Please wait a minute...
Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery  2019, Vol. 3 Issue (9): 124-134    DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.1332
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Analyzing Textual Features of Excess-funded Agricultural Products——Case Study of Crowdfunding Website
Manyu Huang1,Qi Yun1(),Hufeng Peng2,Xuemeng Dou1
1 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
2 School of Information and Safety Engineering, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
Download: PDF (549 KB)   HTML ( 13
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  

[Objective] This paper aims to identify the textual features of excess-funded agricultural products with the crowdfunding services and the time evolution rules of typical topics. [Methods] We used the TOT analysis model to retrieve the texts of 1137 excess-funded agricultural product between September 2013 and April 2018 from the crowdfunding website. Then, we obtained the probability distribution of the terms with each theme. Finally, we examined the time evolution trends of each topic. [Results] The excess-funded agricultural products were in the categories of tea, wine and honey. Text characteristics of these projects focused on the value of customers, quality of the agricultural products and social benefits. The distribution of topic intensity on value of customers and quality of agricultural products from 2014 to 2017 showed the U pattern. [Limitations] The high-quality crowdfunding data of agricultural products is relatively limited. [Conclusions] The projects seeking more crowdfunding support should emphasize the high quality of the products and the unique experience of participation .

Key wordsTopic Mining      Excess-funded      Crowdfunding Project of Agricultural Products      Textual Features      TOT Model     
Received: 27 November 2018      Published: 23 October 2019
ZTFLH:  TP391 G35  

Cite this article:

Manyu Huang,Qi Yun,Hufeng Peng,Xuemeng Dou. Analyzing Textual Features of Excess-funded Agricultural Products——Case Study of Crowdfunding Website. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2019, 3(9): 124-134.

URL:

https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.1332     OR     https://manu44.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_infotech_wk3/EN/Y2019/V3/I9/124

