods for burial relics and unearthed artifacts with knowledge-mining value, resulting in a series of narrative displays. [Limitations] Although the data from the Yanbulake cemetery is representative, the site is relatively small, and the complexity of actual application scenarios may be higher. [Conclusions] The semantic association model constructed in this paper can achieve knowledge representation that aligns with the archaeological data’s knowledge structure and narrative logic at the knowledge unit level.

Key wordsOntology      Semantic Association      CIDOC CRM      Archaeological Excavation Data      Narrative     
Received: 05 May 2023      Published: 08 January 2024
ZTFLH:  G255  
Fund:Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund of Ministry of Education(22YJA870008);National Social Science Fund of China(23CTQ038)
Corresponding Authors: Gao Jinsong,ORCID: 0000-0003-0022-5923,E-mail: jsgao@ccnu.edu.cn。   

Cite this article:

Han Muzhe, Gao Jinsong, Fang Xiaoyin, Li Shuaike, Sun Yanling, Li Yu. Constructing Semantic Association Model for Narrative-Oriented Archaeological Excavation Data. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2024, 8(5): 1-17.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2023.0409     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2024/V8/I5/1

发掘登记资料名称 子域 工作过程 关联资料
遗址 遗迹 遗物 责任方 时间
原始记录登记表
发掘记录表
绘图登记表
器物标签
区域系统调查记录表
入库登记表
摄像登记表
陶片数量统计表
器型统计表
考古调查断面清理记录表
Common Archaeological Excavation Data and the Types of Entities Described Therein
Knowledge Structure in Archaeological Excavation Data
Examples of Entity Obtained from Archaeological Excavation Data
来源 标识符 描述 概念术语 示例
CRM crm:E27_Site 遗址 遗址 ◆焉不拉克墓地遗址
CRM crm:E53_Place 地点 地点位置 ◆焉不拉克村
CRM crm:E16_Measurement 测量活动 测量维度 ◆焉不拉克遗址规模度量
CRM crm:E54_Dimension 维度 遗址规模 ◆焉不拉克遗址面积
CRMarchaeo crma:A9_Archaeological_Excavation 考古发掘活动 考古发掘 ◆1986年焉不拉克墓地考古发掘
CRM crm:E21_Person 人物 相关人员
机构
◆考古工作者-P1
CRM crm:E74_Group 机构 ◆教学科研机构-G1
CRM crm:E52_Time-span 时间跨度 发掘时间 ◆1986年焉不拉克墓地发掘起止时间
CRMarchaeo crma:A1_Excavation_Process_Unit 考古发掘单元 考古发掘进程 ◆焉不拉克T20-T22发掘
CRM crm:E31_Document 档案记录 记录资料 ◆焉不拉克T20-T22发掘登记表
CRM crm:E65_Creation 创建行为 资料整理 ◆焉不拉克遗址考古报告整理
CRM crm:E36_Visual_item 视觉资源 视觉资源 ◆图五:T20-T22墓葬分布图
自定义 arc:HE3_Achievement 研究成果 成果资料 ◆《新疆哈密焉不拉克墓地》
DC dc:HE1_Publisher 出版者 刊布机构 ◆考古学报
自定义 arc:HE2_Outcomes_Catagory 成果类型 刊布形式 ◆期刊论文
Illustrations and Definitions of Entities Associated with Conceptual Terms in the Site Subdomain
Class Hierarchy of Entities of Archaeological Excavation Data Ontology
Entities and Properties in the Ontology of Archaeological Excavation Data (Illustrated with E27_Site)
Semantic Differentiation of Entities Based on Different Properties (Illustrated with E21_Person)
Semantic Decomposition of Corpus 1
Hierarchical Relationships Among Entities within the Ontology of Archaeological Excavation Data
Visualization of Ontology of Archaeological Excavation Data
Semantic Representation of the Location of Yanbulake Cemetery
Semantic Representation of the Scale of Yanbulake Cemetery
Semantic Association of Yanbulake and Its Archaeological Excavation Activities
Semantic Association of M31 & M32 of Yanbulake and Their Stratigraphic Relationships
Semantic Association of Relics Found from M31 of Yanbulake
[1] 闫雪梅. 考古档案的建档工作探索[N]. 中国文物报, 2014-01-17( 7).
