[1] Miller C S, Remington R W. Modeling Information Navigation: Implications for Information Architecture[J]. Human-Computer Interaction, 2004, 19(3): 225-271.
[2] Pirolli P, Card S K. Information Foraging[J]. Psychological Review, 1999, 106 (4): 643-675.
[3] Jul S, Furnas G W. Navigation in Electronic Worlds: A CHI 97 Workshop[EB/OL].[2011-09-01]. http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/sigchi/bulletin/1997.4/jul. html.
[4] Pirolli P, Fu W. SNIF-ACT: A Model of Information Foraging on the World Wide Web[C]. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'03). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2003: 45-54.
[5] Fu W, Pirolli P. SNIF-ACT: A Cognitive Model of User Navigation on the World Wide Web[J]. Human-Computer Interaction, 2007, 22 (4): 355-412.
[6] 郝伯特.A.西蒙. 管理行为[M]. 詹正茂译. 原书第4版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2007: 15. (Simon H A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations[M]. Translated by Zhan Zhengmao. The 4th Edition. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2007: 15.)
[7] Anderson J R. The Adaptive Character of Thought[M]. Psychology Press, 1990.
[8] Oaksford M, Chater N. Rational Explanation of the Selection Task[J]. Psychological Review, 1996, 103 (2): 381-391.
[9] Fu W, Gray W D. Suboptimal Tradeoffs in Information Seeking[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 52 (3): 195-242.
[10] Annan K. If Information and Knowledge are Central to Democracy, They are Conditions for Development[EB/OL].[2013-11-14]. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/1997/1997 0623. sgsm6268.html.
[11] Pirolli P. Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 89-109.
[12] Anderson J R, Lebiere C J. The Atomic Components of Thought[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
[13] Rumelhart D E, McClelland J L. Interactive Processing Through Spreading Activation[A].//Perfetti C A, Lesgold A M. Interactive Processes in Reading[M]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.
[14] Joachims T, Granka L, Pang B, et al. Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback[C]. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR'05). New York: ACM, 2005: 154-161.
[15] Chi E H, Pirolli P, Chen K, et al. Using Information Scent to Model User Information Needs and Actions on the Web[C]. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'01), Seattle, WA, USA. New York: ACM, 2001: 490-497.
[16] van Oostendorp H, Karanam S, Indurkhya B. CoLiDeS+Pic: A Cognitive Model of Web-navigation Based on Semantic Information from Pictures[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology, 2012, 31(1): 17-30.
[17] 杨阳, 张新民. 信息觅食理论的研究进展[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2009(1): 73-79. (Yang Yang, Zhang Xinmin. Advance in Information Foraging Theory[J]. New Technology of Library and Information Service, 2009(1): 73-79.
[18] Kitajima M, Toyota M. Simulating Navigation Behaviour Based on the Architecture Model Human Processor with Real-Time(MHP/RT)[J]. Behaviour & Information Techn-ology, 2012, 31(1): 41-58.
[19] Nielsen J. Designing Web Usability[M]. Indianapolis: New Riders, 2000.
[20] Chi E H, Rosien A, Suppattanasiri G, et al. The Bloodhound Project: Automating Discovery of Web Usability Issues Using the InfoScent Simulator[C]. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03). New York: ACM, 2003: 505-512.
[21] Katsanos C, Tselios N, Avouris N. Evaluating Website Navigability: Validation of a Tool-based Approach Through Two Eye-tracking User Studies[J]. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 2010, 16 (1-2): 195-214.
[22] Blackmon M H, Kitajima M, Polson P G. Tool for Accurately Predicting Website Navigation Problems, Non-problems, Problem Severity, and Effectiveness of Repairs[C]. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05), Portland, Oregon, USA. New York: ACM, 2005: 31-40.
[23] Budiu R, Pirolli P L. Modeling Navigation in Degree of Interest Trees[C]. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville, TN, USA. 2007: 845-850.
[24] Blackmon M H. Information Scent Determines Attention Allocation and Link Selection Among Multiple Information Patches on a Webpage[J]. Behaviour & Information Techno-logy, 2012, 31(1): 3-15.