符号 描述
K 超额募资的农产品众筹项目推介文本的数量
M 超额募资的农产品众筹项目推介文本相关文档的数量
V 超额募资的农产品众筹项目推介文本词项的数量
Nm 文档m中单词的数量
${{\vec{\vartheta }}_{m}}$ 文档m上的主题多项分布, Θ =$\{{{\vec{\vartheta }}_{m}}\}_{m=1}^{M}$(M×K matrix)
${{\vec{\varphi }}_{k}}$ 主题k上的词项多项分布, Φ =$\{{{\vec{\varphi }}_{k}}\}_{k=1}^{K}$(K×V matrix)
${{\vec{\psi }}_{k}}$ 主题k随时间变化的贝塔分布, Ψ =$\{{{\vec{\psi }}_{k}}\}_{k=1}^{K}$(K×2 matrix)
${{z}_{m,n}}$ 文档m中第n个词的主题
${{w}_{m,n}}$ 文档m中第n个词
${{t}_{m,n}}$ 文档m中第n个词的时间戳
$\vec{\alpha }$ 文档多项分布${{\vec{\vartheta }}_{m}}$的狄利克雷先验分布, K维向量
$\vec{\beta }$ 主题多项分布${{\vec{\varphi }}_{k}}$的狄利克雷先验分布, V维向量
排序 品类 项目个数 项目比率
1 茶叶 176 15.5%
2 79 6.9%
3 蜂蜜 70 6.2%
4 大米 65 5.7%
5 橙橘 45 4.0%
6 坚果 36 3.2%
7 枣类 34 3.0%
8 22 1.9%
9 枸杞 20 1.8%
10 其他 590 51.9%
序号 关键词及权重值
Topic1 苹果 0.012883, 健康 0.012853, 种植 0.008783, 分享 0.008691, 产品 0.006641, 提供 0.005906, 农民 0.005692,
食品 0.005049, 农场 0.004743, 营养 0.004621, 家乡 0.004437, 铁皮石 0.004284
Topic2 价值 0.044918, 产品 0.02133, 手工 0.017231, 活动 0.013384, 食品 0.013216, 蜂巢 0.012965, 放心 0.012547,
绿色 0.011962, 体验 0.009619, 会员 0.008532, 采摘 0.008114, 享受 0.007946
Topic3 土蜂 0.017136, 水果 0.010551, 蜂蜜 0.009802, 放心 0.007558, 食品 0.006585, 黑木耳 0.00651, 环境 0.00636,
木桶 0.006286, 特产 0.006061, 黄豆 0.005762, 发起 0.005612, 中华 0.005612
Topic4 苹果 0.116188, 栖霞 0.035779, 烟台 0.031104, 精品 0.015708, 快递 0.014149, 果园 0.010971, 价格 0.010908,
新鲜 0.010659, 品尝 0.010036, 种植 0.009288, 红富士 0.00854, 达成 0.008415
Topic5 传统 0.034746, 茶叶 0.02506, 价值 0.023994, 红茶 0.023549, 工艺 0.013685, 制作 0.012441, 茶园 0.011552,
达成 0.010131, 福鼎 0.010042, 海鲜 0.009242, 茶农 0.008353, 奖励 0.008087
Topic6 价值 0.02788, 世界 0.012021, 会员 0.009378, 礼盒 0.009208, 享受 0.008867, 参与 0.008782, 天麻 0.008611,
加入 0.008355, 了解 0.007929, 加工 0.007759, 信号 0.007503, 粮食 0.006309
Topic7 枸杞 0.040668, 新疆 0.011153, 云南 0.011002, 产品 0.009408, 农家 0.008801, 辣酱 0.008574, 会员 0.007056,
城市 0.006146, 生态 0.006146, 精美 0.005918, 甜蜜 0.005766, 养殖 0.00569
Topic8 蜂蜜 0.03456, 核桃 0.015488, 龙须菜 0.014208, 扶贫 0.01024, 爱心 0.009728, 玉米 0.009728, 资金 0.009088,
农民 0.008256, 农村 0.007552, 公司 0.007296, 农产品 0.007232, 食品 0.006784
Topic9 花香 0.018301, 大米 0.016517, 体验 0.013064, 五常 0.012431, 活动 0.01082, 免费 0.010647, 价值 0.010302,
礼盒 0.009035, 优惠 0.00869, 草莓 0.008633, 新鲜 0.008633, 采摘 0.008402
Topic10 大米 0.039687, 五常 0.01604, 父亲 0.015664, 水稻 0.009639, 生态 0.008811, 分享 0.008736, 香榧 0.00738,
参与 0.007004, 活动 0.006853, 稻田 0.006702, 幸福 0.006401, 安全 0.005949
Topic11 阳澄湖 0.013868, 价值 0.012727, 市场价 0.011498, 定制 0.010884, 礼品 0.010445, 健康 0.010094, 礼盒 0.009567,
适合 0.008514, 品质 0.0079, 原浆 0.007812, 石榴 0.007812, 枇杷 0.007285
Topic12 樱桃 0.023376, VIP 0.012183, 生态 0.011787, 价值 0.011589, 蜜柚 0.0104, 顺丰 0.010301, 种植 0.010103,
幸运 0.010004, 健康 0.009608, 新鲜 0.009608, 花生 0.009113, 基地 0.008815
Topic13 原生态 0.01888, 免费 0.015518, 体验 0.013578, 产品 0.012608, 价值 0.011121, 梦想 0.009052, 预定 0.00847,
板栗 0.007565, 全国 0.007565, 乡村 0.006983, 地址 0.006595, 精美 0.00653
Topic14 花椒 0.014352, 蔬菜 0.013056, 种植 0.011761, 生活 0.011295, 产品 0.008652, 原生态 0.008393, 栗子 0.007772,
核桃 0.007046, 农业 0.00658, 采摘 0.006114, 绿色 0.006114, 孩子 0.005699
Topic15 茶叶 0.025476, 咖啡 0.022074, 铁观音 0.016574, 绿茶 0.013824, 高山 0.012231, 春茶 0.010205, 茶农 0.009771,
茶树 0.008613, 作用 0.008468, 发展 0.008323, 普洱茶 0.007599, 自然 0.00731
Topic16 新疆 0.053813, 红枣 0.019016, 和田 0.016467, 核桃 0.014115, 营养 0.011468, 大枣 0.011076, 葡萄 0.01039,
玫瑰 0.010096, 运费 0.008724, 阿克苏 0.00794, 美味 0.007842, 统一 0.007842