[1] (Yan Xuemei. Exploration of the Archival Work of Archaeological Records[N]. Weekly of China’s Cultural Relics, 2014-01-17( 7).)
[2] 张庆捷. 考古发掘报告积压的问题[N]. 中国文物报, 2011-09-23( 3).
[2] (Zhang Qingjie. The Issue of Archaeological Excavation Reports Backlog[N]. Weekly of China’s Cultural Relics, 2011-09-23( 3).)
[3] 叶鹰. 质性知识构造与量化知识分析综论: 兼论学术对标法理论基础[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2022, 48(1): 38-51.
[3] (Ye Y. A Synthetic Probing into the Qualitative Knowledge Construction and Quantitative Knowledge Analytics: Concerning the Theoretical Foundations for Academic Benchmarking Method[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2022, 48(1): 38-51.)
[4] Gruber T R. A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications[J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5(2): 199-220.
[5] 上海图书馆. 历史人文大数据平台[DB/OL]. [2023-06-07]. https://dhc.library.sh.cn/.)
[5] (Shanghai Library. Digital Humanities Platform of Shanghai Library[DB/OL]. [2023-06-07]. https://dhc.library.sh.cn/.)
[6] 夏翠娟. 文化记忆资源的知识融通: 从异构资源元数据应用纲要到一体化本体设计[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021(1): 53-65.
[6] (Xia Cuijuan. Knowledge Consilience for Cultural Heritage Materials: From Heterogeneous Metadata Application Profiles to Integrated Ontology[J]. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2021(1): 53-65.)
[7] 文物出版社. 文物考古知识服务平台[DB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. http://www.wbsjk.com/.
[7] (Cultural Relics Press. Cultural Relics and Archaeology Knowledge Service Platform[DB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. http://www.wbsjk.com/.)
[8] CIDOC CRM[DB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. https://cidoc-crm.org/.
[9] Categories for the Description of Works Art[DB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. http://www.getty.edu/research/publi-cations/electronic_publications/cdwa/.
[10] VRA Core[DB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/.
[11] 国家文物局. 馆藏文物登录规范.WW/T 0017-2013[S]. 北京: 文物出版社. 2013.
[11] (National Cultural Heritage Administration. Specification for Registration of Cultural Relics in the Collection of Cultural Institutions. WW/T 0017-2013[S]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2013.)
[12] 国家文物局. 博物馆藏品信息指标体系规范(试行).文物博发[2001]81号[S].[2001-01-19].
[12] (National Cultural Heritage Administration. Specification for Museum Collection Information Index System (Pilot). Wenwubofa[2001]81[S]. [2001-01-19].)
[13] 文物数字化保护元数据标准规范征求意见稿[EB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. https://www.lib.pku.edu.cn/portal/cn/news/0000001494.
[13] (Discussion Draft on Metadata Standards for Digital Protection of Cultural Relics[EB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. https://www.lib.pku.edu.cn/portal/cn/news/0000001494.)
[14] Zhang C X, Cao C G, Gu F, et al. Domain-Specific Formal Ontology of Archaeology and Its Application in Knowledge Acquisition and Analysis[J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2004, 19(3): 290-301.
[15] 国家文物局. 田野考古工作规程[M]. 北京: 文物出版社, 2009.
[15] (National Cultural Heritage Administration. Field Archaeology Protocol[M]. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press, 2009.)
[16] 宋宁远, 王晓光. 基于情节本体的叙事性文本语义结构化表示方法研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(2): 96-113.
[16] (Song Ningyuan, Wang Xiaoguang. Semantic Structured Representation Method of Narrative Text Based on Plot Ontology[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2020, 46(2): 96-113.)
[17] 房小可. 面向社会记忆重构的档案信息语义组织研究[J]. 档案学研究, 2022(2): 77-82.
[17] (Fang Xiaoke. Semantic Organization of Archival Information for Social Memory Reconstruction[J]. Archives Science Study, 2022(2): 77-82.)
[18] 徐雷, 王晓光. 叙事型图像语义标注模型研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2017, 43(5): 70-83.