Topic17 果园 0.037619, 生活 0.026533, 猕猴桃 0.024534, 葡萄酒 0.019627, 秦岭 0.01363, 精选 0.012721, 免费 0.012631,
香菇 0.010995, 订制 0.009814, 葡萄 0.009632, 愉快 0.008814, 冰糖 0.008632
Topic18 西藏 0.02197, 芒果 0.021736, 小米 0.019937, 脐橙 0.019468, 长白山 0.017905, 红薯 0.01681, 木耳 0.016654,
老人 0.016028, 种植 0.015637, 海南 0.013995, 宁夏 0.013839, 内蒙古 0.012353
Topic19 礼盒 0.020906, 预定 0.012037, 专用 0.011826, 柿饼 0.011826, 黄河 0.011192, 酱油 0.009819, 黄花菜 0.009503,
产品 0.008975, 达成 0.008447, 富平 0.008447, 陕西 0.007602, 文化 0.007602
Topic20 红糖 0.042929, 鸡蛋 0.02264, 手工 0.016956, 会员 0.010879, 价格 0.010781, 团队 0.010781, 私人 0.010291,
古法 0.009311, 甘蔗 0.009311, 品质 0.009115, 价值 0.009115, 限量 0.008037
一级维度 二级维度 涵盖的主题 代表性关键词
消费者
价值
体验 Topic2、Topic6、Topic9、Topic10、Topic13、Topic17 采摘、活动、分享、免费、订制
时令礼品 Topic11、Topic19 礼品、礼盒、预定、专用、健康
农产品
属性
健康绿色 Topic1、Topic3、Topic12、Topic14 健康、营养、放心、环境、生态、原生态、新鲜、绿色
原产地 Topic4、Topic7、Topic16、Topic18 苹果、栖霞、烟台、红富士、枸杞、新疆、云南、红枣、和田、阿克苏、芒果、海南
畅销品类 Topic5、Topic15 茶叶、红茶、茶园、茶农、铁观音、绿茶、高山、春茶、普洱茶
生产工艺 Topic20 私人、古法、手工、限量
社会效应 扶贫 Topic8 扶贫、爱心、资金、农民、农村
[1] Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A . Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014,29(5):585-609.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.003
[2] Ordanini A, Miceli L, Pizzetti M , et al. Crowd-funding: Transforming Customers into Investors Through Innovative Service Platforms[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2011,22(4):443-470.
doi: 10.1108/09564231111155079
[3] 刘明霞, 黄丹 . 基于扎根理论的奖励型众筹发起者参与动机研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2015,32(24):6-11.
[3] ( Liu Mingxia, Huang Dan . Motivations of Creators to Participate in Reward-based Crowd Funding Based on Grounded Theory[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015,32(24):6-11.)
[4] Cordova A, Dolci J, Gianfrate G . The Determinants of Crowdfunding Success: Evidence from Technology Projects[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015,181:115-124.
[5] 曾江洪, 甘信禹 . 社会资本对众筹项目融资成功率影响的实证研究[J]. 技术经济, 2014,33(11):90-95, 115.
[5] ( Zeng Jianghong, Gan Xinyu . Empirical Research on Effect of Social Capital to Success Rate of Crowdfunding Project[J]. Technology Economics, 2014,33(11):90-95, 115.)
[6] Bi S, Liu Z, Usman K . The Influence of Online Information on Investing Decisions of Reward-based Crowdfunding[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017,71:10-18.
[7] 王伟, 陈伟, 祝效国 , 等. 众筹融资成功率与语言风格的说服性——基于 Kickstarter的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2016(5):81-98.
[7] ( Wang Wei, Chen Wei, Zhu Xiaoguo , et al. The Persuasion of Crowdfunding Success Rate and Language Style——An Empirical Study Based on Kickstarter[J]. Management World, 2016(5):81-98.)
[8] 邱瑾, 张淑楠 . 基于数据挖掘的互联网众筹成功进度分位数回归模型[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2018,33(2):36-45.
[8] ( Qiu Jin, Zhang Shu’nan . The Quantile Regression Model for the Internet Crowdfunding’s Successful Progress Based on Data Mining[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2018,33(2):36-45.)
[9] Jegelevičiūtė S, Valančienė L . Comparative Analysis of the Ways Crowdfunding is Promoted[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015,213:268-274.
[10] 余涛 . 众筹规制探究——一个规范分析的路径[J]. 证券市场导报, 2015(3):12-19.
[10] ( Yu Tao . Crowdfunding Regulation Research—A Path of Normative Analysis[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2015(3):12-19.)
[11] Belleflamme P, Omrani N, Peitz M . The Economics of Crowdfunding Platforms[J]. Information Economics and Policy, 2015,33:11-28.
[12] 张雅, 孙晓辉 . 农业众筹的起源、特点与未来[J]. 中国农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2016,33(6):96-150.
[12] ( Zhang Ya, Sun Xiaohui. The Origin , Features and Future of Agriculture Crowdfunding[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, 2016,33(6):96-150.)
[13] 蒋文龙, 崔丽 . 玩转农业众筹, 助推品牌农业[J]. 江西农业, 2015(5):19-22.
[13] ( Jiang Wenlong, Cui Li . Promote Agricultural Crowdfunding and Boost Brand Agriculture[J]. Jingxi Agriculture, 2015(5):19-22.)
[14] 郑风田 . “众筹农业”的未来在哪里[J]. 中国畜牧业, 2014(13):41.
[14] ( Zheng Fengtian . Where is the Future of “Crowdfunding Agriculture”?[J]. China Animal Husbandry, 2014(13):41.)
[15] 吕映秀, 郭丽芳, 马家齐 . “互联网+”环境下农业众筹发展现状及对策研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2017(6):4-7.
[15] ( Lv Yingxiu, Guo Lifang, Ma Jiaqi . Research on the Current Situation and Countermeasures of Agricultural Crowdfunding Development Under the “Internet +” Environment[J]. Modernization of Management, 2017(6):4-7.)
[16] 肖建, 朱泓宇, 贾晋 . 农业众筹融资平台的对比研究与最优选择[J]. 农村经济, 2017(1):24-29.
[16] ( Xiao Jian, Zhu Hongyu, Jia Jin . Comparative Study and Optimal Choice of Agricultural Crowdfunding Financing Platform[J]. Rural Economy, 2017(1):24-29.)
[17] 孟枫平, 江洋 . 基于QCA的涉农小微企业众筹融资关键影响因素研究[J]. 江淮论坛, 2017(6):18-22, 59.
[17] ( Meng Fengping, Jiang Yang . Study on Key Factors Affecting Crowdfunding of Small and Micro-Agricultural Enterprises Based on QCA[J]. Jianghuai Forum, 2017(6):18-22, 59.)
[18] 杜俊娟, 李姚矿 . 农产品众筹发起人特征对融资达成率的影响研究——基于信任理论视角[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(3):15-28.
[18] ( Du Junjuan, Li Yaokuang . The Impact of Initiators’ Characteristics on Crowdfunding Performance of Agricultural Projects: An Analysis Based on the Trust Theory[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(3):15-28.)
[19] 黄漫宇, 李若男 . 农业众筹项目融资绩效影响因素的实证分析[J]. 统计与决策, 2018(11):172-175.
[19] ( Huang Manyu, Li Ruonan . Empirical Analysis on Influencing Factors of Financing Performance of Agricultural Crowd-funding Projects[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2018(11):172-175.)
[1] Ma Yingxue,Zhao Jichang. Patterns and Evolution of Public Opinion on Weibo During Natural Disasters: Case Study of Typhoons and Rainstorms[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2021, 5(6): 66-79.
[2] Lei Yang,Zirun Wang,Guisheng Hou. Discovering Topics of Online Health Community with Q-LDA Model[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2019, 3(11): 52-59.
[3] Wang Shuyi,Liao Huatao,Wu Chake. Mining News on Competitors with Sentiment Classification[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2018, 2(3): 70-78.
[4] Yang Haixia,Gao Baojun,Sun Hanlin. Extracting Topics of Computer Science Literature with LDA Model[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2016, 32(11): 20-26.
[5] Zhu Hengmin, Zhu Weiwei. Study on Web Topic Online Clustering Approach Based on Single-Pass Algorithm[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2011, 27(12): 52-57.
  Copyright © 2016 Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery   Tel/Fax:(010)82626611-6626,82624938   E-mail:jishu@mail.las.ac.cn