[18] (Xu Lei, Wang Xiaoguang. Narrative Image Annotation Ontology for Semantic Web[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2017, 43(5): 70-83.)
[19] 张平, 艾尔肯·米吉提, 田早信, 等. 新疆哈密焉不拉克墓地[J]. 考古学报, 1989(3): 325-362.
[19] (Zhang Ping, Alken Mijiti, Tian Zaoxin, et al. The Yanbulake Cemetery in Hami, Xinjiang[J]. Acta Archaeologia Sinica, 1989(3): 325-362.)
[20] Information Systems Laboratory. Data Models and Standards[EB/OL]. [2023-02-10]. https://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/data-models-and-standards.
[21] Niccolucci F, Richards J D. ARIADNE: Advanced Research Infrastructures for Archaeological Dataset Networking in Europe[J]. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2013, 7(1-2): 70-88.
[22] May K, Binding C, Tudhope D. A STAR is Born: Some Emerging Semantic Technologies for Archaeological Resources[C]// Proceedings of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. 2008.
[23] Binding C, May K, Tudhope D. Semantic Interoperability in Archaeological Datasets: Data Mapping and Extraction via the CIDOC CRM[C]// Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Springer, 2008: 280-290.
[24] Vlachidis A, Binding C, May K, et al. Automatic Metadata Generation in an Archaeological Digital Library: Semantic Annotation of Grey Literature[M]//Przepiórkowski A, Piasecki M, Jassem K, et al. Computational Linguistics. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013: 187-202.
[1] Zhang Junliang, Fang Xuemei, Zhang Fan, Liu Xiwen, Zhu Peng. Analyzing Medical Semantic Association with Complex Network[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(9): 125-137.
[2] Gao Jinsong, Zhang Qiang, Li Shuaike, Sun Yanling, Zhou Shubin. Poet’s Emotional Trajectory in Time and Space: Case Study of Li Bai for Digital Humanities[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(9): 27-39.
[3] Yue Tieqi, Fu Youfei, Xu Jian. An Analysis Framework for Job Demands from Job Postings[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(2/3): 151-166.
[4] Li Xiaomin,Wang Hao,Li Yueyan,Zhao Meng. Constructing Knowledge Base for Chinese Geographical Name[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(11): 139-153.
[5] Sheng Shu, Huang Qi, Yang Yang, Xie Qiwen, Qin Xinguo. Exchanging Chinese Medical Information Based on HL7 FHIR[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(11): 13-28.
[6] Zeng Zhen,Li Gang,Mao Jin,Chen Jinghao. Data Governance and Domain Ontology of Regional Public Security[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4(9): 41-55.
[7] Shaohua Qiang,Yunlu Luo,Yupeng Li,Peng Wu. Ontology Reasoning for Financial Affairs with RBR and CBR[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(8): 94-104.
[8] Shiqi Deng,Liang Hong. Constructing Domain Ontology for Intelligent Applications: Case Study of Anti Tele-Fraud[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(7): 73-84.
[9] Zhu Fu,Yuefen Wang,Xuhui Ding. Semantic Representation of Design Process Knowledge Reuse[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(6): 21-29.
[10] Guangshang Gao. A Survey of User Profiles Methods[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(3): 25-35.
[11] Qinghong Zhong,Xiaodong Qiao,Yunliang Zhang,Mengjuan Weng. Cross-media Fusion Method Based on LDA2Vec and Residual Network[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(10): 78-88.
[12] Ying Wang,Li Qian,Jing Xie,Zhijun Chang,Beibei Kong. Building Knowledge Graph with Sci-Tech Big Data[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(1): 15-26.
[13] He Youshi,He Shufang. Sentiment Mining of Online Product Reviews Based on Domain Ontology[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(8): 60-68.
[14] Tang Huihui,Wang Hao,Zhang Zixuan,Wang Xueying. Extracting Names of Historical Events Based on Chinese Character Tags[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(7): 89-100.
[15] Pang Beibei,Gou Juanqiong,Mu Wenxin. Extracting Topics and Their Relationship from College Student Mentoring[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(6): 92-101.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn